Attach-6_PPQ_TEMPLATE.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9126G26QA086
About this file
This is a USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-1) template designed for contractors to document their relevant past contract experience during the proposal submission process.
The questionnaire is divided into two sections: contractor-completed and client-completed. Offerors must provide their firm information (name, CAGE code, UEI number, contact details), specify their role as prime contractor, subcontractor, or joint venture partner, and document the contract details including contract number, type (firm fixed price or cost reimbursement), award date, completion dates, and original and final contract prices with explanations of any variances. Contractors must also describe project complexity (high, medium, or routine) and explain the relevance of the past project to the current solicitation's requirements, addressing similar equipment, requirements, conditions, and staffing.
The client or reference contact completes the second portion, providing their organizational information and role in the project, then assigns overall performance ratings across five categories: contractor quality, timeliness/on-schedule performance, management/staffing, satisfaction, and overall work performance. Ratings use a defined scale of Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U), or Not Applicable (N), with detailed definitions provided. Clients are encouraged to submit completed questionnaires directly to the offeror for inclusion in proposals, though direct submission to USACE is permitted. The government reserves the right to verify all information provided on the form.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE (Form PPQ-1)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Offeror to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Offeror Information:
Firm name: _____________________________________ CAGE Code: ________________________ Address: _______________________________________ UEI Number: ________________________ Phone Number: _________________________________ Email Address: __________________________________ Point of Contact: _________________________________ Contact Phone Number: ___________________________
2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Subcontractor |_|Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain): __________________________________________________________________ Percent of Project work performed: _____________% If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name): ____________________ Phone #: _____________________________
3. Contract Information Contract Number: _____________________________________________ Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable): _________________________ Contract type: |_| Firm Fixed Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (please specify):
Contract Title: _____________________________________________________________________ Award Date (mm/dd/yy): _____________________________________________________________ Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): __________________________________________________ Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): ____________________________________________________ Explain Differences: _________________________________________________________________ Original Contract Price (Award Amount): _________________________________________________ Final contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): ________________________________ Explain Differences: _________________________________________________________________
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work |_| High |_| Med |_| Routine How is this project relevant to this solicitation’s requirements? (Please provide details, i.e., similar equipment, requirements, conditions, staffing etc.): _________________________________________
REFERENCE INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information:
Name: _________________________________ Title: __________________________________ Phone Number: _________________________ Email Address: __________________________
6. Describe the client’s role in the project: _____________________________________________
See Ratings and Definitions on next page
Overall Contractor Quality: __________________________________________________________
Overall Contractor Timeliness/On Schedule: ___________________________________________
Overall Contractor Management/Staffing: ______________________________________________
Overall Contractor Satisfaction: ______________________________________________________
Overall Rating for Work Performed: ___________________________________________________
Any additional comments regarding the contractor’s performance: _____________________________
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy): ________________________
8. Client’s Signature: ________________________________________________
NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNARIE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNARIE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATIONOF THE CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
(N) Not Applicable Equivalent to Neutral Adjectival Rating
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
Rev 1 20251008
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .