7-4-DA27002-26317480 Structural-Calculations-CW Bldg. 21.pdf
PDF 9 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DA27002
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a structural calculation document prepared by Structural Design Studio, Inc. for the Utah National Guard's Camp Williams Building 21 remodel project, governed by the 2021 International Building Code. The project involves the remodel of an existing FEMA Hazardous Decontamination Facility and Emergency Response Center located in Bluffdale, Utah. The building, originally constructed in 1995 under the 1994 Uniform Building Code, is being redesignated under Risk Category II with an importance factor of 1.00. The structural calculations indicate that the remodel scope does not increase demand/capacity ratios for lateral force resisting elements by more than 10 percent under the International Existing Building Code prescriptive method. The design incorporates specialized structural criteria including seismic loads with a Site Class-D classification, wind speeds of 105 mph at Exposure C, special reinforced masonry shear walls as the lateral force resisting system, and specific material properties for concrete (3000 psi), masonry (2000 psi compression), and steel components. The roof loading is calculated at 18.20 psf total dead load with 26 psf flat roof snow load.
The associated Stage II invitation to bid construction project carries a construction cost estimate of $2,400,000.00 and is open only to contractors prequalified under DFCM's Stage I Prequalification process. The scope encompasses comprehensive building repairs and upgrades including replacement of all exterior windows, storefront, and doors; roof framing and standing metal seam roof installation; complete electrical system replacement from the main distribution panel; ceiling tiles and flooring covering; metal soffit and rain gutters; HVAC system installation; EFIS exterior wall finish over the entire building; latrine and shower facilities; and interior floor plan updates to meet current code requirements and user needs.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
CW Bldg 21 Project No. 25061
Camp Williams
Bluffdale, Utah
PREPARED FOR:
Architectural Nexus
The attached documents have been prepared for the client listed above and pertain only to the above referenced project. All information attached is the copyright property of Structural Design Studio, Inc. and shall not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission
2225 E. Murray Holladay Rd., Suite 110 :: Salt Lake City, Utah 84117 :: 801.274.3950 :: structuralds.com
PROJECT DESIGN CRITERIA
General Project Information
Project Name: CW Bldg 21 Client Name: Architectural Nexus
Street Address: Camp Williams Governing Code: 2021 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC)
City, State: Bluffdale, Utah Risk Category: Risk Category II (All Others)
Project Description:
Remodel of an existing FEMA Hazardous Decontamination Facility and Emergency Response Center on Camp Williams campus.
Structural Loads and Criteria
LIVE LOADS WIND LOADS SEISMIC LOADS
Roof Live Load: 20 psf Wind Speed: 105 mph Site Classification: Site Class-D (Default)
Floor Live Load: Wind Exposure: Exposure C (All Others) Short Period (Ss): 1.129 g
Flat Roof Snow Load: 26 psf Enclosure: Partially Enclosed Long Period (S1): 0.411 g
Misc. Load: N/A Analysis Method: Directional Design Category: D
Structural Material Properties
SOILS MASONRY CONCRETE
Soil Type: Site Class-D (Default) Compression (f'm): 2000 psi Compression (f'c): 3000 psi
Bearing: 1500 psf Mortar Type: Type S Steel Reinforcing: A615
Sliding: 0.30 Grout: 2000 psi w/c ratio: 0.45
Short Tem Increase: 33% CMU Type: Normal Wt Air Content: 1.00%
STEEL WOOD LATERAL FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM
Beams: N/A Sawn Lumber: DF No.1 Special reinforced masonry shear walls
Columns: N/A Glulam Lumber: N/A R-Factor: 5.00
Plates: A36 Sheathing: OSB Omega (Wo): 2.50
Anchor Bolts: N/A All Thread: A307 Amplification (Cd): 3.50
Calculation Set Table of Contents Seal:
This signed engineering seal is intended only for this single project and applies only to the project scope as listed above. This seal only applies to the attached calculation set for this project and applies to no other documentation or aspects of the project.
(c) Structural Design Studio, Inc. G1
05/14/2026
General Design Criteria: G1-G11
Engineering Design: E1-E10
STRUCTURAL SUMMARY DESIGN SHEET
CW Bldg 21 The existing structure was designed and built in the 1995 under the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). As indicated by the Utah
National Guard this building has had a Emergency Response Center function and also as a FEMA Hazardous Decontainment facility.
Per UBC Table 16-K - The occupancy category for such structures are listed as an Essential Facility and a Hazardous Facility. Both of these occupancy classifications per the table woudl result in a seismic importance factor of 1.25 and a wind importance factor of 1.15 respectively.
The interior remodel and function of the space would be classified as a Structural Risk Category II structure with an importance factor of 1.00 per the International Building Code 1604.3. The following calculations indicate that per the International Existing Building Code prescriptive method the demand/capacity ratio for lateral force resisting elements does not increase by more than 10%.
(c) Structural Design Studio, Inc.
G2
PROJECT LOADING CRITERIA
ROOF LOADING
DEAD LOADS - New LIVE LOADS
Roof System: 2.00 psf Standing seam metal roof Roof Live Load: 20.00 psf
Roof Insulation: 1.50 psf 6" Rigid Insulation Flat Roof Snow Load: 26.00 psf
Roof Deck Collateral: 1.70 psf Densdeck Sloped Roof Snow Load: 26.00 psf
Roof Deck: 2.00 psf 7/16" Plywood Decking Roof Wind Load: 0.00 psf
Elec/Mech/Piping: 4.00 psf Elevation: 4820 ft
Ceiling Finishes: 4.00 psf 5/8" Gypsum Board System
Misc Collateral:
Other: Total Roof Decking DEAD Load: 7.20 psf
Roof Joists: 3.00 psf Total Roof Joist DEAD Load: 18.20 psf
Roof Girders: Total Roof Girder DEAD Load: 18.20 psf
TOTAL LOAD: 18.20 psf <- No Increase
TOTAL MODEL LOAD: 15.20 psf <- When self weight is calculated by software. TOTAL ROOF SEISMIC MASS: 18.20 psf
FLOOR LOADING
DEAD LOADS - Existing
Roof System: 5.50 psf Asphalt shingles (2-layer)
Roof Insulation: 0.00 psf NONE
Roof Deck Collateral:
Roof Deck: 2.00 psf 7/16" Plywood Decking
Elec/Mech/Piping: 4.00 psf
Ceiling Finishes: 4.00 psf 5/8" Gypsum Board System
Misc Collateral:
Other:
Roof Joists: 3.00 psf
Roof Girders:
TOTAL LOAD: 18.50 psf
TOTAL MODEL LOAD: 15.50 psf <- When self weight is calculated by software.
WALL LOADING
DEAD LOADS
WALL TYPE 1 - New Exterior TOTAL WALL WEIGHT: 56.00 psf
Exterior Finish: 2.00 psf EIFS Wall Height: 8.67 ft
Insulation: 1.00 psf 2" Rigid Insulation Total Wall Mass: 486 plf
Structure: 48.00 psf 8" Atlas Brick w/ grout @ 48" OC
Interior Finish: 3.00 psf 5/8" Gypsum board Increase 9.80%
Other: 2.00 psf Plywood
WALL TYPE 2 - Existing Exterior TOTAL WALL WEIGHT: 51.00 psf
Exterior Finish: 0.00 psf NONE Wall Height: 8.67 ft
Insulation: 0.00 psf NONE Total Wall Mass: 442 plf
Structure: 48.00 psf 8" Atlas Brick w/ grout @ 48" OC
Interior Finish: 3.00 psf 5/8" Gypsum board
Other:
G3
Utah Ground Snow Load Map
Latitude: 40.431
Longitude: -111.929
Elevation: 4,818 ft
Ground Snow Load:
37 psf / 1.79 kPa
*This document is not legally binding. The user is urged to verify ground snow load values with the local authority having jurisdiction.
Snow Load (psf)
Map data ©2025 Report a map error
These ground snow load values represent 50-year ground snow load estimated value at a 2% probability of exceedance for the location given. The grid used in the map is 3350ft by 3350ft. Elevations for these grid cells were estimated by aggregating data from 100ft by 100ft USGS digital elevation models and may not coincide with the actual site elevation. These predictions are calculated using the process outlined in The Utah Snow Load Study.
Final predictions given are bounded at a lower limit for a minimum ground snow load of 21 psf to meet ASCE 7. Estimated values for snow loads at elevations significantly higher than all nearby stations lead to unreasonably high snow load estimates, therefore, the predictions in the map are not allowed to extend beyond the highest 50-year station ground snow load of 429 psf. Elevations over 9,000 ft are also considered less accurate due to the limited number of stations at these elevations. The results shown in this report have included a warning if the results have reached or exceeded the upper limit.
While great efforts have been made to ensure these predictions are as accurate as possible, designers must use expert judgement to ensure that such predictions are appropriate for their particular project. The SEAU and the authors cannot accept responsibility for prediction errors or any consequences resulting therefrom.
1 Bean, Brennan; Maguire, Marc; and Sun, Yan, "The Utah Snow Load Study" (2018). Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty Publications. Paper 3589.
Utah State University sites use cookies. By continuing to use this site you accept our privacy and cookie policy. I agree
G4 https://www.google.com/maps/@40.430536,-111.9291688,16z/data=!5m1!1e4!10m1!1e1!12b1?source=apiv3&rapsrc=apiv3 https://maps.google.com/maps?ll=40.430536,-111.929169&z=16&t=p&hl=en-US&gl=US&mapclient=apiv3 https://maps.google.com/maps?ll=40.430536,-111.929169&z=16&t=p&hl=en-US&gl=US&mapclient=apiv3 https://www.usu.edu/privacy/
SNOW LOADING + DRIFT
Designation: Typical Snow Loads County: Salt Lake
Risk Category: Risk Category II (All Others) Elevation: 4820 ft
Roof Exposure: Partially Exposed Ground Snow Load: 37 psf
Terrain Category: Exposure C (All Others) Roof Slope: 18 deg
Roof Thermal Type: All Other Structures Roofing Material: All Others
Load Type: Utah Snow Load Study
[[Utah Ground Snow Load Map]]
Ground Snow Load (pg): 37 psf
Exposure Factor (Ce): 1.00 Table 7.3-1
Thermal Factor (Ct): 1.00 Table 7.3-2
Importance Factor (I): 1.00 Table 1.5-2
Flat Roof Snow Load (pf): 26 psf Equation 7.3-1
Sloped Roof Factor (Cs): 1.00 Figure 7-2
Sloped Roof Snow Load (ps): 26 psf Equation 7.4-1
Snow Density (g): 18.9 pcf Equation 7.7-1
Flat Roof Snow Depth (hb): 1.4 ft
Roof Step Drifting Design
Drift Designation HL OH LL Parapet/RTU Drift Load (pd) Drift Length (w) Wind/Leeward
A 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft N 0 psf 0.0 ft N/A
B 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft N 0 psf 0.0 ft N/A
C 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft N 0 psf 0.0 ft N/A
D 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft N 0 psf 0.0 ft N/A
E 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft N 0 psf 0.0 ft N/A
F 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft N 0 psf 0.0 ft N/A
(c) Structural Design Studio, Inc.
G5 https://utahsnowload.usu.edu/index.php
ASCE Hazards Report Address:
No Address at This Location
Standard: ASCE/SEI 7-16 Latitude: 40.43058
Risk Category: II Longitude: -111.929201
Soil Class: D - Default (see Section 11.4.3)
Elevation: 4847.59929479837 ft (NAVD 88)
Wind
Results:
Wind Speed 103 Vmph
10-year MRI 73 Vmph
25-year MRI 79 Vmph
50-year MRI 84 Vmph
100-year MRI 89 Vmph
Data Source: ASCE/SEI 7-16, Fig. 26.5-1B and Figs. CC.2-1–CC.2-4, and Section 26.5.2
Date Accessed: Mon Dec 15 2025
Value provided is 3-second gust wind speeds at 33 ft above ground for Exposure C Category, based on linear interpolation between contours. Wind speeds are interpolated in accordance with the 7-16 Standard. Wind speeds correspond to approximately a 7% probability of exceedance in 50 years (annual exceedance probability = 0.00143, MRI = 700 years).
Site is not in a hurricane-prone region as defined in ASCE/SEI 7-16 Section 26.2.
Page 1 of 3https://ascehazardtool.org/ Mon Dec 15 2025 G6 https://ascehazardtool.org/
SS : 1.128
S1 : 0.411
Fa : 1.2
Fv : N/A
SMS : 1.353
SM1 : N/A
SDS : 0.902
SD1 : N/A
TL : 8
PGA : 0.5
PGA M : 0.6
FPGA : 1.2
Ie : 1
Cv : 1.326
Seismic
Site Soil Class:
Results:
Data Accessed:
Date Source:
D - Default (see Section 11.4.3)
USGS Seismic Design Maps
Ground motion hazard analysis may be required. See ASCE/SEI 7-16 Section 11.4.8.
Mon Dec 15 2025
Page 2 of 3https://ascehazardtool.org/ Mon Dec 15 2025 G7 https://doi.org/10.5066/F7NK3C76 https://ascehazardtool.org/
SEISMIC DESIGN & LOADING
Section 11.4-Seismic Ground Motions
Short Period Map Acceleration (Ss): 1.13 g TL: 8.00 s
1-Sec Period Map Acceleration (S1): 0.41 g
Site Class: Site Class-D (Default)
Soil Modification (Fa): 1.20
Soil Modification (Fv): 1.89
Design Spectral Accelerations
SDS: 0.90 g
SD1: 0.52 g
Use Exception (11.4.8): Exception 2
Section 11.5-Importance and Occupancy
Risk Category: Risk Category II (All Others)
Importance (I): 1.00
Section 11.6-Seismic Design Category Section 12.3-Redundancy Factor
Design Category: D Building Design: Regular, w/ 2-Bays of perimeter framing ea.side
Section 12.2-Structural System Redundancy-r: 1.00
Framing System: A-Bearing Wall Systems
Lateral System: Special reinforced masonry shear walls Section 12.8-Equivalent Lateral Force
R Wo CD Fundamental Period (T): 0.10 s
5.00 2.50 3.50 Seismic Coefficient (Cs): 0.181
Base Shear (Qe): 34.03 kips
Section 12.8.3: Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces Base Shear (E): 34.03 kips
# of Diaphragm Levels: 1 Amplified Base Shear (WoQe): 85 kips Period Factor-k: 1.00
Diaphragm / Story Height Diaphragm Diaphragm Perimeter Perimeter Seismic Force @ Story Diaphragm
Floor Level Height abv Base Area Weight Wall Length Wall Wt. Wt (kips) Floor Lvl Shear Force
ROOF 9 ft 9 ft 5770 ft2 18 psf 341 ft 243 plf 188 kips 34 kips 34 kips 34 kips
BASE 0 ft 0 kips 0 kips 34 kips 0 kips
TOTALS 9 ft 5770 ft2 33 psf 188.37 kips 34.03 kips 34.0 kips
G8 http://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php
SEISMIC DESIGN & LOADING
Existing
Section 11.4-Seismic Ground Motions
Short Period Map Acceleration (Ss): 1.13 g TL: 8.00 s
1-Sec Period Map Acceleration (S1): 0.41 g
Site Class: Site Class-D (Default)
Soil Modification (Fa): 1.20
Soil Modification (Fv): 1.89
Design Spectral Accelerations
SDS: 0.90 g
SD1: 0.52 g
Use Exception (11.4.8): Exception 2
Section 11.5-Importance and Occupancy
Risk Category: Risk Category III (Substantial Hazard)
Importance (I): 1.25
Section 11.6-Seismic Design Category Section 12.3-Redundancy Factor
Design Category: D Building Design: Table 12.3-3 (page 126)
Section 12.2-Structural System Redundancy-r: 1.00
Framing System: A-Bearing Wall Systems
Lateral System: Special reinforced masonry shear walls Section 12.8-Equivalent Lateral Force
R Wo CD Fundamental Period (T): 0.10 s
5.00 2.50 3.50 Seismic Coefficient (Cs): 0.226
Base Shear (Qe): 40.87 kips
Section 12.8.3: Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces Base Shear (E): 40.87 kips
# of Diaphragm Levels: 1 Amplified Base Shear (WoQe): 102 kips Period Factor-k: 1.00
Diaphragm / Story Height Diaphragm Diaphragm Perimeter Perimeter Seismic Force @ Story Diaphragm
Floor Level Height abv Base Area Weight Wall Length Wall Wt. Wt (kips) Floor Lvl Shear Force
ROOF 9 ft 9 ft 5770 ft2 18 psf 341 ft 221 plf 181 kips 41 kips 41 kips 41 kips
BASE 0 ft 0 kips 0 kips 41 kips 0 kips
TOTALS 9 ft 5770 ft2 31 psf 180.98 kips 40.87 kips 40.9 kips
G9 http://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php
WIND LOADING - DIRECTIONAL PROCEDURE
Risk Category: Risk Category II (All Others) On Escarpment (see 26.8.1): No
Terrain Category: Exposure C (All Others) --
Wind Speed, V: 105 mph --
Mean Roof Height, h: 14.00 ft --
Roof Slope (deg): 18 deg
Roof Ridge is Normal to wind direction Classification: Partially Enclosed Height above ground, z: 9.00 ft Elevation: 4820 ft
Length, normal to wind, B: 124.00 ft Length, parallel to wind, L: 46.50 ft
Main Wind Force Resisting System: Topographic Effects:
Wind Speed: H/Lh: --
Terrain: C x/Lh: -- Kd: 0.85 z/Lh: -- Kzt: 1.00 K1: -- Ke: 0.84 K2: -- G: 0.85 K3: --
GCpi: ±0.55 Roof Slope, θ: 18.43
Walls qz or qh Cp p (psf) Windward Wall 17.1 0.80 11.6 Leeward Wall 17.1 -0.50 -7.3
Side Wall 17.1 -0.70 -10.2
Roof Region qz or qh Cp p (psf) Windward 17.1 -0.32 -4.7 Windward 17.1 0.16 2.3 Leeward 17.1 -0.60 -8.7
Base Shear: 42.8 k Force in Diaphragm: 21.4 k SEISMIC GOVERNS
23.5 k WIND EXISTING > Wind current
G10
WIND LOADING - DIRECTIONAL PROCEDURE
Existing Wind
Risk Category: Risk Category II (All Others) On Escarpment (see 26.8.1): No
Terrain Category: Exposure C (All Others) --
Wind Speed, V: 110 --
Mean Roof Height, h: 14.00 ft --
Roof Slope (deg): 18 deg
Roof Ridge is Normal to wind direction Classification: Partially Enclosed Height above ground, z: 9.00 ft Elevation: 4820 ft
Length, normal to wind, B: 124.00 ft Length, parallel to wind, L: 46.50 ft
Main Wind Force Resisting System: Topographic Effects:
Wind Speed: H/Lh: --
Terrain: C x/Lh: -- Kd: 0.85 z/Lh: -- Kzt: 1.00 K1: -- Ke: 0.84 K2: -- G: 0.85 K3: --
GCpi: ±0.55 Roof Slope, θ: 18.43
Walls qz or qh Cp p (psf) Windward Wall 18.8 0.80 12.8 Leeward Wall 18.8 -0.50 -8.0
Side Wall 18.8 -0.70 -11.2
Roof Region qz or qh Cp p (psf) Windward 18.8 -0.32 -5.1 Windward 18.8 0.16 2.5 Leeward 18.8 -0.60 -9.6
Base Shear: 46.9 k Force in Diaphragm: 23.5 k SEISMIC GOVERNS
G11
FLEXIBLE DIAPHRAGM DESIGN
CW Bldg 21 - X-DIRECTION
LEVEL: Roof Diaphragm
GENERAL LOADING & GEOMETRY LAYOUT OF DIAPHRAGM AND SUPPORT FRAME LINES
Force @ Level (E): 34.0 k AREA WIDTH DEPTH FRAME LINE LENGTH
Diaphragm Force (Ed): 34.0 k a* FRAME 1 88.00 ft
Allowable Deck Shear: 340 plf b 46.50 ft 124.00 ft FRAME 2 92.33 ft
Redundancy: 1.00 c FRAME 3
GOVERNS: SEISMIC d FRAME 4 e FRAME 5
E/Ed Ratio: 100.0% f FRAME 6
Strength Deck Shear: 486 plf g*
* Cantilevered diaphragms ONLY. Otherwise leave blank.
GENERAL PROGRAM REPRESENTATION LAYOUT AND AREA DEFINITIONS
DIAPHRAGM LOADING AND CHORD DESIGN SUMMARY TABLE
AREA % Area Load (w) M Max Chord T/C Deck PLF Re-Entrant Status a 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf 0.00 ft PASS b 100.0% 732 plf 197.8 k-ft 1.60 k 69 plf -- PASS c 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf -- PASS d 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf -- PASS e 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf -- PASS f 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf -- PASS g 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf 0.00 ft PASS
E1
LEVEL: Roof Diaphragm
DIAPHRAGM DESIGN AND SHEAR ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
FRAME 1 FRAME 2 FRAME 3 FRAME 4 FRAME 5 FRAME 6
Frame Reaction (E): 17.01 k 17.01 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k
Diaphragm Reaction (Ed): 17.01 k 17.01 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k
Shear Force (Left): 0.00 k 17.01 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k
Req'd Length (Left): 0.00 ft 35.03 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft
Deck Shear (Left): 0 plf 137 plf 0 plf 0 plf 0 plf 0 plf
Deck Status (Left): PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Shear Force (Right): 17.01 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k
Req'd Length (Right): 35.03 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft
Deck Shear (Right): 137 plf 0 plf 0 plf 0 plf 0 plf 0 plf
Deck Status (Right): PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Collector Length: 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft
*Collector Force (Ed): 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k
*Need to amplify collector forces as required by code if necessary
E2
LEVEL: Roof Existing Diaphragm
GENERAL LOADING & GEOMETRY LAYOUT OF DIAPHRAGM AND SUPPORT FRAME LINES
Force @ Level (E): 40.9 k AREA WIDTH DEPTH FRAME LINE LENGTH
Diaphragm Force (Ed): 40.9 k a* FRAME 1 88.00 ft
Allowable Deck Shear: 340 plf b 46.50 ft 124.00 ft FRAME 2 92.33 ft
Redundancy: 1.00 c FRAME 3
GOVERNS: SEISMIC d FRAME 4 e FRAME 5
E/Ed Ratio: 100.0% f FRAME 6
Strength Deck Shear: 486 plf g*
* Cantilevered diaphragms ONLY. Otherwise leave blank.
GENERAL PROGRAM REPRESENTATION LAYOUT AND AREA DEFINITIONS
DIAPHRAGM LOADING AND CHORD DESIGN SUMMARY TABLE
AREA % Area Load (w) M Max Chord T/C Deck PLF Re-Entrant Status a 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf 0.00 ft PASS b 100.0% 879 plf 237.5 k-ft 1.92 k 82 plf -- PASS c 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf -- PASS d 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf -- PASS e 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf -- PASS f 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf -- PASS g 0.0% 0 plf 0.0 k-ft 0.00 k 0 plf 0.00 ft PASS
E3
LEVEL: Roof Existing Diaphragm
DIAPHRAGM DESIGN AND SHEAR ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
FRAME 1 FRAME 2 FRAME 3 FRAME 4 FRAME 5 FRAME 6
Frame Reaction (E): 20.43 k 20.43 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k
Diaphragm Reaction (Ed): 20.43 k 20.43 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k
Shear Force (Left): 0.00 k 20.43 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k
Req'd Length (Left): 0.00 ft 42.07 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft
Deck Shear (Left): 0 plf 165 plf 0 plf 0 plf 0 plf 0 plf
Deck Status (Left): PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Shear Force (Right): 20.43 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k
Req'd Length (Right): 42.07 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft
Deck Shear (Right): 165 plf 0 plf 0 plf 0 plf 0 plf 0 plf
Deck Status (Right): PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Collector Length: 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft
*Collector Force (Ed): 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k 0.00 k
*Need to amplify collector forces as required by code if necessary
E4
E5E5
E X
IS
T
IN
G
R O
O F
F R
A M
IN
G
P
LA
N
M L
M L
M L
M L M L
M L
M L
M L
ML ML ML
ML ML ML
M L
M L
M L
M L E X
IS
T
IN
G
O P
E N
IN
G
, T Y
P
E5E6
F
LO
O R
P
LA
N W
/ N E
W O
P E
N
IN
G S
E X
O P
E X
O P
E X
O P
E X
O P
E X
O P
E X
O P
EX OP EX OP EX OP
E X
O P
E X
O P
E X
O P
E X
O P
E X
O P
E X
O P
EX OPEX OP
EX OP
N W
O P
N W
O P
N W
O P
N W
O P
1B 1A
1C 1D
1E 1F
1G
3B 3A
3C 3D
1E 3F
3G
E X
IS
T
IN
G
O P
E N
IN
G
, T Y
P N
E W
O P
E N
IN
G
, T Y
P
E7
CW21 Wall Modifications Evaluation
GRID 1
f'm 1500 psi Original Vwall = 20.43 kips Original Risk Category Essential/Hazardous facitliy (I = 1.25) Em 1350 ksi Current Vwall = 17.01 kips Current - Risk Category II (I=1.00) G 540 ksi Thickness 7.625 in
Original Current Original Current
Pier Number Length Height
Pier Extends to Base? Length Height
Pier Extends to Base?
Pier Stiffness
% of Total
Stiffness Vpier Pier
Stiffness % of Total Vpier
Percent Change in in Y/N in in Y/N kips/in kips kips/in kips
1A 184 88 Y 184 88 Y 6303 13.33% 2.7 6303 15.71% 2.7 -1.9% 1B 54 48 N 54 48 N 3520 7.44% 1.5 3520 8.77% 1.5 -1.9% 1C 54 48 N 54 48 N 3520 7.44% 1.5 3520 8.77% 1.5 -1.9% 1D 468 88 Y 324 88 Y 20725 43.84% 9.0 13559 33.80% 5.8 -35.8% 1E 59 48 N 59 48 N 4002 8.46% 1.7 4002 9.98% 1.7 -1.9% 1F 52 48 N 52 48 N 3327 7.04% 1.4 3327 8.29% 1.4 -1.9% 1G 176 88 Y 176 88 Y 5882 12.44% 2.5 5882 14.66% 2.5 -1.9%
* Per IEBC 503.4 the demand is less than 10% with new openings, therefore ok
CW21 Wall Modifications Evaluation
GRID 3
f'm 1500 psi Original Vwall = 20.43 kips Original Risk Category Essential/Hazardous facitliy (I = 1.25) Em 1350 ksi Current Vwall = 17.01 kips Current - Risk Category II (I=1.00) G 540 ksi Thickness 7.625 in
Original Current Original Current
Pier Number Length Height
Pier Extends to Base? Length Height
Pier Extends to Base?
Pier Stiffness
% of Total
Stiffness Vpier Pier
Stiffness % of Total Vpier
Percent Change in in Y/N in in Y/N kips/in kips kips/in kips
3A 200 88 Y 200 88 Y 7145 14.07% 2.9 7145 17.09% 2.9 1.1% 3B 58 48 N 58 48 N 3905 7.69% 1.6 3905 9.34% 1.6 1.1% 3C 50 48 N 50 48 N 3134 6.17% 1.3 3134 7.49% 1.3 1.1% 3D 481 88 Y 301 88 Y 21362 42.06% 8.6 12389 29.63% 5.0 -41.4% 3E 61 48 N 61 48 N 4194 8.26% 1.7 4194 10.03% 1.7 1.1% 3F 58 48 N 58 48 N 3905 7.69% 1.6 3905 9.34% 1.6 1.1% 3G 200 88 Y 200 88 Y 7145 14.07% 2.9 7145 17.09% 2.9 1.1%
* Per IEBC 503.4 the demand is less than 10% with new openings, therefore ok
FORCE
DEMAND
CHANGE
FORCE
DEMAND
CHANGE
OPENING IN EXISTING WALL
Typical New Opening - CW Bldg 21
General Design Input
Total Wall Height: 8.67 ft Steel Plate Lintel Depth: 6.00 in Vert DL, Dead Weight: 545 plf
Wall Thickness: 7.63 in Steel Plate Lintel Thickness: 0.38 in Vert DL, Above Wall: 0 plf
Opening Height: 7.17 ft Steel Plate Jamb Width: 6.00 in Vert LL: 0 plf
Opening Width: 5.33 ft Steel Plate Jamb Thickness: 0.38 in Vert SL: 818 plf
Bolt Diameter: 3/4 in Horz Wind (W): 25 psf
Bolt Spacing: 16 in o.c. Horz Quake (E): 20 psf
Bolt Grade: A325 Allowable Deflection: L/600
Trib Area: 27.25 ft
Analysis and Calculations
Steel Plate Lintel:
Arching action: No
Effective Span, le: 5.83 ft
Demand Capacity
Mu: 8.41 k-ft fMn: 18.23 k-ft
Vu: 5.77 k fVn: 72.90 k
Bolts, Ru: 2.6 k fRu: 14.2 k
Deflection: 0.107 in Deflection: 0.091 in
L/600 L/765
Steel Plate Jamb:
Demand Capacity
Mu+: 0.9 k-ft fMn: 48.6 k-ft
Vu: 0.4 k fVn: 72.9 k
Pu: 6.0 k fPn: 145.8 k
Bolts, Ru: 1.1 k fRu: 14.2 k
Deflection: 0.003 in Deflection: 0.003 in
L/600 L/31105
Design Summary
Lintel Interaction Summary: Jamb Interaction Summary:
Moment: 0.46 Moment: 0.02
Shear: 0.08 Shear: 0.01
Bolts: 0.19 Axial: 0.04
Deflection: 0.86 Bolts: 0.08
Deflection: 0.02
Steel Plate Lintel: Steel Plate Jamb:
0.375 X 6" Steel Plate Each Face 0.375 X 6" Steel Plate Each Face w/ 0.75" Dia A325 Bolts @ 16" o.c. w/ 0.75" Dia A325 Bolts @ 16" o.c. Overall Status: O.K.
E8
General Design Input
Total Wall Height: 8.67 ft Steel Plate Lintel Depth: 4.00 in Vert DL, Dead Weight: 545 plf
Wall Thickness: 7.63 in Steel Plate Lintel Thickness: 0.38 in Vert DL, Above Wall: 0 plf
Opening Height: 7.17 ft Steel Plate Jamb Width: 4.00 in Vert LL: 0 plf
Opening Width: 3.33 ft Steel Plate Jamb Thickness: 0.38 in Vert SL: 818 plf
Bolt Diameter: 3/4 in Horz Wind (W): 25 psf
Bolt Spacing: 16 in o.c. Horz Quake (E): 20 psf
Bolt Grade: A325 Allowable Deflection: L/600
Trib Area: 27.25 ft
Analysis and Calculations
Steel Plate Lintel:
Arching action: No
Effective Span, le: 3.66 ft
Demand Capacity
Mu: 3.31 k-ft fMn: 8.10 k-ft
Vu: 3.62 k fVn: 48.60 k
Bolts, Ru: 2.6 k fRu: 14.2 k
Deflection: 0.067 in Deflection: 0.048 in
L/600 L/917
Steel Plate Jamb:
Demand Capacity
Mu+: 0.5 k-ft fMn: 32.4 k-ft
Vu: 0.3 k fVn: 48.6 k
Pu: 3.8 k fPn: 97.2 k
Bolts, Ru: 0.7 k fRu: 14.2 k
Deflection: 0.003 in Deflection: 0.003 in
L/600 L/32594
Design Summary
Lintel Interaction Summary: Jamb Interaction Summary:
Moment: 0.41 Moment: 0.02
Shear: 0.07 Shear: 0.01
Bolts: 0.18 Axial: 0.04
Deflection: 0.72 Bolts: 0.05
Deflection: 0.02
Steel Plate Lintel: Steel Plate Jamb:
0.375 X 4" Steel Plate Each Face 0.375 X 4" Steel Plate Each Face w/ 0.75" Dia A325 Bolts @ 16" o.c. w/ 0.75" Dia A325 Bolts @ 16" o.c. Overall Status: O.K.
E9
General Design Input
Total Wall Height: 8.67 ft Steel Plate Lintel Depth: 8.00 in Vert DL, Dead Weight: 545 plf
Wall Thickness: 7.63 in Steel Plate Lintel Thickness: 0.38 in Vert DL, Above Wall: 0 plf
Opening Height: 7.17 ft Steel Plate Jamb Width: 8.00 in Vert LL: 0 plf
Opening Width: 6.50 ft Steel Plate Jamb Thickness: 0.38 in Vert SL: 818 plf
Bolt Diameter: 3/4 in Horz Wind (W): 25 psf
Bolt Spacing: 16 in o.c. Horz Quake (E): 20 psf
Bolt Grade: A325 Allowable Deflection: L/600
Trib Area: 27.25 ft
Analysis and Calculations
Steel Plate Lintel:
Arching action: No
Effective Span, le: 7.17 ft
Demand Capacity
Mu: 12.75 k-ft fMn: 32.40 k-ft
Vu: 7.12 k fVn: 97.20 k
Bolts, Ru: 2.6 k fRu: 14.2 k
Deflection: 0.130 in Deflection: 0.088 in
L/600 L/972
Steel Plate Jamb:
Demand Capacity
Mu+: 1.1 k-ft fMn: 64.8 k-ft
Vu: 0.5 k fVn: 97.2 k
Pu: 7.4 k fPn: 194.4 k
Bolts, Ru: 1.4 k fRu: 14.2 k
Deflection: 0.003 in Deflection: 0.003 in
L/600 L/33163
Design Summary
Lintel Interaction Summary: Jamb Interaction Summary:
Moment: 0.39 Moment: 0.02
Shear: 0.07 Shear: 0.01
Bolts: 0.19 Axial: 0.04
Deflection: 0.68 Bolts: 0.10
Deflection: 0.02
Steel Plate Lintel: Steel Plate Jamb:
0.375 X 8" Steel Plate Each Face 0.375 X 8" Steel Plate Each Face w/ 0.75" Dia A325 Bolts @ 16" o.c. w/ 0.75" Dia A325 Bolts @ 16" o.c. Overall Status: O.K.
E10
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .