70RFPW21QWA000005 AMD0006 Signed.pdf

(x)

70RFPW21QWA000005

x x

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

Auburn WA 98001 Attn: Maria Colville

OPO/FPS/WEST CCG/R8F

400 15th Street SW Ofc of Procurement Operations - FPS U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security DHS/FPS/West CCG/Region 8

Auburn WA 98001 400 15th Street SW

70RFPW

Federal Protective Service Acq. Division Office of Procurement Operations U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security

FPS WEST CCG (70RFPW)

07/14/20210006

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

05/13/2021

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

CO: Maria Santiago, Maria.Santiago@fps.dhs.gov

CS: Maria Colville, Maria.Colville@fps.dhs.gov

Video Surveillance System (VSS) Installation for the Juneau Federal Building, Juneau, Alaska

This purpose of Amendment 0006 (AMD0006) is to revise the due date for submission of RFQ

Attachment E - Past Performance Questionnaires. The form has been revised as follows:

“Please provide the past performance questionnaire no later than date and time quotes are due.” The revised Attachment E replaces page 124/154.

The due date for receipt of quotations of JULY 26, 2021 at Noon PDT has not changed.

Continued ...

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Maria Santiago

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

TEL: EMAIL: 253-876-6840 Maria.Santiago@fps.dhs.gov

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

2 7

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

70RFPW21QWA000005/0006

There are no other changes as a result of this amendment. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

*****OFFERORS ARE ENCOURAGED TO REVIEW THE RFQ

PACKAGE IN ITS ENTIRETY. ANY SUBMISSION WHICH

DOES NOT MEET THE REQURIEMENTS OF THIS RFQ WILL

BE REMOVED FROM AWARD CONSIDERATION. RFQ

ATTACHMENT F OUTLINES THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS

RFQ PACKAGE.*****

ATTACHMENT:

1 – Attachment E - PPQ

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Protective Service West Consolidated Contracting Group 400-15th Street Southwest Auburn, WA 98001

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: 70RFPW21QWA000005

NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE:

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above-named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The Federal Protective Service is considering this Contractor for the installation of a VSS System at the Juneau Federal Building, 709 W Ninth Street, Juneau, Alaska 99801. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten or typed responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. security specialist, COR, COTR, etc.) respond to this questionnaire.

More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate. Please provide the past performance questionnaire no later than date and time quotes are due.

Upon completion of the survey, PLEASE EMAIL to maria.colville@fps.dhs.gov. If you have any questions, please submit in writing. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.

CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

TOTAL PROJECT VALUE (TO DATE):

NAME:

TITLE:

COMPANY:

TELEPHONE:

EMAIL:

AMD000670RFPW21QWA000005

AMD0006 Page 3 of 7 mailto:maria.colville@fps.dhs.gov

3. Discuss the Contractor’s quality control over the entirety of the installation. How effective was the

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS:

Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we may determine any similarities to this contract:

Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of professionalism and attentiveness.

Comments:

2. Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of customer service and responsiveness.

70RFPW21QWA000005

AMD0006 Page 4 of 7

3. Contractor in identifying and resolving problems—was the Contractor proactive or reactionary?

4. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to provide sufficient supervision/staffing to ensure effective and successful performance.

5. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to them by owner and tenant representatives?

AMD0006 Page 5 of 7

6. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project.

7. Please describe any special, unique and/or complex requirements of the project, and how well the Contractor was able to handle those complex requirements.

8. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?

AMD0006 Page 6 of 7

9. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

a. Highly Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.

b. Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.

c. Unacceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.

AMD0006 Page 7 of 7