Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

U.S. International Development Finance Corporation Draft RFP: 77344426R0001 Past Performance Questionnaire

ATTACHMENT 1

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Offerors (Section A):

Section A shall be completed by the Offeror (the firm requesting the reference) prior to issuing the questionnaire. The Offeror shall send the questionnaires to the reference provided in Proposal Volume III, Section 1. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to encourage references to submit a questionnaire.

Instructions to Individual Providing Reference (Section B):

In order to assess Offerors who responded to the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) request for proposals for legal services support for international transactions, the Government is requesting your candid assessment of the Offeror’s past performance. As a reference for work performed by the firm identified in Section A of this questionnaire, response will assist in the the Government’s evaluation process. Please complete Section B of the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible, and submit directly to solicitation@dfc.gov no later than (date will be specified in the Advisory Notice). The subject line in the submission e-mail shall read: DFC Questionnaire for <Company Name>. The message shall originate from the reference’s government or commercial e-mail system. A copy shall not be provided to the Offeror. Responses to the questionnaire are confidential and will not be provided to the Offeror.

You may receive a follow-up phone call from the DFC Acquisition team to confirm or clarify information. This is a major acquisition and your input is greatly appreciated. If you have questions regarding this questionnaire, please contact Remi Eggers or Melissa Hergenrader at solicitation@dfc.gov.

SECTION A

(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR REQUESTING REFERENCE)

PART I: OFFEROR INFORMATION

Offeror Name

Offeror Address

Offeror DUNS

Offeror POC Name

POC Email

POC Phone

TITLE OF PROJECT/ENGAGMENT or CONTRACT NUMBER:

PROJECT/ENGAGMENT ROLE (Prime or Subcontract)

PART II: PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TYPE OF SERVICES/PRODUCTS REQUIRED UNDER THE CONTRACT:

DESCRIBE THE COMPLEXITY OF THE WORK PERFORMED):

SECTION B

(TO BE COMPLETED BY INDIVIDUAL PROVIDING REFERENCE)

PART I: REFERENCE INFORMATION

NAME & TITLE:

ORGANIZATION:

CONTRACT ROLE (e.g. CO, COR, PM):

ADDRESS:

PHONE NUMBER:

EMAIL:

Part II: INFORMATION ABOUT REFERENCED PROJECT/CONTRACT

Please Identify and correct any information that is not accurate in Section A (Reference may attach additional pages if required):

Please objectively assess the requesting firm in each performance element below by assigning an “X” to the most appropriate rating:

· Exceptional (E): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

· Very Good (VG): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

· Satisfactory (S): Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

· Marginal (M): Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

· Unsatisfactory (U): Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contract’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective

1. Quality of Product or Service: Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship/performance (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).

Comments:

2. Schedule: Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule).

Comments:

3. Cost Control: Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.

Comments (Please Put N/A if a FFP Contract):

4. Business Relations: Assess the contractor’s integration and coordination of all the activities needed to execute the contract, specifically focus on the timeliness, completeness, and quality of the offeror’s problem identification procedures, corrective action plans, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction (including professional concern for interest of customers), and timely award and management of subcontractors.

Comments:

5. Management of Key Personnel: Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing key personnel, when necessary, with equally qualified candidates.

Comments:

6. Utilization of Small Business: FAR Subpart 19.7 and 15 U.S.C. 637 contains statutory requirements for complying with the Small Business subcontracting Program. Assess whether the contractor provided maximum practicable opportunity for small business to participate in contract performance consistent with efficient performance of the contract.

Comments (Please Put N/A if Offeror is a Small Business):

7. What would your overall rating of this contractor’s performance be?

8. Identify any overall strengths on the referenced projects.

9. Identify any overall weaknesses on the referenced projects.

10. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?

11. Are you aware of any other efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify the contractor/program and any known point of contact.

12. Additional comments you would like to share (Reference may attach additional pages if required):