Attachment 02- OPPD.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Divers Life Support System (DLSS) Routine Maintenance Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N00244-25-R-0016
About this file
This is an Offeror's Past Performance Data questionnaire template for solicitation N00024-25-R-0016 to be submitted to NAVSUP FLC San Diego. The template requests detailed information about previous contracts, including contract numbers, amounts, types, and performance periods from potential offerors.
The questionnaire focuses on evaluating four key performance areas: quality and meeting contract requirements, timeliness, contractor responsiveness, and additional observations. It seeks specific feedback on customer satisfaction, instances of rework, innovative solutions, schedule compliance, problem resolution, cost control, and overall contractor strengths and weaknesses. The form is designed to help NAVSUP evaluate contractors' past performance for a contract involving Divers Life Support System (DLSS) routine maintenance services, which includes maintenance of high and low pressure systems, compressors, and recompression chambers for EODGRU1 and Navy Expeditionary Combat Command missions.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N00244-24-R-0016- 0004 .pdf | ||
| DLSS PWS Updated 1.23.pdf | ||
| N00244-25-R-0016- 0003 DLSS.pdf | ||
| N00244-25-R-0016-002.pdf | ||
| OHA- Notice Order.pdf | ||
| N00244-25-R-0016- 0001 Final.pdf | ||
| Attachment 03_Requirements_Submission_Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Exhibit A_CDRL 0001 - DLSS Monthly Status Report.pdf | ||
| Attachment 01_PWS.pdf | ||
| Attachment 04_QASP.pdf | ||
| N00244-25-R-0016 .pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE DATA
Solicitation N00024-25-R-0016
Complete and return no later than the solicitation closing date to:
NAVSUP FLC San Diego Attn: Patricia Castillo Phone: (619) 556-5523 Email: patricia.castillo26.civ@us.navy.mil
On behalf of:
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Description of Effort: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the NAVSUP FLC San Diego to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
2. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
b. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
3. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
4. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .