ATTACHMENT 10 - DFSP Pt. Loma Sampling Analysis Plan.pdf

Title: Sampling and Analysis Plan Project Name: DFSP Point Loma Environmental Program Revision Number: 0 Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #1 - Title and Approval Page

SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN

(Field Sampling Plan and Quality Assurance Project Plan)

Defense Fuel Support Point—Point Loma NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center

Naval Base Point Loma San Diego, California

May 2016

Prepared for:

Defense Logistics Agency, Installation Support for Energy 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2828

Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6222

Prepared by:

CB&I Federal Services LLC 1230 Columbia Street, Suite 1200

San Diego, CA 92101 619.239.1690

Prepared under:

Environmental Response Contract

SP0600-13-D-5354

Delivery Order 0009

Document Control Number: PL3-031

Review Signature: May 4, 2016

Rose Condit/Program Chemist Date CB&I Federal Services LLC

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CB&I Federal Services LLC (CB&I) has prepared this Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) (Field Sampling Plan/Quality Assurance Project Plan [QAPP]) in support of various ongoing sampling activities associated with operations at the Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Point Loma, Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California (Figure 1). This SAP will describe field and laboratory procedures used to support routine groundwater monitoring, discharge compliance sampling for the DFSP Point Loma Remediation System, and miscellaneous sampling activities associated with new monitoring well installation or waste disposal. The SAP was prepared by CB&I for the Defense Logistics Agency, Installation Support for Energy (DLA Energy) (formerly the Defense Energy Support Center [DESC]) under Environmental Response Contract Number SP0600-13-D-5354, Delivery Order 0009.

The DFSP Point Loma is an active fuel terminal that stores and dispenses diesel fuel, jet fuel, and lubricating oils. These fuels were formerly contained in aboveground and underground bulk-fuel storage tanks (ASTs and USTs, respectively) constructed primarily between 1918 and 1954. Petroleum fuel releases from the tanks and associated piping have occurred and have been investigated at the site. These ASTs and USTs have since been demolished and replaced by new ASTs constructed under a military construction (MILCON) project at the facility. The sources and nature of the contaminants of primary concern (COPCs) at the site are petroleum hydrocarbons, primarily from diesel fuel, marine (DFM) and jet propellant 5 (JP-5), as well as minor amounts of aviation gasoline (AVGAS). The tanks and piping that released the fuels have either been removed from service, repaired, or replaced, and are no longer a source. Residual soil contamination exists between the tanks or pipelines that leaked while non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) is present at the groundwater table. The residual contamination held in the soil is not migrating. NAPL has the potential to migrate and diffuse into the groundwater if not remediated.

The SAP objective is to describe sampling activities to collect and analyze soil, soil gas, and/or groundwater samples related to the monitoring and treatment of the known fuel releases.

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheets Page

SAP Worksheet #1 - Title and Approval Page SAP Worksheet (WS) #2 - SAP Identifying Information SAP Worksheet #3 - Distribution List SAP Worksheet #4 - Project Personnel Sign-Off Sheet SAP Worksheet #5 - Project Organization Chart SAP Worksheet #6 - Communication Pathways SAP Worksheet #7 - Personnel Responsibilities and Qualifications Table ……………………………………18 SAP Worksheet #8 - Special Personnel Training Requirements Table SAP Worksheet #9 - Project Scoping Session Participants Sheet SAP Worksheet #10 - Problem Definition SAP Worksheet #11 - Project Quality Objectives/Systematic Planning Process Statements SAP Worksheet #12.1 - Measurement Performance Criteria Table – Soil Field QC Samples SAP Worksheet #12.2 - Measurement Performance Criteria Table – Water Field QC Samples SAP Worksheet #12.3 - Measurement Performance Criteria Table—Soil Gas QC Samples SAP Worksheet #12.4 - Measurement Performance Criteria Table—Waste Samples (Soil or Water) SAP Worksheet #13 – Secondary Data Criteria and Limitations Table SAP Worksheet #14 – Summary of Project Tasks SAP Worksheet #15.1 – Reference Limits and Evaluation Table – Site-Specific COPCs (Water Matrix) SAP Worksheet #15.2 – Reference Limits and Evaluation Table – Site-Specific COPCs (Soil Matrix) SAP Worksheet #15.3 – Reference Limits and Evaluation Table (Discharge Permit) SAP Worksheet #16 – Project Schedule/Timeline Table SAP Worksheet #17 – Sampling Design and Rationale SAP Worksheet #18 – Sampling Locations and Methods Requirements Table SAP Worksheet #19 – Analytical SOP Requirements Table SAP Worksheet #20 – Field QC Sample Summary Table SAP Worksheet #21 – Project Sampling SOP References Table SAP Worksheet #22 – Field Equipment Calibration, Maintenance, Testing, and Inspection Table SAP Worksheet #23 – Analytical SOP References Table SAP Worksheet #24.1 – Analytical Instrument Calibration Table (Gas Chromatography) SAP Worksheet #24.2 – Analytical Instrument Calibration Table (ICP) SAP Worksheet #24.3 – Analytical Instrument Calibration Table (GC/Mass Spectrometer VOA) SAP Worksheet #24.4 – Analytical Instrument Calibration Table (GC/Mass Spectrometer SVOC) SAP Worksheet #24.5 – Analytical Instrument Calibration Table (Cold Vapor) SAP Worksheet #24.6 - Analytical Instrument Calibration Table (GC/Mass Spectrometer - Soil Gas) SAP Worksheet #24.7 - Analytical Instrument Calibration Table (Anions - Ion Chromatography) SAP Worksheet #24.8 - Analytical Instrument Calibration Table (Miscellaneous Inorganic Parameters) SAP Worksheet #25 – Analytical Instrument and Equipment Maintenance, Testing, and Inspection Table 82 SAP Worksheet #26 – Sample Handling System SAP Worksheet #27 – Sample Custody Requirements Table SAP Worksheet #28.1 – Laboratory QC Samples Table (EPA Method 8015B) SAP Worksheet #28.2 – Laboratory QC Samples Table (Metals) SAP Worksheet #28.3 – Laboratory QC Samples Table (VOC) SAP Worksheet #28.4 – Laboratory QC Samples Table (SVOC) SAP Worksheet #28.5 – Laboratory QC Samples Table (PCB) SAP Worksheet #28.6 – Laboratory QC Samples Table (Mercury)

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #28.7 - Laboratory QC Samples Table (VOC—in Air) SAP Worksheet #28.8 - Laboratory QC Samples Table (Anions) ……………………………………………. 99 SAP Worksheet #28.9 - Laboratory QC Samples Table (Total Suspended Solids/Sulfide/Cyanide) SAP Worksheet #28.10 - Laboratory QC Samples Table (Oil and Grease) SAP Worksheet #29 – Project Documents and Records Table SAP Worksheet #30 – Analytical Services Table SAP Worksheet #31 – Planned Project Assessments Table SAP Worksheet #32 – Assessment Findings and Corrective Action Responses SAP Worksheet #33 – QA Management Reports Table SAP Worksheets #34-36 - Data Verification and Validation (Steps I and IIa/IIb) Process Table SAP Worksheet #37 – Usability Assessment References

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

List of Figures

Figure 1 DFSP Point Loma Site Vicinity Map Figure 2 Field Activity Map with Well Gauging and Sampling Intervals Figure 3 DFSP Point Loma Remediation System Sample Port Location Diagram

List of Attachments

Attachment 1 DoD Quality System Manual (QSM) Control Limits Attachment 2 Field Forms

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

Acronyms

°C degree Celsius °F degree Fahrenheit µg/L microgram per liter µg/m3 microgram per cubic meter µm micrometer or micron % percent %D percent difference %R percent recovery ACL applicable cleanup level Ag silver API American Petroleum Institute AST aboveground bulk-fuel storage tank ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials AVGAS aviation gasoline BFB bromofluorobenzene bgs below ground surface BNA base, neutral, acid BTEX benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylenes C&T Curtis and Tompkins Laboratory CAP Corrective Action Plan CAS Chemical abstracts service CB&I CB&I Federal Services LLC CCB continuing calibration blank CCC calibration check compound CCR California Code of Regulations CCV continuing calibration verification Cd cadmium COC chain-of-custody COPC contaminant of primary concern COR Contracting Officer’s Representative Cr chromium Cu copper cy cubic yards DESC Defense Energy Support Center DFM diesel fuel, marine DFSP Defense Fuel Support Point DFTPP decafluorotriphenylphosphine DLA Energy Defense Logistics Agency, Installation Support for Energy DO dissolved oxygen DoD U.S. Department of Defense DOT U.S. Department of Transportation DQA data quality assessment DQI data quality indicator

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

Acronyms (continued)

DQO data quality objective DTSC California Department of Toxic Substance Control ECD electron capture detector EDD electronic data deliverable ELAP Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FID flame ionization detector FISC Fleet & Industrial Supply Center FLC Fleet Logistics Center GC gas chromatograph GRO gasoline range organics H&S health and safety HCl hydrochloric acid HDPE high density polyethylene HAZWOPER Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Hg mercury IC ion chromatography ICAL initial calibration ICB ICAL blank ICP inductively coupled plasma ICS interference check solution ICV ICAL verification ID sample identification IDL instrument detection limit JP-5 jet propellant 5 LCS laboratory control sample LCSD laboratory control sample duplicate LOD limit of detection LOQ limit of quantitation MDL method detection limit m/e mass over charge m/z mass to charge ratio mg/kg milligram per kilogram mg/L milligram per liter MIBK 4-methyl-2-pentanone MILCON military construction mL milliliter MS matrix spike MSD matrix spike duplicate MTBE methyl-tert-butyl ether NA not applicable NAPL non-aqueous phase liquid NAVSUP Naval Supply Systems Command

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

Acronyms (continued)

NBPL Naval Base Point Loma Ni nickel ORP oxidation/reduction potential O&M operations and maintenance OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration oz ounce PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Pb lead PCB polychlorinated biphenyl PCE tetrachloroethene PDS post digestion spike pH hydrogen ion potential PID photoionization detector PM Project Manager POC point of contact PPE personal protective equipment ppm parts per million QA Quality Assurance QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan QC Quality Control QL Quantitation Limit QSM Quality System Manual RF response factor RL reporting limit RO reverse osmosis RO#1 Reverse Osmosis Unit #1 RO#2 Reverse Osmosis Unit #2 RPD relative percent difference RSD relative standard deviation SAM San Diego County, Site Assessment and Mitigation Manual SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan SDCDEH San Diego County Department of Environmental Health SOP standard operating procedure SPCC system performance check compound SSHO Site Safety and Health Officer SVOC semivolatile organic compounds TOX total organic halides TPH total petroleum hydrocarbons TSS total suspended solids UFP Uniform Federal Policy UST underground bulk-fuel storage tank VOA volatile organic analysis

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

Acronyms (continued)

VOC volatile organic compound Water Board California State Water Resources Control Board—Region 9: San

Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board WET California Waste Extraction Test WS worksheet Zn zinc

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet (WS) #2 - SAP Identifying Information

Site Name/Number: Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Point Loma Contractor Name: CB&I Federal Services LLC Contract Number: SP0600-13-D-5354 Contract Title: Environmental Response Contract Work Assignment Number: Delivery Order 0009

1. This SAP was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Federal Policy (UFP) for QAPPs (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], 2005) and EPA Guidance for QAPPs (EPA, 2002), with additional guidance from the following:

Quality Systems Manual for Environmental Laboratories, Version 5.0 (U.S.

Department of Defense [DoD], 2013)

Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives Process

(EPA, 2006).

2. Identify regulatory program: Petroleum Program.

3. This is a project-specific SAP.

4. List dates of scoping sessions that were held:

Not Applicable (NA)

5. List dates and titles of any SAP documents written for previous site work that are relevant to the current investigation.

Title Date Final Groundwater Monitoring Plan, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Point Loma, Naval Base Point Loma (NBPL), San Diego, California, prepared by Shaw Environmental, Inc.

March 2007

Addendum No.1 to the Final Groundwater Monitoring Plan, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Point Loma, Naval Base Point Loma (NBPL), San Diego, California, prepared by Shaw Environmental, Inc.

August 2009

Addendum No.2 to the Final Groundwater Monitoring Plan, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Point Loma, Naval Base Point Loma (NBPL), San Diego, California, prepared by CB&I.

July 2015

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

6. List organizational partners (stakeholders) and connection with lead organization:

Example for project-specific SAPs:

California State Water Resources Control Board – Region 9: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board)

Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center (FLC), terminal operator funded by DLA Energy

US Navy (land owner for Naval Base Point Loma)

7. Lead organization

DLA Energy

8. If any required SAP elements or required information are NA to the project or are provided elsewhere, then note the omitted SAP elements and provide an explanation for their exclusion below:

UFP-QAPP

Worksheet #

Required Information Crosswalk to Related Information

A. Project Management Documentation

1 Title and Approval Page

2 Table of Contents; SAP Identifying Information

3 Distribution List

4 Project Personnel Sign-Off Sheet

Project Organization

5 Project Organizational Chart

6 Communication Pathways

7 Personnel Responsibilities and Qualifications Table

8 Special Personnel Training Requirements Table No special training required

Project Planning/Problem Definition

9 Project Planning Session Documentation No project scoping session

10 Problem Definition, Site History, and Background. Site Maps

11 Site-Specific Project Quality Objectives

12 Measurement Performance Criteria Table

13 Sources of Secondary Data and Information; Secondary Data Criteria and Limitations Table

14 Summary of Project Tasks, sampling procedures, data management

15 Reference Limits and Evaluation Table

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

UFP-QAPP

Worksheet # Required Information

Crosswalk to Related Information

16 Project Schedule/Timeline Table

B. Measurement Data Acquisition Sampling Tasks

17 Sampling Design and Rationale

18 Sampling Locations and Methods/Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Requirements Table; Sample Location Map(s)

19 Analytical Methods/SOP Requirements Table

20 Field Quality Control (QC) Sample Summary Table

21 Project Sampling SOP References Table Sampling SOPs

22 Field Equipment Calibration, Maintenance, Testing, and Inspection Table

Analytical Tasks

23 Analytical SOPs/Analytical SOP References Table

24 Analytical Instrument Calibration Table

25 Analytical Instrument and Equipment; Maintenance, Testing, and Inspection

Sample Collection

26 Sample Handling System, Documentation Collection, Tracking, Archiving and Disposal; Sample Handling Flow Diagram

27 Sample Custody Requirements, Procedures/SOPs Sample Container Identification; Example Chain-of-Custody (COC) Form

QC Samples

28 QC Samples Table and Screening/Confirmatory Analysis Decision Tree

Data Management Tasks

29 Project Documents and Records Table

30 Analytical Services Table; Analytical and Data Management SOPs

C. Assessment Oversight 31 Planned Project Assessments Table; Audit Checklists

32 Assessment Findings and Corrective Action Responses Table

33 Quality Assurance (QA) Management Reports Table

D. Data Review 34 Verification (Step I) Process Table

35 Validation (Steps IIa and IIb) Process Table

36 Validation (Steps IIa and IIb) Summary Table

37 Usability Assessment

Project-Specific SAP Title: Sampling and Analysis Plan

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #3 - Distribution List

Name of SAP Recipients Title/Role Organization Telephone Number E-mail Address or Mailing Address

Nicholas Carros Contracting Officer Representative (COR)

DLA Installation Support – Energy

DLA Energy 703.767.6624 Nicholas.carros@dla.mil

DLA Installation Support – Energy

8725 John J. Kingman Road

Suite 2828

Fort Belvoir, VA 22060

Brian McDaniel Water Board Representative Water Board 619.521.5897 California Environmental Protection Agency

California Water Quality Control Board - San Diego Region (Water Board)

2375 Northside Drive, Suite 100

San Diego, CA 92108

Brian.Mcdaniel@waterboards.ca.gov

Chris Corey Project Manager (PM) CB&I 619.533.7330

949.466.4816 (cell)

Chris.Corey@cbifederalservices.com

1230 Columbia Street, Suite 1200

James Horna Project Engineer

CB&I 619.533.7320

619.865.3856 (cell)

James.Horna@cbifederalservices.com

1230 Columbia Street, Suite 1200

San Diego, CA 92101

Dennis Talbot Project QC Manager

Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO)

CB&I 864.505.6784 Dennis.Talbot@cbifederalservices.com

1230 Columbia Street, Suite 1200

San Diego, CA 92101

Rose Condit Project Chemist CB&I 925.288.2151 Rose.Condit@cbifederalservices.com 4005 Port Chicago Highway Concord, California 94520

Mark Unruh Project Hydrogeologist CB&I 619.533.7301 Mark.Unruh@cbifederalservices.com

1230 Columbia Street, Suite 1200

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #4 - Project Personnel Sign-Off Sheet

The Project Personnel Sign-Off Sheet will be used to document all key project personnel performing site work have read the applicable sections of the SAP and will perform the sampling and analysis tasks as described.

Name Organization/Title/Role Signature/Email

Receipt SAP Section

Reviewed Date SAP Read

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #5 - Project Organization Chart

All lines of responsibility (solid lines) and lines of communication (dotted lines) are provided.

Nicholas Carros DLA Energy COR

Office: 703.767.6624

Brian McDaniel Water Board

Office: 619.521.5897

Chris Corey

CB&I

Project Manager Office: 619.533.7330

James Horna

CB&I

Project Engineer Cell: 619.865.3856

Dennis Talbot

CB&I

Project QC Manager

SSHO

Cell: 864.505.6784

Rose Condit

CB&I

Project Chemist Office: 925.288.2151

Mark Unruh

CB&I

Project Hydrogeologist Office: 619.533.7301

Susan Waterman

CB&I

Data Manager Office: 470.253.8007

Field Technical Staff

– Geologists

– Field Technicians

– Subcontractors

Subcontract Laboratory PMs

(See WS#30)

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #6 - Communication Pathways

Communication Drivers

Responsible Affiliation Name

Telephone Number Procedure

Communication with Regulators

DLA Energy COR Nicholas Carros 703.767.6624 The DLA Energy COR will be the primary point of contact (POC) for communication with regulators for project information. The DLA Energy COR will communicate any project field changes or quality issues to the regulators. The DLA Energy COR may direct the CB&I PM to coordinate specific actions directly with the Water Board.

POC with DLA COR CB&I PM Chris Corey 619.533.7330 All materials and information about the project will be forwarded to the DLA Energy COR by the CB&I PM. The CB&I PM will communicate project field changes or quality issues to the DLA Energy COR in a timely manner.

Sample Collection Field Changes

Project Chemist or Project QC Manager

Rose Condit

Dennis Talbot

925.288.2151

864.505.6784

The Project Chemist is responsible for documenting field changes related to sampling and for informing or seeking approval from the Technical Lead or PM. The Project Chemist oversees the documentation, notification, and corrective actions associated with data collection issues. Due to the potential impact field changes may have on the project, the Project Chemist is to be notified of such issues within 24 hours.

Sampling Quality Issues

Project Chemist or Project QC Manager

Rose Condit

Dennis Talbot

925.288.2151

864.505.6784

In general, the Project Chemist is the POC for sampling and chemistry issues and the Project QC Manager is the POC for other quality issues. Quality issues will be resolved at the project level (in consultation with the PM, site supervisor, technical lead, etc.) Upon resolution, the Project QC manager or Project Chemist oversees the documentation, notification, and corrective actions associated with the QA issue in writing.

Notification of Nonusable Analytical Data

Project Chemist Rose Condit 925.288.2151 If significant problems are identified by the laboratory or the project team that impact the usability of the data (i.e., the data is rejected or the data quality objectives [DQO] are not met), the Project Chemist will notify the Project Technical Lead and PM within 24 hours or the next business day.

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #6 - Communication Pathways (continued)

Communication Drivers

Responsible Affiliation Name

Telephone Number Procedure

Site Safety and Health Issues

CB&I SSHO Dennis Talbot 864.505.6784 The Project SSHO is the POC for health and safety (H&S) issues.

H&S issues will be resolved at the project level in consultation with the PM, Site Superintendent and Technical Lead (etc.). Upon resolution, the Project SSHO oversees the documentation, notification, and corrective actions associated with the issue in writing. Due to the potential seriousness of H&S issues, the SSHO is to be notified of H&S issues immediately. The SSHO will communicate with the Health & Safety Manager as required to satisfy the notification process.

Sample Collection Issues

Project Chemist Rose Condit 925.288.2151 The Project Chemist is the POC for sampling and chemistry issues. If sampling issues are not resolved at the project level (in consultation with the laboratory PM, Site Supervisor, Geologist, etc.), then the issue will be elevated to the PM and Technical Lead. Upon resolution, the Project Chemist oversees the documentation, notification, and corrective actions associated with the sample collection issue in writing. Due to the potential impact sampling issues may have on the project decisions, the Project Chemist is to be notified of sampling issues within 24 hours.

Laboratory reporting or data quality issues

Project Chemist

Laboratory PM

Rose Condit 925.288.2151 The Project Chemist is the POC for laboratory issues. The Project Data Manager is the POC for electronic data deliverables (EDD). If laboratory issues are not resolved with the Project Chemist or Data Manager, then the issues will be elevated to the Program Chemist.

Upon resolution, the Project Chemist oversees the documentation, notification, and corrective actions associated with the laboratory issues in writing.

Field Activity Issues Project QC Manager Project Hydrogeologist

PM

Dennis Talbot

Mark Unruh

Chris Corey

864.505.6784

619.533.7301

619.533.7330

The Site Project QC Manager and Project Hydrogeologist are the POCs for all project site activities such as scheduling, staffing, subcontractors, field work, etc. The Site Project QC Manager and Project Hydrogeologist, in consultation with the PM, will resolve all project field activities issues.

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #7 - Personnel Responsibilities and Qualifications Table

Name Title/Role Organizational

Affiliation Responsibility

Nicholas Carros COR DLA Energy Manages governmental oversight of the project Manages project funding and scope Coordinates project documents review Primary contact and liaison with regulatory agencies Responsible for technical oversight of the project

Chris Corey PM CB&I Manages oversight of the project for CB&I POC for communication with the DLA Energy PM Ensures that all requirements of project contract are attained in a manner consistent with Project Plans Oversees planning, execution, and conclusion of all project activities Manages project budgets and schedules

Rose Condit Project Chemist CB&I Selects qualified subcontract laboratories Conducts field and laboratory audits as necessary Oversees field sampling activities Performs validation of laboratory data Prepares the appropriate sections of the report summarizing the project sampling activities and data quality

James Horna Project Engineer CB&I Develops Work Plans to address project scope of work Manages technical project elements Reports to PM

Mark Unruh Project Hydrogeologist

CB&I Develops Work Plans to address project scope of work Prepares Work Plan variances, if necessary Oversees field activities Manages technical project elements Writes Final Reports related to field activities Reports to PM

Dennis Talbot Project QC

Project SSHO

CB&I Oversees field activities Administers the QC Plan; Manages QC documentation and QC deliverables Conducts inspections (preparatory, initial, follow-up, completions) Develops and administers the Site H&S Plan; Reviews essential H&S requirements with on-site personnel Manages personnel and environmental monitoring; Coordinates preparation of Job Safety Analyses Selects appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and facilitates daily safety meetings

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #7 – Personnel Responsibilities and Qualifications Table (continued)

Name Title/Role Organizational

Affiliation Responsibility

Field Technician Field Technician (sampling)

CB&I Performs all sampling in accordance with approved SAP/QAPP Ensures that field QC samples are collected as specified in the SAP Completes field documentation and implements field corrective actions as required Must have Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 40-hour Certification and 8-hour OSHA Refresher Certification

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #8 - Special Personnel Training Requirements Table

Routine Training Requirements: All field personnel will be required to have completed the OSHA 40-hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Standard Protection training, annual 8-hour HAZWOPER refresher, and submit to annual medical surveillance, as required by OSHA. The CB&I SSHO will be responsible for ensuring that training and/or certification is met and that qualified personnel are performing the work.

Project Function

Specialized Training -

Description of Course

Training Provider

Training Date

Personnel/ Groups

Receiving Training

Personnel Titles/

Organizational Affiliation

Location of Training

Records and Certificates

No Specialized Training Needed for this Project

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #9 - Project Scoping Session Participants Sheet

No specific project scoping session conducted for this SAP; this project SAP/QAPP covers on-going sampling activities at DFSP Point Loma.

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #10 - Problem Definition

The planning team consists of the representatives of DLA Energy and CB&I with primary regulatory oversight by the Water Board. DLA Energy is the lead federal agency for the direction of the site activities and the prime decision maker.

Leaking USTs, ASTs, and associated fuel distribution lines and spills are believed to be the principal cause of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination (and related constituents) to the subsurface soil and groundwater at the DFSP Point Loma (Figure 1). The sources and nature of the COPCs at the site are petroleum hydrocarbons, primarily from DFM and JP-5, as well as minor amounts of AVGAS. The tanks and piping that released the fuels have been removed from service and demolished as part of a military construction (MILCON) project to replace the fuel terminal infrastructure with new tanks and appurtenances, and are no longer a source. To monitor and address identified fuel releases at the site, ongoing sampling and analysis of groundwater, soil gas, and soil are necessary. This SAP will be used to describe activities to collect and analyze soil, soil gas, and groundwater samples related to the routine monitoring and treatment of the known fuel releases.

10.1 Site Location and Background

NBPL is located on the Point Loma peninsula in San Diego, California. DFSP Fuel Depot is located approximately 1,000 feet from the shoreline of San Diego Bay (Figure 1). DFSP Point Loma is managed and operated by the NAVSUP FLC (formerly the Fleet & Industrial Supply Center [FISC]). DFSP Point Loma is one of several tenant facilities located at NBPL. Other major facilities of NBPL include the Naval Submarine Base, the Fleet Naval Mine and Antisubmarine Warfare Command Complex, the Fleet Combat Training Center-Pacific, and the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command.

The DFSP Point Loma Fuel Depot included ASTs and USTs used to store aviation fuel JP-5, DFM, and lube oils. Most of the tanks were constructed between 1917 and 1954 and were interconnected by a network of large-diameter pipelines.

The MILCON P-401 project began replacing the existing ASTs, USTs, and support facilities with new ASTs and appurtenances in May 2009. As a result, the old fuel storage ASTs and USTs were demolished. The new ASTs built by MILCON P-401 are the only tanks the DFSP Point Loma Fuel Depot uses for bulk fuel storage and dispensing. The MILCON project caused some normal measurements of remediation system operations and well measurements to be interrupted or deferred/delayed. The MILCON project also included the destruction of many of the wells used to monitor the thickness of the NAPL plume and the remediation systems’ effectiveness. In 2012, several piezometers were installed by DLA Energy to replace many of the wells destroyed by the MILCON P-401 project.

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

In agreement with the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health (SDCDEH), and more recently the Water Board, the U.S. Navy and DLA Energy have maintained groundwater monitoring for potential impacts from fuel storage and distribution activities in the DFSP Point Loma Fuel Depot. In 1994 and 1995, seven monitoring wells (FISC-MW01 through FISC-MW07) were installed at NBPL to monitor groundwater downgradient of the DFSP Point Loma Fuel Depot (Figure 2). From November 2005 through August 2007, additional monitoring wells (MT-06, MT-07, FISC-08 through FISC-MW18, OS-MW01, OS-MW03, and OS-MW05) and soil vapor monitoring points (OS-SG01, OS-SG02, OS-SG04, and SG-14) were installed during the site assessments for Tanks 42 through 83 (Defense Energy Support Center [DESC], 2007a). Following Water Board review of the site assessment report and the subsequent Corrective Action Plan (CAP) (DESC, 2007b), a comprehensive, facility-wide Groundwater Monitoring Plan (DESC, 2007c) was prepared and implemented by DLA Energy. Since that Groundwater Monitoring Plan was prepared, it was agreed that three additional wells (T85-MW02, T85-MW03, and T63-MW06) would be sampled, and dissolved-phase constituents would be analyzed as a result of comments received from the Water Board on the Final Site Assessment Report for Tank 85. Addenda to the plan include a revision of the monitoring network, analyses, and frequency of sampling (DESC, 2009; DLA Energy, 2015a).

Off-site soil vapor and groundwater monitoring locations (OS-MW01 through OS-MW04, and OS-SG01 through OS-SG04) were removed from the monitoring suite in accordance with Addendum 2 of the Groundwater Monitoring Plan (DLA Energy, 2015a). Multiple years of soil gas monitoring and human health risk assessments demonstrated that risks to human health are well below the recognized incremental lifetime cancer risks; therefore, annual soil gas sampling was removed from the monitoring suite. Additionally, multiple years of monitoring off-site locations demonstrated the remediation system has successfully drawn the LNAPL and dissolved-phase plume back onto Navy property. Because the system maintains a gradient which prevents contaminants from migrating off of the property, piezometers along the northern property boundary (PZ-06, PZ-07, and PZ-08) were added to the monitoring suite in place of the off-site location wells. Once access to the private property is obtained by DLA Energy, the off-site wells and soil vapor points listed above will be decommissioned following the procedures presented in Addendum 14 to the Multiple Tank Site Assessment Work Plan (DLA Energy, 2015b).

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #11 - Project Quality Objectives/Systematic Planning Process Statements

Step 1 Define the Problem that Necessitates the Study

The planning team consists of the representatives of the DLA and CB&I with primary regulatory oversight by the Water Board. DLA is the lead federal agency for the direction of the site activities and the prime decision maker.

Leaking USTs, ASTs, and associated fuel distribution lines and spills are believed to be the principal cause of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination (and related constituents) to the subsurface soil and groundwater at the DFSP Point Loma (Figure 1). The sources and nature of the COPCs at the site are petroleum hydrocarbons, primarily from DFM and JP-5, as well as minor amounts of AVGAS. The tanks and piping that released the fuels have either been removed from service or repaired and are no longer a source. To monitor and address identified fuel releases at the site, ongoing sampling and analysis of groundwater and soil are necessary. In order to stop contaminant migration, installations of the remediation systems have been completed. The site monitoring wells are sampled to evaluate the effectiveness of the remedial action and act as early warning measurements in locations where released fuel has not been observed. This SAP will be used to describe activities to collect and analyze soil, soil gas, and groundwater samples related to the routine monitoring and treatment of the known fuel releases.

Step 2 Identify the Goal of the Study

The goal of the sampling activities are:

Identify any soil or groundwater contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons and related constituents in the vicinity of known petroleum releases at DFSP Point Loma.

The Study Questions are:

Is the long-term remedial action effective?

Do areas that have not been impacted by releases remain unaffected?

Does treated groundwater meet the City of San Diego Discharge Permit requirements?

What are the disposal options for site waste?

The decisions requiring environmental data acquisition will answer the following questions:

Has a release from the DFSP Point Loma Fuel Depot migrated past the monitoring network?

Are the groundwater cleanup levels being achieved at the release areas?

Does soil gas represent a hazard to nearby residents or on-site workers?

Step 3 Identify Information Inputs

Existing site data from routine groundwater monitoring, monthly discharge monitoring, and waste characterization will be used to make decisions for future site sampling activities.

The following sample data will be used to make decisions for this project:

Groundwater (Annual and Semiannual)

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs): benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylenes (BTEX), methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and Naphthalene by EPA Method 8260

Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as jet fuel (C10-C16) diesel fuel (C16-C24) – EPA Method 8015 with silica gel cleanup

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

Treated Groundwater/Product from Remediation System Discharge:

TPH-gasoline range organics (GRO) (C6 – C10) by EPA Method 8015B

VOCs by EPA Method 8260B TPH-jet fuel and diesel fuel by EPA Method 8015B Cyanide by SM4500-CN

Metals by EPA Method 6010B/7470/7471

Semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC) by EPA Method 8270C

Oil and Grease by EPA 1664 HEM

Ignitability by EPA 1010

Sulfide by SM4500-S2

Anions (Chloride, sulfate, nitrate) by EPA 300

Miscellaneous soil, waste soil/sludge, waste water samples, or soil gas collected as needed for project decisions:

TPH-GRO by EPA Method 8015B

VOCs (BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene) by EPA Method 8260B

TPH-jet fuel (C10 C16), diesel fuel (C10 C24) by EPA Method 8015B

Cyanide by SM4500-CN

Metals by EPA Method 6010B/7470/7471

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) – EPA Method 8082

Total organic halides (TOX) by EPA 9020/9023

VOCs in Soil Gas by EPA TO-15

The specific analysis for each sample location will depend on the task being performed and may not include all of the methods listed above.

Step 4 Define the Boundaries of the Study

Figure 2 shows the location of existing site groundwater monitoring wells sampled semiannually. Depth to groundwater varies over the site; it generally ranges from 10 feet below ground surface (bgs) on the east bay side of the facility to approximately 95 feet bgs on the west hill side of the facility. Figure 3 shows the sampling ports located in the on-site remediation systems process lines.

There are no practical constraints to data collection at this site. Normal weather conditions would not affect data collection and no protected species are present. Monitoring well access during routine groundwater sampling in residential and traffic areas is restricted to permitted hours only. Sampling schedules will be coordinated with the Project SSHO or Project Geologist to accommodate restricted traffic lanes.

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #11 - Project Quality Objectives/Systematic Planning Process Statements (continued)

Step 5 Develop the Analytic Approach

If free product is detected in wells downgradient from the site that did not previously contain product, then the project team will assume that the remedial action is not effectively containing the identified plume, or that a new release has occurred. Appropriate action will be taken to stop further migration and to identify the product type and possible source(s).

If COPCs are detected in samples collected from monitoring wells downgradient from the site in an increasing trend exceeding applicable cleanup levels (ACLs), then the project team will assume that the remedial action is not effectively containing the dissolved-phase and/or free-phase portion of the identified plume, or a new release has occurred, and that the release has or can potentially migrate past the monitoring network. Appropriate action will be taken to stop further migration and to identify possible source(s) so mitigation can be implemented.

If contaminants in the downgradient monitoring wells remain at or below ACLs, then the project team will assume the remedial action is effective in controlling contaminant migration.

After completion of free-product removal, if the contaminants in all the monitoring wells associated with the site are less than the cleanup goals established for the site, then the project team will assume that the remedial action is effective, that groundwater cleanup levels will have been achieved, and that site closure can be requested.

Soil gas samples have been removed from the current sampling program; however, if soil gas data are needed in the future, the following decisions would apply.

If COPC levels in the soil gas are measured below risk-based action levels, then the soil vapor will not be deemed a risk to workers and nearby residents.

If COPC levels in the soil gas exceed the appropriate risk-based action levels, then the data will be assessed and future action determined.

Waste sample decision statements:

If analytical results from waste (soil/sludge/water) are above hazardous waste criteria, then the waste will be disposed of at a hazardous waste facility.

If analytical results from waste (soil/sludge/water) are below hazardous waste criteria, then the waste will be disposed of at a nonhazardous waste facility.

Step 6 Specify Performance or Acceptance Criteria

The sampling was designed to generate sufficient data to comply with the agreement with the SDCDEH and the Water Board to maintain groundwater monitoring for potential impacts from fuel storage and distribution activities in the DFSP Point Loma Fuel Depot. The sampling is also designed to comply with the City of San Diego discharge permit requirement for treated groundwater.

To limit uncertainty in obtained environmental data, criteria for the precision, accuracy, representativeness, completeness, and comparability parameters and limit of quantitation (LOQ) for the chemicals of concern have been developed to meet the project objectives. Measurement errors will be controlled by using appropriate sampling and analytical methods, adhering to the DoD Quality System Manual (QSM) (2013), following established SOPs, and having the generated data reviewed by a CB&I Project Chemist to verify laboratory processes. The field crews will review the SAP before sample collection to limit sample collection errors.

Step 7 Plan the Design for Obtaining Data

The planned sampling design consists of semiannual and annual groundwater sampling from 24 existing site monitoring wells. It also includes sampling site groundwater remediation systems, monthly for operation and maintenance (O&M) and bi-monthly for the City of San Diego discharge permit compliance. A more detailed description of the sampling strategy is provided in WS#17.

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #12.1 - Measurement Performance Criteria Table – Soil Field QC Samples

QC Sample Analytical

Group Frequency Data Quality Indicators

Measurement Performance

Criteria

QC Sample Assesses Error for

Sampling, Analytical or

Both Field Duplicates

None Due to the known heterogeneity of soil matrix, no soil field duplicate samples will be collected

NA NA

NA

Rinse Blanks TPH

VOCs

(specific analysis as applicable to each site being sampled that day)

None – if disposable or dedicated sampling equipment is used, 1 per day if using nondisposable sampling equipment

Bias Contamination

Representativeness

Analytes not detected above

LOQ

Sampling

Source Water Blank

TPH

VOCs

(specific analysis as applicable to each site being sampled that day)

If rinse blanks are collected, each batch of source water used for rinse blanks will be sampled prior to use

Bias Contamination

Representativeness

Analytes not detected above

LOQ

Sampling

Matrix Spikes TPH

VOCs

(specific analysis as applicable to each site being sampled that day)

5 percent (%); One per 20 field samples collected

Precision and Accuracy

DoD QSM control limits if available, or

Laboratory statistically derived control limits

(QSM control limits in Attachment 1)

Analytical

Temperature Blanks

TPH

VOCs

(specific analysis as applicable to each site being sampled that day)

Every cooler shipped to the laboratory

Representativeness 0 - 6 °C

(degrees Celsius)

Sampling

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #12.2 - Measurement Performance Criteria Table – Water Field QC Samples

QC Sample Analytical

Group Frequency Data Quality Indicators

Measurement Performance

Criteria

QC Sample Assesses Error for

Sampling, Analytical or

Both Field Duplicates

TPH

VOCs

(specific analysis as applicable to each site being sampled that day)

One per 10 field samples collected

Precision 35% - relative percent difference

(RPD)

Groundwater

Sampling and Analytical

Rinse Blanks TPH

VOCs

(specific analysis as applicable to each site being sampled that day)

None – if disposable or dedicated sampling equipment is used, 1 per day if using nondisposable sampling equipment

Bias Contamination

Representativeness

Analytes not detected above

LOQs

Sampling

Source Water Blank

TPH

VOCs

(specific analysis as applicable to each site being sampled that day)

If rinse blanks are collected, each batch of source water used for rinse blanks will be sampled prior to use

Bias Contamination

Representativeness

Analytes not detected above

LOQ

Sampling

Matrix Spikes TPH

VOCs

(specific analysis as applicable to each site being sampled that day)

5%; One per 20 field samples collected

Precision and Accuracy

DoD QSM control limits if available, or Laboratory statistically derived control limits

(QSM control limits in Attachment 1)

Analytical

Trip Blanks TPH-GRO

VOCs

1 per cooler shipped to the laboratory

Bias Contamination

Representativeness

Analytes not detected above

LOQs

Sampling

Temperature Blanks

All Analyses Every cooler shipped to the laboratory

Representativeness 0 - 6 °C Sampling

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #12.3 - Measurement Performance Criteria Table—Soil Gas QC Samples

QC Sample Analytical

Group Frequency Data Quality Indicators

(DQIs)

Measurement Performance

Criteria

QC Sample Assesses Error for

Sampling, Analytical or

Both Field Duplicates VOCs One per 10 field samples collected on soil gas wells Precision 35% RPD Sampling and

Analytical

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #12.4 - Measurement Performance Criteria Table—Waste Samples (Soil or Water)

QC Sample Analytical

Group Frequency Data Quality Indicators

(DQIs)

Measurement Performance

Criteria

QC Sample Assesses Error for

Sampling, Analytical or

Both Field Duplicates

None Not Applicable to Waste Samples

Not Applicable (NA) NA

Rinse Blanks None Not Applicable to

Matrix Spikes None Not Applicable to

Temperature Blanks

Specific analysis as applicable to each site being sampled

Every cooler shipped to the laboratory

Representativeness 0 - 6 °C Sampling

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #13 – Secondary Data Criteria and Limitations Table

Secondary Data

Data Source (originating organization, report title, and date)

Data Generator(s) (originating organization, data types, data generation/collection dates)

How Data Will Be Used

Limitations on Data

Use

Existing site groundwater and soil gas data

Semiannual and Annual Groundwater Monitoring

Reports, CB&I

CB&I

Groundwater and soil data from Annual and Semiannual monitoring events

Continued monitoring, characterization and disposal decisions as necessary

None

Existing wastewater and product sample data

Monthly discharge compliance sample results from Reverse Osmosis and Replacement Recovery System operation

CB&I

Existing monthly wastewater and product sample data

Continued monitoring, characterization and disposal decisions as necessary

None

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

SAP Worksheet #14 – Summary of Project Tasks

14.1 SCOPE OF WORK

The scope of work of sampling activities for this SAP/QAPP includes:

Groundwater sampling (new or existing site wells).

Groundwater treatment system sampling.

Soil gas sampling (if deemed necessary).

Various soil sampling procedures (if deemed necessary).

Direct push groundwater sampling (if deemed necessary).

Equipment decontamination.

Waste disposal.

Review and validation of data, and upload to Geotracker.

14.2 SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS AND PROCEDURES

The following sections describe the sampling methods and procedures that may be used for this project. Primary sampling activities include routine groundwater and treatment system sampling.

However, other sampling techniques discussed below may be used, if necessary, to support new well installation or other investigative activities. The appropriate sampling technique will be determined by the project Technical Lead, Project Geologist, or Project Chemist as appropriate.

Relevant field documents are included as Attachments 2. Project-specific procedures are described below.

14.2.1 Groundwater Sampling (Monitoring Well Locations)

New or existing site monitoring wells will be sampled in accordance with the procedures described in this section. All wells (2- to 4-inch diameter) will be purged using a bladder pump, by a low-flow (micro-purging) technique or by a no-purge method prior to sampling.

The following standard procedures will be followed when sampling a monitoring well by low-flow methods:

1. Put on a new, clean, and chemical-resistant pair of disposable gloves prior to taking the sample.

2. Confirm the well identification at each monitoring well.

3. Calibrate field instruments in accordance with the manufacturer’s directions. Record all calibration documentation in the field logbook-calibration form (Attachment 2).

Site Location: Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California Revision Date: May 2016

4. Remove the well cap and measure the depth to water at each monitoring well using an electronic water level indicator probe. Record the water level measurement to the nearest 0.01 inch in the field logbook. Decontaminate the water level indicator before each measurement.

5. If using portable bladder pumps, carefully lower the pump and tubing into the well.

Place the intake to the pump at the middle of the screen interval. If the initial water level is below the top of the screen, then place the pump intake at the center of the water column.

6. Start the pump. The pump speed will be set so that the water column in the well does not drop more than 0.33 feet below the initial water level reading.