Attachment 0019 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 60mm (M204, M235, M236); 81mm (M218, M219, M220, M658); and 120mm (M234A1) Propelling Charges
- Solicitation number
- W519TC-24-R-0003
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for offerors responding to a solicitation from the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Rock Island Arsenal. The solicitation seeks proposals for 60mm, 81mm, and 120mm propelling charges. Offerors must provide information on recent and relevant contracts of similar size and scope for evaluation of past performance. References will receive a questionnaire to evaluate compliance with requirements, project management effectiveness, timeliness, customer satisfaction, and other performance factors. References should return completed questionnaires by the stated deadline, which is 15 days from receipt.
View the file
Other files
Show all 38
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 0019
Performance Assessment
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND – ROCK ISLAND
(Insert Date)
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W519TC-23-R-0047
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command- Rock Island (ACC-RI) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 332993. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the Army Contracting Command- Rock Island (ACC-RI), Rock Island, Illinois 61299, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or (insert date), whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to
Anna Whitcomb, Contracting Officer, anna.e.whitcomb2.civ@army.mil George Lingris, Contract Specialist, george.r.lingris.civ@army.mil
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at anna.e.whitcomb2.civ@army.mil.
Sincerely, Anna E. Whitcomb Contracting Officer
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
[Questionnaire should include questions to assess compliance with FAR 52.219-8 and FAR 52.219-9.]
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and/or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .