Amendment 04 - IFB_70Z08826B0030252-DREDGING-SF BAY.pdf

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

0004 13AUG2026 51290PR260030252 10597026

6. ISSUED BY CODE 70Z088 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

CODE 70Z088

Commanding Officer

CG CEU OAKLAND (CN)

1301 Clay Street 7th Floor, Suite 700N Oakland, CA 94612-5203

Commanding Officer

CG CEU OAKLAND (CN)

1301 Clay Street 7th Floor, Suite 700N Oakland, CA 94612-5203

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No. Street, county, State and ZIP: Code) () 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

ISC BioExpress

X 70Z08826B0030252

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

Kaysville, UT. 84037

July 15, 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning one (1) copy of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATA SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and data specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

() A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER: Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return 1 copy to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

FY26 DREDGING AND SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AT USCG SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA-THREE (3) LOCATIONS

The purpose of this RFP Amendment No. 04 is to:

1) Provide answers to RFI/Questions No. 18-21 on the following page.

- All other Terms & Conditions remain unchanged.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Guiljohn Alcantara

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

BY ___________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11-2016)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE COMPUTER GENERATED Prescribed by FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

RFP 70Z08826B0030252

FY26 DREDGING AND SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AT USCG SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA-THREE (3) LOCATIONS

RFI QUESTIONS 18-21

Question 18:

Confirm that there are no CDFW permit or requirements for biological monitoring on the Station Vallejo project Answer 18:

Correct.

Question 19:

Provided in Amendment 003 was the CAD drawing showing the dredge limit for YBI that only shows the small boat area, please confirm if the cutter alder section is included in the project limits.

Answer 19:

Beneficial reuse may go to either approved location as answered in RFI question 8 in amendment 02.

Question 20:

Please confirm that for each of the 3 sites, 20% of the volume of dredged material is required to go to the In-Bay disposal sites, and the remaining volume can go to the beneficial use sites and no material is required to be disposed of at SF-DODS Answer 20:

Correct, no dredging is required at the USCG Cutter (Alder) mooring. Per the scope of work in the specs, the small boat mooring area is the only dredging required as Sector San Francisco.

Question 21:

Can you please provide the Liquidated Damages amount for the project. Please provide amounts if they are different for all three locations.

Answer 21:

Liquidated damages are not applicable to this project. Contractor project performance/evaluation will be documented in CPARS.

-END-