The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Amended
| Fulfillment and Visitor Services |
| SOLICITATION #GN27-104 |
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET |
| Score will be assigned as follows: |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information |
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner |
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them |
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) |
| 1 | Vendor must certify that company, or organization has a minimum of five years of combined experience in the following areas: guide distribution (both individual and bulk, mail distribution strategy, and international shipping. | Attachment E – Technical Criteria | |
| 2 | Vendor must certify it has storage capacity to accommodate Utah printed materials | Attachment E – Technical Criteria | |
| 3 | Vendor must certify it can meet all data privacy requirements and understands it may have to also meet GovRamp Requirements. | Attachment E – Technical Criteria | |
Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| 1 | Fulfillment and Distribution Approach, including data privacy | 64 | 40.0% | 320.00 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Fulfillment and Distrobution Core Experience | 48 | 30.0% | 240.00 | 0.00 |
| 3 | Key Personnel | 32 | 20.0% | 160.00 | 0.00 |
| 4 | Value Added Services | 16 | 10.0% | 80.00 | 0.00 |
| | | 100.0% | 800.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| | 65% | 520.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | |
Scoreable Interveiw Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| 1 | Presentation on Fulfillment and Visitor Services | 20 | 100.0% | 100.00 | 0.00 |
| | | 100.0% | 100.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Interview Point Threshold | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| 65% | 65.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | |
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| | | | 10% | 100.0 | 0.0 |
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). Other cost evaluation methods may be used as long as they are within Procurement Code/Rule. Ensure the method for awarding points is clearly stated on the score sheeet and within the solicitation documents.
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 90% | 800.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Interview Evaluation Points | | 100.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 10% | 100.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 |