Attachment 01 past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 268 KB Posted

Attached to
Drayage-Germany Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W564KV22R0002
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command

About this file

This document contains a draft past performance questionnaire for a solicitation seeking drayage services in Germany. The questionnaire is to be completed by references for offerors to assess their past performance on relevant contracts. It requests ratings and rationale for compliance with specifications, project management effectiveness including subcontractor control, timeliness, and commitment to customer satisfaction. Respondents are asked to return the completed questionnaire by 18 April 2022 to the 409th Contracting Support Brigade in support of solicitation number W564KV-22-R-0002 for an award date unspecified. The related federal contract opportunity posting provides additional context, identifying the solicitation number, the Department of the Army as agency, and an opportunity description of drayage services in Germany.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Drayage-Germany, newest first.
File Type Posted
W564KV22R0002 amendement 0007.pdf PDF
W564KV22R0002 Amendment 0006.pdf PDF
W564KV-22-R-0002 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
Performance Work Statement (PWS) - Drayage Germany 14 July 2022.pdf PDF
W564KV22R0002 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Attachment 04- Performance Work Statement 13 July 2022.pdf PDF
W564KV22R0002 QAs 13 Jul 2022.pdf PDF
W564KV22R0002 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 04 Performance Work Statement (PWS) - Drayage Germany 8 Jul 2022.pdf PDF
Attachment 07 FMO Addresses and Radiuses.pdf PDF
W564KV22R0002 Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
W564KV22R0002 QAs 7 Jul 2022.pdf PDF
Attachment 06 Estimated Workload Data.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W564KV-22-R-0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 05 Cubic Meter Listing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 04 Performance Work Statement (PWS) - Drayage Germany.pdf PDF
Attachment 01 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment 02 Certification of Capability to Provide Adequate Staffing.pdf PDF
Attachment 03 Historical Workload Data and Key.pdf PDF
Attachment 03 Historical Workload Data.pdf PDF
Attachment 08 Addresses and Radiuses FMO - Germany.pdf PDF
Attachment 07 Historical Workload Data Key.pdf PDF
Attachment 02 Certificate of Capabilities.pdf PDF
W564KV22R0002 DRAFT.pdf PDF
Attachment 06 Estimated Workload Data.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 05 CubeMeterListing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 04 Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

Attachment 01: Past Performance Questionnaire

APPENDIX D

Performance Assessment

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

DEPARTEMENT OF THE ARMY

Theater Contracting

Command Unit

23156 APO AE

09227

CCSB-EUZ-CST

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W564KV-22-R-0002

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The 409TH US Army 409th Contracting Support Brigade is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 484210. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return electronically, no later than 7 days after receipt of request or 18 April 2022 whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire electronically to Kathryn.r.cortes.civ@army.mil and shea.korth2.civ@army.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at Kathryn.r.cortes.civ@army.mil.

mailto:Kathryn.r.cortes.civ@army.mil mailto:shea.korth2.civ@army.mil mailto:Kathryn.cortes.civ@army.mil

Sincerely, Shea Korth

Contracting Officer

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .