Addendum_2_IFB2024-007_Haven_on_Vine_Project_Renovation_of_two_ADA_Apartments_-_A_CDBG_Funded_Project_-_with_4_attachments.pdf

October 28, 2024

Addendum No. 2

Project: Haven on Vine Project Renovation of two ADA apartments - a CDBG Funded Project Bid No: IFB2024-007

TO ALL PROPOSERS:

The following items are clarifications, corrections, additions, deletions and / or revisions, which shall take precedence over the original documents.

Question: 1 Hand rail in specs is not the same on the sheet, please clarify.

Answer: We revised our plans and any handrail originally added before, have been removed. The only items shown are grab bars in the bathrooms.

Question: 2 Does this bid require certified payroll?

Answer: Yes

Question: 3 We are only doing the 2 ADA apartments on this bid?

Answer: Yes, only these 2 ADA Apartments for now.

Question: 4 Can something be sent out for gutting the inside only – easier to estimate and build.

Answer: Yes, we will add the line item for demolition and specify that this is a complete interior demo and rebuild

Question: 5 When was the building built?

Answer: 1974

Question: 6 Is the electrical to be brought up to code?

Answer: Yes, all interior electrical work is to be included, however, the Exterior

Panels Electrical will be included in the main construction projects.

Question: 7 Can we put a 20-30 dumpster on property?

Answer: Yes, the City will provide the dumpster services.

Question: 8 Do we the contractor hire and pay the dumpster fees?

Answer: The City of Kissimmee will call Waste Management and pay fees regarding the dumpster use.

Question: 9 Do the exterior electrical panels need to be changed?

Answer: No, DO NOT include the exterior panel in your pricing The exterior electrical panels will be replaced under a different contract.

Question: 10 Is there a staging area for our equipment?

Answer: There will be 3 to 4 parking spaces in front of the apartments for the contractor to use.

Question: 11 Who is responsible for the equipment and materials if they got stolen from the staging area, who will replace those items?

Answer: This property is owned by the City and is patrolled by the Police

Department regularly. In addition, the successful bidder will be required to carry insurance coverage per the bid documents.

Question: 12 Flooring showing no thresholds?

Answer: Existing thresholds to remain, we are not touching exterior doors.

Question: 13 Is the budget $175,000 amount listed in Addendum 1 firm what if there is additional demolition?

Answer: The budget was based on doing everything, including the demo, we understand its an old building and we understand it could be more or less.

Question: 14 Are we removing the drywall?

Answer: Yes, you will be removing down to the studs.

Question: 15 Who pays for the permitting fees for this project.

Answer: The City of Kissimmee will pay for permitting fees.

Question: 16 Does the insulation get replaced in this project?

Answer: Yes

Question: 17 Walls that we are removing totally and relocating, is it a structural wall?

Answer: No, the walls are not structural, the building has block exterior.

Question: 18 Stone and tile are not specified are they going to be specified?

Answer: Yes, we will be specifying and include it in the addendum. See

Reference sheets A300 and A400 for information.

Question: 19 Do you ant bullnose or smooth around the tile?

Answer: We will look at what the unit that complete.

Question: 20 Are you going to require a land renovator contractor?

Answer: No

Question: 21 Even though the building was built before 78’?

Answer: Before the city purchased the hotel, we did all the testing, we did our due diligence. We had to do this to comply with Federal funding requirements before moving forward with the project. We also completed all the environmental testing and it cleared.

Question: 22 Do you want the same appliances in both units?

Answer: Yes, the appliances should match those in existing adjacent units.

Brand and Models listed below:

Refrigerator: Frigidaire; MOD LFTR1835VF3- SERIAL # BA21102024.

Microwave: Whirlpool Convection; MOD WMH78019HZ05 SERIAL #

TRB0912589.

Refrigerator: Whirlpool; MOD- not available Cooktop: Karinear.

Kitchen faucet: Forious.

Kitchen faucet: Glacier Bay Toilet: Glacier Bay.

Toilet: American Standard.

Toilet: Project Source.

Bathroom Light Fixture.

Question: 23 What brand of sinks do you want for these 2 apartments, as well as the appliances so we are all bidding the same thing.

Answer: See Referenced MEP drawings.

Question: 24 Drawings show laminate / particle board covering countertop. Document shows covered with laminate. But this finished apartment we seen has granite, please clarify what the city wants for these 2 apartments?

Answer: Granite is to be used. See Reference sheet A300.

Question: 25 Are we to reuse plumbing fixtures, is that true?

Answer: No, see plumbing drawings for fixture schedule.

Question: 26 Are the interior stairs part of this project?

Answer: No

Question: 27 Our project manager mentioned that during today's site visit someone said these two apartments are somewhat of a test ground for the larger renovation required in the rest of the project. I wanted to confirm with you whether or not that means we potentially won't need to rebid on the larger project if all goes well with these two units.

Answer: No. The larger project will be bid independently. However, this project will help the project team finalize finish selections and put a plan in place for the main construction schedule.

Question 28: Due to location of sink to side wall, should we continue the tile on the side wall?

SEE ATTACHED

Answer: Yes, width of tiling along wall to match counter depth.

Question 29: What type of transition at (highlighted in yellow) from Outer Bathroom (12x24x3/8 Porcelain tile) to the (2x2x3/8 Porcelain tile)? What type of Transition and size of tile in Shower Pan- note (highlighted in Red) from FF2 Outer Bathroom Floor (12x12x3/8 Porcelain tile) *NOTE* Based on recent work Typical ADA showers have required Linear Drains (highlighted in Purple) with 1/8" slope per foot (highlighted in blue arrows) for additional ease of use. SEE ATTACHED

DRAWING

Answer: Provide M-D Flat Top Threshold 11056 or equal at the door location (yellow highlight). Provide pre-formed insert for FHA-complaint shower enclosure, Laurel Mountain Model #LM6233BFR064 or equal.

Question 30: Drawing A001, Flooring Notes: #8 Note Resilient Base. Drawing A400, Finishes

Legend Note BF1 - Notes Wooden Baseboard to be installed. Please clarify which is correct Resilient Base or Wooden Baseboard.

Answer: Disregard note 8 on sheet A001. Wood base per sheet A400 is to be used.

Question 31: Should the Wall Tile and Back splash Tile come with Metal Trim (Schluter) or Tile

Trim?

Answer: Tile trim to match adjacent tile.

Question 32: Please confirm all drywall and insulation is to be removed and replaced in both apartments I1 & I2 with this project. This was discussed during the Prebid meeting.

Answer: Confirmed, all wall and ceiling gypsum board is to be removed and replaced in kind.

Question 33: A400 Detail 1 indicates interior door threshold style at type #03-closet doors.

With vinyl plank flooring through out the only location a transition threshold would be required at #02- bathroom doors which indicate and exterior sill?

Answer: Correct, only threshold should be located at #02 bathroom doors.

Provide M-D Flat Top Threshold 11056 or equal.

Question 34: Flooring Note #15 says " Provide Black Rubber Reducer Strip where ECO surfaces Rubber Flooring and VCT transition occurs, unless otherwise noted" There are NO Details for the "ECO" flooring. Please clarify.

Answer: Disregard note 15 on sheet A001. Flooring is to be per schedule.

Question 35: We would like to get a copy of the Hazardous Materials Report that was previously performed on the Haven on Vine property.

Answer: City of Kissimmee to provide – see attached

Question 36: Please confirm the scope of this project is limited to the interior renovation of apartments I1 & I2. No exterior work is in the scope.

Answer: Yes, this project is complete interior, no exterior.

Question 37: Please confirm the existing Electrical Panels will remain in use. Replacement of these panels will be in a future project.

Answer: Yes, existing panels are to be relocated.

Question 38: Although plans call for a specific selective demo area, we want to confirm that we will remove all existing wall finishes down to the studs throughout the whole unit.

Do you want us to use the workbook quantities received on the “Haven on Vine – Apartments workbook”?

Answer: Confirmed, all wall and ceiling gypsum board is to be removed and replaced in kind. Quantities to be determined by bidder

Question 39: Wall type on plans does not call for insulation; do we need to consider it part of our scope and if so where exactly do we need to consider it?

Answer: Sounds batt insulation is to be provided at all interior walls, both new and at existing walls prior to gypsum board re-application. Sound batt thickness to match wall stud thickness in which they are installed.

Question 40: Shall we all use a “bid allowance” for the insulation or is going to be handled as a Change Order once the drywall gets removed?

Answer: Yes, please use bid allowance method.

Question 41: “Paint & Walls Covering Notes” call for a smooth finish as opposed to the existing

“textured” finish. Which one shall we need to consider for the bidding process?

Answer: Texture on all new wall surfaces is to be “light orange poeel”.

Question 42: “Flooring Notes” call for a resilient wall base, the units have a wood base. Which one shall we need to consider for the bidding process?

Answer: Disregard flooring notes referenced on sheet A001 that are in conflict with finish schedule. Flooring and other finishes are to be per finish schedule.

Question 43: When could we receive the “material selection” schedule?

Answer: Please see revised submission with revision 1 dated 10/30/24 for the requested information.

Question 44: As per our walk-thru and site visit, the City rep mentioned that the electrical distribution panel won’t be relocated, as per the new plans P1 & P2 will need to be relocated; what’s the final resolution on this?

Answer: The existing panels are to be relocated.

Question 45: Are the ADA ramps part of this bid? There are no concrete sections on the provided “bid workbook”

Answer: Yes, all exterior concrete work as shown on revision 1 submission (dated 10/30/24) is to be part of the bid.

Question 46: Do we need to include the appliances as part of our bid or just install the appliances provided by the owner’s rep.?

Answer: Model numbers will be provided by City of Kissimmee; GCs to purchase and install.

Question 47: Is Phase 2 going to be awarded to the same GC who gets Phase 1?

Answer: Phase 2 may or may not be awarded to GC who is selected for Phase 1.

A. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDA:

1. The proposer shall acknowledge receipt of this addendum by completing the applicable section in the RFP. The Proposer shall submit said Form with the proposal.

2. All other terms and conditions of the RFP remain unchanged.

Brandon Durango Procurement Manager

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDA NO.(S) _________ (IF APPLICABLE)

(Signature)

COMPANY NAME _______________________________________

COMPANY ADDRESS _______________________________________

BY: _________________________ DATE:________________________

(signature)

_____________________________ EMAIL:_______________________

(typed name/title of signer)

For Questions 28 and 29

1155 S. Semoran Blvd., Suite 3-1111 Winter Park, Florida 32792

407-658-4151 • Fax 407-658-4410

LIMITED MOLD ASSESSMENT

Haven on the Vine Buildings 1, 2, & Gym 1815 W. Vine Street

Kissimmee, Florida 34741

GLE Project No.: 23000-28136

Prepared for:

Mr. Robert Masiku City of Kissimmee

101 Church Street, Suite 301

August 2023

Prepared by:

Limited Mold Assessment

Conducted at:

Haven on the Vine Buildings 1, 2, & Gym 1815 W. Vine Street

GLE Project No.: 23000-28136

Prepared for:

Mr. Robert Masiku City of Kissimmee

101 Church Street, Suite 301

Zac Klarich Junior Project Manager Signature

Michael B. Collins, CIH, CSP, CIEC Principal Certified Industrial Hygienist Signature Florida Licensed Mold Assessor MRSA73

GLE Associates, Inc.

1155 S. Semoran Blvd., Suite 3-1111 Winter Park, Florida 32792 Phone 407-658-4151 Facsimile 407-658-4410

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 BACKGROUND

3.0 PROCEDURES AND METHODOLOGY

3.1 Limited Visual Assessment and Moisture Measurements

3.2 Comfort Parameter Measurements

4.0 FINDINGS

4.1 Limited Visual Assessment and Moisture Measurements

Table 4.1-1 Summary of Water/Mold Damage

4.2 Comfort Parameter Measurements

Table 4.2-1 Summary of Comfort Parameter Measurements

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.0 LIMITATIONS

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A - Remediation Recommendations APPENDIX B - Personnel and Laboratory Certifications

1.0 INTRODUCTION

At the request of City of Kissimmee, GLE Associates, Inc. (GLE) conducted a limited mold assessment on July 21, 2023, within Haven on the Vine buildings 1, 2, & Gym, located in Kissimmee, Florida. The objective of this assessment was to determine if mold amplification was present in response to occupant concerns. Specifically, the scope of services included the following:

Limited Visual Assessment and Moisture Measurements Temperature, Carbon Dioxide and Relative Humidity Measurements

Consequently, this report is limited to the specified scope of services. While additional comments may be provided, the additional comments are submitted as a courtesy and are not intended to expand the original scope of this investigation. This report outlines the background information, our procedures and methodology, sample results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations.

2.0 BACKGROUND

Building representatives reported concerns associated with possible microbial growth in select Client-identified unoccupied units. GLE was requested to visually assess the immediately accessible, unoccupied, interior areas.

3.0 PROCEDURES AND METHODOLOGY

3.1 Limited Visual Assessment and Moisture Measurements

GLE assessed immediately accessible, interior areas of the subject buildings for visual evidence of water and/or mold-impacted materials, including, but not limited to, building materials exhibiting visible water staining, water damage, mold growth, and/or elevated moisture content. Non-destructive visual observations were utilized for this task.

Moisture content measurements were confirmed with a handheld moisture meter, a GE Protimeter SurveyMaster or equivalent instrument. The moisture meter was utilized to collect moisture measurements from areas exhibiting visible water intrusion. Elevated moisture measurements, greater than or equal to 20% Wood Moisture Equivalent (WME) or Moisture Content (MC), may be an indication of previous or active water intrusion, and may provide an environment favorable for fungal proliferation.

3.2 Comfort Parameter Measurements

Temperature and relative humidity measurements were obtained with a VelociCalc Indoor Air Quality Meter manufactured by TSI. Carbon dioxide (CO2) was measured with a dual-wavelength non-dispersive infrared sensor, with results reported in parts per million (ppm). Temperature was measured with a thermistor sensor, with results reported in degrees Fahrenheit (°F). Relative humidity (Rh) was measured with a thin film capacitive sensor, with results reported in percent (%).

Currently, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has no regulations specifically addressing temperature and humidity in an office setting; however, OSHA recommends temperature control in the range of 68-78°F and humidity control in the range of 30%-60%. Additionally, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) have published guidelines referencing maintaining relative humidity at levels below 60% as a mold preventive measure.

Carbon dioxide levels may be used as an indicator of sufficient outside air intake, treatment and distribution. Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the exterior environment fluctuate between 300 and 450 ppm. Inside concentrations of carbon dioxide may typically range between 500 and 2000 ppm depending on the rate of exchange for indoor air, the occupant loading, and the demand within a space. A buildup of CO2 can lead to complaints of headaches and lethargy from occupants of the building. General discomfort, malaise, and increased perception of bodily odors have been observed when concentrations significantly exceed outdoor concentrations for extended periods.

When using the air quality approach, ASHRAE 62.1-2016 stipulated that in an effort to ensure adequate ventilation, indoor carbon dioxide levels should not exceed 700 ppm over outdoor concentrations. The OSHA Eight hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) is 5000 ppm. These concentrations may periodically fluctuate, and attention should focus on responsible factors such as improperly functioning control equipment, periods of increased occupation, and environmental conditions.

4.0 FINDINGS

4.1 Limited Visual Assessment and Moisture Measurements

GLE performed a walkthrough visual assessment of accessible areas of concern within the scope of work. The assessment identified water and/or mold impacted materials, including, but not limited to, building materials exhibiting visible water staining, water damage, and/or mold growth. Visual observations are outlined in Table 4.1-1 – Summary of Water/Mold Damage.

TABLE 4.1-1 – SUMMARY OF WATER/MOLD DAMAGE

Haven on the Vine Building 1, Building 2

Area Damage Type Location Building

Material

Approx.

Quantity*

(H’xL’)

%WME

Unit 118 AMG Ceiling and Wall Drywall/Cement 50’x50’ 99% Unit 134 AMG Bathroom Ceiling Drywall 2’x2’ <20%

* Approximate quantities listed as height in feet by length in feet, unless otherwise noted AMG – Assumed Mold Growth PA – Particulate Accumulation N/A – Not Applicable WS – Water-Stained WD – Water-Damaged MG – Mold Growth SF – Square Feet %WME – % Wood Moisture Equivalent

No visual damage observed in the Gym.

4.2 Comfort Parameter Measurements

During the assessment, temperature, relative humidity, and carbon dioxide measurements were obtained from throughout the subject area. The measurements are included in Table 4.2-1: Summary of Comfort Parameter Measurements.

TABLE 4.2-1 – SUMMARY OF COMFORT PARAMETER MEASUREMENTS

Haven on the Vine Building 1, Building 2, Gym

Location Relative Humidity

Temperature (°F)

Carbon Dioxide (ppm)

Exterior 55.4 98.6 398 Unit 118* 89.0 79.1 526 Unit 101* 79.0 77.6 500 Unit 201 69.9 76.1 586

Unit 215* 86.1 81.5 572 Unit 220 48.6 75.2 477

Gym 88.5 83.0 503 Unit 143* 80.7 85.3 495 Unit 129* 74.6 86.7 416 Unit 224* 71.8 88.3 437 Unit 241* 71.1 91.5 449

Bold measurements indicate levels outside the recommended parameters.

*Indicates HVAC system was not turned on at time of inspection

Interior temperature measurements ranged from 79-91°F, which are above the OSHA recommended range of 68-78°F, in Units 118, , 215, Gym, 143, 129, 224, and 241.

Interior temperature measurements ranged from 75°F -76°F, which are within the OSHA recommended range of 68-78°F, in Units 101, 201, and 220. It should be noted that the recommended range is based on occupant thermal comfort.

Relative humidity measurements ranged from 69-89%, which is above the OSHA recommended range of 30%-60%, in Units 118, 101, 201, 215, Gym, 143, 129, 224, and

241. Relative humidity measurements were 48%, which is within the OSHA recommended range of 30%-60%, in Unit 220. It should be noted that the recommended range is based on occupant thermal comfort and control of microbial growth on building surfaces.

Interior carbon dioxide measurements were found to be below the maximum ASHRAE level of 700 ppm above outside readings and below the OSHA PEL of 5,000 ppm.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results of the assessment, GLE provides the following conclusions:

1. Visibly water-stained and mold-impacted materials were observed in the assessed areas as outlined in Table 4.1-1.

2. Direct read temperature and relative humidity measurements were above recommended guidelines as identified an Table 4.2-1

Based on the findings of the assessment, GLE recommends the following:

1. All water/mold damaged building materials identified in Table 4.1-1 should be properly remediated in accordance with the remediation recommendations presented in Appendix B - Remediation Recommendations.

2. All non-porous building materials (such as wood, metal, glass, tile, painted plaster, plastic, etc.) exhibiting surficial mold growth and/or particulate accumulation should be properly cleaned by a qualified mold remediation contractor utilizing damp-wiping and HEPA-vacuuming techniques. During remediation/cleaning activities, HEPA-filtered negative air machines should be operated in the re-circulation mode (scrubbing) to continuously filter the air within the identified portions of the site. The air scrubbing equipment should be relocated periodically to enhance the entrainment and subsequent filtration of airborne fungal spores within the identified portions of the site.

Additionally, all horizontal surfaces within the identified portions of the site should be HEPA vacuumed and damp (not wet) wiped.

All porous building materials (such as upholstered furniture, linens, window treatments, carpet, etc.) exhibiting surficial mold growth should properly cleaned or laundered. Materials exhibiting mold growth following cleaning should be discarded.

3. Qualified mechanical personnel, or a qualified contractor, should evaluate, clean, and make any necessary repairs to the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems associated with the subject building to assure that the HVAC system components are operating within the manufacturer’s specifications, and are properly sized for the subject spaces.

Specifically, the following should be addressed:

a) Significant dust accumulation

b) Elevated interior temperature

c) Elevated interior humidity

The HVAC system should be properly cleaned periodically and operated in a manner to maintain temperature and relative humidity within the recommended ranges. HVAC units found to be unrepairable, or unable to maintain the temperature and relative humidity within the recommended ranges, should be considered for replacement.

6.0 LIMITATIONS

GLE performed the scope of services as presented in our proposal. Reasonable effort has been made by GLE personnel to assess representative locations within the facility. Destructive sampling was not utilized as part of this assessment. GLE assumes no liability for existing conditions or damage within the subject facility or for any consequential effects that may result from our services and collection of field samples and measurements.

Mold growth may occur in various areas of a structure where water/moisture leak(s) are not addressed. These areas include cavities/enclosures and adjacent building materials that house plumbing/drainage-lines and can be affected by moisture intrusion from the exterior the building.

This investigation did not include areas not known to have been affected by water damage moisture damage or inaccessible areas; therefore, the potential for mold growth in these areas cannot be dismissed at this time.

The information contained in this report was prepared based upon specific parameters requested by the Client. If additional information is available or becomes available, it should be forwarded for our review to determine if changes to our conclusions and recommendations are necessary.

The data and evaluation in the report reflects conditions identified at the time of our site visit, and should not be construed as being representative of the site at a later date. GLE assumes no liability for any perceived or documented health effects of tenants, visitors, contractors, or any other individual that has or may come in contact with the building that may be attributable to the microbial conditions present within the building.

The information herein is only for the specific use of the Client and GLE. GLE accepts no responsibility for the use, interpretation, or reliance by other parties on the information contained herein, unless written authorization has been obtained from GLE. This report is not intended to be used as a document to render health related opinions.

APPENDIX A

Remediation Recommendations

Remediation Recommendations

1. Assure source of moisture intrusions, including but not limited to the suspect moisture intrusion issues outlined in this report, have been terminated and corrected.

2. In work areas where no visible microbial growth was identified, a controlled pressure enclosure area is not required. However, GLE recommends that these areas be isolated utilizing typical construction methods for dust suppression during the destructive removal of the moisture impacted materials.

If mold growth is identified at any time during the cleaning and/or removal of the moisture impacted building materials, then the area must be handled as containing mold growth and all control mechanisms recommended for mold-affected building materials should be immediately implemented.

If mold growth is not identified during the removal of the moisture impacted building materials, then the mitigation of these areas should continue under normal construction procedures.

3. Building materials identified as water stained only should be appropriately cleaned and dried (below 20% MC/WME). Following appropriate cleaning and verification of acceptable moisture content, the surface area may be primed and/or painted. If appropriate cleaning cannot be achieved, the materials may need to be removed and replaced.

4. Properly remove and dispose of all mold and water damaged porous building materials identified in Table 4.1-1.

5. Non-porous diffusers and return grilles, appliances, furniture, boxes and other miscellaneous items in remediation work areas should be thoroughly cleaned/scrubbed using wet-wipe cleaning utilizing a two-towel system with a microbial biocide agent and vacuums utilizing HEPA filters.

6. Porous furniture and/or other miscellaneous items in remediation work areas should be evaluated on an individual basis. In most cases, these items can be thoroughly cleaned/scrubbed using wet methods utilizing a microbial biocide agent, and vacuumed utilizing a vacuum system with HEPA filters.

7. Exposed wall, floor and/or ceiling components should be thoroughly cleaned/scrubbed using wet methods utilizing a microbial biocide agent, and vacuumed utilizing a vacuum system with HEPA filters.

8. Any wood components of the exposed walls and ceilings should be sealed with an appropriate sealant after following the cleaning protocol and allowing sufficient drying time (components should have a moisture level of less than 12%). The sealant should not contain Linseed Oil.

9. Additional mold affected materials may be discovered during remediation activities conducted at the site, and should be addressed upon discovery.

10. All mold remediation activities should be conducted in a controlled pressure enclosure utilizing HEPA filtration. The intent is to isolate the remediation work area(s) to prevent dispersion of mold spores to unaffected areas of the structure. Activating any HVAC systems during any remediation activities should be avoided.

11. If air sampling indicates that bio-amplification of microbial spores is occurring, then

HEPA-filtered negative air machines should be operated in the re-circulation mode (scrubbing) to continuously filter the air within the identified portions of the structure.

The air scrubbing equipment should be relocated periodically to enhance the entrainment and subsequent filtration of airborne fungal spores within the identified portions of the structure. Additionally, all horizontal surfaces within the identified portions of the structure should be HEPA vacuumed and damp (not wet) wiped.

12. GLE recommends that post mold remediation confirmation testing (PMRCT) be performed to assess the effectiveness of the mold remediation activities. The sampling should be done prior to the initiation of the installation of replacement building components/finishes. The following PMRCT activities should be performed:

Visual Evaluation – GLE will assess the work area for the presence of visible microbial growth, water damage, water staining, standing water and significant particulate accumulation. GLE will verify that recommended material removal was conducted and moisture levels in the affected areas are within an acceptable range (<20% MC/WME).

Air Sampling – Indoor and outdoor baseline air samples should be collected and analyzed to determine the presence interior mold spore concentrations in the affected areas of the structure.

13. All work should be performed in strict accordance with all federal, state, and local regulations and ordinances using experienced and trained personnel.

APPENDIX B

Personnel and Laboratory Certifications

Melanie S. Griffin, SecretaryRon DeSantis, Governor

STATE OF FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION

MOLD-RELATED SERVICES LICENSING PROGRAM

THE MOLD ASSESSOR HEREIN IS CERTIFIED UNDER THE

PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 468, FLORIDA STATUTES

COLLINS, MICHAEL B

Do not alter this document in any form.

5405 CYPRESS CENTER DR

LICENSE NUMBER: MRSA73

EXPIRATION DATE: JULY 31, 2024

This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.

SUITE 110

TAMPA FL 33609

Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=29f033228217314053b08be4774d0978

1155 South Semoran Boulevard, Suite 3-1111 Winter Park, Florida 32792

407-658-4151 • Fax 407-658-4410

LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SURVEY REPORT

Haven on the Vine Buildings 1, 2, & Gym 1815 W. Vine Street

Kissimmee, Florida 34741

GLE Project No.: 23000-28136

Prepared for:

Mr. Robert Masiku City of Kissimmee

101 Church Street, Suite 301 Kissimmee, Florida 34741

August 2023

1155 S. Semoran Boulevard, Suite 3-1111 | Winter Park, Florida 32792 | 407-658-4151 | Fax: 407-658-4410 Tampa | Ft. Lauderdale | Miami | Jacksonville | Gainesville | Atlanta | Nashville

Architecture AR 0007729 • Engineer RY 5483 • Asbestos ZA 0000034 • Geology PG 1737

August 10, 2023

Mr. Robert Masiku City of Kissimmee 101 Church Street, Suite 301 Kissimmee, Florida 34741

RE: Lead-Containing Paint Survey Report Haven on the Vine Buildings 1, 2, & Gym 1815 W. Vine Street Kissimmee, Florida 34741

GLE Project No.: 23000-28136

Dear Mr. Masiku:

GLE Associates, Inc. (GLE) performed a survey to identify lead-containing paint on July 21, 2023, at Haven on the Vine buildings 1, 2, & Gym, located in Kissimmee, Florida. The survey was performed by Mr. Zac Klarich with GLE. This report outlines the sampling and testing procedures, and presents the results along with our conclusions and recommendations.

GLE appreciates the opportunity to work with you on this project. Should you have questions regarding any of the information contained in this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Sincerely, GLE Associates, Inc.

Zac Klarich Robert B. Greene, PE, PG, CIH, LEED AP Junior Project Manager President

ZK/PSZ/RBG/jl

I:\Work\Asb\'23\23000\28136.City Of Kissimmee.Super 8.Bulk ACM.LMA.LBP\Report\LBP\Lead Survey Report.doc

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Facility Description 1

2.0 RESULTS 1

2.1 Lead Survey Procedures 1

2.2 Identified Suspect Lead-Containing Paint 2

Table 2.2-1 — Summary of Analytical Results

3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4

4.0 LIMITATIONS AND CONDITIONS 4

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Analytical Results and Chain of Custody Appendix B – Personnel and Laboratory Qualifications

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 INTRODUCTION

On July 21, 2023, a lead-containing paint survey was conducted at Haven on the Vine buildings 1, 2, & Gym, located in Kissimmee, Florida. The survey was performed by Mr. Zac Klarich with

GLE.

1.2 FACILITY DESCRIPTION

A summary of the facility investigated is outlined in the table below.

Facility Type: Apartments Construction Date: 1972-1974 Number of Floors: 2

Exterior Floor Support: Concrete Wall Support: Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) Exterior Finish: Stucco, Paint Roof System Type: Roofing Shingles

Interior Wall Substrate: Drywall, CMU Wall Finishes: Paint, Cove Base Floor Finishes: Carpet, Vinyl Floor Tile, Sheet Vinyl Flooring, Ceramic Ceiling System: Drywall Ceiling Finishes: Drywall

2.0 RESULTS

2.1 LEAD SURVEY PROCEDURES

It is GLE’s understanding that the survey was conducted to provide information needed to comply with 29 CFR Part 1926 “Lead Exposure in Construction; Interim Final Rule” for future demolition and/or renovation activities. The Scope of the “Lead Exposure in Construction;

Interim Final Rule” “…applies to all occupational exposure to lead in all construction work in which lead, in any amount, is present in an occupationally related context.” Due to the lack of a firm correlation between lead levels in paint and airborne lead levels during construction activities, OSHA has developed task-related triggers that require the implementation of the provisions required in 29 CFR Part 1926. Demolition and/or renovation activities involve tasks covered under this standard.

The survey was performed by observing and testing accessible painted component surfaces of the building. The sampling protocol used in this lead paint survey is a modified version of the survey methodology established by HUD. The protocol was modified to conform to the specific parameters of this project.

After the overall visual survey was completed, an inventory of painted surfaces was developed.

The surveyor then subdivided the areas into homogeneous areas of apparent similar paint history.

Sampling of the paint surfaces was performed by collecting representative paint chips. All samples were submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc., an accredited laboratory recognized under EPA’s National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP), located in Orlando, Florida.

These samples were analyzed by EPA Method SW 846 3050B/7000B and the results are reported in percentage of lead by weight of the paint sample (% Wt).

2.2 IDENTIFIED SUSPECT LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT

A total of nine samples of suspect lead-containing paint were collected from the facility during the survey. The results of the laboratory analyses are included in Appendix A.

A summary of the paint chip sample analytical results is outlined in the following table:

TABLE 2.2-1: SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS

HAVEN ON THE VINE-KISSIMMEE FL

SAMPLE

# BUILDING INTERIOR OR

EXTERIOR LOCATION LEAD CONCENTRATION (% BY WEIGHT)

L-1 Building 1 Interior Common Walls Bld. 1 Interior <0.013 % wt L-2 Building 1 Interior Ceilings, Bld. 1 Interior <0.0080 % wt L-3 Building 1 Interior Bathrooms, Bld. 1 Interior <0.021 % wt L-4 Building 1, Gym Interior Gym, Bld. 1 Interior <0.0094 % wt L-5 Building 1 Interior Reception Bathroom <0.017 % wt L-6 Building 2 Interior Building 2 Common Walls Interior <0.0080 % wt L-7 Buildings 1, 2, Gym Exterior All Buildings Exterior <0.0080 % wt L-8 Buildings 1, 2, Gym Exterior All Buildings Exterior <0.0080 % wt L-9 Buildings 1, 2, Gym Exterior All Buildings Exterior <0.0080 % wt

1 BOLD result indicates lead-containing paint.

2 The requirements of the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard 29CFR 1926.62 are invoked if any amount of lead is present in the sample; there is no minimum concentration.

3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Analytical results indicate that Nine of the Nine painted surfaces tested did not contain concentrations (% by weight) of lead within the paint greater than the laboratory’s detection limits.

4.0 LIMITATIONS AND CONDITIONS

Due to the inaccessibility of some building elements, it is conceivable that all potential lead-containing paint within the extents of this survey may not have been located and identified. We do warrant, however, that the investigations and methodology reflect our best efforts based upon the prevailing standard of care in the environmental industry.

APPENDIX A

Analytical Results and Chain of Custody

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Weight Lead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

3303 PARKWAY CENTER COURT, Orlando, FL 32808 Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com orlandolab@emsl.com

Attn: Zac Klarich GLE Associates 1155 South Semoran Boulevard Suite 3-1111 Winter Park, FL 32792

Received: 7/21/2023 05:03 PM

City Of Kissimmee 1815 W. Vine Street

Fax: (407) 658-4410 Phone: (407) 658-4151

Project:

7/21/2023Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

342316339 CustomerID: GLEA51D CustomerPO: 23000-28136 ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

0.1509 Site: Common Walls Bld. 1 Interior 342316339-0001L-1 <0.013 % wt7/24/2023 g7/21/2023

0.2682 Site: Ceilings, Bld. 1 Interior 342316339-0002L-2 <0.0080 % wt7/24/2023 g7/21/2023

0.0944 Site: Bathrooms, Bld. 1 Interior 342316339-0003L-3 <0.021 % wt7/24/2023 g7/21/2023

0.2125 Site: Gym, Bld. 1 Interior 342316339-0004L-4 <0.0094 % wt7/24/2023 g7/21/2023

0.1152 Site: Bld 1, Reception Bathroom 342316339-0005L-5 <0.017 % wt7/24/2023 g7/21/2023

0.2601 Site: Building 2 Common Walls Interior 342316339-0006L-6 <0.0080 % wt7/24/2023 g7/21/2023

0.2669 Site: All Buildings Exterior 342316339-0007L-7 <0.0080 % wt7/24/2023 g7/21/2023

0.2989 Site: All Buildings Exterior 342316339-0008L-8 <0.0080 % wt7/24/2023 g7/21/2023

0.2565 Site: All Buildings Exterior 342316339-0009L-9 <0.0080 % wt7/24/2023 g7/21/2023

Heather Ohye, Metals Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 7/27/2023 5:05:57 PM

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. The report reflects the samples as received.

Results are generated from the field sampling data (sampling volumes and areas, locations, etc.) provided by the client on the Chain of Custody. Samples are within quality control criteria and met method specifications unless otherwise noted.

* Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008% wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. "<" (less than) result signifies the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FL AIHA LAP, LLC-ELLAP Accredited #163563

Initial report from 07/27/2023 17:05:57 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:orlandolab@emsl.com

OrderID: 342316339

OrderID: 342316339

APPENDIX B

Personnel and Laboratory Qualifications has fulfilled the requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 402, and has received certification to conduct lead-based paint activities pursuant to 40 CFR Part 745.226

All EPA Administered Lead-based Paint Activities Program States, Tribes and Territories

This certification is valid from the date of issuance and expires March 02, 2024

Certification #

LBP-2060-2

Issued On

January 05, 2021

Michelle Price, Chief

Lead, Heavy Metals, and Inorganics Branch

AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC acknowledges that

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

3303 Parkway Center Ct Orlando, FL 32808-1040

Laboratory ID: LAP-163563 along with all premises from which key activities are performed, as listed above, has fulfilled the requirements of the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs (AIHA LAP), LLC accreditation to the ISO/IEC 17025:2017 international standard, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories in the following:

LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS

INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Accreditation Expires: February 01, 2024

ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD Accreditation Expires: February 01, 2024

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Accreditation Expires: February 01, 2024

FOOD Accreditation Expires:

UNIQUE SCOPES Accreditation Expires:

BERYLLIUM FIELD/MOBILE Accreditation Expires:

Specific Field(s) of Testing (FoT)/Method(s) within each Accreditation Program for which the above named laboratory maintains accreditation is outlined on the attached Scope of Accreditation. Continued accreditation is contingent upon successful on-going compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and AIHA LAP, LLC requirements. This certificate is not valid without the attached Scope of Accreditation. Please review the AIHA LAP, LLC website (www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org) for the most current Scope.

Revision19.1: 07/28/2021

Cheryl O Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC

Date Issued: 01/31/2022

Effective: 07/29/2021 Revision: 8.1

AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION

EMSL Analytical, Inc. Laboratory ID: LAP-163563

3303 Parkway Center Ct Orlando, FL 32808-1040 Issue Date: 01/31/2022

The laboratory is approved for those specific field(s) of testing/methods listed in the table below. Clients are urged to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for the particular field(s) of testing/Methods, since these can change due to proficiency status, suspension and/or withdrawal of accreditation.

The EPA recognizes the AIHA LAP, LLC ELLAP program as meeting the requirements of the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP) established under Title X of the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 and includes paint, soil and dust wipe analysis. Air and composited wipes analyses are not included as part of the

NLLAP.

Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELLAP)

Initial Accreditation Date: 09/01/2007

Component, parameter or characteristic tested

Technology sub-type/Detector Method Method Description

(for internal methods only)

Airborne Dust AA NIOSH 7082 N/A

EPA SW-846 3050B N/A

EPA SW-846 3051A N/APaint AA

EPA SW-846 7000B N/A

EPA SW-846 3050B N/A

EPA SW-846 3051A N/ASettled Dust by Wipe AA

EPA SW-846 7000B N/A

EPA SW-846 3050B N/A

EPA SW-846 3051A N/ASoil AA

EPA SW-846 7000B N/A

A complete listing of currently accredited ELLAP laboratories is available on the AIHA LAP, LLC website at: http:// www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org

Personnel and Laboratory Qualifications