Atch 12 - DRAFT_Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

HTC71125RD002

Attachment 12 CUI (when filled in) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Past Performance Questionnaire

USTRANSCOM

Enterprise Architecture, Data, and Engineering (EADE)

HTC71125RD002

Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract or workload identified below. Your ratings should include comments for any area rated Exceptional or lower than Satisfactory. Rating definitions are provided on the last page. Please respond no later than 8:00 AM Central Time (CT), 30 November 2024 by sending the entire completed questionnaire, in PDF format, via e-mail to all individuals below.

Scott AFB, IL 62225-5015 E-mail: meggan.a.debrobander.civ@mail.mil

NOTE: Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) reports may be reviewed for the contractors in addition to the responses to this questionnaire. Although you may have filed a CPARS for the contract listed, we would appreciate your response to this questionnaire because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.

Index Number _____________________ (To be completed by USTC/TCAQ upon receipt of completed questionnaire.)

I. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION

Contractor (Company/Division):

Contract Number:

Task Order Number (If Applicable):

Contract Type (FFP, CPFF, etc.):

Work Performed Title:

Brief Description of Work Performed:

Dollar value:

Period of Performance:

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Name:

Position/Title:

Business Address:

Relation to Program:

Phone : (DSN)_____________________________(Commercial)__________________________________

FAX : (DSN) _____________________________(Commercial) __________________________________

Other suggested points of contact:

Please note that if your responses indicate a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commenter’s name or office.

III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

NOTE: Remarks are not limited.

1. Staffing

a. Were the types of personnel (skill and expertise) the contractor used adequate to accomplish the effort?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:

b. How effective was the contractor in aligning and re-aligning resources (personnel and other) to meet varying workloads?

REMARKS:

2. Technical

a. How would you rate the contractor's overall technical approach?

REMARKS:

b. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing planned project activities/requirements within the established milestones/timeframes?

REMARKS:

3. Cost Control

a. If the contract was other than firm fixed price, did the contractor use effective methods and effective cost controls? Yes _____ No _______

REMARKS:

4. Key Areas

a. Enterprise Architecture and/or DoDAF Support - Performance/Experience identifying the problem, gathering information, curating a solution, and disseminating to stakeholders to resolve the problem.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

REMARKS:

b. Data Management Support – Performance/Experience with Metadata, Data Architecture, Data Modeling and Design, Enterprise Logical Data Modeling, Interface Management and Data Exchange and Message Template Mining

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

REMARKS:

c. Engineering Support - Performance/Experience with Information Services and Business Rules Analysis and Enterprise Engineering Design Support (MBSE).

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

REMARKS:

5. Contractor’s Overall Performance

REMARKS:

6. Would you award to this contractor in the future?

Yes ___________ No__________

If “No”, why?

Any additional comments:

Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 CUI (when filled in)