7-ATT F - DH2716 -AFV RFSQ Eval Scorsht.pdf
PDF 339 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DH2716-AFV
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This evaluation scoresheet is used by the Salt Lake City School District to assess proposals submitted in response to a Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFSQ) for establishing an approved vendor list of fundraising vendors pursuant to Utah Code 13-22, the Charitable Solicitations Act. The solicitation seeks qualified vendors to provide food items or other products for fundraising activities at various schools within the district. Vendors must submit responses electronically through the Bonfire/U3P system by the specified closing date and time. All vendor submissions must include completed Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) with general information, W-9 forms, valid business licenses, State of Utah Department of Charity and Organization fundraiser permits or co-venturer letters, and proposed vendor documentation.
The evaluation scoresheet employs a five-point scoring rubric ranging from Fail (1) to Excellent (5), with four technical criteria sections weighted as follows: Vendor Qualifications & Experience (40%), Complaints and Problem Resolution (30%), Fundraiser Details (20%), and References (10%), totaling 500 possible points. A minimum threshold of 375 points (75% of total possible points) is required for approval. The scoresheet requires evaluators to verify mandatory requirements and confirm completion of all blocks on Attachment C before scoring. This is a draft document not subject to public records disclosure under Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2) and should be returned only to the evaluation committee chairperson, not to the Purchasing Department.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2).
Score will be assigned as follows:
1 = Fail, the proposal fails to address some or all of the requirements; fails to accurately address some or all of the requirements, or fails to demonstrate they can perform 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria in the RFP unsatisfactorily 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP satisfactorily 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP and may exceed some 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses all requirements in the RFP and exceeds them
RFP
Section
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 2.2 2 SOQ Gen Info - (2.3 Items 1. thru 7.) 2.3 3 SOQ Gen Info - W9 Form (2.3 Item 8.) 2.3
4 2.3 5 Valid Business License (2.3 Item 10.) 2.3 6 2.3
RFP
Section
Evaluator Score (1-5)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
1 2.4A 40 40.0% 200.0 0.0 1 2.4B 30 30.0% 150.0 0.0 1 2.4C 20 20.0% 100.0 0.0 1 2.4D 10 10.0% 50.0 0.0
100.0% 500.0 0.0
RFP
Section
Min Percent
Min Points Required
Points Earned Percent Earned Evaluation
4.2 75% 375.0 0.0 0.0%
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Earned
100% 500 0
100% 500 0
Vendor Docs/Proposed Contract (2.3 Item 11.)
Vendor Qualifications & Experience
Total Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
References
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Complaints/Problm Resolution
Required Technical Point Threshold
Fundraiser Details
SOQ Gen. Info - State of Utah DOC Fundraiser Permit, co-venturer ltr or ltr of exemp (2.3 Item 9)
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Check ALL Blocks on Attachment C
ATTACHMENT F
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
APPROVED VENDOR'S LIST- FUND RAISING, SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL
DISTRICT
SOLICITATION # DH2716-AFV
RFSQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .