7-TB2627-FS - Attachment E - RFP Evaluation Scoresheet.pdf
PDF 95 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- TB2627-FS
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) Evaluation Scoresheet for the Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD) for a District Property Feasibility Study, identified by Solicitation #TB2627-FS. The RFP seeks a comprehensive feasibility study involving five key tasks: Project Initiation & Kickoff, Real Estate Analysis, Financial and Economic Analysis, Community and Stakeholder Engagement, and Final Report and Presentation.
The evaluation process includes a technical scoring component worth 80% (800 points) and a pricing component worth 20% (200 points). The technical evaluation covers criteria such as company experience, qualifications of key personnel, approach to scope of work, project timeline, references, and value-added services. Proposals will be scored on a 0-10 scale, with 7.5 considered a passing score. The pricing evaluation will award full points to the lowest-cost proposal, with other vendors receiving proportional points based on a calculated formula. The minimum technical point threshold is 75% (600 points), and the total possible evaluation points are 1,000.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2).
Score will be assigned as follows:
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-10) Criteria Weight
Points Possible
Points Earned
1 2.2(A) 1a 2.2(A) 8 80 0 1b 2.2(A) 8.8 88 0 2 2.2(B)
2a 2.1 4.8 48 0 2b 2.1 14.4 144 0 2c 2.1 14.4 144 0 2d 2.1 8 80 0 2e 2.1 8 80 0 3 2.2(C) 8 80 0 4 2.2(D) 4.8 48 0 5 2.2(E) 0.8 8 0
800 0
RFP Section Min Percent Min Points Required
Points Earned
Percent Earned Evaluation
4.2 75% 600 0 0
RFP Section Low Price
Option Vendored
Price Percent of
Total Points Possible Points Earned
3.1 20% 200 0
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Earned
80% 800 0 20% 200 0
100% 1,000 0Total Evaluation Points Total Price Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
District Property Feasibility Study
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Vendor Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
Solicitation # TB2627-FS
- Qualifications of Key Personnel Assigned to the SLCSD Approach to Scope of Work and Requirements
References
Pricing will be evaluated based on the following:
- The vendor with the lowest price will receive the full allocation of price points.
- All other vendor proposals will receive a percentage of the allocated points based on the following formula:
- (Lowest Total Cost / Proposed Total Cost) x 200 = Vendors awarded price points.
Example: $1,000,000 / $1,150,000 = (87%) 87% x 200 Points = 174 Points Awarded
0 = Fail, the proposal does not answer or address the requirement 1-4 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal has major gaps in addressing some or all of the requirements of the RFP or has serious deficiencies in support or detail for multiple requirements.
5-7 = Substandard, the proposal does not address all of the requirements or criteria in the RFP or does not provide sufficient support or detail to address all of them.
7.5 = Pass, the proposal addresses all requirements with sufficient support and detail for each requirement.
8 = Good, the proposal addresses all aspects of the requirements, with ample support and detail for each requirement.
9 = Great, the proposal addresses all aspects of the requirements, with abundant support and detail for each requirement.
10 = Excellent, the proposal addresses all aspects of the requirements, with exceptional support and detail for each requirement.
Price
Required Technical Point Threshold
Project Timeline
- Task 2 - Real Estate Analysis (REA)
- Task 3 - Financial and Economic Analysis
Value-Added Services
0.0%
0.0%
NOTE: the evaluation committee may also utilize half points (i.e. 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, etc) where it deems appropriate
- Company History and Qualifications as a Whole Company Experience and Qualification of Key Personnel
Scoreable Technical Criteria
- Task 1 - Project Initiation & Kickoff
- Task 5 - Final Report and Presentation
- Task 4 - Community and Stakeholder Engagement
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .