7-Attachment G -Score Sheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 55 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MK27-105 WIC Pharmacy Services
- Solicitation number
- MK27-105
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Solicitation #MK27-105 WIC Pharmacy Services, issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services. The RFP seeks to establish a single contract award with a responsive and responsible vendor to provide pharmacy services for the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program. The contract term is five years, with vendors required to guarantee pricing for a minimum of one year.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes a comprehensive scoring methodology allocating 725 total points to technical criteria and 310.7 points to cost evaluation. Technical evaluation criteria include Scope of Work Alignment (250 points, 34.5%), Timely Delivery Plan (250 points, 34.5%), Demonstrated Experience (100 points, 13.8%), Facility Quality Control (100 points, 13.8%), and Professional References (25 points, 3.4%). A minimum technical score threshold of 65% (471.3 points) is required for evaluation consideration. Four mandatory requirements must be satisfied on a pass/fail basis: Certification and Licensing, Cost Sheet submission, Delivery Coverage, and Utah-Based Inventory. Cost points are calculated using a comparative formula in which the lowest proposed price receives 100% of the 310.7 cost points, with all other proposals receiving proportionally reduced points based on their price variance from the lowest bid. Total evaluation points are distributed as 70% technical (725 points) and 30% cost (310.7 points), yielding a maximum possible score of 1,035.7 points.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 6-Attachment A - Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-Attachment C - Cost Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 3-Attachment F - Reference Document.docx | DOCX document | |
| 9-Attachment D - Mandatory Minimums Technical Requirements.docx | DOCX document | |
| 8-Attachment B - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Attachment E - Delivery Locations.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| WIC Pharmacy Services | ||||||
| SOLICITATION #MK27-105 | ||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, fails to address the requirements in the RFP | |||||
| 2 = Fair, addresses the requirements in the RFP unsatisfactorily | ||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Good, addresses all requirements in the RFP satisfactorily | |||||
| 4 = Very Good, addresses all requirements in the RFP and may exceed some | ||||||
| Date: | 5 = Superior, addresses all requirements in the RFP and exceeds them | |||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |||||
| 1 | Certification and Licensing | |||||
| 2 | Cost Sheet | |||||
| 3 | Delivery Coverage | |||||
| 4 | Utah-Based Inventory | |||||
| 0 | ||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | Evaluator Score (1-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points |
Earned
| 1 | Scope of Work Alignment | 50 | 34.5% | 250.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2 | Timely Delivery Plan | 50 | 34.5% | 250.0 | 0.0 | |
| 3 | Demonstrated Experience | 20 | 13.8% | 100.0 | 0.0 | |
| 4 | Facility Quality Control | 20 | 13.8% | 100.0 | 0.0 | |
| 5 | Professional References | 5 | 3.4% | 25.0 | 0.0 | |
| 100.0% | 725.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |
| 65% | 471.3 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Cost | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| 30% | 310.7 | 0.0 | ||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/ Proposed Price). | ||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 725.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 310.7 | 0.0 | |||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,035.7 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .