A00817 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORTS.pdf

Massachusetts Department Of Transportation Highway Division Proposal No. 613202-129788

A00817 - 1

DOCUMENT A00817

Bridge Inspection Reports

B-01-014 (4AN) Inspectio Report Pages 3 throuh 19

B-01-012 (4AP) Inspectio Report Pages 21 through 39

Massachusetts Department Of Transportation Highway Division

A00817 - 2

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

1. Abutments

3. Pile Bents

2. Piers or Bents

Dive Cur

OVERHEAD SIGNS

(Attached to bridge)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

DEFDECK SUPERSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

2.

3.

4.

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

g.

6.

7.

8.

5.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

Year Painted

COLLISION DAMAGE: Please explain

LOAD DEFLECTION: Please explain

LOAD VIBRATION: Please explain

CURB REVEAL

ITEM 58

(In millimeters)

APPROACHES DEF

DEF

(Y/N) a.

b.

c.

a.

b.

c.

Any Cracks:

(Y/N)

(Y/N)

COLLISION DAMAGE:

UNDERMINING (Y/N) If YES please explain

SCOUR: Please explain

I-60 (Dive Report):

Any Fracture Critical Member:

93B-U/W (DIVE) Insp a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

g.

DEF DEF

X=UNKNOWN N=NOT APPLICABLE H=HIDDEN/INACCESSIBLE R=REMOVED

ITEM 59 ITEM 60

RTN(1)7-96

h.

i.

j.

k.

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

g.

h.

i.

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

I-60 (This Report):

l.

m.

j.

k.

d.

STRUCTURES INSPECTION FIELD REPORT2-DIST B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.

CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. 41-STATUS 90-ROUTINE INSP. DATE

MEMORIAL NAME/LOCAL NAME 27-YR BUILT 106-YR REBUILT YR REHAB'D (NON 106)

06-FEATURES INTERSECTED 26-FUNCTIONAL CLASS

43-STRUCTURE TYPE 22-OWNER 21-MAINTAINER

WEATHER TEMP. (air)

TEAM LEADER

07-FACILITY CARRIED

TEAM MEMBERS107-DECK TYPE

1PAGE OF

)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))

)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))

)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))

)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))

)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))

DIST. BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

ROUTINE INSPECTION05 4AN

B-01-014 11-Kilo. POINT

BARNSTABLE B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI 000.000 A:OPEN AUG 22, 2023

G. Simpson

Urban Minor Arterial J. Spiezio

107 : Concrete Frame State Highway Agency

State Highway Agency

1 : Concrete Cast-in-Place M. EMMONS

6 6 7

Wearing surface 4 S-A Stringers N - 7

Deck Condition 6 M-P Floorbeams N - Pedestals N N - Bridge Seats N N -

Stay in Place Forms N - Floor System Bracing N - Backwalls N N - Curbs 5 M-P Girders or Beams N - Breastwalls N 7 M-P

N 7 M-P N - Trusses - General N - Wingwalls

Median N N -N Slope Paving/Rip-Rap -6 M-P Upper Chords

Sidewalks Pointing N N - Lower Chords N - N H -

Parapets 6 M-P Footings

Web Members N - Piles N N - Railing N - Scour N N -

Lateral Bracing N - N - Settlement N 7 M-P

Anti Missile Fence Sway Bracings N - N N -

Drainage System N - Portals N - N N -

Lighting Standards N - N End Posts N -

N - N N -Utilities Pin & Hangers N Pedestals

- Caps N N -

Deck Joints N - Conn Plt's, Gussets & Angles N - Columns N N - Cover Plates N N NN - - Stems/Webs/Pierwalls -

Pointing N N - N - Bearing Devices N - Footing N N -

Diaphragms/Cross Frames N - Piles N N -N - N N NRivets & Bolts - Scour -

Settlement N NE W - Welds N - N N -

215 177 Member Alignment 6 M-P N N -

Paint/Coating N N- N N -Concrete Frame 6 Pile Caps

M-P Appr. pavement condition 4 S-A Piles N N -

Diagonal Bracing N N - Appr. Roadway Settlement 4 S-A Horizontal Bracing N N - Appr. Sidewalk Settlement 5 M-P Fasteners N N -

XN - N

N X X

X Condition of Welds N - X Condition of Bolts N - N N 7 Condition of Signs N -

N 00/00/0000

HWY OAK ST 1950 0000 0000

US 6 EB/MID CAPE HWY

Cloudy 20°C

N

A00817 - 3

RATING If YES please give priority:

HIGH ( MEDIUM ( LOW ( )))

CLEARANCE POSTING

Out of service - beyond corrective action.

ITEM 61 (This Report):

DEFECTS

Excellent condition.

No problem noted.

Some minor problems.

Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stablility.

Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put it back in light service.

Structural elements show some minor deterioration.

All primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.

Advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.

Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

Advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken.

REASON:

Recommend for Rating or Rerating (Y/N):

Date:

Rating Report (Y/N):

CHANNEL &

CHANNEL PROTECTION

RTB(2)04-07

ACCESSIBILITY

Lift Bucket Ladder Boat Waders Inspector 50 Rigging Staging Traffic Control RR Flagger Police Other:

(Y/N/P)

DEF

ITEM 36 TRAFFIC SAFETY

36 COND

A. Bridge Railing B. Transitions C. Approach Guardrail D. Approach Guardrail Ends

ITEM 61

WEIGHT POSTING Not Applicable

Actual Posting

Recommended Posting

Waived Date:

Signs In Place

EJDMT Date:

(Y=Yes,N=No, NR=NotRequired) Legibility/ Visibility

At bridge Other Advance

STREAM FLOW VELOCITY:

ITEM 61 (Dive Report):

93b-U/W INSP. DATE:

PLANS (Y/N):

TOTAL HOURS

Signs In Place

Legibility/ Visibility

Not Actual Field Measurement Posted Clearance inft

List of field tests performed:

S= Severe/Major Deficiency C-S= Critical Structural Deficiency -

M= Minor Deficiency

CATEGORIES OF DEFICIENCIES:

URGENCY OF REPAIR:

DEFICIENCY:

I = Immediate-

A = ASAP-

P = Prioritize-

At bridge Advance

(For Items 58, 59, 60 and 61)

Dive Cur DEF

Deficiencies which are more extensive in nature and need more planning and effort to repair. Examples include but are not limited to: Moderate to major deterioration in concrete, Exposed and corroded rebars, Considerable settlement, Considerable scouring or undermining, Moderate to extensive corrosion to structural steel with measurable loss of section, etc.

Deficiencies which are minor in nature, generally do not impact the structural integrity of the bridge and could easily be repaired. Examples include but are not limited to: Spalled concrete, Minor pot holes, Minor corrosion of steel, Minor scouring, Clogged drainage, etc.

A defect in a structure that requires corrective action.

[Shall be prioritized by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) and repairs made when funds and/or manpower is available].

[Action/Repair should be initiated by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) upon receipt of the Inspection Report].

A deficiency in a structural element of a bridge that poses an extreme unsafe condition due to the failure or imminent failure of the element which will affect the structural integrity of the bridge.

C-H= Critical Hazard Deficiency A deficiency in a component or element of a bridge that poses an extreme hazard or unsafe condition to the public, but does not impair the structural integrity of the bridge. Examples include but are not limited to: Loose concrete hanging down over traffic or pedestrians, A hole in a sidewalk that may cause injuries to pedestrians, Missing section of bridge railing, etc.

[Inspector(s) immediately contact District Bridge Inspection Engineer (DBIE) to report the Deficiency and to receive further instruction from him/her].

meterinft

SERIOUS

CRITICAL

"IMMINENT" FAILURE

FAILED

NOT APPLICABLE

CODE CONDITION

G

G G F F P

P

C

C

N

EXCELLENT

VERY GOOD

GOOD

SATISFACTORY

FAIR

POOR

Needed Used

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

(Y=Yes,N=No, NR=Not Required)

2PAGE OF

DEFICIENCY REPORTING GUIDE

Inspection data at time of existing rating I 58: I 59: I 60: Date :

(V.C.R.)

TAPE#:

(Y/N):

1.

2.

3.

5.

6.

7.

8.

4.

CONDITION RATING GUIDE

Tidal ( High ( Moderate ( Low ( None ( )))))

3S2 SingleH 3

N 6 M-P P N 7 M-P N N 7 M-P N N

N N - N - N N N N - X N N

N N - N N

N NN N -

P N

N N - N N N N - P N N N - N N - N N

Y

N X

Y NR Y NR

Y N

6 6 7

N

N N N N

N N N N 00/00/0000 00/00/0000

4.4114 6 15 8 0 0

N N

7 7 Visual and Tactile.00/00/0000 4 7

04/01/2018

N S N S

E W E W

E W

4AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBIBARNSTABLE AUG 22, 2023B-01-014

08/25/2015

Channel Scour

Fender System Aggradation Rip-Rap/Slope Protection Utilities Vegetation Debris Embankment Erosion

A00817 - 4

PAGE

REM.(2)7-96

REMARKS

4AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

3 15

BARNSTABLE AUG 22, 2023

OF

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

B-01-014

BRIDGE ORIENTATION

Orientation as follows:

• Bridge carries Oak Street intersecting US EB with north/south orientation, see sketch 1.

GENERAL REMARKS

Vertical Clearances Minimum vertical clearance is 14'-6" along the high speed shoulder line below the NW sector, see sketch 1.

There are EB gated advanced and at bridge height posting signs (13'-10") in place, legible and the north EB at bridge posting sign is obscured with vegetation, see photos 1 and 11 for examples.

Access Vehicle staging at the SE, top side inspected from the safety of the sidewalks, underside inspected from behind the guardrail system via NW embankment.

ITEM 58 - DECK

Item 58.1 - Wearing surface Bituminous wearing surface deficiencies as follows:

• Wide spread densely spaced unsealed/sealed longitudinal, transverse and irregular cracks ≤1/2"W throughout, predominantly FL along the east SL, see photos 2 and 3.

• Impending potholes, predominantly east SL and near the abutments.

• S/A - Moderate to severe rutting in the wheel paths ≤4"D, see photos 2 and 4.

• Debris/vegetation impaction FL along both curb lines.

Item 58.2 - Deck Condition See Item 59.15 - Concrete Frame.

Item 58.4 - Curbs Deficiencies as follows:

• FL both curbs, rotated towards the roadway ≤1.5", worst at the NE (Photo 3), see photos 2, 4 and 5 for examples.

• FL both curbs, vegetation/debris impaction at the sidewalk interface, see photos 3 - 5 for examples.

Item 58.6 - Sidewalks Deficiencies as follows:

• Both sidewalks (Safety-walk) exhibit random ≤1/8W transverse cracking, scaling/spalling/delaminations with vegetation impaction at ends and along curb lines, see photos 2 - 5 for overview examples.

Item 58.7 - Parapets Solid concrete barrier with slabs of New England Pink Granite affixed along the exterior vertical faces and affixed along the tops (Cap Stones), see photos 2, 3 and 9 - 11 for typical overviews.

Deficiencies as follows:

• SE endpost is missing a plaque, see photo 6.

• Wide spread separation/voids in mortar joints, predominantly along the tops (Cap Stones), however, slabs of New England Pink Granite resonate stable when sounded, see photos 4 and 7.

A00817 - 5

REMARKS

4AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

4 15

BARNSTABLE AUG 22, 2023

OF

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

B-01-014

• Solid concrete sections along both fascias exhibit ≤FL moderate - severe densely spaced ≤1/16"W longitudinal cracking with heavy active efflorescence, see photos 10 and 11 for exterior views.

APPROACHES

Approaches a - Appr. pavement condition Both approaches have sealed saw cuts over the abutments.

Deficiencies as follows:

SOUTH APPROACH

• Wide spread densely spaced unsealed/sealed longitudinal, transverse and irregular cracks ≤1/2"W throughout, predominantly over the abutment and east SL, see photo 6.

• Over the abutment, curb to curb saw and sealed cuts each exhibiting some separation ≤1/2"W in the shoulders with some debris impaction, see photo 6 for an example.

• S/A, severe rutting in the wheel paths that continues onto the bridge 2"D - 4"D.

• Debris/vegetation along both edges of the roadway.

• NB, FL x ≤3'W longitudinal asphalt patch and two large (≤4' diameter patches beyond bridge limits), see photo 6.

North Approach - See photo 3 for an overview.

• Wide spread moderately spaced unsealed/sealed longitudinal, transverse and irregular cracks ≤1/2"W throughout, predominantly over the abutment, see photo 7.

• Over the abutment, curb to curb saw and sealed cuts each exhibiting some separation ≤1/2"W in the shoulders with some debris impaction, see photo 3 for an example.

• S/A, severe rutting in the wheel paths that continues onto the bridge 2"D - 4"D, see photo 7.

• Debris/vegetation along both edges of the roadway.

Approaches b - Appr. Roadway Settlement See Approach Pavement for condition comments.

Approaches c - Appr. Sidewalk Settlement Sidewalks do not extend beyond approaches at the south or north approach of adjacent structure.

Deficiencies as follows:

• All approach sidewalks settled ≤2" and exhibit curb rotation ≤1.25" towards the roadway, see photos 3 - 5 for examples.

• FL Both sidewalks display greatly spaced unsealed ≤1/8"W transverse cracks, see photo 2.

• Moderate - heavy vegetation impaction at the ends and along the curbs, see photos 2 - 5 for examples.

A00817 - 6

REMARKS

4AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

5 15

BARNSTABLE AUG 22, 2023

OF

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

B-01-014

ITEM 59 - SUPERSTRUCTURE

Item 59.13 - Member Alignment In general, the top of the wingwalls/approach parapets exhibit settlement/rotation in relation to the bridge parapets. Misalignments were field measured along the tops, interior vertical faces of the cap granite and concrete portion below, see photo 5 and sketch 2 for location/method of measurements and chart 1 for results of field measurements.

Item 59.15 - Concrete Frame Condition based in conjunction with item 60.1.d - Breastwalls, deficiencies as follows :

• Minor cover spalls along the north frame leg. See photo 11 for general underside.

• FL both soffit edge and elevations exhibits moderate concrete contamination with densely spaced ≤1/16"W longitudinal cracking with active heavy efflorescence (East Elevation Worst), see photos 8 - 11.

• All concrete appears stable at the time of this inspection.

ITEM 60 - SUBSTRUCTURE

Item 60.1 - Abutments Item 60.1.d - Breastwalls Breastwalls (Frame Legs) deficiencies as follows:

• See photos 10 and 11 for an overview of the north breastwall.

• SW edge of frame displays some minor cover spalls, see photo 10.

Item 60.1.e - Wingwalls Deficiencies as follows:

• Top NE wingwall, isolated area of ≤1/16"W map/irregular cracking and active efflorescence, see photo 11.

• All wingwalls, heavy vegetation encroachment (Poison Ivy), see photos 10 and 11.

Item 60.1.k - Settlement See item 59.13 - Member Alignment for related condition comments.

TRAFFIC SAFETY

Item 36a - Bridge Railing Bridge railing consist of C.I.P. R/C with New England pink granite facade & cap, non-standard.

See Item 58.7 - Parapets for condition comments.

Item 36b - Transitions South steel W beam transitions are smoothly/firmly attached, nested/lapped correctly, however, irregular post spacings, missing collapsible pins and post affixed with steel offset blocks, all non-standard, see photo 6.

The north transitions are N/A, continuous to adjacent bridge B01012 (4AP), see photo 7.

Item 36c - Approach Guardrail Approach rails at the south are steel W beam with steel posts affixed with steel offset blocks, non-standard.

A00817 - 7

REMARKS

4AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

6 15

BARNSTABLE AUG 22, 2023

OF

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

B-01-014

The north are not N/A, continuous to adjacent bridge B01012 (4AP), see photo 7.

Item 36d - Approach Guardrail Ends Guardrail ends to the south are beyond bridge limits, the north are not applicable.

Sketch / Chart / Photo Log Sketch 1 : Plan view and vertical clearances.

Sketch 2 : Points of measurement at bridge and approach parapet interface. Approach parapet in the foreground.

Chart 1 : 2023 Field measurements at the four interfaces of the approach parapets/bridge parapets.

Photo 1 : Looking east at EB advanced/at bridge height posting signs, north at bridge sign obscured by vegetation.

Photo 2 : Looking NW from the SE over wearing surface, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/ unsealed cracks and isolated/random asphalt filled potholes.

Photo 3 : Looking SW from the NE over wearing surface, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/ unsealed cracks and isolated/random asphalt filled potholes.

Photo 4 : Looking south at NW corner, sidewalk settlement, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/ unsealed cracks and isolated/random asphalt filled potholes.

Photo 5 : Looking NW at SW corner, parapet field measurements and sidewalk/curb settlement.

Photo 6 : Looking SW over south approach pavement, continued wearing surface deficiencies with FL asphalt patch in NB lane.

Photo 7 : Looking NW over north approach pavement, continued wearing surface deficiencies and NE corner sidewalk/curb settlement.

Photo 8 : Looking north, general underside.

Photo 9 : Close up of previous photo (East Soffit Edge), FL active efflorescence with HL densely spaced longitudinal cracks.

Photo 10 : West elevation.

Photo 11 : East elevation.

A00817 - 8

A00817 - 9

SKETCHES

Points of measurement at bridge and approach parapet interface.

Approach parapet in the foreground.

Sketch 2:

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE 4AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE OF8 15

B-01-014

A00817 - 10

A00817 - 11

Looking east at EB advanced/at bridge height posting signs, north at bridge sign obscured by vegetation.

Looking NW from the SE over wearing surface, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/unsealed cracks and isolated/random asphalt filled potholes.

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-014

Photo 2:

4AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 10 15OF

Photo 1:

A00817 - 12

Looking SW from the NE over wearing surface, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/unsealed cracks and isolated/random asphalt filled potholes.

Looking south at NW corner, sidewalk settlement, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/unsealed cracks and isolated/random asphalt filled potholes.

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-014

Photo 4:

4AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 11 15OF

Photo 3:

A00817 - 13

Looking NW at SW corner, parapet field measurements and sidewalk/ curb settlement.

Looking SW over south approach pavement, continued wearing surface deficiencies with FL asphalt patch in NB lane.

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-014

Photo 6:

4AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 12 15OF

Photo 5:

A00817 - 14

Looking NW over north approach pavement, continued wearing surface deficiencies and NE corner sidewalk/curb settlement.

Looking north, general underside.

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-014

Photo 8:

4AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 13 15OF

Photo 7:

A00817 - 15

Close up of previous photo (East Soffit Edge), FL active efflorescence with HL densely spaced longitudinal cracks.

West elevation.

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-014

Photo 10:

4AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 14 15OF

Photo 9:

A00817 - 16

East elevation.

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-0144AN B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 15 15OF

Photo 11:

A00817 - 17

Report Date: November 20, 2024 Code

Code

Code

Code

Classification

Field Posting

Misc.

Rating Loads

Appraisal

Load Rating and Posting

Condition

Inspections

State Information

Geometric Data

Age and Service

Structure Type and Material

Identification

Navigation Data

Accessibility (Needed/Used)

Jointless bridge type:

FHWA Select List= Y (6/21/2017)

BDEPT#=

B.I.N= AASHTO=4AN 074.5

Town=

(35) Structure Flared

(33) Bridge Median -

C) Type of deck protection -

B) Type of membrane -

A) Type of wearing surface -

(107) Deck Structure Type -

(40) Navigation Horizontal Clearance

(116) Vert-lift Bridge Nav Min Vert Clear

(39) Navigation Vertical Clearance

Code

(47) Inventory Route Total Horiz Clear

(49) Structure Length

(50) Curb or sidewalk:

(27) Year Built

(106) Year Reconstructed

(42) Type of Service: On -

Under -

(28) Lanes: On Structure

(29) Average Daily Traffic

(30) Year of ADT

(19) Bypass, detour length

(108) Wearing Surface / Protective System:

(43) Structure Type Main:

(46) Number of approach spans

(45) Number of spans in main unit

(44) Structure Type Appr:

(99) Border Bridge Structure No. #

(8) Structure Number

(16) Latitude

(5) Inventory Route

(2) State Highway Department District

(3) County Code (4) Place code

(6) Features Intersected

(7) Facility Carried

(9) Location

(11) Kilometerpoint

DEG

(17) Longitude

(98) Border Bridge State Code Share %

Code

Code

Code

Code

Code

Code

Code

Under structure

(109) Truck ADT %

(48) Length of maximum span

Left Right

(51) Bridge Roadway Width Curb to Curb

(52) Deck Width Out to Out

(32) Approach Roadway Width (w/shoulders)

Code

(34) Skew DEG

(10) Inventory Route MIN Vert Clear

(53) Min Vert Clear Over Bridge Rdwy

(54) Min Vert Underclear ref

(55) Min Lat Underclear RT ref

(56) Min Lat Underclear LT

(38) Navigation Control -

(111) Pier Protection Code

(12) Base Highway Network

(13) LRS Inventory Route & Subroute

MIN SEC

DEG MIN SEC

(112) NBIS Bridge Length

(37) Historical Significance

(22) Owner -

(100) Defense Highway

(21) Maintain -

(20) Toll -

(110) Designated National Network

(103) Temporary Structure

(102) Direction of Traffic -

(101) Parallel Structure

(26) Functional Class -

(104) Highway System

(105) Federal Lands Highways

KM

M M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

B010144ANDOTNBI N

151000000 2

001 03635 0

US 6 EB/MID CAPE HWY

HWY OAK ST 3

AT JCT SERVICE ROAD 01

0000.000 01

Z

41 41 02.52

70 21 13.77

02 02

006701

2023 06

0014.3 00016.8

00.8 00.8

009.1

011.5

009.1

99.99

09.1

99.99

H 04.41

H 01.6

01.5

N

000.0

0000.0

Agency Br.No.

Anti-missile fence

Recommended

2 Axle 3 Axle 5 Axle Actual

Bridge Name

Status Posting DateLEGAL 06/11/19

Acrow Panel Jointless Bridge

(B) Underwater Inspection

(C) Other Special Inspection

(*) Closed Bridge

(A) Fracture Critical Detail

(*) Damage Inspection

(92) Critical Feature Inspection:

MO

MO A)

(93) CFI DATE

(91) Frequency(90) Inspection Date

MO B)

MO C)

MO *)

MO *)

MO *)

(113) Scour Critical Bridges

(36) Traffic Safety Features

(72) Approach Roadway Alignment

(71) Waterway adequacy

(69) Underclearances, vert. and horiz.

(68) Deck Geometry

(67) Structural Evaluation

(41) Structure -

(66) Inventory Rating

(64) Operating Rating

(31) Design Load -

(62) Culverts

Condition

(58) Deck

(59) Superstructure

(60) Substructure

(61) Channel & Channel Protection

(70) Bridge Posting

(63) Operating Rating Method -

(65) Inventory Rating Method -

N N

99.9

75.4 A

N

0 0 0 N

N

08/22/23 24

00 00/00/00

00 00/00/00

00 00/00/00

00 00/00/00

00 00/00/00

00/00/00

H20 Type 3 Type 3S2 Type HS

61.0 88.0 99.0 97.0

38.0 47.0 75.0 50.0

(*) UW Special Inspection MO *)00 00/00/00

(*) Other Inspection ()

Missing Signs

Freeze/Thaw

RANK= 2355 H.I.=

MHDL.O.

Y N

N

N

N 000000000000

N

B01014 Barnstable

Urban Minor Arterial

2-way traffic

On free road

State Highway Agency

State Highway Agency built after 1949 presumed to be not eligib

Concrete

Frame RIGID FRAME

Other

Concrete Cast-in-Place

Bituminous

Built-up

None

Highway

Highway

No median

Not applicable, no waterway

N N N N N N

N

N N Y 3 : No Deteriorated concrete; No known problematic history

H 20=M 18

Open

Load Factor (LF)

Load Factor (LF)

96.7 %

Operating Inventory

Report Date 04/01/18

Single

P / N Liftbucket N / N N / N N / N P / N N / N N / N

P / N

N / N Rigging

N / N

Ladder Staging Boat Traffic Control Wader RR Flagperson Inspector 50 Police

Inspection Hours: 012

N / N Other

# Stairs On/Adjacent 0 Stair Owner(s)

A00817 - 18

National Bridge Element Inspection

Span Group

Item 8

BDEPT#

B.I.N.

Town

District

District Bridge Inspection Eng'r

Inspecting Agency

Team Leader

Team Member(s)

B-01-014

4AN

B01014-4AN-DOT-NBI

Grant Simpson

Barnstable

Mass. Highway Dept.

John Spiezio

Mark Emmons

Date 08/22/2023

El # Element Name Units Env. Total Q. % or Q State 1 State 2 State 3 State 4

Re Concrete Slab sq feet 2 1,926.740 1,632.740 294.000%38

Notes :

Cracking (RC and Other) sq feet 2 294.000 294.000% > 1130

Notes :

Wearing Surfaces sq feet 2 1,646.878 1,367.878 279.000% > 510

Notes :

Del/Spall/Patch/Pot(Wear Surf) sq feet 2 100.000 100.000% > > 3210

Notes :

Crack (Wearing Surface) sq feet 2 179.000 179.000% > > 3220

Notes :

Re Conc Abutment feet 2 88.582 83.582 5.000%215

Notes :

Delamination/Spall/Patched Area feet 2 5.000 5.000% > 1080

Notes :

Other Bridge Railing feet 2 111.548 111.548%333

Notes :

A00817 - 19

A00817 - 20

1. Abutments

3. Pile Bents

2. Piers or Bents

Dive Cur

OVERHEAD SIGNS

(Attached to bridge)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

DEFDECK SUPERSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

2.

3.

4.

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

g.

6.

7.

8.

5.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

Year Painted

COLLISION DAMAGE: Please explain

LOAD DEFLECTION: Please explain

LOAD VIBRATION: Please explain

CURB REVEAL

ITEM 58

(In millimeters)

APPROACHES DEF

DEF

(Y/N) a.

b.

c.

a.

b.

c.

Any Cracks:

(Y/N)

(Y/N)

COLLISION DAMAGE:

UNDERMINING (Y/N) If YES please explain

SCOUR: Please explain

I-60 (Dive Report):

Any Fracture Critical Member:

93B-U/W (DIVE) Insp a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

g.

DEF DEF

X=UNKNOWN N=NOT APPLICABLE H=HIDDEN/INACCESSIBLE R=REMOVED

ITEM 59 ITEM 60

RTN(1)7-96

h.

i.

j.

k.

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

g.

h.

i.

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

I-60 (This Report):

l.

m.

j.

k.

d.

STRUCTURES INSPECTION FIELD REPORT2-DIST B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.

CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. 41-STATUS 90-ROUTINE INSP. DATE

MEMORIAL NAME/LOCAL NAME 27-YR BUILT 106-YR REBUILT YR REHAB'D (NON 106)

06-FEATURES INTERSECTED 26-FUNCTIONAL CLASS

43-STRUCTURE TYPE 22-OWNER 21-MAINTAINER

WEATHER TEMP. (air)

TEAM LEADER

07-FACILITY CARRIED

TEAM MEMBERS107-DECK TYPE

1PAGE OF

)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))

)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))

)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))

)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))

)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))

DIST. BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

ROUTINE INSPECTION05 4AP

B-01-012 11-Kilo. POINT

BARNSTABLE B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI 000.000 A:OPEN AUG 22, 2023

G. Simpson

Urban Minor Arterial J. Spiezio

107 : Concrete Frame State Highway Agency

State Highway Agency

1 : Concrete Cast-in-Place M. EMMONS

7 7 7

Wearing surface 6 S-P Stringers N - 7

Deck Condition 7 M-P Floorbeams N - Pedestals N N - Bridge Seats N N -

Stay in Place Forms N - Floor System Bracing N - Backwalls N N - Curbs 5 S-P Girders or Beams N - Breastwalls N 7 M-P

N 7 M-P N - Trusses - General N - Wingwalls

Median N N -N Slope Paving/Rip-Rap -5 S-P Upper Chords

Sidewalks Pointing N N - Lower Chords N - N H -

Parapets 7 M-P Footings

Web Members N - Piles N N - Railing N - Scour N N -

Lateral Bracing N - N - Settlement N 7 -

Anti Missile Fence Sway Bracings N - N N -

Drainage System N - Portals N - N N -

Lighting Standards N - N End Posts N -

N - N N -Utilities Pin & Hangers N Pedestals

- Caps N N -

Deck Joints N - Conn Plt's, Gussets & Angles N - Columns N N - Cover Plates N N NN - - Stems/Webs/Pierwalls -

Pointing N N - N - Bearing Devices N - Footing N N -

Diaphragms/Cross Frames N - Piles N N -N - N N NRivets & Bolts - Scour -

Settlement N NE W - Welds N - N N -

190 203 Member Alignment 6 M-P N N -

Paint/Coating N N- N N -Concrete Frame 7 Pile Caps

M-P Appr. pavement condition 6 S-P Piles N N -

Diagonal Bracing N N - Appr. Roadway Settlement 5 S-A Horizontal Bracing N N - Appr. Sidewalk Settlement 5 S-P Fasteners N N -

XN - N

N X X

X Condition of Welds N - X Condition of Bolts N - N N 7 Condition of Signs N -

N 00/00/0000

HWY OAK ST 1950 0000 0000

US 6 WB/MID CAPE HWY

Cloudy 20°C

N

A00817 - 21

RATING If YES please give priority:

HIGH ( MEDIUM ( LOW ( )))

CLEARANCE POSTING

Out of service - beyond corrective action.

ITEM 61 (This Report):

DEFECTS

Excellent condition.

No problem noted.

Some minor problems.

Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stablility.

Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put it back in light service.

Structural elements show some minor deterioration.

All primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.

Advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.

Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

Advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken.

REASON:

Recommend for Rating or Rerating (Y/N):

Date:

Rating Report (Y/N):

CHANNEL &

CHANNEL PROTECTION

RTB(2)04-07

ACCESSIBILITY

Lift Bucket Ladder Boat Waders Inspector 50 Rigging Staging Traffic Control RR Flagger Police Other:

(Y/N/P)

DEF

ITEM 36 TRAFFIC SAFETY

36 COND

A. Bridge Railing B. Transitions C. Approach Guardrail D. Approach Guardrail Ends

ITEM 61

WEIGHT POSTING Not Applicable

Actual Posting

Recommended Posting

Waived Date:

Signs In Place

EJDMT Date:

(Y=Yes,N=No, NR=NotRequired) Legibility/ Visibility

At bridge Other Advance

STREAM FLOW VELOCITY:

ITEM 61 (Dive Report):

93b-U/W INSP. DATE:

PLANS (Y/N):

TOTAL HOURS

Signs In Place

Legibility/ Visibility

Not Actual Field Measurement Posted Clearance inft

List of field tests performed:

S= Severe/Major Deficiency C-S= Critical Structural Deficiency -

M= Minor Deficiency

CATEGORIES OF DEFICIENCIES:

URGENCY OF REPAIR:

DEFICIENCY:

I = Immediate-

A = ASAP-

P = Prioritize-

At bridge Advance

(For Items 58, 59, 60 and 61)

Dive Cur DEF

Deficiencies which are more extensive in nature and need more planning and effort to repair. Examples include but are not limited to: Moderate to major deterioration in concrete, Exposed and corroded rebars, Considerable settlement, Considerable scouring or undermining, Moderate to extensive corrosion to structural steel with measurable loss of section, etc.

Deficiencies which are minor in nature, generally do not impact the structural integrity of the bridge and could easily be repaired. Examples include but are not limited to: Spalled concrete, Minor pot holes, Minor corrosion of steel, Minor scouring, Clogged drainage, etc.

A defect in a structure that requires corrective action.

[Shall be prioritized by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) and repairs made when funds and/or manpower is available].

[Action/Repair should be initiated by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) upon receipt of the Inspection Report].

A deficiency in a structural element of a bridge that poses an extreme unsafe condition due to the failure or imminent failure of the element which will affect the structural integrity of the bridge.

C-H= Critical Hazard Deficiency A deficiency in a component or element of a bridge that poses an extreme hazard or unsafe condition to the public, but does not impair the structural integrity of the bridge. Examples include but are not limited to: Loose concrete hanging down over traffic or pedestrians, A hole in a sidewalk that may cause injuries to pedestrians, Missing section of bridge railing, etc.

[Inspector(s) immediately contact District Bridge Inspection Engineer (DBIE) to report the Deficiency and to receive further instruction from him/her].

meterinft

SERIOUS

CRITICAL

"IMMINENT" FAILURE

FAILED

NOT APPLICABLE

CODE CONDITION

G

G G F F P

P

C

C

N

EXCELLENT

VERY GOOD

GOOD

SATISFACTORY

FAIR

POOR

Needed Used

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

(Y=Yes,N=No, NR=Not Required)

2PAGE OF

DEFICIENCY REPORTING GUIDE

Inspection data at time of existing rating I 58: I 59: I 60: Date :

(V.C.R.)

TAPE#:

(Y/N):

1.

2.

3.

5.

6.

7.

8.

4.

CONDITION RATING GUIDE

Tidal ( High ( Moderate ( Low ( None ( )))))

3S2 SingleH 3

N 7 M-P P N 7 M-P P N 6 M-P N N

N N - 7 M-P N N N N - X N N

N N - N N

N NN N -

P N

N N - N N N N - P N N N - N N - N N

Y

N X

NR Y NR Y

Y N

7 7 7

N N N N

N N N N 00/00/0000 00/00/0000

4.290 14 1 0 13 9

N N

7 7 Visual and Tactile.00/00/0000 7 5

08/01/2010

N S N S

E W E W

E W

4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBIBARNSTABLE AUG 22, 2023B-01-012

08/27/2009

Channel Scour

Fender System Aggradation Rip-Rap/Slope Protection Utilities Vegetation Debris Embankment Erosion

A00817 - 22

REMARKS

4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

3 17

BARNSTABLE AUG 22, 2023

OF

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

B-01-012

BRIDGE ORIENTATION

Orientation as follows:

• Bridge carries Oak Street intersecting US WB with north/south orientation, see sketch 1.

GENERAL REMARKS

Vertical Clearances At the time of this inspection, there were five WB gated height posting signs labeled 13'-9", two at bridge, two advanced, and one of two (One missing) east of exit 68 between Mile Markers 68.4 and 68.6, see photos 1, 2 and sketch 2. Minimum vertical clearance is 14'-1" along the high speed shoulder line below the SW sector, see sketch 1. The WB gated advanced and at bridge height posting signs (13'-9") are in place and legible, however, the WB advanced bridge posting sign is obscured with vegetation, see photo 1 for example.

Access Vehicle staging at the SE, topside inspected from the safety of the sidewalks, underside inspected from behind the guardrail system via NW embankment.

ITEM 58 - DECK

Item 58.1 - Wearing surface Bituminous wearing surface deficiencies as follows:

• Wide spread densely spaced unsealed/sealed longitudinal, transverse and irregular cracks ≤1/2"W throughout, predominantly FL along the NB lane, see photos 3 and 4.

• Impending potholes, predominantly NB lane and near the abutments.

• S/P - Moderate to severe rutting in the wheel paths ≤2"D, see photos 3 and 4.

• Debris/vegetation impaction FL along both curb lines.

Item 58.2 - Deck Condition See Item 59.15 - Concrete Frame.

Item 58.4 - Curbs Both curbs display the following deficiencies :

• On average, FL x 1"W separation between concrete sidewalk/curbs with heavy vegetation/debris impaction throughout, see photos 3 and 4 for typical overviews, worst separation at the SW = 1-3/4", see photo 5.

Item 58.6 - Sidewalks Both sidewalks deficiencies as follows :

• Scattered ≤1/8"W transverse cracks, see photos 3 - 7.

• Light scale/spalling ≤1/2"D, minor delaminations with heavy vegetation impaction throughout, see photos 3 - 7 for overviews.

Item 58.7 - Parapets Solid concrete barrier with slabs of New England Pink Granite affixed along the exterior vertical faces and affixed along the tops (Cap Stones), see photos 4 - 7 and 9, 10 and 12 for typical overviews.

Deficiencies as follows:

• NW endpost is missing a plaque, see photo 7.

• Wide spread separation/voids in mortar joints, predominantly along the tops (Cap Stones), however, slabs

A00817 - 23

REMARKS

4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

4 17

BARNSTABLE AUG 22, 2023

OF

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

B-01-012 of New England Pink Granite resonate stable when sounded, see photos 4 - 7, 9 and 10.

• Solid concrete sections along both fascias exhibit ≤FL moderate - severe densely spaced ≤1/16"W longitudinal cracking with some active efflorescence (Ends), see photos 9, 10 and 12 for exterior views.

APPROACHES

Approaches a - Appr. pavement condition Both approaches have sealed saw cuts over the abutments. Deficiencies as follows:

SOUTH APPROACH

• Wide spread densely spaced unsealed/sealed longitudinal, transverse and irregular cracks ≤1/2"W throughout, predominantly over the abutment and NB lane, see photo 6.

• Over the abutment, curb to curb saw and sealed cuts each exhibiting some separation ≤1/2"W in the shoulders with some debris/vegetation impaction, see photos 5 and 6 for an examples.

• Severe rutting in the wheel paths that continues onto the bridge ≤2"D.

• Debris/vegetation along both edges of the roadway.

• NBL, FL x ≤3'W longitudinal asphalt patch and two large (≤4' diameter patches beyond bridge limits), see photo 6.

NORTH APPROACH

• Wide spread moderately spaced unsealed/sealed longitudinal, transverse and irregular cracks ≤1/2"W throughout, predominantly over the abutment, see photo 7.

• Over the abutment, curb to curb saw and sealed cuts each exhibiting some separation ≤1/2"W in the shoulders with some debris/vegetation impaction, see photos 4 and 7.

• Severe rutting in the wheel paths that continues onto the bridge 2"D - 4"D, see photo 7.

• Debris/vegetation along both edges of the roadway.

• Over the abutment, curb to curb saw and sealed cuts each exhibiting some separation ≤1/2"W in the shoulders with some debris impaction, see photo 6 for an example.

Approaches b - Appr. Roadway Settlement S/A, Both approaches exhibit rutting in the wheel paths (Settlement) which continues onto the bridge.

Most notable area is at the south approach in the NB lane, see photo 6.

Approaches c - Appr. Sidewalk Settlement Deficiencies as follows:

• All approach sidewalks (SW worst) have settlement ≤4"D with vegetation/debris impaction, see photos 4 - 7.

• At the SW approach (Granite) curb, FH x FW x FP diagonal crack, see photo 5 for an overview.

A00817 - 24

REMARKS

4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

5 17

BARNSTABLE AUG 22, 2023

OF

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

B-01-012

ITEM 59 - SUPERSTRUCTURE

Item 59.13 - Member Alignment In general, the top of the wingwalls/approach parapets exhibit settlement/rotation in relation to the bridge parapets. Misalignments were field measured along the tops, interior vertical faces of the cap granite and concrete portion below, see photo 5 and sketch 3 for location/method of measurements and chart 1 for results of field measurements.

Item 59.15 - Concrete Frame Condition based in conjunction with item 60.1.d - Breastwalls, rigid frame displayed deficiencies as follows:

• Isolated ≤5'L x ≤1/2"D cover spall with exposed/corroded rebar over the north guardrail/breakdown lane, see photo 8.

• Exterior faces exhibits scattered hairline map cracking with light efflorescence and leakage, see photos 9, 10 and 12 for examples.

Also see SuperStructure Collision Notes.

SuperStructure Collision Notes Apex of East edge of the frame, two entry spalls each over both lanes ≤8"L x ≤6"W x ≤2"D, see photo 12.

Both entry spalls exhibit associated scrapes FL x 4"W along the rigid frame soffit.

ITEM 60 - SUBSTRUCTURE

Item 60.1 - Abutments Item 60.1.d - Breastwalls Deficiencies as follows:

• Four exterior corners, leakage staining and vegetation encroachment, see photos 9 and 10 as examples and overview.

• Top SE corner of the rigid frame leg, vertical spall ≤2'H x ≤6"W x ≤1/2"D with adjacent (Below) vertical delamination (Stable) ≤5'H x ≤1'W, see photo 11.

• Minor spall at the NW.

Item 60.1.e - Wingwalls Minor deficiencies as follows :

• Leakage staining, isolated active leakage at the SE corner construction joint.

• SW corner, 50 square feet of densely spaced ≤1/16"W map cracking with efflorescence leakage.

TRAFFIC SAFETY

Item 36a - Bridge Railing Deficiencies as follows:

• Bridge railing consist of C.I.P. R/C with New England pink granite facade & cap, non-standard.

Also see Item 58.7 - Parapets for condition comments.

Item 36b - Transitions Deficiencies as follows:

A00817 - 25

REMARKS

4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

6 17

BARNSTABLE AUG 22, 2023

OF

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

B-01-012

•Transitions at the south are not applicable, continue to bridge B01014 (4AN), see photo 6.

• North steel W beam transitions are smoothly/firmly attached, nested/lapped correctly, however, irregular post spacings, missing collapsible pins and steel posts affixed with steel offset blocks are all non-standard, see photo 7 as example and overview.

Item 36c - Approach Guardrail Deficiencies as follows:

• The approach rail at the south is not applicable, continue to bridge B01014 (4AN), see photo 6.

• North approach rail is steel W-beam panels, however, steel posts affixed with steel offset blocks with panels spliced on posts, non-standard.

• NE approach guardrail has minor FL collision damage (Scrapes/Dents/Tears) along the panels, see photo 13.

Item 36d - Approach Guardrail Ends The terminals at the south end are not applicable, see photo 6.

The north terminals are buried, non-standard, see photo 13.

Sketch / Chart / Photo Log Sketch 1 : Plan view showing low clearance.

Sketch 2 : Locus Plan with existing clearance posting signs.

Sketch 3 : Points of measurement at bridge and approach parapet interface. Approach parapet in the foreground.

Chart 1 : Field measurements at the four interfaces of the approach and bridge parapets.

Photo 1 : WB advanced height posting signs, advanced sign partially obscured with vegetation.

Photo 2 : Looking west between Mile Markers 68.4 & 68.6 south of exit 68, height posting sign obscured with vegetation and a sign is missing.

Photo 3 : Looking NW from the SE over wearing surface, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/ unsealed cracks and isolated/random asphalt filled potholes.

Photo 4 : Looking SE from the NW over wearing surface, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/ unsealed cracks and NW approach sidewalk settlement.

Photo 5 : Looking NW at SW corner, parapet field measurements and sidewalk/curb settlement.

Photo 6 : Looking south over north approach pavement, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/ unsealed cracks and SE sidewalk/curb settlement.

Photo 7 : Looking NW over north approach pavement, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/ unsealed cracks and NE sidewalk/curb settlement (Ponding).

Photo 8 : Looking north, general underside.

Photo 9 : East elevation.

Photo 10 : West elevation.

Photo 11 : Looking west at SE corner of rigid frame leg, spall at the top and delamination below.

Vegetation encroaching.

Photo 12 : Looking west at east edge of ridid frame soffit, two entry spalls and FL scrapes over both lanes.

Photo 13 : Looking south at NE approach guardrail, panels damaged FL.

A00817 - 26

A00817 - 27

Locus Plan with existing clearance posting signs.Sketch 2:

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE 4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE OF8 17

B-01-012

A00817 - 28

Points of measurement at bridge and approach parapet interface.

Approach parapet in the foreground.

Sketch 3:

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE 4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE OF9 17

B-01-012

A00817 - 29

A00817 - 30

WB advanced height posting signs, advanced sign partially obscured with vegetation.

Photo 1:

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE 4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 11 17OF

B-01-012

A00817 - 31

Looking west between Mile Markers 68.4 & 68.6 south of exit 68, height posting sign obscured with vegetation and a sign is missing.

Looking NW from the SE over wearing surface, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/unsealed cracks and isolated/random asphalt filled potholes.

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-012

Photo 3:

4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 12 17OF

Photo 2:

A00817 - 32

Looking SE from the NW over wearing surface, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/unsealed cracks and NW approach sidewalk settlement.

Looking NW at SW corner, parapet field measurements and sidewalk/ curb settlement.

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-012

Photo 5:

4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 13 17OF

Photo 4:

A00817 - 33

Looking south over north approach pavement, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/unsealed cracks and SE sidewalk/curb settlement.

Looking NW over north approach pavement, severe rutting in the wheel paths, sealed/unsealed cracks and NE sidewalk/curb settlement (Ponding).

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-012

Photo 7:

4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 14 17OF

Photo 6:

A00817 - 34

Looking north, general underside.

East elevation.

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-012

Photo 9:

4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 15 17OF

Photo 8:

A00817 - 35

West elevation.

Looking west at SE corner of rigid frame leg, spall at the top and delamination below. Vegetation encroaching.

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-012

Photo 11:

4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 16 17OF

Photo 10:

A00817 - 36

Looking west at east edge of ridid frame soffit, two entry spalls and FL scrapes over both lanes.

Looking south at NE approach guardrail, panels damaged FL.

AUG 22, 2023BARNSTABLE B-01-012

Photo 13:

4AP B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

PHOTOS

B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE

PAGE 17 17OF

Photo 12:

A00817 - 37

Report Date: November 20, 2024 Code

Code

Code

Code

Classification

Field Posting

Misc.

Rating Loads

Appraisal

Load Rating and Posting

Condition

Inspections

State Information

Geometric Data

Age and Service

Structure Type and Material

Identification

Navigation Data

Accessibility (Needed/Used)

Jointless bridge type:

FHWA Select List= Y (6/21/2017)

BDEPT#=

B.I.N= AASHTO=4AP 072.5

Town=

(35) Structure Flared

(33) Bridge Median -

C) Type of deck protection -

B) Type of membrane -

A) Type of wearing surface -

(107) Deck Structure Type -

(40) Navigation Horizontal Clearance

(116) Vert-lift Bridge Nav Min Vert Clear

(39) Navigation Vertical Clearance

Code

(47) Inventory Route Total Horiz Clear

(49) Structure Length

(50) Curb or sidewalk:

(27) Year Built

(106) Year Reconstructed

(42) Type of Service: On -

Under -

(28) Lanes: On Structure

(29) Average Daily Traffic

(30) Year of ADT

(19) Bypass, detour length

(108) Wearing Surface / Protective System:

(43) Structure Type Main:

(46) Number of approach spans

(45) Number of spans in main unit

(44) Structure Type Appr:

(99) Border Bridge Structure No. #

(8) Structure Number

(16) Latitude

(5) Inventory Route

(2) State Highway Department District

(3) County Code (4) Place code

(6) Features Intersected

(7) Facility Carried

(9) Location

(11) Kilometerpoint

DEG

(17) Longitude

(98) Border Bridge State Code Share %

Code

Code

Code

Code

Code

Code

Code

Under structure

(109) Truck ADT %

(48) Length of maximum span

Left Right

(51) Bridge Roadway Width Curb to Curb

(52) Deck Width Out to Out

(32) Approach Roadway Width (w/shoulders)

Code

(34) Skew DEG

(10) Inventory Route MIN Vert Clear

(53) Min Vert Clear Over Bridge Rdwy

(54) Min Vert Underclear ref

(55) Min Lat Underclear RT ref

(56) Min Lat Underclear LT

(38) Navigation Control -

(111) Pier Protection Code

(12) Base Highway Network

(13) LRS Inventory Route & Subroute

MIN SEC

DEG MIN SEC

(112) NBIS Bridge Length

(37) Historical Significance

(22) Owner -

(100) Defense Highway

(21) Maintain -

(20) Toll -

(110) Designated National Network

(103) Temporary Structure

(102) Direction of Traffic -

(101) Parallel Structure

(26) Functional Class -

(104) Highway System

(105) Federal Lands Highways

KM

M M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

B010124APDOTNBI N

151000000 2

001 03635 0

US 6 WB/MID CAPE HWY

HWY OAK ST 3

ADJCENT TO JCT SERVICE RD 01

0000.000 01

Z

41 41 04.26

70 21 12.65

02 02

006071

2023 06

0014.3 00016.8

00.8 00.8

009.1

011.5

009.1

99.99

09.1

99.99

H 04.29

H 01.5

01.5

N

000.0

0000.0

Agency Br.No.

Anti-missile fence

Recommended

2 Axle 3 Axle 5 Axle Actual

Bridge Name

Status Posting DateLEGAL 11/18/10

Acrow Panel Jointless Bridge

(B) Underwater Inspection

(C) Other Special Inspection

(*) Closed Bridge

(A) Fracture Critical Detail

(*) Damage Inspection

(92) Critical Feature Inspection:

MO

MO A)

(93) CFI DATE

(91) Frequency(90) Inspection Date

MO B)

MO C)

MO *)

MO *)

MO *)

(113) Scour Critical Bridges

(36) Traffic Safety Features

(72) Approach Roadway Alignment

(71) Waterway adequacy

(69) Underclearances, vert. and horiz.

(68) Deck Geometry

(67) Structural Evaluation

(41) Structure -

(66) Inventory Rating

(64) Operating Rating

(31) Design Load -

(62) Culverts

Condition

(58) Deck

(59) Superstructure

(60) Substructure

(61) Channel & Channel Protection

(70) Bridge Posting

(63) Operating Rating Method -

(65) Inventory Rating Method -

N N

50.1

30.0 A

N

0 0 0 0

N

08/22/23 24

00 00/00/00

00 00/00/00

00 00/00/00

00 00/00/00

00 00/00/00

05/20/14

H20 Type 3 Type 3S2 Type HS

66.0 91.0 99.0 88.0

22.0 36.0 57.0 33.0

(*) UW Special Inspection MO *)00 00/00/00

(*) Other Inspection ()

Missing Signs

Freeze/Thaw

RANK= 3019 H.I.=

MHDL.O.

Y N

N

N

N 000000000000

N

B01012 Barnstable

Urban Minor Arterial

2-way traffic

On free road

State Highway Agency

State Highway Agency built after 1949 presumed to be not eligib

Concrete

Frame RIGID FRAME

Other

Concrete Cast-in-Place

Bituminous

Built-up

None

Highway

Highway

No median

Not applicable, no waterway

N N N N N N

N

N N Y 3 : No Deteriorated concrete; No known problematic history

H 20=M 18

Open

Load Factor (LF)

Load Factor (LF)

98.1 %

Operating Inventory

Report Date 08/01/10

Single

P / N Liftbucket P / N N / N N / N P / N N / N N / N

P / N

N / N Rigging

N / N

Ladder Staging Boat Traffic Control Wader RR Flagperson Inspector 50 Police

Inspection Hours: 016

N / N Other

# Stairs On/Adjacent 0 Stair Owner(s)

A00817 - 38

National Bridge Element Inspection

Span Group

Item 8

BDEPT#

B.I.N.

Town

District

District Bridge Inspection Eng'r

Inspecting Agency

Team Leader

Team Member(s)

B-01-012

4AP

B01012-4AP-DOT-NBI

Grant Simpson

Barnstable

Mass. Highway Dept.

John Spiezio

Mark Emmons

Date 08/22/2023

El # Element Name Units Env. Total Q. % or Q State 1 State 2 State 3 State 4

Re Concrete Slab sq feet 2 2,067.000 1,926.000 141.000%38

Notes : ∆ BL * O-O = 54.9 * 37.66 = 2067.5 sq ft

Delamination/Spall/Patched Area sq feet 2 5.000 5.000% > 1080

Notes :

Efflorescence/Rust Staining sq feet 2 136.000 136.000% > 1120

Notes :

Damage sq feet 2 5.000 5.000% > 7000

Notes :

Wearing Surfaces sq feet 2 1,647.000 847.000 400.000 400.000% > 510

Notes : ∆ Quantity: Bridge Length * curb to curb = 54.9 * 30= 1647 sq ft

Del/Spall/Patch/Pot(Wear Surf) sq feet 2 400.000 400.000% > > 3210

Notes :

Crack (Wearing Surface) sq feet 2 400.000 400.000% > > 3220

Notes :

Re Conc Abutment feet 2 88.582 84.582 4.000%215

Notes :

Delamination/Spall/Patched Area feet 2 4.000 4.000% > 1080

Notes :

Other Bridge Railing feet 2 111.548 111.548%333

Notes :

A00817 - 39

A00817 - 40