A3_ Past Present Perf Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 214 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AE Multiple Award Contract for Malmstrom AFB, MT Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA462622R0001
About this file
This document contains a past and present performance questionnaire for a multiple award contract solicitation for architecture and engineering services at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana. The solicitation seeks proposals for various AE services primarily supporting Malmstrom AFB under an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract structure. Respondents are asked to evaluate offerors' past performance across six areas: quality of service and deliverables, project management, business relations, cost control, employee qualifications and skills, and team composition. Evaluations will be used to assess offerors for award of contracts under the multiple award solicitation issued by the Department of the Air Force Global Strike Command. The questionnaire requests details of prior contracts and performance ratings on a scale of outstanding to unsatisfactory, and asks for narrative comments on strengths, weaknesses, and future hiring considerations. Completed questionnaires must be returned by the specified date directly to designated contracting personnel at Malmstrom AFB.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A_AE MAC RFQ Amend 04.pdf | ||
| AE MAC QA_4 15 Mar 22.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| A1_Malmstrom AE MAC SOW Amend 04.pdf | ||
| A1_Malmstrom AE MAC SOW Amend 03.pdf | ||
| AE MAC QA_3 09 Mar 22.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| A_AE MAC RFQ Amend 03.pdf | ||
| A_AE MAC RFQ Amend 02.pdf | ||
| A_AE MAC RFQ Amend 01.pdf | ||
| AE MAC QA_2 18 Feb 22.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| A1_Malmstrom AE MAC SOW Amend 01.pdf | ||
| AE MAC QA_1 15 Feb 22.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| A_AE MAC RFQ.pdf | ||
| A1_Malmstrom AE MAC SOW.pdf | ||
| A2_SF330-AE Qualifications.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3: PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
MALMSTROM AFB AE MAC
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
RFQ #: FA462622R0001
Architecture and Engineering Services
When completed, this document becomes Source Selection Sensitive Information
In Accordance With FAR 3.104
Note: To be completed by the references provided by firm and returned via email directly to 341 CONS by the date specified. All questionnaires must be sent to 341 CONS from the individual that answered the questionnaire only. Failure to do so may result in rejection of firm response.
This questionnaire will be used to evaluate the past and present performance for the firm and contracting action.
The questionnaire is arranged by six performance areas:
• Quality of Service and Deliverables
• Project Management
• Business Relations
• Cost Control
• Employee Qualifications and Skills
• Team Composition
Your candid response to the questions is important to our evaluation effort and may affect the award outcome. The names of individuals supplying past performance information will remain confidential.
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:
Contractor Name:
Contractor Phone Number:
Contractor Point of Contact (name, title, phone, e-mail):
Name of Engagement Partner of the Contact (name, phone, e-mail):
Contract/Project Title:
Description of Contract/Project:
Contract Number:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance:
Contract Type:
Was this a competitive contract (Yes/No):
Initial Contract Amount: $
Current/Final Contract Amount: $
Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and current/final contract cost:
Geographic Description of Services Under this Contract (local/nationwide/worldwide/others):
B. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION:
Respondent Name:
Respondent Title:
Respondent Agency/Company Name:
Respondent Address:
Respondent Phone Number:
Respondent E-mail:
Respondent Role in the Contract:
Number of Years Respondent Worked on Subject Contract:
C. EVALUATION:
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. Although not required, we request that you justify each of your scale with a comment. Please be specific in your comment as much as possible, especially in situations that warrant very high or very low scales. Use extra pages as necessary or expand the form electronically as needed.
Scales are defined as follows:
SCALE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
O OUTSTANDING: The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as “Excellent.”
E EXCELLENT: The contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements.
G GOOD: There are no, or very minimal issues and the contractor has met the contract requirements.
F FAIR: Overall compliance requires minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
P POOR: Overall compliance requires significant agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
U UNSATISFACTORY: Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements.
NA NOT APPLICABLE: Unable to provide a score.
Quality of Service and Deliverables
O E G F P U NA Comments
Ability to Understand Contract Objectives and Technical Requirements
Quality of Deliverables and Final Reports
Adequacy / Effectiveness of Quality Control Program
Identified Risks / Provides Effective Solutions to Problems
Compliance with Contract Requirements
Contractor Implemented Responsive / Flexible Processes to Improve Quality
Timeliness of Problem Identification and Quality of Corrective Action Plans
Project Management
O E G F P U NA
Comments
Ability to Effectively Lead, Manage, and Control the Contract
Timeliness / Effectiveness of Contract Problem Resolution Without Extensive Customer Guidance
Timeliness of Performance
Ability to Successfully Respond to Emergency Situations
Scheduling Control and Reliability
Responsive to Schedule Changes
Integration and Coordination of All Activities Needed to Execute the Contract
Business Relations
O E G F P U NA
Comments
Responsible / Responsive Attitude to Customer Needs
Contractor was Reasonable and Cooperative in Dealing with Staff
Ability to Successfully Resolve Disagreements / Disputes
Assessability of Engagement Partner and Key Personnel to the Customer
Communications with the Customer
Actively Seeking Feedback on Customer Satisfaction
Cost Control O E G F P U NA Comments Ability to Alert Government to Unforeseen Costs Before They Occur
Ability to Meet Forecasted Costs and Perform Within Contract Costs
Accuracy and Timeliness of Cost Reporting (Invoices)
Employee Qualifications and Skills
O E G F P U NA Comments
Auditing Technical Knowledge of Contractor Personnel
Information Technology (IT) Technical Knowledge of Contractor Personnel
Laws and Regulations (in Financial Statements Audit and IT) Technical Knowledge of
Knowledge in Performing an Integrated Financial Statement Audit and IT Evaluation
Contractor Written Skills
Presentation Skills
Team Composition O E G F P U NA Comments Effectiveness of Team Composition in Terms of Appropriate Mix of Experience, Knowledge, Skills, and Education to Accomplish Contract Requirements
Ability to Provide Sufficiently Experienced, Trained Personnel as Originally Proposed
Ability to Retain Experienced, Trained Personnel Over the Life of Contract
Ability to Smoothly Transition Personnel and Resources
Ability to Hire / Apply a qualified workforce to the Contract
Contracts Only: has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.):
D. NARRATIVE SUMMARY:
• Please list and explain strength(s) of contractor’s performance of the contract.
• Please list and explain weakness(es) of contractor’s performance of the contract:
• Would you hire this contractor in the future to perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please explain.
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Respondent Signature: ______________________________ Date: __________________
Please email completed Questionnaire to Colleen Goad at colleen.goad.1@us.af.mil and Jillian Urick at jillian.urick@us.af.mil.
Thank you for your Prompt Response and Assistance!
Please list and explain strength(s) of contractor’s performance of the contract.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .