Attachment 12 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 65 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70CDCR20R00000005
- Issued by
-
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a transportation guard services contract. The questionnaire is being used to evaluate offerors for an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency to provide transportation guard services in the San Antonio area of operations. Respondents are asked to evaluate offerors on factors including corporate commitment, quality of service, and timeliness of performance using defined rating criteria. The questionnaire requests contract details like number, value, award and completion dates, and type. Respondents are also asked about strengths, weaknesses, and whether they would award another contract to the offeror. Completed questionnaires must be returned by a specified date via email.
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
The company who has provided you with this form is proposing on a U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) request to provide Transportation Services to meet the mission needs of ICE. Past Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important. The information is to be provided directly to OAQDCRSW@ice.dhs.gov. This information will not be disclosed to the Respondent. Please provide an honest assessment and return the questionnaire to ICE by e-mail to the address shown below no later than XX:XXAM, Eastern Daylight Time on May XX, 2020. If you have questions, please contact OAQDCRSW@ice.dhs.gov.
Completed questionnaires should be emailed to the following address: OAQDCRSW@ice.dhs.gov
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. RESPONDENT’S NAME:
2. RESPONDENT’S TITLE:
3. CONTRACT NUMBER:
4. CONTRACT VALUE: _______________________
5. CONTRACT AWARD DATE: 6. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
7. CONTRACT TYPE (Check All That Apply): 8. COMPLEXITY OF WORK (Check One Response):
Fixed Price Cost-Plus Fixed Price Cost-Plus Award Fee DIFFICULT ROUTINE
T & M OTHER
PART TWO: RESPONDENT PERFORMANCE RATING
On the following pages, please summarize the Respondent’s performance in each rating factors. Each factor has a set of sub factors with four possible adjectival ratings. Determine the confidence rating that most nearly represents your experience with this Respondent and indicate your assessment by placing an “X” under the appropriate heading. Respondent performance factors are:
A. CORPORATE COMMITMENT
B. QUALITY OF SERVICE
C. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
Adjectival ratings are defined below and should be used as a reference in assessing performance:
High Confidence
The Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform.
Some Confidence
The Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform.
Low Confidence
The Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform.
Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
The Offeror’s performance record is so sparse, a meaningful confidence rating cannot be reasonably assigned.
mailto:OAQDCRSW@ice.dhs.gov
CORPORATE COMMITMENT High Confidence
Some Confidence
Low Confidence
Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
Did contractor provide effective contract and project management?
How effective has the contractor been in understanding and responding to user requirements?
Did the contractor establish and maintain effective quality control standards and procedures?
QUALITY OF SERVICE High
Some Confidence
Low
Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
Did the contractor provide quality goods/services?
Did the contractor provide quality reports and documentation (i.e., accurate, current and complete)?
Was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from counterparts?
Did the contractor supply professional and qualified personnel?
Did the contractor respond to emergency situations to include staffing and responsiveness?
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE High
Some Confidence
Low Confidence
Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
Did the contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules in the following areas:
(a) Performance of services?
(b) Delivery of reports or other documentation?
(c) Qualified Staffing
1. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default? YES NO
If yes, please explain (e.g. inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules - also include contract number, name, address, and phone number of Terminating Contracting Officer - TCO).
2. What was the contractor’s greatest strength in the performance of the contract?
3. What was the contractor’s greatest weakness in the performance of the contract?
4. Would you award another contract to this contractor? YES NO
COMMENTS:
PART THREE: EVALUATOR’S CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS FORM IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE
BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR
TITLE OF EVALUATOR DATE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .