Attach_L-5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

Controlled Unclassified Information When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 1 of 9

FA8232-23-R-3000

ATTACHMENT L-5

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Offeror: Complete Section 1, then e-mail questionnaire to the customer points of contact listed on the Past Performance Information Sheet.

Offeror’s Evaluator: Complete Sections 2-5 and e-mail to: skye.barnard@us.af.mil (PCO) and jessica.boyles.1@us.af.mil (buyer). DO NOT PROVIDE A COPY BACK TO THE OFFEROR.

The Air Force F-16 Foreign Military Sales System Program Office, AFLCMC/WAMI, Hill Air Force Base is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a F-16 FMS Product Support Integrator program. Scope includes F- 16 Repair and Return of assets (R&R), Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS), and Engineering and Technical Services (E&TS).

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than [Date TBD]. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to skye.barnard@us.af.mil (PCO) and jessica.boyles.1@us.af.mil (buyer). Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 2 of 9

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 3 of 9

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 4 of 9

Technical Performance E V S M U N/A

T1. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the contract?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T2. How was the quality of testing and certification efforts?

T3. How was the quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts?

T4. How adequate/effective was the System Engineering Process?

T5. Effectiveness of access to data Library and/or use/control of TCTOs or other Government data

T6. How well did the contractor develop, and execute test and evaluation efforts?

T7. How well did the contractor develop, manage, and control system and subsystem interface requirements and communicate and manage system and subsystem requirements to the subcontractor?

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 5 of 9

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

P3. Did the program include a corrective action process and a system or process for tracking, resolving, and improving upon any identified non-conformances?

P4. Was this contractor able to effectively resolve contract problems without extensive customer involvement/guidance in a timely manner?

P5. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

P6. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?

P7. How successful was the contractor with timely award and effective management and quality of subcontracts?

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 6 of 9

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P8. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including Government Furnished Property, Material and maintaining security controls for facility)?

P9. How effective was the contractor’s acquisition management?

P10. Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors?

P11. To what degree did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

Transition / Phase-in E V S M U N/A

TP1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

TP2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

TP3. Effectiveness of ramp-up for full assumption of responsibilities as new awardee.

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 7 of 9

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation E V S M U N/A

S1. If the contract included FAR 52.219-9, to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan?

(Please state if FAR 52.219-9 was not included in the contract)

S2. If the contract included FAR 52.219-8, how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?

(Please state if FAR 52.219-8 was not included in the contract)

Cost Performance E V S M U N/A

C1. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

C2. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

C3. How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

C4. How sufficient and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?

Quality E V S M U N/A

Q1. Were any deliveries considered insufficient or fail inspection and have to be returned for rework?

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 8 of 9

Quality E V S M U N/A

Q2. Did the program include quality improvement in repeatable maintenance

Schedule E V S M U N/A

SCH1. Efficiency in achieving schedule reductions through actions such as streamlined logistics, work sequencing, and work planning

SCH2. How well did the contractor perform against the delivery schedules of the contract? In the remarks, specify if the contractor met, exceeded, or failed to meet contractual delivery dates.

SCH3. Were there any late deliveries on your contract?

Risk Management E V S M U N/A

R1. Did the Contractor provide a risk management plan, to include risk mitigation strategies, for any identified risks?

R2. Was the Contractor proactive at identifying and mitigating risk throughout the duration of the program?

Country Specific E V S M U N/A

C1. Did effort involve application of customs, application for Visas, or use of a port of entry?

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 9 of 9

Country Specific E V S M U N/A

C2. Were there any issues with shipping, receiving, and/or transporting material to and from the Contractor’s location of operations?

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to Skye Barnard and Jessica Boyles.

E-Mail to: skye.barnard@us.af.mil and jessica.boyles.1@us.af.mil