7-Score-Sheet-NC26-3 for informational purposes only.xls
XLS spreadsheet 41 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- NC26-3
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This evaluation scoresheet is for Utah's solicitation NC26-3, issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing in partnership with the Utah Geological Survey's Energy & Mineral Resources division. The procurement seeks U-Th-Pb geochronology services to obtain crystallization ages of intrusive magmatic rocks through a 5-year contract with guaranteed pricing for one year. Vendors must demonstrate 5+ years of experience conducting mineral separation and U-Pb geochronology on zircon from igneous rocks for external customers, provide in-house mineral separation capabilities for zircon, and offer cathodoluminescence imaging of mineral mounts.
The evaluation process uses a 1,000-point scoring system with technical criteria weighted at 70% (700 points) and cost proposals at 30% (300 points). Technical evaluation focuses on data ability (100 points), data workflow (100 points), report quality (200 points), laboratory longevity (100 points), and external collaborations (200 points), with a minimum technical threshold of 70% (490 points) required for consideration. Cost scoring awards full points to the lowest bidder, with other proposals receiving proportional points based on their price differential. The procurement anticipates a single contract award to the highest-scoring responsive and responsible vendor.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 3-Attachment A Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-Attachment C Cost Proposal Form Quantity.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 6-Attachment D Technical Criteria.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Attachment B Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| U-Pb Crystallization Ages for Igneous Rocks | ||||||||||
| SOLICITATION # NC26-3 | ||||||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||||||
| This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2). | ||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | ||||||||
| 1 | The Laboratory must have 5 plus years conducting mineral separation, U -Pb geochronology on zircon from igneous rocks, and producing reports with calculated crystallization ages for external customers/collaborators. | |||||||||
| 2 | Must be able to conduct in-house mineral separation for zircon. | |||||||||
| 3 | Must be able to provide Cathodoluminescence imaging of mineral mounts. | |||||||||
| 0 | ||||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Data Ability | 20 | 14.3% | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | Data Workflow | 20 | 14.3% | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | Report of Data | 40 | 28.6% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 4 | Longevity of lab operation | 20 | 14.3% | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5 | External Collaborators | 40 | 28.6% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 700.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | ||||
| 70% | 490.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| 30% | 300.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | ||||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 700.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 300.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .