J.25 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 68 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 75FCMC19R0041
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for Durable Medical Equipment Medicare Administrative Contractor services. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is soliciting proposals to administer Medicare claims processing and payment services for Jurisdiction C, which includes Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Offerors must demonstrate strong past performance as evaluated through a questionnaire sent to references, with responses due by the date specified in proposals. The contract type and period of performance will be determined upon award.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 51 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment J.25 Past Performance Questionnaire
RFP # 75FCMC19R0041
JC PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Sample Cover Letter
[COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Prime or subcontractor)]
Reference Name and Address:
Date:
SUBJECT: RFP# 75FCMC19R0041 DME MAC JC Contractor
Dear _________________:
We are currently responding to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Request for Proposal number Request for Proposal (RFP) # 75FCMC19R0041 (as a subcontractor to______ (If applicable)). The purpose of this contract is to perform claims processing activities in accordance with the Durable Medical Equipment Medicare Administrative Contractor (DME MAC) requirements.
There is an increased emphasis on past performance in the federal source selection process. The CMS is requesting that customers and clients of Offerors provide the information as described within the attached questionnaire and return it to them for evaluation. We have identified you as one of our references and respectfully request that you complete and sign the attached questionnaire and then return it to CMS.
Questionnaires are due to CMS no later than ____________ (to be filled in by Offeror); however, we would appreciate an earlier response if at all possible.
We sincerely appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely, Company Representative
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop B2-14-21 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850
Office of Acquisition and Grants Management
SUBJECT: Solicitation No. 75FCMC19R0041 – DME MAC JC Contractor, Past Performance Questionnaire
To Whom It May Concern:
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) very much appreciates your time and thoughtfulness in completing the attached questionnaire. The information obtained from this questionnaire will be utilized to evaluate the past performance of Offerors/Contractors who wish to be awarded a contract with CMS. Please be advised that neither your name, nor position or organization, nor this survey, will be divulged before, during or after this survey has been completed.
The questionnaire is arranged by the following agency goals: Customer Service, Financial Management, Operational Excellence, and Innovations and Technology. Each area consists of a few basic questions relating to these aspects of performance with regard to the Offeror/Contractor with which you worked. Please complete the questionnaire as indicated on the form.
Finally, please sign your name and identify your position during your association with the referenced Offeror/Contractor. Once completed, please submit the questionnaire in one of the following manners:
Email PDF (Preferred): Karen.Epps@cms.hhs.gov
Mail Original: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Office of Acquisition and Grants Management Division of Medicare Support Contracts ATTN: Karen Epps, Contract Specialist
| 7500 Security Blvd., Mailstop B2-14-21 |
| Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 |
Thank you for taking the time to complete the questionnaire. If you have questions, please contact me on (410) 786-8680.
Sincerely, Karen Epps Contract Specialist
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CMS Solicitation No. 75FCMC19R0041 - DME MAC JC Contractor
Company Being Evaluated (Offeror)
Offeror/Contractor: ___________________________
Address: ___________________________
Name of Contracting Activity: ____________________________________________________ Brief Description of Work: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Contract Type: ________________________________________________________________ Total Contract Value: ___________________________________________________________ Performance Period: ____________________________________________________________ Please complete the following questionnaire about the Offeror/Contractor and indicate your responses in the blocks or columns, as appropriate. Numerical ratings are as indicated in the Rating Scale below. Other Ratings are as indicated in each block. Note: Use of the term “Agency” can be interpreted as also Government/non-Government agencies or customers.
RATING SCALE
| N/A |
| Not Applicable: Question does not apply to the contract discussed in this report |
| 0 |
| Unsatisfactory: Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements. |
| 1 |
| Poor: Overall compliance requires significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| 2 |
| Fair: Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
| 3 |
| Good: There are no, or very minimal, quality problems, and the Contractor has met the contract requirements. |
| 4 |
| Excellent: There are no quality issues, and the Contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the Government. |
| 5 |
| Outstanding: The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example for others, so that it justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
We request that you justify each of your ratings with a comment. Please be as specific in your comment as possible, especially in situations that warrant very high or very low ratings. Use extra pages as necessary or expand the form electronically as needed.
CUSTOMER SERVICE
How did the contractor work collaboratively with the “customers” of the contract?
“Customers” may include, but are not limited to, other stakeholders (such as Medical Providers in a health insurance contract) critical to the success of the contract in question and those members of your staff responsible for the administration of the contract.
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
Is/was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction and would you hire this contractor again?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Was the contractor timely and accurate in processing payments if the contractor administered funds and/or payments for services?
If the contractor administered funds and/or payments on this contract, was the contractor timely and accurate in submitting accounting reports?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE
How was the contractor’s quality of products/services? How well did the contractor meet the standards and requirements of the contract’s Statement of Work? Was the contractor timely in meeting its contract schedule and/or requirements?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
How well was did the contractor utilize internal controls to effectively manage its staff and systems?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
INNOVATIONS
How well did the contractor develop and continually refine its internal business processes to improve the quality of the work delivered on the contract?
If the contractor did incorporate internal business processes changes, what was the impact of those changes on the daily operations?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Yes/No: |
Agency/Company COMPLETING Questionnaire
Agency/Company Name: ___________________________
Address: ___________________________
Signature of Individual Completing the Questionnaire: _________________________
Date: _________________________
Name: _______________________
Telephone No.: ________________________
Title: ___________________________
Email Address: ________________________
January 10, 2019 Page 6 of 6 image1.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .