Attachment 0002 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).docx

Attachment 0002 Past Performance Questionnaire

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation W912CH-24-R-0175, U.S. Army Contracting Command for Detroit Arsenal, MI.

1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

This information, when filled in, shall be treated as Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 3.104-3 and shall not be disclosed to anyone outside the Government Source Selection Team.

Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward it by electronic mail to: Kelly Germano at kelly.l.germano.civ@army.mil and Stephanie Douangmala at stephanie.a.douangmala.civ@army.mil.

Officer’s Representative

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT SOLICITATION:

The Army Contracting Command-Detroit Arsenal (ACC-DTA) proposes to release a solicitation W912CH-24-R-0175 for Corrosion Prevention and Engineering Services. The purpose of this contract is for the contractor to provide corrosion engineering and logistics technical, analytical, programmatic, research, technical assistance, testing, training, and technical writing support for the United States (U.S.) Army's Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) Ground Vehicle Systems Center (GVSC) and Tank-Automotive and Armaments Command (TACOM) Corrosion Prevention and Control (CPC) Program. The contractor shall provide independent analysis and assessment of TACOM's CPC Program to help administer the CPC Program for corrosion prevention, detection, and mitigation practices during sustainment and in support of DEVCOM's technical objectives. The contractor shall provide engineering and logistics analytical support to include field assessments, inspection, technology assessment, demonstration, testing, technical assistance, technical writing, material, engineering changes, acquisition support, video production, research, and statistical analysis services.

3. Instructions on Completing Questionnaire:

Offerors interested in proposing on this effort have been requested to send the provided Past Performance Questionnaire to the appropriate point(s) of contact on past and present contracts, which the offeror deems relevant to this effort as defined in Section L. In this regard, the ACC-DTA is conducting a past performance assessment in anticipation of a possible contract award.

We are requesting your assistance in completing this questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offerors in the area of past performance. This questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract identified. Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. If a question on the questionnaire is not applicable, please so indicate.

SUSPENSE: Please complete and submit the questionnaire as soon as possible, but no later than 5:00 PM on 28 February 2025. Thank you in advance for your assistance in making this a Past Performance Procurement.

Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire Please provide your candid response to the following questions. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic email to the Points of Contact (POCs) at kelly.l.germano.civ@army.mil and stephanie.a.douangmala.civ@army.mil by 5:00 PM Eastern Standard Time on 28 February 2025. Thank you for your assistance.

PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. RELEVANT CONTRACT

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract/Task Order Number:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor’s name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Contract Period of Performance End Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:

Brief Description of the Relevant Contract Scope:

B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

FAX Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II - EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS

Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.

Table 1

1. Technical / Business Relations

a. Assess the contractor’s ability to perform coating/corrosion engineering tasks and material evaluations.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

b. Evaluate the contractor’s ability to work in an engineering functional team as a technical lead and/or in a subordinate role.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments :

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

2. Schedule/ Timeliness

a. Assess the contractor’s ability to develop and format technical reports, laboratory results, technical briefings, engage in corrosion research such as scientific literature review, technical publication analysis, and material testing.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. delays by the customer/end user, changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor (e.g. unusually severe weather or default of a subcontractor beyond the control of both the Contractor and subcontractor).

b. Assess the contractor’s ability to incorporate feedback into document revisions within the required timeframe.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. delays by the customer/end user, changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor (e.g. unusually severe weather or default of a subcontractor beyond the control of both the Contractor and subcontractor).

3. Management

a. Assess the contractor’s database management and ability to retain data for corrosion surveys.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. delays by the customer/end user, changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor (e.g. unusually severe weather or default of a subcontractor beyond the control of both the Contractor and subcontractor).

4. General Comments

Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.

Comments:

PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

Please provide respondent point of contact information who compiled or completed Part II of this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire. NOTE: Send completed questionnaire to the contract specialist identified on Page 1.

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

Fax Number:

E-mail Address:

Once Filled In, this document is considered Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 image1.png