Attach.5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 284 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Elevator Maintenance
- Solicitation number
- FA462025RA904
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for an Elevator Maintenance Services contract at Fairchild Air Force Base in Washington. The questionnaire is designed to collect detailed performance feedback from a previous contractor, with sections evaluating management and technical performance across multiple dimensions such as daily work coordination, maintenance effectiveness, responsiveness to service calls, personnel qualifications, and overall contract execution.
The form requires respondents to rate the contractor's performance on a scale from 1 (Unsatisfactory) to 4 (Very Good) across 13 specific performance criteria, including coordination of monthly inspections, maintenance of professional relationships, timeliness of service calls, routine maintenance quality, and knowledge of installed elevator systems. The document must be completed and returned by 22 April 2025 at 10:00 AM Pacific Time, with email submissions preferred to A1C Michael Salone and Paul Blais at their respective Air Force email addresses.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0002 Elevators.pdf | ||
| Attach.2 Amendment 0002 - Pricing Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attach.4 - FAFB OPSEC 0 Measures.pdf | ||
| Attach.3 - Wage Determination 2015-5537 Rev. 24.pdf | ||
| Attach.1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf | ||
| FA462025RA904 Combo.pdf | ||
| Attach.2 Pricing Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA462025RA904
Attachment 5
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
PRESENT / PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES
FAIRCHILD AFB, WA
SOLICITATION NO: FA462025RA904
1. Your assistance is respectfully requested in providing information on the attached performance questionnaire. The importance of your opinion cannot be overstated. This survey measures the present/past performance of prospective offeror for providing Elevator Maintenance Services at Fairchild AFB, WA.
2. INSTRUCTIONS FORM COMPLETION: Please fill this questionnaire in by hand or electronically, and please email the results to the A1C Michael Salone at michael.salone@us.af.mil and Paul Blais and paul.blais@us.af.mil. Email submissions are preferred.
92 CONS/PKA
Contracting Officer Attn: Paul Blais 110 W. Ent St Fairchild AFB WA 99011
3. Please direct questions to A1C Michael Salone (509) 247-8082 and Mr. Paul Blais (509) 247-4864. Your participation is greatly appreciated.
4. PLEASE RETURN NO LATER THAN: 22 April 2025, at 10:00 AM (Pacific Time)
Section A: Contractor Information.
Contractor’s name and address:
a. Point of Contact:
b. Phone #:
c. Contract Number:
d. Project Title:
e. Period of Performance:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
a. Respondent’s name and address: Organization: _
Address:
City: _ State: _ Zip: _ mailto:michael.salone@us.af.mil mailto:paul.blais@us.af.mil
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
b. Respondent’s Name and Title:
Signature:
c. Commercial Phone #: DSN Phone #:
Fax #: E-Mail:
d. Contract Type:
e. Award Amount: $ Final Amount: $
f. What was the job title for this project?:
What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract?
If you have questions regarding this questionnaire, please call Paul Blais @ 509-247-4864.
For any ratings less than satisfactory rating, please provide explanation in Remarks section below.
1 2 3 4 Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good
Performance does not Performance does not meet Performance meets Performance meets meet most contractual some contractual contractual contractual requirements requirements and requirements. The requirements. The and exceeds some to the recovery is not likely in contractual performance of contractual performance Government’s benefit. The a timely manner. The the element or sub-element of the element or sub- contractual performance of contractual performance being evaluated reflects a element contains some the element or sub-element of the element or sub- serious problem for which minor problems for being evaluated was element contains a the contractor has not yet which corrective actions accomplished with some serious problem(s) for identified corrective actions. taken by the contractor minor problems for which which the contractor’s The contractor’s proposed appear or were corrective actions taken by corrective actions actions appear only satisfactory the contractor was appear or were marginally effective or were effective.
ineffective. not fully implemented.
MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE:
1. How well did the contractor coordinate daily work including all monthly inspections, maintenance, repairs, replacements, routine and emergency service calls?
N/A
2. How well did the contractor work with scheduling 5 and or 3 year over-speed valve tests in accordance with American National Standards Institute A17.1.
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. How effective was the contractor in maintaining professional business relationships with government personnel and in resolving contract issues?
1 2 3 4 N/A
TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE
1. How effective was the contractor at maintaining and operating vertical transportation equipment (Elevators)
1 2 3 4 NA
2. Did the company respond to any unscheduled service calls in a timely manner? 1 2 3 4 N/A
3. How well did the contractor perform routine maintenance? 1 2 3 4 NA
4. Did contractor personnel possess all the required training and certificates? 1 2 3 4 N/A
5. Did the contractor submit reports in an accurate and timely manner? 1 2 3 4 N/A
6. Was the contractor knowledgeable and experienced working with the installed elevators?
N/A
CORRECTIVE ACTION HISTORY:
1. Have there been any show cause or cure notices issued or legal actions taken? (circle one)
YES NO
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
2. If Contract Discrepancy Reports (CDR) were issued, were they addressed appropriately? If so, how? (circle one)
YES NO N/A
If yes, explain and indicate the status.
EVALUATION SUMMARY:
1. Overall evaluation of the contractor. (Circle one and explain.) 1 2 3 4
2. Would you enter into another contract with this contractor? (circle one)
YES NO N/A
If no, please explain.
Additional Remarks:
| PRESENT / PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES |
| FAIRCHILD AFB, WA |
| SOLICITATION NO: FA462025RA904 |
| 4. PLEASE RETURN NO LATER THAN: 17 February 2020, at 2:00 PM (Pacific Time) |
| SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION |
| CORRECTIVE ACTION HISTORY: |
| EVALUATION SUMMARY: |
| Additional Remarks: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .