Addendum 2_52.212-2 Evaluation Criteria.pdf
PDF 293 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 19AQMM24R0106
About this file
This document is an addendum to an evaluation criteria section for a Request for Proposal (RFP) on commercial products and commercial services. The key details are:
The Government will award a contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms to the solicitation and is the most advantageous. Evaluation factors include Technical (Prior Demonstrated Experience and Organizational Experience/Resumes), which are significantly more important than Price. The Government will assign confidence ratings (High, Some, Low) to the technical subfactors. Price will be evaluated for reasonableness through comparison with other proposed prices. The Government may determine an offer is unacceptable if option prices are significantly unbalanced. The contract award will be in the form of a written notice to the successful offeror.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Addendum 52.212-2 Evalua�on—Commercial Products and Commercial Services
RFP - 19AQMM24R0106
Page | 1
The Government will award a contract resul�ng from this solicita�on to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms to the solicita�on and is the most advantageous to the Government. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers.
The table below shows the ra�ngs the Government will assign in its evalua�on of proposals when evalua�ng Technical Subfactors 1 and 2. A combined confidence ra�ng will also be assessed for Technical overall.
Table 1: Confidence Ra�ngs High Confidence The Government has high confidence that the Offeror understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in the performing the contract with no Government interven�on.
Some Confidence
The Government has some confidence that the Offeror understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in the performing the contract with litle or no Government interven�on.
Low Confidence The Government has low confidence that the Offeror understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in the performing the contract even with Government interven�on.
Technical and Organizational Experience are significantly more important than Price.
Technical: Technical elements of the evalua�on shall be based solely on informa�on furnished by the vendor. The Government is not responsible for loca�ng or securing any informa�on, which is not iden�fied in the offer.
Subfactor 1: Prior Demonstrated Experience The Government will assess its confidence that the proposal will successfully perform the work, by evalua�ng the proposals demonstrated experience from three contracts/orders performed within the past five (5) years (from the date of this RFP release). Prior experience will be evaluated to assess the expecta�on of successful outcomes based on the extent to which the Proposal has successfully performed services similar to the Statement of Objec�ves. The Government will also evaluate the relevance (similar in nature of work, size, and complexity) of the Offeror’s demonstrated prior experience to the Performance Work Statement.
Subfactor 2: Organiza�onal Experience/Resumes The Government will assess the extent to which the Offeror iden�fies and commits personnel with appropriate experience and qualifica�ons and will be assigned a confidence ra�ng. Staffing Plan & Resume will be evaluated based on the currency, quality, and depth of experience of individual personnel working on similar projects (size, scope, magnitude, dura�on, and complexity).
Price The Government expects to receive price compe��on through mul�ple offers. The total evaluated price will be evaluated for price reasonableness through comparison with other proposed prices and may include other price analysis techniques. Offerors are to provide price/cost data concerning labor categories, hours, rates, and materials broken out by the tasks 1 through 6 and their tasks outlined in the PWS. The Government will evaluate the alignment of the proposed pricing to the Offeror’s proposed technical in accordance with FAR 13.106-3. Prices that do not align to the Offeror’s proposed technical approach may indicate an inability to understand the requirements and therefore may be considered a
Addendum 52.212-2 Evalua�on—Commercial Products and Commercial Services
Page | 2
RFP - 19AQMM24R0106
high-risk approach to contract performance. The price proposal will not be given a confidence ra�ng, but discounts and rates will be evaluated to ensure labor categories and rates are fair and reasonable.
Op�ons The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all op�ons to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the op�on prices are significantly unbalanced. Evalua�on of op�ons shall not obligate the Government to exercise the op�on(s).
Writen No�ce:
A writen no�ce of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the �me for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further ac�on by either party. Before the offer’s specified expira�on �me, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are nego�a�ons a�er its receipt, unless a writen no�ce of withdrawal is received before award.
(End to Addendum)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .