Attachment 10 - Section M.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
REPAIR HARDEE ROAD JBSA FORT SAM HOUSTON TX
Solicitation number
JBSF236851
Issued by

About this file

This document is an Attachment to a Solicitation that provides the Evaluation Criteria and Basis for Award for a federal contract opportunity. The acquisition is restricted for Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB) and will be awarded to the WOSB offeror providing the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP). Key details include:

The evaluation will consist of a general review to ensure bids are responsive, with price being the sole evaluation factor. Offerors must submit two volumes - a detailed price breakdown (Volume I) and completed contract documentation (Volume II). The TEP will be calculated by multiplying the quantities for each CLIN by the unit price, and adding the total for all CLINs. The offeror with the lowest TEP will be considered for award. The Contracting Officer will determine price reasonableness, and may require certified cost or pricing data if adequate price competition does not exist. This is a WOSB set-aside acquisition for a project valued between $1-5M to repair Truemper Road at JBSA-Lackland, with a site visit scheduled for July 8, 2024.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
REPAIR HARDEE ROAD RECORD OF BIDS 26 JUL 24.pdf PDF
Bid Openinig Hardee Road Sign In sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment 13- RFI Questions and Goverment Response Hardee Road.pdf PDF
Attachment 9- Section L.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA301624B00010001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Attachment 13- RFI Questions and Goverment Response Hardee Road.pdf PDF
Attachment 1- SOW JBSF236851 Repair William Hardee (Letterman Road)_rev1.pdf PDF
Attachment 3- Appendix B Utility Maps (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) _rev1.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 Heavy and Highway 5 JAN 2024.pdf PDF
Attachment 4- Appendix C Site Maps William Hardee road_rev1.pdf PDF
Attachment 7- Appendix D Material Submittal Register_rev1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 12- Appendix I Soil Management Plan.pdf PDF
Hardee Road site visit.pdf PDF
FA301624B0001- SOLICITATION REPAIR HARDEE ROAD.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 Appendix B Utility Maps (FOR REFERENCE ONLY).pdf PDF
Attachment 2 Appendix A Site Maps William Hardee road V4.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 Appendix D Material Submittal Register.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5-Climatology Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 SOW JBSF236851 Repair William Hardee (Letterman Road).pdf PDF
Attachment 11- Cost Estimate Breakdown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 8 - Appendix E SpecIntact Guidance (KTR Distro).pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment 9- Section L.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 Appendix C Environment Lead Base Paint 2023-04-19 SAM William Hardee.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Section M – Evaluation for Award

Evaluation and Basis for Award. The 502d CONS/JBKAD will issue an award to the offeror who is determined to offer the best value to the Government.

1. The Government will perform a general review of each bid, as follows:

a) Only bids that are specific to this effort will be evaluated.

b) This acquisition is restricted for Woman Owned Small Businesses(WOSB) as determined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) in accordance with 13 CFR Part 125. Therefore, only offer from WOSB will be eligible for award.

c) Offerors will be checked against the List of Parties Excluded From Federal Procurement and Nonprocurement Programs. Any offeror who is listed will be eliminated without further consideration.

d) Bids will be checked for minor informalities or irregularities. The Contracting Officer may give the offeror an opportunity through a clarification to cure any defect resulting from a minor informality or irregularity, whichever is to the advantage of the Government. The Government plans on awarding a contract without conducting discussions.

e) Price will be the sole evaluation factor evaluated.

f) Offerors shall submit all required bid documentation to be considered responsive (Volume

I and II).

2. Only electronic copies will be evaluated. The response shall consist of two (2) separate volumes:

a) Volume I – Pricing (Contractor Detailed Cost Breakdown): The offeror shall submit a detailed cost breakdown (Attachment #10) displaying the essential elements of work with pricing.

b) Volume II – Contract Documentation (Filled SF 1442): The offeror shall submit the SF 1442 with all required fill ins.

(i) Section A: SF 1442 with completed blocks 14, 15, 16 (if different than block 14), 17, 20a, 20b, 20c, and block 19 if amendments have been issued. An authorized official of the firm must sign SF 1442 block 20b.

(ii) Section B: Complete pricing information for all CLINs.

(ii) Section I: Complete appropriate certifications.

(iv) Section K: Complete all appropriate and applicable Representations and

Certifications.

(v) Bid Guarantee: A copy of the bid guarantee should be included in the electronic bid. The original sealed copy should be mailed out addressed to the official POCs so it is received no later than the time and day of bid opening.

3. Price Evaluation. Price will be the sole factor evaluated to determine best value for the Government. The evaluated price shall be the total price proposed by the offeror in Section B as supplemented by the Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown (Attachment 11).

FA301624B0001 Attachment 12 1 MAY 24

3.1 Price Factor: Prices will be evaluated based on the Total Evaluated Price (TEP), which will be calculated by multiplying the quantities for CLIN 0001 by the CLIN’s unit price to determine the total amount for CLIN0001. The same process will be calculated for all the subsequent CLINs. The total amount for all CLINs added together will then equal the

TEP.

3.2 Best Value: The offeror that provides the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP) for all items covered in the solicitation will represent the best value and be considered for an award.

3.3 Price Reasonableness: The contracting officer will make a determination that a prospective contractor is responsible in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.1 and that the prices offered are reasonable and balanced using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404-1. Note that unreasonably high prices, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for the Government not to proceed with award. The burden of proof for credibility of prices rests with the Offeror.

3.4 Adequate price competition for this acquisition per FAR 15.403-1(c)(1) is anticipated;

therefore, certified cost or pricing data are not required per FAR 15.403-1(b)(1). If at any time, however, during this competition the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, or if price reasonableness cannot be determined offerors may be required to submit certified cost or pricing data or additional data other than certified cost or pricing data (as appropriate) for the CO to determine price reasonableness.

(End of Evaluation)

FA301624B0001 Attachment 12 1 MAY 24

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .