A1-3 WR Pre-Proposal_RFIs 001 - 008.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Whiteriver Hospital Construction
- Solicitation number
- 75H70126R00016
About this file
This file is a Pre-Proposal Inquiries (RFI) log for Solicitation 75H70126R00016, the Whiteriver Hospital Construction project located in Whiteriver, Arizona, managed by the Indian Health Service Division of Engineering Services. The RFI document captures eight inquiries submitted by prospective general contractors seeking clarification on design and specification details prior to proposal submission, with responses provided by the Architect/Engineer (AE) and Contracting Officer's Representative (COR).
The inquiries address critical construction specifications and procurement decisions. The primary RFI concerns headwall premanufacturing and procurement responsibilities, with the AE confirming openness to premanufactured headwalls requiring a substitution request, and clarifying that headwalls are Contractor Furnished/Contractor Installed (CFCI) with the GC responsible for providing the entire wall assembly including panels and accessories. Subsequent inquiries seek clarification on drainage system components, including confirmation of lift station status (new versus existing), cattle guard sizing, storm drain specifications (requesting approval for 60-inch CMP alternative to specified 72-inch HDPE), catch basin and manhole details, discrepancies between plan sheets and profiles regarding pipe sizes on Phase Two, and guidance on identifying catch basins and manholes marked with standardized designations. The responses indicate the AE and COR defer several design decisions to the general contractor's discretion while maintaining control over substitution approvals and requiring adherence to solicitation-specified pricing formats. No response dates or deadline information is documented in this RFI log.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 107 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Form
| RFI No. | Date | Reference | |
| Drawing, Spec, Page | COMMENTS | RP | IHS Approved Response |
1 4/1/26 CSI 10 or 11 I was unable to locate headwall specifications within the current document set (usually in CSI 10 or 11). To allow us to prepare accurate pricing, we are requesting clarification on the following items:
Before reading the bullet point list, please confirm that you will take a quote for premanufactured Headwalls and will not be building as you go (for instance the single gas outlet in H-19C I can see as being built as you go, but H-21 Inpatient Room looks more like a premanufactured headwall). If this is correct, please answer the following:
| AE | The Design Team is open to Premanufactured Headwalls; the current Documents represent a stick-built method. If GC would like to pursue this method then a Substitution Request should be provided for review / approval. | ||||
| 1. Procurement Designation – Will the headwalls be Owner Furnished/Owner Installed (OFOI), Owner Furnished/Contractor Installed (OFCI), or Contractor Furnished/Contractor Installed (CFCI)? (do you have a list of bidding GC’s if CFCI?) | AE/COR | The headwallsare CFCI, but we do not maintain a list of bidding GC's. | |||
| 2. Panel Supply – Would you like the headwall supplier to furnish the wall panels as part of their scope, or will panels be provided separately? If so, should we supply the specialty sheet wall protection when called out? | AE/COR | This is up to the GC. IHS expects the GC to provide the entire wall assembly including wall panels and headwalls. FYI…there are custom patterns the Headwalls in some areas that will need to be coordinated with the Finish Schedule. | |||
| 3. Accessories – The plans show accessories attached to the headwalls. Should these accessories be included in the headwall supplier's scope of supply? | AE | The Design Team is open to Premanufactured Headwalls; the current Documents represent a stick-built method. If GC would like to pursue this method then a Substitution Request should be provided for review / approval. | |||
| 4. Pricing Format – Would you prefer pricing submitted as a complete unit (headwall with all accessories) or broken out as individual accessory line items? Could you please confirm the above at your earliest convenience? Once we have that clarification, we will prepare and submit pricing to the appropriate party. | AE/COR | This is up to the GC. Pricing Format provided by the GC to IHS must follow the format outlined in the solicitation, but the pricing format between the GC and supplier is determined by the GC. | |||
| 2 | Is the lift station new or existing? | ||||
| a. | The detail shows up on 3 different plan sets received. | ||||
| b. | There’s a note on one that says CORE EXISTING SEWER LIFT STATION and grout around reclaimed line … | ||||
| c. | There’s no depth for the diversion MH on the detail – is this new or existing? | ||||
| 3 | What size cattle guard is needed? | ||||
| 4 | On sheet C4.05 the plans are calling for 72" HDPE storm drain when 60" is the largest size offered. Can we provide an alternate of CMP Spiral rib? | ||||
| 5 | Is there more detail on the storm drain catch basins off of the water tanks calling for a Sump inlet pages C3.03 & C3.04? | ||||
| 6 | Going through the drainage on phase two I found a discrepancy on C4.11B (page 111). On the top plan it shows 24" for a run and then on the profile it shows 18" | ||||
| 7 | As I get into the plans for the hospital I'm noticing pipe footage differences between the plans and the profiles. It's only on random sections | ||||
| 8 | The catch basins and manholes have the same SD with a circle around it, do we follow the call out and numbers to figure out what they are? | ||||
| 9 | |||||
| 10 | |||||
| 11 | |||||
| 12 | |||||
| 13 | |||||
| 14 | |||||
| 15 | |||||
| 16 | |||||
| 17 | |||||
| 18 | |||||
| 19 | |||||
| 20 | |||||
| 21 | |||||
| 22 | |||||
| 23 | |||||
| 24 | |||||
| 25 | |||||
| 26 | |||||
| 27 | |||||
| 28 | |||||
| 29 | |||||
| 30 | |||||
| 31 | |||||
| 32 | |||||
| 33 | |||||
| 34 | |||||
| 35 | |||||
| 36 | |||||
| 37 | |||||
| 38 | |||||
| 39 | |||||
| 40 | |||||
| 41 | |||||
| 42 | |||||
| 43 | |||||
| 44 | |||||
| 45 | |||||
| 46 | |||||
| 47 | |||||
| 48 | |||||
| 49 | |||||
| 50 | |||||
| 51 | |||||
| 52 | |||||
| 53 | |||||
| 54 | |||||
| 55 | |||||
| 56 | |||||
| 57 | |||||
| 58 | |||||
| 59 | |||||
| 60 | |||||
| 61 | |||||
| 62 | |||||
| 63 | |||||
| 64 | |||||
| 65 | |||||
| 66 | |||||
| 67 | |||||
| 68 | |||||
| 69 | |||||
| 70 | |||||
| 71 | |||||
| 72 | |||||
| 73 | |||||
| 74 | |||||
| 75 | |||||
| 76 | |||||
| 77 | |||||
| 78 | |||||
| 79 | |||||
| 80 | |||||
| 81 | |||||
| 82 | |||||
| 83 | |||||
| 84 | |||||
| 85 | |||||
| 86 | |||||
| 87 | |||||
| 88 | |||||
| 89 | |||||
| 90 | |||||
| 91 | |||||
| 92 | |||||
| 93 | |||||
| 94 | |||||
| 95 | |||||
| 96 | |||||
| 97 | |||||
| 98 | |||||
| 99 | |||||
| 100 | |||||
| 101 | |||||
| 102 | |||||
| 103 | |||||
| 104 | |||||
| 105 | |||||
| 106 | |||||
| 107 | |||||
| 108 | |||||
| 109 | |||||
| 110 | |||||
| 111 | |||||
| 112 | |||||
| 113 | |||||
| 114 | |||||
| 115 | |||||
| 116 | |||||
| 117 | |||||
| 118 | |||||
| 119 | |||||
| 120 | |||||
| 121 | |||||
| 122 | |||||
| 123 | |||||
| 124 |
Indian Health Service Division of Engineering Services Document Owner: Erik Lundstrom
| Date: | PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES |
| Solicitation 75H70126R00016 | Project: Whiteriver Hospital |
Construction location: Whiteriver, AZ Department: IHS/DES
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .