Addendum 52.212-2 Evaluation.pdf
PDF 179 KB Posted
- Attached to
- B75216 Roof Replacement
- Solicitation number
- FA446026Q0023
About this file
This is an addendum to FAR clause 52.212-2 establishing the evaluation criteria and award process for commercial products and services. The Government will evaluate offers based on two approximately equal factors: price and technical evaluation/capability. Offerors must meet all solicitation requirements or risk being deemed non-responsive and excluded from consideration.
The evaluation process follows a three-step methodology. First, the Government ranks all responsive offers by price, calculating the total evaluated price across all contract line items and reserving the right to reject incomplete, unreasonable, or unbalanced pricing. Second, the Government conducts technical evaluations starting with the lowest-priced offer to determine acceptability based on compliance with the Performance Work Statement and associated requirements. An "Acceptable" rating requires that optional attachments and quote descriptions meet all specifications, while an "Unacceptable" rating results in removal from further consideration. Technical evaluation continues in price order until at least three offerors receive acceptable ratings; if fewer than three offers exist, all offers are technically evaluated; if no offers are acceptable, no award is made and the Contracting Officer re-evaluates the requirement. Third, once the requisite number of offers receive both price and technical evaluations, the Government makes an award. The Government reserves the right to communicate with offerors regarding issues, decline to select a contractor based on offer quality or fund availability, and may accept offers before the expiration time unless a written withdrawal notice is received.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers B75216 Roof.docx | DOCX document | |
| PWS_Replace Roofing 75216.pdf | ||
| FA446026Q0023.pdf | ||
| Addendum 52.212-1 Instructions to Offeror.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADDENDUM
52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Nov 2021)
1. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
1.1. Price.
1.2. Technical Evaluation/Capability.
2. By submission of its offer, the offeror agrees to abide by all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers/Offerors that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be considered non-responsive and/or excluded from consideration. (IAW 52.212-1)
3. Price and technical evaluation/capability, when combined, are considered approximately equal in importance.
4. Evaluation Factors and Process Defined:
4.1. First, the Government shall rank all responsive offers by price.
4.1.1. An offeror’s total evaluated price will include the total of all Contract Line Items as outlined in this solicitation or any associated attachments.
4.1.2. The Government reserves the right to deem an offeror's overall quotation to be unresponsive in the event that incomplete, unreasonable, or unbalanced pricing is submitted.
4.2. Second, the Government will look at the vendors technical capability and conduct a Technical Evaluation, starting with the lowest priced evaluated responsive offer, to determine if they are “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable,” based on the offer/offeror meeting requirements as outlined in the solicitation or any associated attachments.
4.2.1. “Acceptable” means: optional attachments and the description on the submitted quote or the Form 1449 DOES meet the specifications and requirements as described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS), or associated attachments.
4.2.2. “Unacceptable” means: optional attachments and the description on the submitted quote or the Form 1449 DOES NOT meet the specifications described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS), or associated attachments. An unacceptable technical description will result in offer/offeror being removed from further consideration.
ADDENDUM
52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Nov 2021)
4.2.3. The Technical Evaluation processing of offers will continue (in order by price) until the Government determines that at least three (3) offerors are determined to have an “Acceptable” technical rating.
4.2.3.1. If there are less than 3 offers/offerors, the Government will perform a Technical Evaluation on ALL offers/offerors.
4.2.3.2. If no offer/offeror is determined to be “Acceptable,” then no award will be made, and the Contracting Officer will re-evaluate the requirement.
4.3. Third, once the requisite number of offers/offerors have been evaluated for both Price and Technical Capability/Acceptance, the Government will make an award to the offer/offeror.
5. The Government reserves the right to communicate with all, some, or none of the offerors to address any issues, if necessary. The Government also reserves the right not to select a contractor, depending on the quality of the offers/offerors submitted and the availability of funds.
6. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .