Attachment 0004 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf

Page 1 of

Attachment 0004: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE G-4 Global Intelligence Logistics and Engineering (GILE) Support

W50NH9-24-R-0005

1. The INSCOM G-4 has a non-personal services requirement to provide multi-disciplined engineering, facilities, maintenance, logistics, and sustainment support to U.S. Army INSCOM Headquarters and its Major Subordinate Commands (MSCs), Army Intelligence, Joint Forces, Combatant Commands, and the IC. INSCOM G-4 has the responsibility for worldwide integrated facility and logistics support to ground and airborne Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) systems, and intelligence operational facilities. ACC-DTA is conducting a past performance assessment in anticipation of possible contract award.

2. Offerors interested in proposing on this work have been requested to send the attached Past Performance Questionnaire to points of contact on recent and relevant contracts as defined in Section L of the solicitation. In this regard, we are requesting your assistance in completing this questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror in the area of past performance. The attached questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the contractor’s performance in each of the areas of consideration in the gray boxes for the identified contract. Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. If a question on the questionnaire is not applicable, please so indicate. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate, and complete as possible to preclude that the need for follow-up by the evaluators.

3. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic mail to:

kameron.f.mcvittie.civ@army.mil. Please confirm receipt of the submitted questionnaire via email response from the aforementioned email address. Please submit questions or comments regarding this letter to Kameron McVittie at (571) 588-9086 or by e-mail at kameron.f.mcvittie.civ@army.mil or the undersigned at (571) 588-9135 or by e-mail at paul.w.horrell.civ@army.mil.

4. Please complete and submit your questionnaire within 24 hours of the closing date of this solicitation. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Sincerely, Contracting Officer

[Encl(s)] (1) Past Performance Questionnaire mailto:paul.w.horrell.civ@army.mil

Once Filled In, this document is considered Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire

PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. RELEVANT CONTRACT

Prime Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract/Task Order Number:

Contract Award Date:

Contract Period of Performance End Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:

B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

Please provide your candid response to the following questions. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic email to kameron.f.mcvittie.civ@army.mil within 24 hours of the closing date of this solicitation. Thank you for your assistance.

mailto:amy.m.dombrowski.civ@army.mil

PART II - EVALUATION

(To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS

Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.

Table 1

1. Quality:

a. Assess the contractor’s quality of performance of scheduled and unscheduled maintenance for facility and military intelligence (MI) systems support?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Too soon to tell Not Applicable

Comments:

Provide justification/comments to validate. For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

b. Assess the contractor’s quality of service in regards to the management and accountability of Government Furnished Property (GFP) in multiple locations, including both CONUS and OCONUS.

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

2. Delivery Schedule:

a. Assess the contractor’s ability to deliver sensitive and non-sensitive equipment for routine, priority, and urgent supply requests to both CONUS and OCONUS locations.

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

If any delivery extensions were granted, please provide justification/comments for why the extension was needed (i.e. the extent of fault of the contractor), include the contractor’s efforts that contributed, negatively or positively, to the delivery schedule.

b. Assess the contractor’s service order response time to meet scheduled/unscheduled maintenance for routine, priority, and urgent requirement requests against contract requirements to both CONUS and OCONUS locations.

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

If any extensions were granted, please provide justification/comments for why the extension was needed (i.e. the extent of fault of the contractor), include the contractor’s efforts that contributed, negatively or positively, to the delivery schedule.

3. Management / Business Relations:

a. How effective was the contractor’s Program Management (to include use and control of subcontractors)?

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

b. To what extent was the contractor effective in managing significant risks (cost, schedule, and performance) in the performance of this contract?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

4. Regulatory Compliance.

a. Assess the contractor’s compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract relating to applicable regulations and codes, considering aspects of performance such as compliance with financial, environmental, safety, and labor regulations as well as any other reporting requirements in the contract terms and conditions.

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

5. General Comments.

Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.

PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

Please provide a point of contact who compiled or completed this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire.

Organization:

Address:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address: