ATT_D_Reference Check Form~1.doc

DOC document 53 KB Posted

Attached to
FIRE SPRINKLER TESTING, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR SERVICES (PRICE AGREEMENT)
Solicitation number
S-10700-00014404
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This document is a Reference Check Form for RFP S-10700-00013714, specifically for Fire Sprinkler Testing, Maintenance and Repair services. The form is designed for potential vendors to have their previous clients complete a detailed evaluation of their performance, with ratings requested on a 0-10 scale across three key assessment areas: overall quality of services, service delivery, and responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests.

The reference check form provides a structured method for collecting qualitative feedback from prior clients, enabling the procuring agency to gather third-party perspectives on a proposer's capabilities and past performance. Each section allows for a numerical score and accompanying comments, which will presumably help evaluate a vendor's suitability for the fire sprinkler testing and maintenance contract. The form appears to be a standard procurement document from DAS (Department of Administrative Services) Procurement Services, with versions dated November 19, 2014 and December 9, 2016, indicating ongoing refinement of the reference evaluation process.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]

ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

RFP S-10700-00013714 Fire Sprinkler Testing, Maintenance and Repair

ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Proposer Name:

Reference Entity:

Reference Contact Name:

Contact Telephone Number:

Contact Email Address:

Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10:

0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied.

1. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Proposer?

Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________

2. How would you rate the Proposer’s delivery of service?

Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________

3. How would you rate the Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, urgent repair requests etc.)?

Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________

Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014 DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.0 – December 9, 2016

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .