Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire August 2020.docx

DOCX document 59 KB Posted Dec 22, 2021

Attached to: FPS Armed Protective Security Officer (PSO) services throughout Los Angeles, CA
Solicitation number: 70RFPW21RW9000003
Issued by: Department of Homeland Security Office of Procurement Operations

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 30, 2023

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and information on a related federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is for a contractor requesting reference on a previous contract to provide armed protective security officer services in Los Angeles, CA and surrounding areas. It asks the reference to evaluate the contractor's performance across areas such as staffing, employee appearance, training documentation, issue resolution, and overall quality of services.

The associated federal contract opportunity will be an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract with a one-year base period and four one-year option periods to acquire armed protective security officer services throughout Los Angeles, CA. The estimated security officer hours are 4,658,325 for the five-year period. The source selection process will utilize best value tradeoff with technical factors more important than price. The NAICS code is 561612 and size standard is $22 million. The solicitation will be issued on December 1, 2021 and questions must be submitted to the contracting specialist.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
70RFPW21RW9000003 - AM4.pdf	PDF	Jan 24, 2022
70RFPW21RW9000003 - AM0003.pdf	PDF	Jan 13, 2022
Attachment 9 - Proposal Submission Checklist - via AM3.doc	DOC document	Jan 13, 2022
Amendment 0002.pdf	PDF	Jan 11, 2022
Exhibit 13 - Post Exhibit.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Jan 11, 2022
Amendment 0001.pdf	PDF	Jan 11, 2022
Attachment 3 - Past Project Form August 2020.doc	DOC document	Dec 22, 2021
Attachment 9 - Proposal Submission Checklist - December 2016 Version.doc	DOC document	Dec 22, 2021
Attachment 8 - Field Level Supervision Exhibit.xls	XLS spreadsheet	Dec 22, 2021
_2.1 - 70RFPW21RW9000003 - Solicitation.pdf	PDF	Dec 22, 2021
Attachment 6 Price Element Breakdown August 2020 Revision.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Dec 22, 2021
_Pricing Schedule.xls	XLS spreadsheet	Dec 22, 2021
Attachment 6a - Price Element Breakdown Instructions August 2020 Revision.doc	DOC document	Dec 22, 2021
Attachment 7 - Award Approval Request.doc	DOC document	Dec 22, 2021

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Protective Service 701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19106

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Protective Service 400 15th Street SW Auburn, WA 98001

ATTACHMENT 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: 70RFPW21RW9000003, PSO Services for Los Angeles, CA

NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE: __________________

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The Federal Protective Service is considering this Contractor for Protective Security Officer services at various Federal buildings located in and around the Los Angeles, CA area. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. security specialist, COR, COTR, etc.) respond to this questionnaire. More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate.

Upon completion of the survey, please email to Rachel.D.Kalac@fps.dhs.gov. If you have any questions, please contact Rachel Kalac at Rachel.D.Kalac@fps.dhs.gov. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.

CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE: _____________________________________

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS:_________________________________________

TOTAL PROJECT VALUE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS: _________________________________________

ANNUAL NO. OF PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER HOURS (Note: If ID/IQ contract, provide the maximum post hours available for the most recent one year ordering period):_________________________________________

If ID/IQ ACTUAL NO. OF PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER HOURS PERFORMED FOR THE MOST RECENT ONE YEAR ORDERING PERIOD: ________________________________________________________

Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we determine any similarities to this contract:

QUESTIONS

PERFORMANCE:

Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. How consistent is the Contractor in providing required staffing at each post of duty?

Comments: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. How consistent is the Contractor in providing employees who report to duty properly groomed, uniformed, and equipped?

3. How consistent is the Contractor in keeping training records, certifications, and related documentation complete, accurate, and current?

4. Discuss the overall level of professionalism, attentiveness, and bearing of the Contractor's workforce.

5. How effective is the Contractor in identifying potential problems and resolving them on his own?

6. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to him by owner and tenant representatives?

7. Discuss the Contractor’s quality control of the project.

8. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project

9. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to seamlessly transition or phase-in under a newly awarded contract (if applicable):

Comments:

10. Discuss the Contactor’s ability to provide the level of supervision sufficient to ensure effective performance by the productive Protective Security Officers over the course of the Contract.

Comments:

11. Did this contract require the contractor to submit a subcontracting plan? If so, has the contractor been making a good faith effort to meet the subcontracting goals contained within the plan? (NOTE: The individual completing this questionnaire may need to contact the cognizant contracting officer in order to ascertain whether the contractor is meeting subcontracting goals.)

12. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?

13. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

a. _____	Highly Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.
b. _____	Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.
c. _____	Unacceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.

Your Name:		______________________________
Your Position:	______________________________
Company:		______________________________
Telephone No:	______________________________
Fax:			______________________________
E-mail address:	______________________________

August 2020 Version image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Dec 22, 2021.