9048_AttC_Administrative Proposal Form.docx
DOCX document 111 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-91400-00013635
- Issued by
- Oregon
About this file
This document is an Administrative Proposal Form for RFP #S-9140-00013635 issued by Oregon Housing and Community Services Department for HUD Contract Administration Software. The RFP solicits proposals for a Section 8 contract administration software solution, with proposers required to have at least 3 years of experience implementing such software and demonstrate capabilities within the last 5 years. The document outlines comprehensive proposal requirements including minimum qualifications, references, security standards, disadvantaged business outreach plans, and mandatory certifications.
The proposal involves strict security requirements, with proposers needing to demonstrate capability to handle Level 3 Information under Oregon's Information Asset Classification policy and comply with state cybersecurity standards. Proposers must meet specific responsibility criteria, including financial stability, past contract performance, legal compliance, and having necessary licenses and insurance. The proposal includes provisions for potential subcontracting opportunities with certified disadvantaged businesses, and requires proposers to complete detailed sections on organizational capabilities, security protocols, and legal compliance. The proposal is valid for 180 days and involves potential contract negotiations with specific emphasis on data protection, system security, and meeting Oregon's statewide information technology policies.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 9048_AttA_Solution Requirements Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 9048_AttB_Sample Contract.docx | DOCX document | |
| 9048_Notice of Intent to Award.pdf | ||
| RFQ Generator~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 9048_AttD_Technical Proposal Response Template.pdf | ||
| 9048_AttE_Cost Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 9048_A1_HUD RFP.pdf | ||
| 9048_Notice of Competitive Range.pdf | ||
| 9048_RFP_HUD Contract Admin Software.pdf | ||
| 9048_HUD RFP_FAQ_v3.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP #S-9140-00013635, HUD Contract Administration Software – Attachment C
RFP #S-9140-00013635, HUD Contract Administration Software – Attachment C
RFP Attachment C Administrative Proposal Form
Oregon Housing and Community Services Department HUD Contract administration software
Disclaimer:
Some sections are marked as “Required” while others are “Contingent”. Proposers must read the instructions for each section to determine if “Contingent” sections are required or optional for the Proposer.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Section 1 – Proposer Information and Minimum Qualifications (Required) | 3 | |
| 1.1 | PROPOSER INFORMATION | 3 |
| 1.2 | STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT TO THE RFP SCHEDULE | 3 |
| 1.3 | RESPONSE TO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS AND QUALIFICATIONS | 4 |
| 1.4 | RESPONSE TO SECURITY STANDARDS | 5 |
| Section 2 – References (Required) | 7 | |
| Section 3 – Certified Disadvantaged Business Outreach Plan (Required) | 8 | |
| 3.1 Certified Disadvantaged Business Information (Required) | 8 | |
| 3.2 Certified Disadvantaged Business Outreach Plan (Contingent) | 9 | |
| Section 4 – Responsibility Inquiry Form (Required) | 10 | |
| Section 5 – Proposed Terms and Conditions (Required) | 13 | |
| 5.1 Redlined Sample Contract | 13 | |
| 5.2 License Agreements | 13 | |
| Section 6 – Disclosure Exemption Affidavit (Contingent) | 14 | |
| Exhibit A to Section 6 – Exempt Information | 16 | |
| Section 7 – Mandatory Certifications and Authorized Signature (Required) | 17 | |
| Section 8 – Proposer Appendices | 19 | |
| Appendix A – Proposer-Attached Pay Equity Certificate (Contingent) | 19 | |
| Appendix B – Proposer-Attached Redlined Sample Contract (Required) | 19 | |
| Appendix C – Proposer-Attached License Agreements (Required) | 19 |
Section 1 – Proposer Information and Minimum Qualifications (Required) Instructions: Proposer is to complete the three subsections:
· Proposer Information: Provide the requisite information, to include the primary contact for this Proposal.
· Commitment to the RFP Schedule: Given the expedient nature of the schedule, Proposer commits to being expedient, punctual, and responsive during all RFP phases.
· RFP Minimum Qualifications: Proposers to check the boxes to indicate they meet the minimum qualifications, as further detailed in RFP Section 3.1 (Minimum Qualifications).
· Response to Security Standards: Provide narratives of how the Proposer and Proposer’s Solution meets the Security Standards, as mandated by state laws and regulations.
PROPOSER INFORMATION
Legal Name of Proposer;
State of Incorporation; and Entity Type
Oregon Business Registry Number (if required)
Street Address;
City, State, Zip
Primary Contact Name;
Phone; and email
Contact Information for Demos (if different from above)
STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT TO THE RFP SCHEDULE
1.2.1. Does Proposer guarantee that it will be ready and available to provide demos within the timeframe specified in RFP Section 1.2?
Yes ☐ / No ☐
1.2.2. How will Proposer ensure an expedient negotiation process? (Consider the negotiable topic domains, such as Project scope/schedule, pricing, legal terms and conditions, etc.)
Response:
RESPONSE TO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS AND QUALIFICATIONS
| No. |
| Subject |
| Minimum Requirement/Qualification |
| Met? |
| Explanation |
| 1) |
| Proposer |
| Proposer (or one of Proposer's subcontractors identified in the Proposal) must have 3 years of experience implementing Section 8 contract administration software and support services. |
| ☐ Yes |
☐ No
| 2) |
| Proposer |
| Proposer (or one of Proposer’s subcontractors identified in the Proposal) must have experience implementing Section 8 contract administration software within the last 5 years. |
| ☐ Yes |
☐ No
RESPONSE TO SECURITY STANDARDS
1.4.1 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
Provide a narrative statement that demonstrates how the Proposer meets all requirements of Data Protection:
Proposer understands and has the capability of handling and protecting Agency Data that has been classified as Level 3 Information under the State of Oregon’s Information Asset Classification policy, available online at https://www.oregon.gov/das/Policies/107-004-050.pdf.Proposer and its employees, contractors, subcontractors, and agents shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and State of Oregon policies governing Agency Data (as defined in the Sample Contract) and its use and disclosure, including as those laws, regulations, and policies may be updated from time to time, including:
· Oregon’s Statewide Information Security Standards, found online at: https://www.oregon.gov/eis/cyber-security-services/Pages/guidance-for-state-agencies.aspx including security controls that meet or exceed “Moderate” security controls in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-53.
· Oregon’s Statewide Information Security Plan, found online at: https://www.oregon.gov/eis/cyber-security-services/Pages/guidance-for-state-agencies.aspx.
· Statewide Cloud Computing policy: http://www.oregon.gov/das/policies/107-004-150.pdf.
· Oregon’s Statewide Information Technology Policies: www.oregon.gov/das/Pages/policies.aspx#IT.
· Privileged Access Monitoring and Reporting viewable at: https://www.oregon.gov/das/Policies/107-004-140.pdf.
1.4.2 SECURITY NARRATIVE
As an organization that shares the responsibilities to protect the State's data, it is important to understand how cybersecurity principles at an architectural and organizational level will be applied. Provide a narrative that describes Proposer’s security program as it relates to the proposed Solution, addressing the following NIST 800-53 control families in response.
| Control Family |
| Required Topics |
| AC |
| Access Control |
| Account Management, Least Privilege |
| AT |
| Awareness and Training |
| Cybersecurity training |
| AU |
| Audit and Accountability |
| Logging and Auditing |
| CA |
| Security Assessment and Authorization |
| Penetration tests, Security assessments |
| CM |
| Configuration Management |
| CP |
| Contingency Planning |
| DR/BCP |
| IA |
| Identification and Authentication |
| General Authentication (MFA, modern auth) |
| IR |
| Incident Response |
| Incident response plans and procedures |
| MA |
| Maintenance |
| Patching |
| MP |
| Media Protection |
| PE |
| Physical and Environmental Protection |
| PL |
| Planning |
| PM |
| Program Management |
| Governance (Security Program, Plan of Action and Milestones, System Inventory) |
| PS |
| Personnel Security |
| Background Checks |
| PT |
| PII Processing and Transparency |
| RA |
| Risk Assessment |
| Vulnerability Management, General Risk Management |
| SA |
| System and Services Acquisition |
| Secure Development |
| SC |
| System and Communications Protection |
| SI |
| System and Information Integrity |
| Remediation, System Monitoring, Malicious Code Protection |
| SR |
| Supply Chain Risk Management |
Section 2 – References (Required) (Instructions: Proposer shall provide 2 references from client firms using the response form provided below. Agency may check to determine if references provided support Proposer’s ability to comply with the requirements of the RFP. Agency may use references to obtain additional information, or verify any information needed. Agency may contact any reference (submitted or not) to verify Proposer’s qualifications and accuracy of the information provided in its Proposal.)
Reference 1
Reference Entity Reference Contact Name Contact Phone Number Contact Email Address
Reference 2
Reference Entity Reference Contact Name Contact Phone Number Contact Email Address
Section 3 – Certified Disadvantaged Business Outreach Plan (Required) (Instructions: If Proposer is not subcontracting any of the Services contemplated under the Contract, then only subsection 3.1 below is required. If Proposer does intend to subcontract any of the Services, then Proposer shall complete both subsections below.)
3.1 Certified Disadvantaged Business Information (Required)
“Certified Firm” means a small business certified under ORS 200.055 by the Oregon Certification Office for Business Inclusion and Diversity (COBID) as minority-owned businesses, woman-owned businesses, businesses that service-disabled veterans own, and emerging small businesses.
Certified Firms must have an equal opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed with state funds. By submitting its offer, Proposer certifies that it has taken, and if there are further opportunities, will take reasonable steps to ensure that Certified Firms are provided an equal opportunity to compete for and participate in the performance of any subcontracts resulting from this procurement.
The information submitted in response to this clause will not be considered in any scored evaluation.
3.1.1. Is Proposer an Oregon certified firm? Yes ☐ / No ☐
If yes, indicate all certification type(s):
DBE ☐ / MBE ☐ / WBE ☐ / SDV ☐ / ESB ☐
Oregon State Certification Number: Click or tap here to enter your number.
3.1.2. Include a list of Certified Firms that Proposer has had a contractual relationship with within the last two years.
Click or tap here to enter text.
3.1.3. Include a list of firms that Proposer has had a contractual relationship with within the last two years that are not Certified Firms but may be minority-owned, woman-owned, service-disabled veteran-owned or emerging small businesses.
Click or tap here to enter text.
3.1.4. Does Proposer foresee any subcontracting opportunities for this procurement?
Yes ☐ / No ☐
(If no, do not complete the rest of this form and submit this section 3.1 with your Proposal.)
(If yes, please complete section 3.2 below and submit both sections with your Proposal.)
3.2 Certified Disadvantaged Business Outreach Plan (Contingent)
3.2.1. Describe the steps Proposer will take to solicit Certified Firms for subcontracting opportunities if awarded a contract from this procurement.
Click or tap here to enter text.
3.2.2. Describe the subcontracting opportunities and the approximate dollar value of each that may be available, if awarded a Contract.
Click or tap here to enter text.
3.2.3. Would Proposer be willing to report the identity of each subcontractor and the value of each subcontract to COBID if awarded a Contract from this procurement?
Yes ☐ / No ☐
[This space intentionally left blank; the Responsibility Inquiry Form follows on the next page.]
Section 4 – Responsibility Inquiry Form (Required) Agency will determine responsibility of a Proposer prior to award and execution of a Contract. In addition to this form, Agency may notify Proposer of other documentation required, which may include but is not limited to recent profit-and-loss history, current balance statements and cash flow information, assets-to-liabilities ratio, including number and amount of secured versus unsecured creditor claims, availability of short and long-term financing, bonding capacity, insurability, credit information, materials and equipment, facility capabilities, personnel information, record of performance under previous contracts, etc. Failure to promptly provide requested information or clearly demonstrate responsibility may result in an Agency finding of non-responsibility and rejection.
4.1. Does Proposer have available the appropriate financial, material, equipment, facility and personnel resources and expertise, or ability to obtain the resources and expertise, necessary to demonstrate the capability of Proposer to meet all contractual responsibilities?
YES ☐ / NO ☐
4.2. Within the last five years, how many contracts of a similar nature has Proposer completed that, to the extent that the costs associated with and time available to perform the contract remained within Proposer′s control, Proposer stayed within the time and budget allotted, and there were no contract claims by any party? Number:
How many contracts did not meet those standards? Number:
(If any, please explain using the response field below.)
Response:
4.3. Within the last three years has Proposer (incl. a partner or shareholder owning 10% or more of Proposer’s firm) or a major subcontractor (receiving 10% or more of a total contract amount) been criminally or civilly charged, indicted or convicted in connection with:
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract, violation of federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of bids or Proposals, or embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property?
YES ☐ / NO ☐
If "YES", indicate the jurisdiction, date of indictment, charge or judgment, and names and summary of charges in the response field below.
Response:
4.4. Within the last three years, has Proposer had:
any contracts terminated for default by any government agency; or
· any lawsuits filed against it by creditors or involving contract disputes?
YES ☐ / NO ☐
If "YES", please explain in the response field below. (With regard to judgments, include jurisdiction and date of final judgment or dismissal.)
Response:
4.5. Does Proposer have any outstanding or pending judgments against it?
YES ☐ / NO ☐
Is Proposer experiencing financial distress or having difficulty securing financing?
YES ☐ / NO ☐
Does Proposer have sufficient cash flow to fund day-to-day operations throughout the proposed contract period?
YES ☐ / NO ☐
If "YES” on the first question or second question, or “NO” on the third question, please provide additional details in the response field below.
Response:
4.6. Within the last three years, has Proposer filed a bankruptcy action, filed for reorganization, made a general assignment of assets for the benefit of creditors, or had an action for insolvency instituted against it?
If "YES", indicate the filing dates, jurisdictions, type of action, ultimate resolution, and dates of judgment or dismissal, if applicable.
Response:
4.7. Does Proposer have all required licenses, insurance and/or registrations, if any, and is Proposer legally authorized to do business in the State of Oregon?
YES ☐ /NO ☐
If "NO", please explain in the response field below.
Response:
4.8. Pay Equity Certificate. This certificate is required if Proposer employs 50 or more full-time workers and the prospective contract price is estimated to exceed $500,000. Does a current authorized representative of Proposer possess an unexpired Pay Equity Certificate issued by the Department of Administrative Services?
(Submit a copy of the certificate as Appendix A to the Administrative Proposal.)
If "NO", please explain in the response field below.
Response:
[This space intentionally left blank; Proposed Terms and Conditions follows on the next page.]
Section 5 – Proposed Terms and Conditions (Required)
5.1 Redlined Sample Contract
Proposer must follow the instructions provided within, and attach its redlined copy of, RFP Attachment B (Sample Contract) clearly identifying the requested changes. Proposers should provide justification for each material change. These submittals are to be attached by the Proposer as Appendix B to the Administrative Proposal.
If Proposer does not submit a copy of RFP Attachment B, then Agency will consider the non-submittal as acceptance of those terms and conditions as-is, and they may only be modified by the sole discretion of Agency.
5.2 License Agreements
Proposer must attach all license agreements, including any applicable third-party license agreement(s). This submittal is to be attached by the Proposer as Appendix C to the Administrative Proposal.
[This space intentionally left blank; Disclosure Exemption Affidavit follows on the next page.]
Section 6 – Disclosure Exemption Affidavit (Contingent) (Instructions: If Proposer believes any of its Proposal is exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law (ORS 192.311 through 192.478), Proposer shall complete and submit the Disclosure Exemption Affidavit. In addition, Proposer also shall submit a fully redacted version of its Proposal, clearly identified as the redacted version. Otherwise, if no information is exempt, then this section is not required.)
Click or tap here to enter name. (Affiant), being first duly sworn under oath, and representing insert Proposer name here (hereafter “Proposer”), hereby deposes and swears or affirms under penalty of perjury that:
6.1. I am an employee of the Proposer, I have knowledge of the Request for Proposals referenced herein, and I have full authority from the Proposer to submit this affidavit and accept the responsibilities stated herein.
6.2. I am aware that the Proposer has submitted a Proposal, dated on or about Click or tap to enter a date. (the “Proposal”), to the State of Oregon (State) in response to Request for Proposals ######, for the HUD Contract Administration Software, and I am familiar with the contents of the RFP and Proposal.
6.3. I have read and am familiar with the provisions of Oregon’s Public Records Law, Oregon Revised Statutes (“ORS”) 192.311 through 192.478, and the Uniform Trade Secrets Act as adopted by the State of Oregon, which is set forth in ORS 646.461 through ORS 646.475. I understand that the Proposal is a public record held by a public body and is subject to disclosure under the Oregon Public Records Law unless specifically exempt from disclosure under that law.
6.4. I have reviewed the information contained in the Proposal. The Proposer believes the information listed in Exhibit A to this Section 6 is exempt from public disclosure (collectively, the “Exempt Information”), which is incorporated herein by this reference. It is my opinion that the Exempt Information is exempt from disclosure under Oregon’s Public Records Law under the specifically designated sections as set forth in Exhibit A or constitutes “Trade Secrets” under either the Oregon Public Records Law or the Uniform Trade Secrets Act as adopted in Oregon because that information is either:
a. formula, plan, pattern, process, tool, mechanism, compound, procedure, production data, or compilation of information that:
i. is not patented;
ii. is known only to certain individuals within the Proposer’s organization and that is used in a business the Proposer conducts;
iii. has actual or potential commercial value; and
iv. gives its user an opportunity to obtain a business advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.
or
b. Information, including a drawing, cost data, customer list, formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process that:
i. derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and
ii. is the subject of efforts by the Proposer that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.
6.5. I understand that disclosure of the information referenced in Exhibit A may depend on official or judicial determinations made in accordance with the Public Records Law.
Affiant’s Signature
State of
) ss:
County of
Signed and sworn to before me on ___________ (date) by ______________________ (Affiant’s name).
Notary Public for the State of _________________
My Commission Expires: _________
[This space intentionally left blank; Exhibit A follows on the next page.]
Exhibit A to Section 6 – Exempt Information
Proposer identifies the following information as exempt from public disclosure under the following designated exemption(s):
Proposal Section (e.g. Technical Proposal Section #n) Exempt Information
Exemption Designation (use either A or B)[footnoteRef:1] [1: See Section 6.4 above.]
· Proposer may add or delete rows in the table above as needed.
[This space intentionally left blank; Mandatory Certifications and Authorized Signature follows on the next page.]
Section 7 – Mandatory Certifications and Authorized Signature (Required) Any individual signing below hereby certifies they are an authorized representative of Proposer and that:
7.1. Proposer understands and accepts the requirements of this RFP. By submitting a Proposal, Proposer agrees to be bound by the Contract terms and conditions in RFP Attachment B (Sample Contract) and as modified by any Addenda, except for those terms and conditions that Agency has reserved for negotiation, as identified in the RFP.
7.2. Proposer acknowledges receipt of any and all Addenda to this RFP.
7.3. Proposal is a Firm Offer for 180 days following the Closing.
7.4. If awarded a Contract, Proposer agrees to perform the scope of work and meet the performance standards set forth in the final negotiated scope of work of the Contract.
7.5. I have knowledge regarding Proposer’s payment of taxes and by signing below I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, Proposer is not in violation of any tax laws of the state or a political subdivision of the state, including, without limitation, ORS 305.620 and ORS chapters 316, 317 and 318.
7.6. Proposer does not discriminate in its employment practices with regard to race, creed, age, religious affiliation, gender, disability, sexual orientation, national origin. When awarding subcontracts, Proposer does not discriminate against any business certified under ORS 200.055 as a disadvantaged business enterprise, a minority-owned business, a woman-owned business, a business that a service-disabled veteran owns or an emerging small business. If applicable, Proposer has, or will have prior to contract execution, a written policy and practice, that meets the requirements described in ORS 279A.112 (formerly HB 3060), of preventing sexual harassment, sexual assault and discrimination against employees who are members of a protected class. Agency may not enter into a contract with an anticipated contract price of $150,000 or more with a Proposer that does not certify it has such a policy and practice. See https://www.oregon.gov/DAS/Procurement/Pages/hb3060.aspx for additional information and sample policy template.
7.7. Proposer complies with ORS 652.220 and does not unlawfully discriminate against any of Proposer’s employees in the payment of wages or other compensation for work of comparable character on the basis of an employee’s membership in a protected class. “Protected class” means a group of persons distinguished by race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, veteran status, disability or age.
7.8. Proposer’s continuing compliance constitutes a material element of this Contract and a failure to comply constitutes a breach that entitles Agency to terminate this Contract for cause.
7.9. Proposer may not prohibit any of Proposer’s employees from discussing the employee’s rate of wage, salary, benefits, or other compensation with another employee or another person. Proposer may not retaliate against an employee who discusses the employee’s rate of wage, salary, benefits, or other compensation with another employee or another person.
7.10. Proposer is not engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, or if at any time Proposer is engaged in or may engage in the provision of broadband Internet access service Proposer is in compliance with Oregon Laws 2018, Chapter 88 (HB 4155) and applicable Public Utility Commission rules, and will remain in compliance throughout the term of the Contract.
7.11. Proposer and Proposer’s employees, agents, and subcontractors are not included on:
a. the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons list maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States Department of the Treasury; or
b. the government wide exclusions list in the System for Award Management.
7.12. Proposer certifies that, to the best of its knowledge, there exists no actual or potential conflict between the business or economic interests of Proposer, its employees, or its agents, on the one hand, and the business or economic interests of the State, on the other hand, arising out of, or relating in any way to, the subject matter of the RFP. If any changes occur with respect to Proposer’s status regarding conflict of interest, Proposer shall promptly notify the State in writing.
7.13. Proposer certifies that all contents of the Proposal (i.e. the Administrative Proposal, the Technical Proposal, the Cost Proposal, and any other forms or documentation, if required under this RFP), are truthful and accurate and have been prepared independently from all other Proposers, and without collusion, fraud, or other dishonesty.
7.14. Proposer understands that any statement or representation it makes, in response to this RFP, if determined to be false or fraudulent, a misrepresentation, or inaccurate because of the omission of material information could result in a "claim" {as defined by the Oregon False Claims Act, ORS 180.750(1)}, made under Contract being a "false claim" {ORS 180.750(2)} subject to the Oregon False Claims Act, ORS 180.750 to 180.785, and to any liabilities or penalties associated with the making of a false claim under that Act.
7.15. Proposer acknowledges these certifications are in addition to any certifications required in the Contract at the time of Contract execution.
7.16. Proposer is in compliance with the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352).
PROPOSER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
Authorized Signature
Date
(Printed Name and Title)
Section 8 – Proposer Appendices
Appendix A – Proposer-Attached Pay Equity Certificate (Contingent)
To be attached by Proposer, or “reserved” if not applicable.
· See Section 4 above.
Appendix B – Proposer-Attached Redlined Sample Contract (Required)
To be attached by Proposer.
· See Section 5 above.
· See RFP Section 3.2 for more details.
Appendix C – Proposer-Attached License Agreements (Required)
To be attached by Proposer.
· See Section 5 above.
· See RFP Section 3.2 for more details.
[End of the Administrative Proposal Response Form.]
Page 1 of 1Level 3 - Restricted
Level 3 - Restricted
Page 3 of 3Level 3 - Restricted image1.jpg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .