Att L-3 Vol 3 PPQ 20240214.docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N0001924R0007
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) related to Solicitation N0001924R0007, which is for the procurement of services to support the upgrade of T56-A-16 Power Section Engine Modules to T56-A-16A (Series 3.5) for C/KC-130T aircraft. The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's technical performance, schedule/timeliness, and management capabilities for a previous similar contract. Respondents are asked to rate the contractor's performance on a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory and indicate if they would award a new contract to the same contractor. The solicitation is a total small business set-aside for a single-award Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract with a four-year ordering period. Proposals are due by June 6, 2024, and the planned award timeframe is October 2024 to May 2025. The contracting agency is the Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command.
View the file
Other files
Show all 38
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation: N0001924R0007 V20240214
ATTACHMENT L-3 VOLUME 3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Within 2 weeks from receipt of this questionnaire, return this form to Gregory Webster, Contract Specialist, at gregory.j.webster8.civ@us.navy.mil.
1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION
a. Contractor:
b. Program Title:
c. Contract Number:
d. Type of Contract: Percent Complete:
e. Period of Performance being assessed: _________________________________________________
Note: Whether identified or not, if you have any knowledge of other contracts for the identified contractor, you are requested to complete a questionnaire for each contract or subcontract similar to this acquisition.
2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
a. Name:
b. Agency:
c. Position:
d. Relation to Program:
e. Phone:
f. Fax Number:
g. Email Address:
f. Date Questionnaire Completed:
3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS
3.1. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.
3.2. Please check those activities, which are applicable to your program
a. ____Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS)/Non-Developmental Items (NDI) usage
b. ____Engine Modifications
c. ____Directed subcontracts
d. ____Management of Government Furnished Property (GFP)
e. ____Aircraft Heavy Maintenance to include major aircraft repairs/inspections, engine, propeller and aircraft component overhaul, repair and configuration tracking
f. ____Operation, Development and Maintenance of Computerized Management Information Systems in support Aircraft Field and Heavy Maintenance requirements at multiple sites
g. ____Configuration Management of Aircraft and Aircraft Components
h. ____Engineering support for Field and Heavy Maintenance Activities supporting multiple aircraft sites
i. ____Hazmat/Environmental Program Development, Control and Management
j. ____Flight/Industrial Safety/Quality Assurance Management and Oversight of Field and Heavy Maintenance activities
k. ____Supply Support for Field and Heavy Maintenance activities supporting multiple aircraft sites
l. ____Management of Personnel performing aircraft maintenance at multiple sites to include training, recruitment and transfer of personnel between sites
m. ____Obtaining Customs Clearances for export/import shipment of parts and material
n. ____Engine Overhaul and Repair
o. ____Propeller Overhaul
p. ____Support Equipment Maintenance
q. ____Engineering Services
4. PERFORMANCE LEVELS
4.1. PERFORMANCE GRADES (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).
Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
4.2. QUESTIONS
4.2.1. TECHNICAL (QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICES)
a. What kind of technical performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?
b. What was the cause of these technical problems or strengths?
c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.
d. Overall, the contractor's technical performance is rated ________________________.
|_|Exceptional |_|Very Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory
4.2.2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS
a. What kinds of schedule/timeliness problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?
b. What was the cause of these schedule/timeliness/delivery problems or strengths?
c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.
d. Overall, the contractor's schedule/timeliness performance is rated _________________.
4.2.3. MANAGEMENT OR BUSINESS RELATIONS
a. What was the contractor’s record of timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering change proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions), the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction?
b. What was the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts?
c. To what extent does the contractor discharge their responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identify and apply resources required to meet schedule requirements; assign responsibilities for tasks/actions required by contract; and communicate appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner?
d. What were the contractor’s risk management practices, especially the ability to identify risks and formulate and implement risk mitigation plans?
e. If applicable, identify and provide information on any other areas that are unique to the contract, or that cannot be captured elsewhere under the Management Assessment.
f. Overall, the contractor's management performance is rated____________________.
5. SUMMARY: If you had the option, knowing what you know today, would you (pick one), award this contract to this contractor, given the choice? Please explain.
| a. | definitely not |
| b. | probably not |
| c. | probably |
| d. | definitely |
Explanation:
Signature _____________________________________________ Date _____________
NOTE: Electronic signatures are acceptable. An e-mail from the originator of this document will suffice. Signatures (electronic or hand written) verify that the signator completed this form and agrees with the information contained within it.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .