Atch 5-Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

FA3020-21-R-0001

Attachment 8

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Kitchen Exhaust Hood Certification & Cleaning Services

A. General Information: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ________________________________________________________________

Address: ________________________________ Telephone Number: ___________________ ________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

Point of Contact: _______________________________________

Contract Number: ______________________________________

Contract Period or Dates of Performance and Dollar Amount (See Notes):

Basic Period of Performance: _______________________Amount: __$_______________ Option Period One of Performance: __________________Amount: __$_______________ Option Period Two of Performance: __________________Amount: __$_______________

Option Period Three of Performance: _________________Amount: __$_______________ Option Period Four of Performance: __________________Amount: __$_______________ Total Contract Amount: _$__________________________

Project Title: _______________________________________________________________________ Number of Facilities Contractor provides Exhaust Hoods Services for: _________________________________ Total Number of Exhaust Hoods: _________________________________________________________ Frequencies of Cleaning: ______________________________________________________ Was this a competitive award? _________________ Description of Work: _________________________________________________________________

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel

Notes

(1) When assessing past performance, only performance that occurred within the last three (3) years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation FA3020-21-R-0001) will be considered. As part of our evaluation, past performance information older than 3 years will not be considered. Most recent contracts must have been performed for at least 6 months prior to the issuance date of this solicitation to be considered.

(2) If offeror holds or has held other contracts for Kitchen Exhaust Hoods Services with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

(3) If the total dollar amount of the contract was/is for more than one year, indicate the dollar value for each year/option period and then give the total value of the contract.

FA3020-21-R-0001

Attachment 8

B. Respondent Information:

Name of Respondent: _____________________________Title: __________________________________

Address: ______________________________________________________________________________

Telephone Number: ___________________________Fax Number: ________________________________

E-mail Address: ________________________________________

C. Mail, Electronically Mail, or Fax Completed Survey Form to the address below. The survey needs to be received no later than 11:00 am Central Standard Time on Monday, March 15, 2021:

Address: 82d Contracting Squadron

Attn: Lt. Anna Pastor 206 J Avenue, Bldg 1662 Sheppard AFB TX 76311-2743

E-Mail: anna_patricia.pastor.1@us.af.mil and jerry.roberts@us.af.mil

Fax: 940-676-3784 mailto:anna_patricia.pastor.1@us.af.mil mailto:jerry.roberts@us.af.mil

FA3020-21-R-0001

Attachment 8

D. Performance Information: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, VG, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Please provide a narrative explanation for any ratings that are Exceptional, Marginal or Unsatisfactory.

E VG S M U N

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Assign a Performance Rating by placing an “X” in the appropriate column

E VG S M U N

1 Contractor provided experienced key personnel that met or exceeded the qualifications of the position as described in the contract.

Comments:

2 Contractor delegated authority to project managers and supervisors.

3 Contractor supported actions taken by key personnel.

FA3020-21-R-0001

Attachment 8

E VG S M U N

4 Contractor participated in solving significant local problems.

5 Contractor provided replacement of key personnel, when necessary, with personnel that met or exceeded the qualifications of the position as described in the contract.

6 Accuracy and timeliness of schedules, milestones and administrative requirements.

7 Met established schedules.

8 Accuracy and timeliness of invoices.

9 Contractor interaction with the Government.

10 Contractor’s behavior is reasonable and cooperative.

11 Contractor is customer oriented.

12 Contractor followed accepted Quality Control Plan to meet contract requirements.

13 Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and in accordance with Quality Control Plan.

14 Contractor identified and displayed initiative to resolve issues/problems in a timely manner.

15 Contractor suggested alternative approaches to issues/problems.

16 Contractor was responsive to contract changes.

17 Contractor cooperated with Government after contract award.

FA3020-21-R-0001

Attachment 8

18 Has the contractor ever had financial difficulties (making payroll, payments to sub-contractors, employees, etc.)?

If Yes, please provide comments:

Yes/No

19 Has the contractor ever received a notice of noncompliance? (Law, Regulations, Environment, Safety, etc.)?

20 Was the contractor ever issued a cure show notice?

21 Was the contractor ever issued a show cause notice?

22 Would you award another contract to this contractor?

If No, please provide comments:

23 Is the contractor rated in CPARS?

Comments:

Yes/No

E VG S M U N

How would you rate contractor’s overall performance?

Additional Remarks: _______________________________________________________