Appendix F_Past Performance Questionaire.pdf
PDF 101 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amended _721 APS Baggage Conveyor System
- Solicitation number
- FA561326Q0029
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for solicitation No. FA561326Q0029 issued by the 721st Aerial Port Squadron (APS) for a Baggage Conveyor System at Ramstein Air Base, Germany. The PPQ is designed to collect past performance information from contractors bidding on this opportunity and must be completed and returned to the Contracting Office prior to the offer due date listed in Block 8 of Standard Form (SF) 1449.
The questionnaire requires contractors to provide general information including company name, address, contact details, point of contact, contract number, contract amount, performance dates, and place of performance, along with designation of whether the contractor performed as a prime contractor, sub-contractor, or key personnel. Respondents must rate contractor performance across ten evaluation criteria using a six-point scale (Exceptional, Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Neutral), addressing performance/delivery schedules, ability to comply with performance work statements, qualified personnel capabilities, personnel retention, problem communication and resolution, overall performance, cure or show cause notices, government property damage, CPARS rating status, and willingness to award future contracts. The form also includes sections for narrative explanations of ratings and commentary on contractor strengths, weaknesses, and other relevant remarks. Completed questionnaires should be submitted to TSgt Carleen Clinger (carleen.clinger@us.af.mil) or Ms. Sujin Hawkins (sujin.hawkins@us.af.mil).
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
APPENDIX F_PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
This PPQ is for the solicitation (No. FA561326Q0029) of the 721st Aerial Port Squadron (APS) Baggage Conveyor System at Ramstein Air Base, Germany.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name Contractor’s Address
Contractor’s Telephone # (add country code) Contractor’s Email Address Contractor’s Point of Contact
(POC)
Brief Description of Work (services conducted and items provided)
Contract Number Contract Amount Contract Period or Dates of Performance Contract Place of Performance
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the Contracting Office.
Respondent’s Name Respondent’s Title Respondent’s Address
Respondent’s Telephone # (add country code) Respondent’s Email Address
C. RETURN THE COMPLETED SURVEY FORM PRIOR TO OFFER DUE DATE LISTED IN
BLOCK 8 OF THE STANDARD FORM (SF) 1449.
TSgt Carleen Clinger at carleen.clinger@us.af.mil
Ms. Sujin Hawkins at sujin.hawkins@us.af.mil mailto:carleen.clinger@us.af.mil mailto:sujin.hawkins@us.af.mil
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix below and please provide a narrative explanation for any rating given.
E G S M U N
Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: E G S M U N
1. Has the offeror met the required performance/delivery schedule?
2. Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to comply with the applicable performance work statement/statement of work to render services/items in a timely fashion?
3. Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to provide qualified personnel (to include certifications) for the required work?
4. Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to retain qualified personnel to complete the required work?
5. Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to communicate and resolve problems timely and thoroughly (including any warranty issues)?
6. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
7. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
If yes, explain outcome in “other remarks.”
YES / NO
8. Did the vendor ever damaged government property during the project?
If yes, please explain outcome in “other remarks.”
9. For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES / NO
10. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES / NO
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Other Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .