Addendum No. 3 Security Upgrades - 220316-01.pdf
PDF 242 KB Posted
- Attached to
- District-Wide Security Upgrade #220316-01
- Solicitation number
- S-P26028-00002187
- Issued by
- Multnomah County, Oregon
About this file
This document is Addendum No. 3 for the District-Wide Security Upgrades Project No. 220316-01 in Oregon, involving Multnomah County and the City of Portland. The addendum outlines changes, additions, and deletions to the contract documents dated February 23, 2022, including replacement of intercom systems at certain locations, matching existing intrusion detection systems, and use of wireless door sensors. The addendum also clarifies responsibility for providing NVRs, POE switches, and door security hardware. The bid due date is March 25, 2022, and the substantial completion date is no later than December 23, 2022, with work hour restrictions during school hours. Two substitution requests were rejected, as the district has committed to the Milestone VMS system.
The document does not provide details on pricing terms, set-asides, incumbents, funding requirements or sources, or other financial information. It focuses on technical requirements and project management details for the security upgrades across the district's facilities.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DISTRICT-WIDE SECURITY UPGRADES
PROJECT NO.: 220316-01
March 18, 2022
ADDENDUM NO. THREE (3)
THE FOLLOWING CHANGES, ADDITIONS, AND DELETIONS TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
DATED FEBRUARY 23, 2022 HEREBY BECOME A PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
NOTIFY ALL SUBCONTRACTORS AFFECTED BY THIS ADDENDUM.
BID DUE: Friday, March 25, 2022 at 2:00 PM
Q&A
1. What are we doing with the intercom systems?
a. Intercom systems are being completely replaced under separate contracts at Oliver, CMS, Pleasant
Valley, Patrick Lynch, and Powell Butte. All other intercoms stay as is.
2. What is the design basis of the old intrusion systems?
a. There is no basis for the design – the district has recent installations of DSC systems that they would like to match. Whichever is chosen – the same system must be installed at all sites that require it.
3. Are wireless door sensors acceptable to cut down on the amount of wire that needs to be ran for the new systems?
a. Wireless door sensors are acceptable as long as they have a minimum 3 year battery life and are guaranteed to function at all locations.
4. What will the monitoring interface look like (RF/AES radio, network or cell communicator)?
a. The communications platform will be network based.
5. Should monitoring be included for the IDS system?
a. Not required.
6. All call outs for the access control additions to the MDF’s/IDF’s at the schools call for locking hardware to be installed. In the project document, it does say locking hardware provided by others. Please clarify if it will be provided by others or provided as part of the number from the security contractor.
a. All door security hardware including electric strikes will be provided and installed by this security contractor.
7. Who is responsible for providing the NVR’s and who will be providing the POE network switches to support the cameras?
a. The security contractor is responsible for providing the NVRs – the owner will provide the POE switches.
8. Are we providing the POE switches?
a. POE switches are provided by the owner.
9. Who does the patching and painting at impacted areas?
a. Any incidental patching and painting needed due to impacts by this work is by this contractor and shall be included in your bid.
10. The district access control system is Salto. Doe the new systems need to integrate with Salto or do we need to replace all the Salto with new?
a. The existing Salto system and devices shall remain. The new devices must integrate with Salto.
DISTRICT-WIDE SECURITY UPGRADES
PROJECT NO.: 220316-01
March 18, 2022
ADDENDUM NO. THREE (3)
11. What are the VMS licensing requirements?
a. The District holds the base license for their Milestone VMS. Your bid shall include all licenses for devices. Assume 3-year licenses.
SUBSTITUTIONS
1. The following substitutions were submitted:
a. Verkada System – rejected. District has committed to, and installed, Milestone system for
VMS.
b. Eagle Eye Networks - rejected. District has committed to, and installed, Milestone system for
VMS.
SPECIFICATIONS
1. Section 011100 – Summary of Work: Paragraph 1.3.D – Substantial Completion shall be no later than 12/23/22. Work hour restrictions during school hours applies.
END OF ADDENDUM THREE (3)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .