B05 89503625QSW000193 Amd 0001.pdf

(x)

89503625QSW000193

x x

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR

OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

Tulsa OK 74136-1061

01301

6655 S Lewis Ave U.S. Department of Energy SWPA (Tulsa) Southwestern Power Administration

Tulsa OK 74136-1061

895036

6655 S Lewis Ave U.S. Department of Energy SWPA (Tulsa) Southwestern Power Administration

08/12/20250001

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

08/04/2025

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment is to change:

1) The submittal requirements in "AWARD SELECTION PROCESS / EVALUATION SUBMITTAL

REQUIREMENTS" under "Subfactor B – Technical Approach" from two (2) pages to four (4) pages

2) To add Exhibit B with the Questions and Answers for this Solicitation to date

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Brooke Butcher

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

08/12/2025

AWARD SELECTION PROCESS / EVALUATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

(a) Per FAR Part 13.106-2(b), evaluation for award will be conducted by comparative evaluation of offerors.

This solicitation is not stating nor required to state the relative importance assigned to each evaluation factor and/or sub factor (FAR 13.106-1(a)(2)).

Ratings will be performed as listed below. If a technical rating of unacceptable is received for Subfactor A then the offeror will not be rated any further.

1. Factor 1 – Technical:

(i) Subfactor A – Required Certifications: The Government will evaluate whether the offeror possess the required licenses, permits, and certifications necessary for the performance of security guard services in the jurisdiction where services are to be rendered.

Submittal Requirements – Required Certifications: Provide proof of the following:

• A Certificate of Authority from the Oklahoma Council on Law Enforcement Education & Training (CLEET)

Rating Method – Required Certifications: Acceptable or Unacceptable

(ii) Subfactor B – Technical Approach: The Government will evaluate the feasibility, clarity, and effectiveness of the offeror’s proposed technical approach to meeting the requirements listed in the performance work statement (PWS).

Submittal Requirements – Technical Approach: Provide a narrative (no more than four (4) pages) describing the approach to fulfilling the PWS requirements, including:

• Whether or not a Sub-Contractor will be used

• Staffing plan

• Confirmation that guards will meet the requirements in section 8.0 of the PWS

• Method for scheduling guards and maintaining shift coverage

• Approach to onboarding, vetting, and training personnel

• Communication and reporting procedures (e.g., incident reporting, daily logs)

• Supervision and quality assurance mechanisms

• Risk mitigation and continuity of operations plan

Rating Method – Technical Approach: Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Good, or Excellent

(iii) Subfactor C – Prior Experience: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s relevant prior experience in providing similar security guard services.

Submittal Requirements – Prior Experience: Offerors are required to provide a completed Experience Data Sheet (Exhibit A) of at least one (1) contract performed within the past two (2) years that demonstrates experience of comparable scope and complexity or greater, to the PWS, providing security guard services. The narrative portion of the data sheet must be clear, coherent, and prepared in sufficient detail for effective evaluation. If using a subcontractor, the experience data sheet must show relevant experience for both the prime contractor and subcontractor. **Altered or substituted data sheets may not be evaluated.

Rating Method – Prior Experience: Acceptable or Unacceptable

2. Factor 2 – Price:

Price will be evaluated using one or more of the techniques for price reasonableness in accordance with FAR 13.106-3(a). Total offered price will be evaluated for reasonableness.

Submittal Requirement – Price: Offerors must submit a price for each CLIN in the Solicitation.

3. Factor 3 – Past Performance:

Evaluation of past performance will be based on information obtained from the offer’s experience data sheet contacts, the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), as well as any other sources which may have relevant information.

(b) Options:

The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)