Attach 2. Addendum to 52.212-2.docx

Addendum to 52.212-2, Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services

BASIS OF AWARD

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

This solicitation utilizes streamlined acquisition procedures, FAR Parts 12 and 13. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. In order to be considered for award, there must be an “acceptable” rating in every non-price factor/subfactor. In other words, a rating of “unacceptable” for any factor or subfactor will result in the entire offer being rated unacceptable”.

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s proposal against Government’s minimum requirements as specified on the solicitation to determine whether the proposal is acceptable or unacceptable using the ratings and descriptions outlined in table below.

►Factor A. Technical Capability

Each factor and subfactor will be rated either acceptable or unacceptable. A rating of unacceptable for any factor or subfactor will result in an overall unacceptable rating and will not be eligible for award.

The following ratings will be used in evaluating all non-price factors and sub-factors except Past Performance:

Technical Ratings

FACTOR I TECHNICAL:

Sub-factor 1 Prime Contractor’s ROK Business Permission (PWS, Para 1.10.2): The prime contractor shall submit current and valid certification as below:

(i) One of the following business registrations/permissions:

· “Building Sanitation Control Business Permission (건물위생관리업 영업신고증)”

· “Sanitation Control Business Permission (위생관리용역업 영업신고증)”

· “Business Registration for Facilities Management Services – Building General Cleaning Business (건축물 일반 청소업 – 사업시설관리 서비스업 사업자등록증)”

· “Business Registration for Facilities Management Services – Combined Facilities Support Activities (사업시설 유지관리 서비스업 – 사업시설관리 서비스업 사업자등록증)”

(ii) Annual Hygiene Management Supervisor Training Certificate (공중위생관리 책임자 위생교육 수료증) issued by Korean Facility Hygiene Management Association (한국건물위생관리협회) in CY23 or CY24 to provide cleaning service for HVAC duct, AHUs, Ventilations and Dryer Duct. These licensing and certification shall be maintained up to date throughout the life of contract, and a copy of it shall be submitted to the KO as a part of technical proposal. This certificate shall be renewed every year, and a copy of certification shall be provided to the COR (CDRL #2) before thirty (30) calendar days of the start of any work in that regarding year.

Sub-factor 2 Prime Contractor Qualification (PWS, Para 1.10.1): The Offeror shall submit a minimum of two (2) years of experience of HVAC duct, AHUs, ventilation, and dryer duct cleaning service within the last 5 years with current certifications. The contractor shall provide this information of prior experience as a part of technical evaluation factor when submitting proposal. The experience of a subcontractor cannot be substituted for the prime contractor’s experience.

Sub-factor 3 Personnel Qualification (PWS, Para 1.10.3): The Offeror shall submit a resume of Contract Manager.

i. Contract Manager: The offeror shall submit a resume and documents of Contractor Manager showing a minimum two (2) years of experience as contract manager within the last 5 years or equivalent in the field of cleaning service for HVAC duct, AHUs, ventilations, and dryer duct from the issue of this solicitation.

The following ratings will be used in evaluating all non-price factors and sub-factors except Past Performance:

Technical Ratings

FACTOR II - PRICE:

The offeror shall complete the pricing information for line item that have quantity identified for base period plus four (4) option years. If offeror does not propose any line item, offeror shall state zero (0) in the line item. The proposed price will be reviewed to determine if the estimate is reasonable and complete to assess the offeror's understanding of the solicitation. The definitions of the offeror's price proposal being adequate, reasonable and complete are as follow:

Be Reasonable: Acceptable estimating methodology for developing the price quotation.

Be Complete: Responsive to all solicitation requirements, all PWS items are included, and estimates can be traced.

Proposed prices will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 13.106-2 & 3.

The Government will evaluate offers for award purpose by adding the total of all CLIN prices. As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.217-8 - Option to Extend Services) by adding one-half of the Offeror’s final option period price to the Offeror’s total price.

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, emailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

FACTOR III: Past Performance:

The past performance evaluation is an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to services outlined in the solicitation. The offeror shall provide a list of contracts under which they have performed the same or similar services as to this RFQ within the last five (5) years from the issuance date of this solicitation. This data on recent contracts will be used by the Contracting Officer to evaluate past performance.

The following information shall be included as applicable:

i. The title of the Project or Contract No for the Commercial or Government performance

ii. A clear description of qualifying work experience

iii. Length of contract/project (Year/Month/Date – Year/Month/Date)

iv. Value of contract/project total amount

v. Complete POC of employer (including name, phone no, e-mail) and validating POC.

The following ratings will be used in evaluating Past Performance:

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Note: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.

End of Addendum to 52.212-2