Att 2 H-1 TDM Lot 7 and 8 PRF DRAFT.docx

DOCX document 3 MB Posted Apr 29, 2022

Attached to: DRAFT RFP for H-1 Training Device Modernization Program Procurement, Upgrades to AH-1Z and UH-1Y Flight Training Devices
Solicitation number: N6134022R0030
Issued by: Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Exh C H-1 TDM Lot 8 ENG_ADMIN CDRLS DRAFT.docx	DOCX document	Apr 29, 2022
Exh A H-1 TDM Lot 7 ENG_ADMIN CDRLS DRAFT.docx	DOCX document	Apr 29, 2022
H-1 Lot VII_VIII Draft RFP 4.29.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2022
Exh E H-1 TDM Lot 8 Tech Pubs CDRLs DRAFT.docx	DOCX document	Apr 29, 2022
Exh D H-1 TDM Lot 8 Logistics CDRLs DRAFT.docx	DOCX document	Apr 29, 2022
Attachment 4 DIT Form.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2022
Att 1 H-1 TDM Lot 7 and 8 SOW DRAFT_4.11.docx	DOCX document	Apr 29, 2022
Exh B H-1 TDM Lot 7 Logistic CDRLs DRAFT.docx	DOCX document	Apr 29, 2022

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

CUI	PRF 200037
	11 April 2022

Appendix H

PRF 200037

CAGE 89297

11 April 2022

PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION

SYSTEM SPECIFICATION

FOR

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

H-1 TRAINING DEVICES

TRAINING DEVICE MODERNIZATION

NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER

TRAINING SYSTEMS DIVISION

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO, FL 32826

APPROVED BY:

Captain Lisa Sullivan Program Manager, Naval Aviation Training Systems and Ranges (PMA-205)

APPROVED BY:

John Jabara (Acting) PMA-205 APME (or Designee)

APPROVED BY:

Melissa Benish as Designee APEO (T&E) (or Desginee)

APPROVED BY:

Jose Velez (Acting) Product Support Manager (or Desginee)

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D: Distribution authorized to Department of Defense (DoD) and US DoD Contractors only; (Administrative and Operational Use Only) 01 January 2021). Other requests shall be referred to Department of Navy, PEO(CS)/PMA-205, 47123 Buse Road, RADM William A. Moffett Building, Patuxent River, Maryland, 20670-1547.

Controlled by: Department of Navy

Controlled by: NAWCTSD

CUI Category: CTI

Distribution/Dissemination Control: FEDCON

POC: Nalish Patel, nelish.b.patel.civ@us.navy.mil

Revision History

Revision

Affected Paragraph(s)

Changes

Table of Contents

1.	SCOPE	2
1.1	Identification	2
2.	APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS	2
2.1	General	2
2.2	Government documents	2
2.2.1	Specifications, standards, and handbooks	2
2.2.2	Other Government documents, drawings, and publications	2
2.3	Non-Government publications	2
2.4	Order of precedence	2
3.	REQUIREMENTS	2
3.1	Performance and functional requirements	2
3.1.1	Training missions and objectives	2
3.1.2	Required modes	2
3.1.3	Aircraft simulation	2
3.1.3.1	Design Basis Aircraft (DBA)	2
3.1.3.1.1	DBA criteria data	2
3.1.3.2	Simulation data hierarchy	2
3.1.3.3	System performance	2
3.1.3.4	Avionics equipment performance	2
3.1.3.4.1	Avionics data ports	2
3.1.3.5	Warning, cautions, and advisories	2
3.1.4	Environmental effects	2
3.1.4.1	Wind and wake	2
3.1.4.1.1	Mountain Wind	2
3.1.4.1.1.1	Mountain areas	2
3.1.4.1.2	Ship wakes and airwakes	2
3.1.5	Major cockpit component characteristics	2
3.1.5.1	Multi-Functional Display (MFD)	2
3.1.5.1.1	IOS and TEn display in the MFD	2
3.1.5.2	Circuit breaker panels	2
3.1.5.3	External control lighting panel	2
3.1.5.4	Helmet Mounted Sight and Display (HMSD)	2
3.1.6	Mission computer	2
3.1.7	Weapon, countermeasure systems, and non-weapon stores	2
3.1.7.1	UH-1Y devices	2
3.1.7.1.1	Weapons	2
3.1.7.1.2	Sensors and countermeasures	2
3.1.7.1.2.1	BRITE Star II simulation	2
3.1.7.1.2.2	BRITE Star II image simulation	2
3.1.7.2	AH-1Z devices	2
3.1.7.2.1	Weapons	2
3.1.7.2.2	Sensors and countermeasures	2
3.1.7.2.2.1	Target Sight System (TSS) simulation	2
3.1.7.2.2.2	TSS image simulation	2
3.1.7.3	Flares	2
3.1.8	Flight modeling	2
3.1.8.1	Flight dynamics modeling	2
3.1.8.1.1	Blade element rotor modeling	2
3.1.8.1.2	Automated Test Guide (ATG) functionality	2
3.1.8.2	Control Loading System (CLS) upgrade and refurbishment	2
3.1.8.2.1	Friction and inertia	2
3.1.8.2.1.1	Coulomb friction	2
3.1.8.2.1.2	Viscous friction	2
3.1.8.2.1.3	Smoothness	2
3.1.8.2.2	Stiffness	2
3.1.8.2.3	Flight control tolerances	2
3.1.8.2.4	Secondary control assembly	2
3.1.8.2.4.1	Throttles	2
3.1.8.2.4.2	Rotor brake	2
3.1.8.3	System dynamic response	2
3.1.9	Instructor Operator Station (IOS)	2
3.1.9.1	IOS computational systems performance	2
3.1.9.2	IOS monitor screens	2
3.1.9.3	IOS software	2
3.1.9.3.1	Flight parameters IOS test page	2
3.1.9.3.2	IOS cross-country maps	2
3.1.9.3.3	Instrument Approach Procedures (IAPs)	2
3.1.9.3.4	Ground Controlled Approaches (GCAs)	2
3.1.9.3.5	IOS embedded NATOPS and NATIP manuals	2
3.1.9.4	IOS monitor console	2
3.1.9.5	Cockpit monitoring system (CMS)	2
3.1.9.5.1	Video feed controls	2
3.1.9.6	IOS Keyboards	2
3.1.10	Visual System modifications	2
3.1.11	Simulated Link 16	2
3.1.11.1	Link 16 messages	2
3.1.11.1.1	Broadcasting Link 16	2
3.1.11.1.2	Receiving Link 16	2
3.1.11.1.3	Transparent messages	2
3.1.11.2	Link-16 hardware	2
3.1.11.3	Link-16 IOS control	2
3.1.11.4	Link 16 Zeroize	2
3.1.11.5	Link 16 TEn Operation	2
3.1.11.5.1	Link 16 TEn model operation	2
3.1.11.5.2	Link 16 ADVTE operation	2
3.1.12	System Daily Operational Readiness Test (DORT)	2
3.1.13	Computational system requirements	2
3.1.13.1	Computational hardware components and peripherals	2
3.1.13.1.1	General purpose computers	2
3.1.13.1.2	Internal computer networks	2
3.1.13.1.3	Physically separated networks	2
3.1.13.2	Computational subsystems	2
3.1.13.2.1	Host Computational System (HCS)	2
3.1.13.2.1.1	Host-TEn interface	2
3.1.13.2.1.2	Host-visual interface	2
3.1.13.2.2	Aural cueing and communication system	2
3.1.13.2.3	IOS computational systems	2
3.1.13.2.4	TEn computational system	2
3.1.13.2.5	Control Loader (CL) and cockpit shaker computational system	2
3.1.13.2.6	Cybersecurity computational system	2
3.1.13.3	KVM switch architecture	2
3.1.13.4	Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)	2
3.1.13.5	Operating Systems (OS)	2
3.1.13.5.1	Windows OS	2
3.1.13.5.2	Linux OS	2
3.1.13.5.3	ASTi OS	2
3.1.14	Hardware Management	2
3.1.15	Software requirements	2
3.1.15.1	HCS software	2
3.1.15.2	Cybersecurity requirements for classified trainers	2
3.2	Trainer specific modifications	2
3.2.1	UH-1Y trainer upgrades	2
3.2.1.1	Input/Output	2
3.2.2	AH-1Z trainer upgrades	2
3.2.2.1	Detachable jump seat	2
3.3	Supportability requirements	2
3.3.1	Reliability	2
3.3.1.1	Power supply reliability	2
3.3.2	Maintainability	2
3.3.2.1	Mean-Time-To-Repair (MTTR)	2
3.3.2.2	Maximum-repair-time (Mmax)	2
3.3.2.3	Mean-Preventive-Maintenance-Time (Mpt)	2
3.3.3	Environmental conditions	2
3.3.3.1	Operating temperature	2
3.3.3.2	Non-operating temperature	2
3.3.3.3	Operating relative humidity	2
3.3.3.4	Non-operating relative humidity	2
3.3.4	Transportability	2
3.3.5	Materials and processes	2
3.3.5.1	Parts	2
3.3.5.1.1	Custom designed microelectronic devices	2
3.3.5.1.2	Power supplies	2
3.3.5.2	Materials	2
3.3.5.2.1	TPE reparability	2
3.3.5.2.2	Flammable materials	2
3.3.5.2.2.1	Fire retardant additives	2
3.3.5.2.3	Fungus-inert materials	2
3.3.5.2.4	Hazardous materials	2
3.3.5.2.4.1	Use of hazardous materials	2
3.3.5.2.4.2	Marking of hazardous items	2
3.3.5.2.4.3	Precautions	2
3.3.5.2.5	Metals	2
3.3.5.2.6	Wood products	2
3.3.5.2.6.1	Preservation	2
3.3.5.2.6.2	Fire retardancy	2
3.3.5.2.6.3	Termite protection	2
3.3.5.2.6.4	Grade	2
3.3.5.2.7	Radioactive material	2
3.3.6	Manufacturing processes	2
3.3.6.1	Painting, and preparation for painting	2
3.3.6.2	Nonskid surfaces	2
3.3.6.3	Corrosion prevention	2
3.3.7	Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3)	2
3.3.7.1	Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)	2
3.3.7.1.1	Intra-system EMC	2
3.3.7.2	Electromagnetic Interference (EMI)	2
3.3.7.3	Electrostatic Discharge (ESD)	2
3.3.7.4	Lightning	2
3.3.7.5	Bonding	2
3.3.7.5.1	Direct current (DC) bonding levels	2
3.3.8	Nameplates and product markings	2
3.3.8.1	Lettering, permanency, and legibility	2
3.3.8.2	Trainer nameplate	2
3.3.8.2.1	Data matrix bar codes	2
3.3.8.2.1.1	Trainer bar code	2
3.3.8.2.1.2	Initial Support Kit (ISK) bar code	2
3.3.8.3	Marking of units, assemblies, subassemblies, and parts	2
3.3.8.3.1	Units	2
3.3.8.3.1.1	Location of ID plates	2
3.3.8.3.1.2	ID plate information	2
3.3.8.3.2	Plug-in assemblies	2
3.3.8.3.2.1	Assembly chart	2
3.3.8.3.3	Fuse holders	2
3.3.8.3.3.1	Fuse rating	2
3.3.8.3.3.2	Spare fuses	2
3.3.8.3.4	Controls and indicating devices	2
3.3.8.3.4.1	Function and operation marking	2
3.3.8.3.4.2	Function and operation marking location	2
3.3.8.3.5	Sockets	2
3.3.8.3.5.1	Identification and marking of sockets	2
3.3.8.3.5.2	Chassis marking of sockets	2
3.3.8.3.5.3	Chassis marking of sockets, reverse side	2
3.3.8.3.5.4	Location chart for sockets	2
3.3.8.3.5.4.1	Location chart markings	2
3.3.8.3.6	Printed wiring boards	2
3.3.8.3.6.1	Electrical operation interference	2
3.3.8.3.6.2	Ink type	2
3.3.8.3.6.3	Marking considerations	2
3.3.8.3.7	Terminals, terminal blocks, and strips	2
3.3.8.3.7.1	Marking of terminals, terminal blocks, and strips	2
3.3.8.3.7.2	Marking for limited space areas	2
3.3.8.3.8	ESD marking	2
3.3.8.3.8.1	ESD sensitive assemblies	2
3.3.8.3.8.1.1	ESD symbols	2
3.3.8.3.8.1.2	ESD symbol location for assemblies	2
3.3.8.3.8.2	ESD sensitive equipment	2
3.3.8.3.8.2.1	ESD symbol location for equipment	2
3.3.8.3.8.2.2	ESD symbol visibility	2
3.3.8.3.8.2.3	ESD caution statement location for equipment	2
3.3.8.3.8.3	External equipment terminals	2
3.3.8.3.9	Fluid and gaseous lines	2
3.3.8.3.9.1	Fluid lines marking	2
3.3.8.3.9.2	Pressurized lines	2
3.3.8.3.9.3	Lines conducting hazardous fluids or dangerous gases	2
3.3.8.3.9.4	Line markings legibility and permanency	2
3.3.8.3.9.5	Line marking location	2
3.3.8.4	Reference designators	2
3.3.8.4.1	Replaced units	2
3.3.8.4.2	Major additions	2
3.3.8.4.3	Reference designators for new equipment	2
3.3.8.4.3.1	Assignment of reference designators	2
3.3.8.4.3.2	Identification of unmodified GFE	2
3.3.8.4.3.3	Marking and location of reference designators	2
3.3.8.5	Cable and wire markings	2
3.3.8.5.1	Damage due to markings	2
3.3.8.5.2	Cable and wire marking location	2
3.3.8.5.3	Cable marking method	2
3.3.8.5.4	Cable marking information	2
3.3.8.5.4.1	“W” and “P” cable designations	2
3.3.8.5.4.1.1	“W” cable designations	2
3.3.8.5.4.1.2	Numerical portion of “W” designations	2
3.3.8.5.4.1.3	“P” cable designations	2
3.3.8.5.4.1.4	Numerical portion of “P” designations	2
3.3.8.5.4.2	To-from designators	2
3.3.8.5.4.3	Assembly and part number	2
3.3.8.5.4.3.1	Assembly and part number marking location	2
3.3.8.6	CaNDI marking	2
3.3.8.6.1	Plug-in modules charts for CaNDI	2
3.3.8.6.2	CaNDI identification, nameplates, and labels	2
3.3.8.7	Warning marking for simulated and modified equipment	2
3.3.8.7.1	Trainer-use-only identification	2
3.3.8.7.1.1	Visibility of other markings	2
3.3.8.8	Safety markings	2
3.3.8.8.1	Safety marking of guards, barriers, and access doors, covers, and plates	2
3.3.8.8.2	Safety marking location	2
3.3.8.8.3	Marking of safety hazards	2
3.3.8.8.4	Marking of internal safety hazards	2
3.3.8.8.5	Laser safety marking	2
3.3.8.8.6	Equipment energized from multiple power sources	2
3.3.8.8.6.1	Multiple power sources marking location	2
3.3.9	Interchangeability	2
3.3.10	Electrical Safety	2
3.3.10.1	Emergency equipment power disconnect	2
3.3.10.2	Emercency power off (EPO) control devices	2
3.3.10.2.1	Equipment power removal	2
3.3.10.2.2	EPO control device characteristics	2
3.3.10.2.2.1	EPO control device visibility	2
3.3.10.2.2.2	EPO control device size	2
3.3.10.2.2.3	EPO control device inadvertent actuation	2
3.3.10.2.3	EPO control device marking	2
3.3.10.2.4	EPO control device marking method, permanency, legibility, durability, and lettering	2
3.3.10.3	Temperature sensing alarms	2
3.3.11	Human engineering	2
3.3.11.1	Human engineering performance	2
3.3.11.2	Trainee station Human-Machine Interface (HMI) characteristics	2
3.3.12	Security and privacy	2
3.3.12.1	Cybersecurity	2
3.3.12.1.1	Processing of national security information	2
3.3.12.1.2	Cybersecurity requirements for operating systems (OSs)	2
3.3.12.1.3	Network devices	2
3.3.12.1.4	Virus protection	2
3.3.12.1.5	Software management system	2
3.3.12.1.6	Configuration criteria	2
3.3.12.1.7	Audit logging	2
3.3.12.1.8	Backup management system	2
3.3.12.1.9	Account management	2
3.3.12.1.10	Clock synchronization	2
3.3.12.1.11	Encryption	2
3.3.12.1.11.1	Cryptography requirements	2
3.3.12.2	Cabinet door locks	2
3.3.13	Computational system requirements	2
3.3.13.1	Computational hardware components and peripherals	2
3.3.13.1.1	Storage devices	2
3.3.13.1.2	Network printer	2
3.3.13.1.3	Non-visual system displays	2
3.3.13.1.4	I/O subsystem	2
3.3.13.2	Scalable architecture	2
3.3.13.2.1	Scalable hardware architecture	2
3.3.13.2.2	Open systems architecture	2
3.3.13.2.3	Hardware commonality	2
3.3.13.2.4	Modular design	2
3.3.13.3	Backup and recovery	2
3.3.13.3.1	Backup images	2
3.3.13.3.2	Optical disc image	2
3.3.13.4	Spare computational resource requirements	2
3.3.13.4.1	Spare processing capacity	2
3.3.13.4.2	Spare memory	2
3.3.13.4.3	Spare primary mass storage	2
3.3.13.4.4	Delivered spare primary mass storage	2
3.3.13.4.5	Computational network spare capacity	2
3.3.13.4.6	I/O subsystem spare capacity	2
3.3.13.5	Training device software	2
3.3.13.5.1	General purpose computer operating systems	2
3.3.13.5.2	Open software architecture	2
3.3.13.5.3	Software data rights	2
3.3.13.5.4	Software High Order Languages (HOLs)	2
3.3.13.5.4.1	ASCII source code form	2
3.3.13.5.4.2	License restrictions	2
3.3.13.5.4.3	License maintenance	2
3.3.13.5.5	Software portability	2
3.3.13.5.6	New and modified software characteristics	2
3.3.13.5.7	Application software	2
3.3.13.5.8	Diagnostic and operational status software	2
3.3.13.5.8.1	Computer and peripheral diagnostic programs	2
3.3.13.5.8.2	Operational status checking software	2
3.3.13.5.9	Software coding and style	2
3.3.13.5.9.1	Source code commenting	2
3.3.13.5.9.1.1	Comment blocks	2
3.3.14	Logistics	2
3.3.14.1	Maintenance	2
3.3.14.2	Maintenance concept	2
3.3.14.2.1	Levels of maintenance	2
3.3.14.3	Qualitative maintainability requirements	2
3.3.14.3.1	Special tools	2
3.3.14.3.1.1	Special tools holders	2
3.3.14.3.2	Lamps	2
3.3.14.3.3	Blown fuse indicator lights	2
3.3.14.3.3.1	Visibility of CaNDI and GFE blown fuse indicator lights	2
3.3.14.3.4	Utility receptacles	2
3.3.14.3.4.1	Equipment racks in row configurations	2
3.3.14.3.4.2	Standalone equipment racks	2
3.3.14.3.4.3	Other trainer areas	2
3.3.14.3.5	Maintenance ICS	2
3.3.14.3.6	Accessibility	2
3.3.14.3.6.1	Non-repairable assemblies	2
3.3.14.3.6.2	Routine servicing and maintenance	2
3.3.14.3.6.3	Cable slack	2
3.3.14.3.6.3.1	Cables slack behind equipment panels	2
3.3.14.3.6.3.2	Cables in concealed spaces	2
3.3.14.3.6.3.3	Equipment connection and disconnection	2
3.3.14.3.6.4	Parts	2
3.3.14.3.6.4.1	Front panel and sub-chassis removal	2
3.3.14.3.6.5	Assemblies	2
3.3.14.3.6.5.1	Units, assemblies, subassemblies, and parts accessibility	2
3.3.14.3.6.5.2	Locking devices	2
3.3.14.3.6.5.3	Interior components and parts accessibility	2
3.3.14.3.6.5.4	Mounting screws, test points, adjustment points, lubricating points accessibility	2
3.3.14.3.6.5.5	Access panels	2
3.3.14.3.6.5.6	Accessibility for test probes and maintenance tools	2
3.3.14.3.6.5.7	Mounting of replaceable assemblies	2
3.3.14.3.6.6	Covers, panels, and doors	2
3.3.14.3.6.6.1	Equipment balance	2
3.3.14.3.6.6.2	Removable covers	2
3.3.14.3.6.6.3	Hinged front panels	2
3.3.14.3.6.6.4	Grounding of parts and assemblies mounted on hinged doors, panels, and covers	2
3.3.14.3.6.6.5	Opening of hinged panels	2
3.3.14.3.6.7	Handles	2
3.3.14.3.6.7.1	Enclosure handles	2
3.3.14.3.6.8	Modular assemblies	2
3.3.14.3.6.8.1	Keying of modular assemblies	2
3.3.14.3.6.8.2	Assembly sockets	2
3.3.14.3.6.8.3	Grouping of modular assemblies	2
3.3.14.3.7	Circuit cards	2
3.3.14.3.7.1	Circuit card connectors	2
3.3.14.3.7.2	Circuit card connectors, power and ground	2
3.3.14.3.7.3	Wiring board extender cards	2
3.3.14.3.7.3.1	Indexing system for extender cards	2
3.3.14.3.7.3.2	Conducting surfaces of extender cards	2
3.3.14.4	Facilities and facility equipment	2
3.3.14.4.1	Trainer maintenance access	2
3.3.14.4.2	Trainer power requirements	2
3.3.14.4.3	Safety	2
3.3.14.4.4	Cables	2
3.3.14.4.5	Equipment cooling	2
3.3.14.4.6	Life safety	2
3.3.14.4.7	Fire protection	2
3.4	Interface requirements	2
3.4.1	Government-Furnished Property (GFP) interfaces	2
3.4.2	External interface requirements	2
3.4.3	Internal interface requirements	2
3.5	Fabrication	2
3.5.1	Workmanship	2
3.5.1.1	Cleaning	2
3.5.1.2	Threaded fasteners	2
3.5.1.3	Wiring	2
3.5.1.3.1	Harnesses and cable form containment	2
3.5.1.3.2	Insulation deformation	2
3.5.1.3.3	Burns, abrading, and pinch marks	2
3.5.1.3.4	Wires and cables clearance	2
3.5.1.4	Shielding	2
3.5.1.4.1	Fraying	2
4.	VERIFICATION	2
4.1	Methods of verification	2
4.2	Verification events	2
4.3	Inspections and tests	2
4.3.1	Verification of performance and functional requirements for training devices	2
4.3.1.1	AH-1Z and UH-1Y training missions and objectives verification	2
4.3.1.2	Required modes	2
4.3.1.3	Aircraft simulation	2
4.3.1.3.1	Cockpit and helmet instrumentation verification	2
4.3.1.3.2	Cockpit and helmet instrumentation performance verification	2
4.3.1.3.3	DBA criteria data and simulation data hierarchy	2
4.3.1.4	System performance	2
4.3.1.5	Verification of environmental effects	2
4.3.1.6	Verification of major component characteristics requirements	2
4.3.1.7	Verification of mission computer	2
4.3.1.8	Weapons, countermeasures, and non-weapon stores verification	2
4.3.1.9	Flight dynamics modeling verification	2
4.3.1.9.1	Quantitative validation tests	2
4.3.1.9.2	Qualitative testing	2
4.3.1.9.3	Auto fidelity tests (AFT)	2
4.3.1.10	Verification of control loading system upgrade and refurbishment	2
4.3.1.11	Verification of IOS	2
4.3.1.12	VS performance and functional verification	2
4.3.1.13	Verification of Link 16	2
4.3.1.14	Verification of DORT	2
4.3.1.15	Computational systems requirements verification	2
4.3.1.16	Verification of I/O subsystem modification	2
4.3.1.17	Verification of software requirements	2
4.3.1.18	USMC TEn verification	2
4.3.1.18.1	Verification of detachable jump seats	2
4.3.2	Verification of flight training device performance and functional requirements	2
4.3.2.1	Training scenarios for flight training devices systems	2
4.3.2.2	Stress tests	2
4.3.2.3	Malfunctions tests	2
4.3.2.4	Threat environment tests	2
4.3.2.5	Circuit breaker tests	2
4.3.2.6	Cockpit and helmet instrumentation performance	2
4.3.2.7	Control loading system	2
4.3.2.7.1	Flight control mechanical characteristics tests	2
4.3.2.7.2	Coulomb friction	2
4.3.2.7.3	Viscous friction	2
4.3.2.7.4	System dynamic response verification	2
4.3.2.7.4.1	System dynamic response time history tests	2
4.3.2.8	Reliability verification	2
4.3.2.8.1	Assessment duration	2
4.3.2.8.2	Data collection and tracking	2
4.3.2.8.3	Failure criteria	2
4.3.2.8.3.1	Relevant failure classification	2
4.3.2.8.3.2	Failures applicable to MTBF determination	2
4.3.2.8.4	Reliability assessment conditions	2
4.3.2.8.5	Environmental conditions during reliability assessment	2
4.3.2.8.6	Electrical stresses during reliability assessment	2
4.3.2.9	Maintainability verifications	2
4.3.2.9.1	MTTR elements subject to tracking	2
4.3.2.10	Environmental conditions verification	2
4.3.2.10.1	Thermal survey	2
4.3.2.10.1.1	Temperature measurements	2
4.3.2.10.1.2	Temperature measuring instruments	2
4.3.2.10.1.3	Data recording	2
4.3.2.10.1.4	Data to be collected	2
4.3.2.10.2	Hot spots	2
4.3.2.11	Transportability verification	2
4.3.2.12	Materials and processes	2
4.3.2.13	Manufacturing processes verification	2
4.3.2.14	E3 verifications	2
4.3.2.14.1	EMC verifications	2
4.3.2.14.1.1	Intra system EMC verifications	2
4.3.2.14.2	EMI verifications	2
4.3.2.14.3	ESD verifications	2
4.3.2.14.4	Facility lightning verifications	2
4.3.2.14.5	Bonding verifications	2
4.3.2.15	Nameplate and product markings verification	2
4.3.2.16	Interchangeability verification	2
4.3.2.17	Electrical safety verification	2
4.3.2.18	Human engineering verification	2
4.3.2.19	Cybersecurity verifications	2
4.3.2.20	Computational system verifications	2
4.3.2.20.1	Computational system test procedures	2
4.3.2.20.2	Computational system software tests	2
4.3.2.20.3	Cold-start initial conditions	2
4.3.2.20.4	Cold-start results	2
4.3.2.20.4.1	Spare measurement program(s)	2
4.3.2.20.4.1.1	Spare processing capacity testing	2
4.3.2.20.4.1.2	Spare memory testing	2
4.3.2.20.4.1.3	Spare storage testing	2
4.3.2.20.4.1.3.1	Delivered spare mass storage testing	2
4.3.2.20.4.1.4	Computational network spare capacity testing	2
4.3.2.20.4.1.5	I/O subsystem spare capacity testing	2
4.3.2.21	Logistics verifications	2
4.3.2.21.1	Maintenance verification	2
4.3.2.21.2	Qualitative maintainability requirements verification	2
4.3.2.22	Facilities and facility equipment	2
4.3.3	Interface verifications for training devices	2
4.3.4	Fabrication verification for training devices	2
5.	PACKAGING	2
6.	NOTES	2
6.1	Definitions	2
6.1.1	Commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) item	2
6.1.2	Commercial Item	2
6.1.3	Control Drawing	2
6.1.4	Failure definitions and criteria	2
6.1.4.1	Chargeable failures	2
6.1.4.2	Non-chargeable failures	2
6.1.4.3	Non-relevant failures	2
6.1.4.4	Relevant failures	2
6.1.5	Cybersecurity-Enabled Operating System	2
6.1.6	Initial Support Kit (ISK)	2
6.1.7	Interchangeable item	2
6.1.8	Non-Developmental Item (NDI)	2
6.1.9	Scheduled Maintenance	2
6.1.10	Trainer Peculiar Equipment (TPE)	2
6.1.11	Unscheduled On-site Maintenance	2
6.1.12	User Interface	2
6.1.13	Verification methods	2
6.1.13.1	Analysis	2
6.1.13.2	Demonstration	2
6.1.13.3	Examination	2
6.1.13.4	Test	2

CUI	PRF 200037
	11 April 2022

CUI	PRF 200037
	11 April 2022

Para./Section Title Page i

CUI

FIGURES

Fig. No.	Title	Page
FIGURE 1.	Sample Trainer Nameplate	2
FIGURE 2.	Unit ID Plate	2
FIGURE 3.	ESD Symbols	2
FIGURE 4.	ESD Caution Label	2
FIGURE 5.	Examples of Cable Markings	2
FIGURE 6.	Trainer Use Only Identification	2
FIGURE 7.	Multiple Power Source Label	2

APPENDICES

Appendix	Title	Page
A	H-1 Training Devices Baseline Configuration Upgrade Common Image Generator and Synthetic Environment Visual and Sensor Database and Moving Models Performance Requirements	2
B	H-1 Training Devices Visual Display System (VDS) Performance Requirements	2
C	Systems Malfunctions	2
D	Military Simulator Flight Fidelity Validation Tests and Tolerances Rotary Wing Aircraft	2
E	CAOE Parts List	2
F	TEn Controlled Moving Models	2
G	AH-1Z and UH-1Y Technical Refresh Pre-existing Training System Deficiencies	Error! Bookmark not defined.

CUI	PRF 200037
11 April 2022

Table of Contents xvi

CUI

System Specification For United States Marine Corps H-1 Training Devices AH-1Z and UH-1Y

SCOPE

This specification establishes the functional, performance and testing requirements for training device modernizations to Flight Training Devices (FTDs) and Full Flight Simulator (FFS) located at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) New River, NC; MCAS Kaneohe Bay, HI; JRB Belle Chasse, LA; JRB McGuire, NJ; MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA; and MCAS Futenma, JP.

Identification The H-1 training device modernization will upgrade a total of sixteen existing training devices consisting of FTDs and an FFS for UH-1Y and AH-1Z aircraft. The primary use of the FTDs and FFS will be to instruct United States Marine Corps (USMC) H-1 pilots and co-pilots in the skills necessary to complete the AH-1Z and UH-1Y Training and Readiness (T&R) manual throughout all stages of pilot and co-pilot development. Device numbers will be used to identify aircraft type, trainer type, and FTD location. For the purposes of this specification, the terms FTD, FFS, trainer(s), training system, and training device are equivalent and refer to all devices listed below, unless otherwise indicated. The trainers are located at the sites below.

a. 2F196-1 UH-1Y FTD, MCAS New River, NC;

b. 2F197B-2 AH-1Z FTD, MCAS New River, NC;

c. 2F226-1 UH-1Y FTD, MCAS New River, NC;

d. 2F227-2 AH-1Z FTD, MCAS New River, NC;

e. 2F196B-3 UH-1Y FTD, MCAS Kaneohe Bay, HI;

f. 2F227-1 AH-1Z FTD, MCAS Kaneohe Bay, HI;

g. 2F226-2 UH-1Y FTD, JRB Belle Chasse, LA;

h. 2F227-4 AH-1Z FTD, JRB Belle Chasse, LA;

i. 2F196B-4 UH-1Y FTD, JRB McGuire, NJ;

j. 2F227-3 AH-1Z FTD, JRB McGuire, NJ.

k. 2F196B-2 UH-1Y FTD, MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA;

l. 2F197-1 AH-1Z FTD, MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA;

m. 2F206-1 UH-1Y FFS, MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA;

n. 2F215-1 AH-1Z FFS, MCAS Camp Pendleton, CA;

o. 2F226-3 UH-1Y FTD, MCAS Futenma, JP; and

p. 2F227-5 AH-1Z FTD, MCAS Futenma, JP.

APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

General The documents listed in this section are specified in sections 3 and 4 of this specification. This section does not include documents cited in other sections of this specification or recommended for additional information or as examples. While every effort has been made to ensure the completeness of this list, document users are cautioned that they must meet the specified requirements of documents cited in sections 3 and 4 this specification, whether or not they are listed.

Government documents Specifications, standards, and handbooks The following specifications, standards, and handbooks of the exact revision listed below form a part of this specification to the extent specified herein.

Department of Defense (DoD) Standard Practices

MILSTD130N

Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property

MIL-STD-461G

Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment

MIL-STD-464D

Electromagnetic Environmental Effects, Requirements for Systems

(Copies of these documents are available online at http://assist.dla.mil, or from the Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.)

Other Government documents, drawings, and publications The following Government documents, drawings, and publications of the exact revision level shown form a part of this document to the extent specified herein.

United States (U.S.) Army Corps of Engineers

EM38511

Safety - Safety and Health Requirements

(Available: http://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-manuals/em385-1-1/2003_English/toc.htm)

Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Documents

NAVAIR 01-H1AAD-1

Naval Air Training and Operations Procedures Standardization (NATOPS) Flight Manual, AH-1Z Helicopter, 15 January 2020

NAVAIR 01-110HCG-1

Naval Air Training and Operations Procedures Standardization (NATOPS) Flight Manual, UH-1Y Aircraft, 15 January 2020

NTTP 3-22.3-UH1

Naval Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (NTTP) UH-1 Combat Aircraft Fundamentals

NTTP 3-22.3-AH1

Air Naval Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (NTTP) AH1, August 2015

NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-AH-1Z

AH-1Z Naval Aviation Technical Information Product (NATIP), 22 March 2022

NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-UH1Y

UH-1Y Naval Aviation Technical Information Product (NATIP), 22 March 2022

NAVMC 3500.104C

UH-1Y Training and Readiness (T&R) Manual, 24 November 2021

NAVMC 3500.20D

AH-1Z Training and Readiness (T&R) Manual, 24 November 2021

20-AVI-H1SS-023 Rev -

System Specification for Digital Interoperability (DI) Increment I on AH-1Z and UH-1Y

(Copies of the above documents will be provided by the Naval Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD) as Government-Furnished Information)

Tactical Environment (TEn) Documents

NAVAIR 28-TEN6.2-INS-01

Overview and Installation Guide, 20 March 2018

NAVAIR 28-TEN6.2-ICD-01

Interface Control Document (ICD), Rev. K, 11 November 2016

NAVAIR 28-TEN6.2-TST-01-VOL3

Trainer Test Procedures and Results Report (TTPRR) Volume 3, 8 February 2018

NAVAIR 28-TEN6.2-USG-01

TEn User’s Guide, 20 March 2018

NAVAIR 28-TEN6.2-NOT-01

USMC TEn Release Notes, 17 April 2018

(Copies of the above TEn documents will be provided as Government-Furnished Information.)

DoD Handbooks

MIL-HDBK-454N

General Guidelines For Electronic Equipment

(Copies of these documents are available online at http://assistdocs.com/search/search_basic.cfm, or from the Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.)

DoD Cybersecurity Documents

DoDI 8500.01

Cybersecurity dated 14 Mar 2014

(The above document are downloadable from www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/850001_2014.pdf)

Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS) Instruction

CNSSI 1253

Security Categorization and Control Selection for National Security Systems, 27 Mar 2014

(The above document are downloadable from https://www.cnss.gov/CNSS/issuances/Instructions.cfm)

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

21 CFR 1040

Performance Standards for Light-Emitting Products

29 CFR 1910

Occupational Safety and Health Standards

(Copies of these regulations are downloadable from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR)

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) - Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)

FIPS 140-3

Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules, dated 22 March, 2019

(The above document is downloadable from http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips140-2/fips1402.pdf)

Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC)

UFC 3-600

Design of Fire Protection System

(The above documents are downloadable from http://www.wbdg.org/references/pa_dod.php)

U.S. Navy Publications

USNTPS-FTM-No 106

United States Naval Test Pilot School Manual – Rotary Wing Performance

USNTPS-FTM-No 107

United States Naval Test Pilot School Manual – Rotary Wing Stability and Control

(Available from: http://doni.daps.dla.mil)

Non-Government publications The following documents of the exact revision listed below form a part of this document to the extent specified herein.

American National Standards Institute (ANSI)

ANSI Z535.1-2006 (R 2011)

Safety Colors

ANSI Z535.2-2011

Environmental and Facility Safety Signs

ANSI Z535.3-2011

Criteria for Safety Symbols

ANSI Z535.4-2011

Product Safety Signs and Labels

ANSI Z535.5-2011

Safety Tags and Barricade Tapes (for Temporary Hazards)

(Copies of these documents are available from www.ansi.org, http://global.ihs.com/, or Global Engineering Documents, 15 Inverness Way, East Englewood, CO 80112.)

ANSI/ESDA/JEDEC

ANSI/ESDA/JEDEC JS-001-2014

For Electrostatic Discharge Sensitivity Testing, Human Body Model (HBM) - Component Level

(Copies of these documents are available from www.ansi.org, http://global.ihs.com/, or Global Engineering Documents, 15 Inverness Way, East Englewood, CO 80112.)

American Society of Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)

Unnumbered Document

Handbook - Fundamentals (I-P), 2017 Edition

(Copies of the Above Handbook can be obtained from ASHRAE.org at https://www.ashrae.org/resources--publications/handbook)

American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

ASME Y14.44-2008

Reference Designations for Electrical and Electronics Parts and Equipment

(Copies of this document are available from http://www.asme.org, http://global.ihs.com, or Global Engineering Documents, 15 Inverness Way, East Englewood, CO 80155-6800)

Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA)

EIA RS-471

Symbol and Label for Electrostatic Sensitive Devices

(Copies of this document are available from www.eia.org, or http://global.ihs.com/, or Global Engineering Documents, 15 Inverness Way, East Englewood, CO 80155-6800

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

IEEE 1003.1-2008

Standard for Information Technology – Portable Operating System Interface ( POSIX)

(Copies of this document are available from www.ieee.org or IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854-1331.)

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA):

NFPA-70

National Electrical Code, 2010 Edition

NFPA-72

National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2015 Edition

NFPA-75

Standard for the Protection of Information Technology Equipment 2009 Edition

NFPA-90A

Standard for the Installation of Air-Conditioning and Ventilating Systems

NFPA-101

Life Safety Code

NFPA-110

Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, 2016 Edition

NFPA-2001

Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems, 2012 Edition

(Copies of these documents are available from http://www.nfpa.org/catalog or National Fire Protection Association, 11 Tracy Drive, Avon, MA 02322)

Order of precedence In the event of a conflict between the text of this specification and the references cited herein, the text of this specification takes precedence. Nothing in this specification, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations, unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

REQUIREMENTS

Requirements in this specification shall be applicable to all devices below unless indicated otherwise:

a. 2F196-1 UH-1Y FTD,

b. 2F197B-2 AH-1Z FTD,

c. 2F226-1 UH-1Y FTD,

d. 2F227-2 AH-1Z FTD,

e. 2F196B-3 UH-1Y FTD,

f. 2F227-1 AH-1Z FTD,

g. 2F226-2 UH-1Y FTD,

h. 2F227-4 AH-1Z FTD,

i. 2F196B-4 UH-1Y FTD,

j. 2F227-3 AH-1Z FTD,

k. 2F196B-2 UH-1Y FTD,

l. 2F197-1 AH-1Z FTD,

m. 2F206-1 UH-1Y FFS,

n. 2F215-1 AH-1Z FFS,

o. 2F226-3 UH-1Y FTD, and

p. 2F227-5 AH-1Z FTD.

Performance and functional requirements The modified training device performance and functional baseline shall

a. Preserve the performance and functionality defined by the results from the Baseline Configuration Audit (BCA) and the Pre-Modification Inspection (PMI) of the existing training devices, as specified in the contract, to describe the simulation characteristics and trainer performance of each flight training device prior to contractor modifications, including all functional relationships between various systems of the trainer, such as flight fidelity, control loading, cockpit shaker systems, instructor stations, dynamic motion seats, cockpit, debrief, and Visual System (VS).

b. Include the added functionality and performance defined in this specification (PRF 200037).

c. Not introduce new deficiencies to the BCA and PMI results.

Training missions and objectives The training devices shall provide

a. full tactical and familiarization navigation training;

b. night vision goggle (NVG) training;

c. instrument flight rules (IFR) navigation;

d. emergency procedures training to AH-1Z and UH-1Y pilots and co-pilots;

e. performance and functionality necessary to conduct training of safety of flight, crew coordination, Naval Aviation Training and Operational Procedure Standardization (NATOPS) procedures, all available aircraft communications modes, shipboard operations, forward looking infrared (FLIR), basic and advanced tactics, weapons delivery procedures, flight formation and Electronic Counter Measures (ECM) operations;

f. interoperability network functionality to connect to the classified Government Aviation Distributed Virtual Training Environment (ADVTE) network via the Tactical Environment (TEn) as a separate entity in a shared synthetic environment at training locations that have the network available to connect; and

g. simulator training for the contents of T&R syllabus NAVMC 3500.104C and Error! Reference source not found..

Required modes The training devices shall have the same modes as the 2F197-1 device.

Aircraft simulation Design Basis Aircraft (DBA) The DBA as used herein shall be representative of the AH-1Z Lot 16 (Serial Number (S/N)169862) and UH-1Y Lot 13 (S/N 169291) aircraft.

DBA criteria data The trainer shall simulate or stimulate hardware and software elements as found on the DBA equipment except as required elsewhere in this specification.

Simulation data hierarchy Criteria data order of precedence shall be

a. directly measured aircraft flight test data (highest precedence),

b. corrected and normalized flight test data,

c. estimated data derived from engineering test facilities such as test stands and validated flight simulations,

d. design data, and

e. data derived by analytical methods.

System performance The training devices shall

a. have DBA systems simulated or stimulated for all modes of operation In Accordance With (IAW) 3.1.2, and

b. have simulated aircraft systems in the AH-1Z FTD/FFS and UH-1Y FTD/FFS operate and respond to controls and stimuli in the same way that the corresponding system operates and responds IAW NAVAIR 01-H1AAD-1 and NAVAIR 01-110HCG-1 (hereinafter referred to as the AH-1Z and UH-1Y NATOPS Manuals); and NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-UH1Y and NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-AH-1Z (hereinafter referred to the UH-1Y and AH-1Z NATIP manuals).

Avionics equipment performance Stimulated or simulated aircraft avionics equipment that is integrated as part of the FTD/FFS shall match the performance of the DBA equipment, except as required elsewhere in this specification.

Avionics data ports The FTDs/FFSs shall have avionics data ports

a. to monitor, access, and record 1553 and ARINC-429 databus messages,

b. be placed at the Systems Engineering Integrated Product Team (IPT) chosen location.

Warning, cautions, and advisories The training devices shall display have aircraft warnings, cautions, advisories (WCA) IAW the DBA and C.1.

Environmental effects Wind and wake Mountain Wind The following mountain wind types and wind characterisitics shall be modeled:

a. boundary layer winds,

b. demacation line phenomena,

c. anabatic winds,

d. katabatic winds,

e. mountain waves and rotors,

f. turbulence

(1) mechanical turbulence,

(2) convective turbulence,

(3) shear zone turbulence,

(4) air mass turbulence,

(5) backlash turbulence,

(6) downflow turbulence.

g. valley winds,

h. converging

(1) diverging,

(2) funneling.

Mountain areas The wind model area for mountain winds shall

a. account for real-world effects in the mountainous terrain of the Bridgeport area as defined by A.3.1.3.2.5.1,

b. account for real-world effects in the mountainous terrain of the Hawaii area defined by A.3.1.3.2.6.1, and

c. be limited to 0.5 geocells in size for each area.

Ship wakes and airwakes Wake effects shall

a. be simulated on the ownship helo resulting from the close proximity to surface ship structures and take into account ambient winds, surface ship speed, ownship helo speed, turbulence, and seastate effects;

b. be simulated on the ownship helo that are caused by aircraft wakes emanating from other aircraft in close proximity.

Major cockpit component characteristics The performance characteristics for the major cockpit components shall be IAW the following subordinate paragraphs.

Multi-Functional Display (MFD) The MFD shall have bezel keys IAW NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-UH1Y and NAVAIR NTRP 3-22.4-AH-1Z for the following devices: 2F196-1, 2F226-1, 2F197B-2, 2F196B-3, 2F227-1, 2F196B-4, 2F226-2, 2F197-1, 2F206-1, 2F215-1, and 2F196B-2.

IOS and TEn display in the MFD The MFDs for the training devices shall

a. have simulated MFDs at each pilot and co-pilot station

b. display the IOS on the left MFD and TEn on the right MFD,

c. operate the IOS and TEn via the MFD through touch-screen functionality, and

d. provide the multi-touch technology to enable the pinch to zoom functionality on both MFDs.

Circuit breaker panels The circuit breaker panels in the training device shall

a. replicate the form, fit, function, and performance of the DBA; and

b. be controlled from the IOS.

External control lighting panel The external lighting control panel shall replicate the form, fit, function, and performance of the DBA.

Helmet Mounted Sight and Display (HMSD) The training devices shall be able to plug in a HMSD into the cockpit and emulate the DBA’s functionality.

Mission computer The training device shall have

a. two technology refresh mission computers (TRMC) containing the latest version of Combined System Configuration Set (CSCS) Operational Flight Program at time of Critical Design Review (CDR), and

b. the CSCS shall integrate and operate with the training device.

Weapon, countermeasure systems, and non-weapon stores UH-1Y devices .The UH-1Y weapons, sensors, and countermeasure systems shall

a. be simulated IAW NTRP 3-22.4-UH-1Y,

b. react to the effects provided by the simulated world based on NTTP 3-22.3-UH1 Weapons The training devices shall simulate the following UH-1Y weapons:

c. automatic gun - GAU-17/A,

d. automatic gun - GAU 21,

e. automatic gun – M240.

Sensors and countermeasures The training devices shall simulate the following UH-1Y sensors:

a. AN/APR-39D(V)2 Radar Warning System (RWS),

b. AN/AAR-47(V)2 Missile/Laser Warning System (MLWS),

c. AN/ALE-47 Counter Measure Dispensing System (CMDS),

d. BRITE Star II.

BRITE Star II simulation The BRITE Star II shall

a. be modeled IAW the DBA Brite Star II sensor,

b. have selectable and scalable degradations in pre-point,

c. have a maintaining point (drift),

d. have image focus, and

e. have gain/level requirements to break out targets.

BRITE Star II image simulation The BRITE Star II CTV and FLIR image shall be simulated IAW Appendix A.

AH-1Z devices

a. The AH-1Z weapons, sensors, and countermeasure systems shallbe simulated IAW NTRP 3-22.4-AH-1Z,

b. react to the effects provided by the simulated world based on NTTP 3-22.3-AH1 Weapons The training devices shall simulate the following AH-1Z weapons:

a. Hellfire II missile - AGM-114K and AGM-114N

(1) Accurately reflect all Hellfire II missile station failures on MFD, aural tones, and WCAs.

b. JAGM missile,

c. Sidewinder – AIM-9M,

d. Rockets - MK 66 2.75-inch

(1) high explosive,

(2) illumination,

(3) smoke,

(4) flechette.

e. APKWS II,

f. M-197 20-mm cannon.

Sensors and countermeasures The training devices shall simulate the following AH-1Z sensors:

a. AN/APR-39D(V)2 RWS,

b. AN/AAR-47(V)2 MLWS,

c. AN/ALE-47 CMDS,

d. Target Sight System (TSS).

Target Sight System (TSS) simulation The TSS sensor shall

a. be modeled IAW the DBA TSS,

b. have selectable and scalable degradations in pre-point,

c. have a maintaining point (drift),

d. have image focus, and

e. have gain/level requirements to break out targets.

TSS image simulation The TSS CTV and FLIR image shall be simulated IAW Appendix A.

Flares The training devices shall simulate the following flares:

a. flares (illumination) – LUU-2,

b. flares (illumination) - SUU-25,

c. flares (illumination) - SUU-44.

Flight modeling Flight dynamics modeling The AH-1Z and UH-1Y aero models shall

a. simulate the dynamics of the aircraft based on the solution of the six degrees of freedom equations of motion;

b. respond to all flight and power plant controls and the simulated environment IAW the aircraft validation data;

c. include aerodynamic, inertial, and aero elastic effects for altitudes up to service ceiling as specified in the NATOPS manuals and airspeeds to cover the complete documented flight envelope of the DBA(s);

d. provide flight dynamics representing the DBAs to the extent required in the flight model tolerances listed in Appendix D and as required to perform intended training tasks;

e. provide trainer tests and results IAW U.S. Naval Test Pilot School Manuals for performance testing (USNTPS-FTM-No 106) and stability and control testing (USNTPS-FTM-No 107USNTPS-FTM-No 107);

f. record and plot the engineering parameters associated with the flight test data in the trainer.

Blade element rotor modeling The AH-1Z and UH-1Y rotor models shall

a. utilize the blade element modeling approach for the rotor systems to provide a high-fidelity simulation of helicopter static and dynamic performance throughout the flight envelope;

b. utilize a model structure that is directly analogous to the physical components of the actual rotor system for the DBA, to facilitate the simulation of malfunctions and airframe component changes;

c. include degrees of freedom for individual blade flapping and lead lag characteristics;

d. include the effects of non-uniform inflow distribution and inflow dynamics;

e. simulate flight conditions, including edge of envelope flight conditions, without extensive special function tables for fine-tuning fidelity (e.g. retreating blade stall, vortex ring state, and autorotations);

f. provide smooth continuous real-time solutions for rotor forces and moments;

g. have an azimuth step increment per computation cycle of 6 degrees or less;

h. have no less than 9 blade elements per blade utilized for calculating forces and moments;

i. include degrees of freedom for individual blade bending characteristics.

Automated Test Guide (ATG) functionality An ATG functionality that includes the following features shall be provided:

computer controlled cyclic, collective, pedal, throttle, and engine inputs to actuate the flight and engine dynamics of the trainer and record the results;

automatic trim at a stabilized flight condition and automatic execution of standard open and closed loop flight test techniques;

aircraft flight test data used to excite trainer dynamics to verify trainer fidelity by directly comparing trainer response with recorded aircraft flight test data;

test results recorded and output to a digital file and have control function to print results;

output format for each test including the type of test, test conditions, aircraft configuration, criteria data basis, clearly labeled axes with units, time histories, cross plots, and date and time of test execution;

automatic comparison of test results to criteria data with specified tolerances to facilitate analysis with respect to test pass/fail criteria

(1) for time histories, tolerances plotted in the form of min and max bands around the criteria data;

(2) tolerances for cross plots plotted as high and low bars above and below the data point;

(3) automatic scoring of the test results with an accurate indication of “PASS” or “FAIL” status.

tolerance band limits for time history plots noted using dashed or dotted lines;

function and control to plot aircraft criteria data, to select a previous set of trainer data, and to select the most current set of trainer test results simultaneously, individually or in any combination of pairs, on each plot;

automatic recording and comparison of test results to criteria data with specified tolerances provided so that ATG execution can occur singly from the set of all tests, in batches selected by the test personnel, and in total so that no human intervention is required and the test(s) runs autonomously to completion within 4 hours or less with or without training device hardware in the loop as selected by NAWCTSD test personnel.

Control Loading System (CLS) upgrade and refurbishment The control loading system and associated hardware shall meet the performance listed below:

Friction and inertia As a design goal, the friction and inertia of the installed CLS operating with a zero force model shall be less than the friction and inertia of the AH-1Z and UH-1Y aircraft flight controls. The friction and inertia of the aircraft flight control system cannot be accurately measured for the purposes of criteria data for trainer validation. The friction and inertia requirement is specified to emphasize the importance of proper mechanical design. It is essential that the friction and inertia be minimized in order to match aircraft force versus displacement and stick release tests (that are measurable) with enough margin to allow the trainer friction and inertial characteristics to be constructed via software modeling.

Coulomb friction Coulomb friction in each control axis shall be less than one pound using a quasi-static control sweep with a zero force model.

Viscous friction Viscous friction in each control axis shall be less than one pound, with no evidence of velocity limiting, using rapid control sweep with a zero force model.

Smoothness The total CLS actuators plus mechanical linkage and cockpit controls shall not exhibit any pilot perceivable resonances or instabilities as a result of pilot induced inputs during any simulated flight or malfunction conditions.

Stiffness As a design goal, the stiffness of the installed CLS shall be greater than the control system stiffness of the DBA aircraft throughout the full range of movement including the stops. The stiffness of the aircraft flight controls is not easily measured. However, it is essential that the stiffness of the trainer flight controls is designed greater than that of the aircraft in order to meet the desired mechanical characteristics tests via software modeling. The simulation of control stops shall exhibit no effects that are unrepresentative of the aircraft.

Flight control tolerances The pilot station shall provide flight controls that reflect the feel, damping, friction, force, inertia and response effects representative of similar actions in the modes of operation of the DBA using the tolerances specified in Appendix D.

Secondary control assembly Secondary control assemblies shall consist of the engine throttles and rotor brake.

Throttles The AH-1Z and UH-1Y trainer throttles shall:

a. replicate the form, fit, function of the DBA aircraft throttles throughout the normal operating flight envelope and all identified emergency procedures,

b. be automatically repositioned to a new flight condition or initial condition (IC) when the trainer is repositioned from the IOS,

c. meet the following tolerances

1) rotational displacement: ± 1%;

2) freeplay: 1/8 inch measured linearly at the circumference of the throttle;

3) friction, force, and throttle stop characteristics: Pilot qualitative assessment.

Rotor brake The AH-1Z and UH-1Y trainer rotor brake shall

a. replicate the form, fit and function of the DBA aircraft rotor brake in accordance with aircraft drawings and NATOPS procedures,

b. be actuated by the control loading system to provide accurate force feedback and representative functionality;

c. Meet the following tolerances

(1) applied force: ± 1lb or 10% whichever is greater.

System dynamic response This section establishes requirements for end to end dynamic response (from flight control input to first response) of the visual system, cockpit shaker system, and primary cockpit instruments to ensure efficient hardware/software interface design. The worst case throughput delay time (i.e. from step input to first detectable response) in the cueing systems described below shall not exceed 100 milliseconds and as a design goal, the relative responses of the cueing systems be closely coupled to provide integrated pilot sensory cues.

Instructor Operator Station (IOS) IOS computational systems performance The training devices IOS’s computational systems’ performance characteristics shall be IAW 3.1.13.2.3.

IOS monitor screens The IOS monitors shall

a. be touch screen enabled, and

b. not negatively impact the NVG visual scene.

IOS software The IOS shall utilize the Government provided functional software baseline provided at Post Award Conference (PAC).

Flight parameters IOS test page The IOS shall have

a. a page containing a consolidated list of flight test parameters to evaluate the aerodynamic fidelity of the trainer and include the following:

(1) flight test conditions,

(2) aircraft state parameters,

(3) control positions,

(4) engine and rotor parameters,

(5) parameters arranged in logical groupings to facilitate ease of evaluation, and

(6) the final list of parameters to be deteremind by the Aero IPT at CDR.

IOS cross-country maps

TBD

Instrument Approach Procedures (IAPs) The IOS shall

a. display IAPs listed;

b. provide the function and control for importing digital IAPs in Adobe Acrobat PDF format from external sources via digital media (e.g., CD, DVD);

c. show an ownship icon over the displayed IAP representing the position and heading of the ownship within the simulation;

d. have a representative icon displaying current ownship position relative to the chart symbology;

e. have the function and control to erase and de-clutter tracks from the display;

f. be the latest version available as of CDR;

g. provide all IAPs for the primary and secondary airfields, where available, for the airfields listed in:

(1) East Coast database airfields,

(2) Asia-Pacific database airfields,

(3) West Coast database airfields,

(4) Iraq-Hormuz database airfields,

(5) Afghanistan database primary airfields,

(6) Bridgeport MWTC winter version database airfields, and

(7) Hawaii database airfields.

Ground…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Apr 29, 2022.