IA0089ZZ_Solicitation_Amend_6_-_Attachment_A_Q_and_A_161205.pdf

Solicitation Amendment No. 6 -Questions and Answers

Received via email on 12/1/16 @ 10:48 AM

1. The “Consultants” tab in the AE Proposal Excel workbook does not appear to have the parametric/intelligent functionality as the other tabs are structured. Consultant rates are not

‘autofilling’ from the “Consultant Rates” tab. Can we get a new tab with that functionality built-in?

Response: It is acceptable for the design team to modify the Excel file as necessary as long as the same level of detail is included.

2. Would it be possible to get a sample BIM Execution Plan with expected LOD’s that has been utilized on other/similar projects? This would be incredibly helpful in fine-tuning the costs associated with the BIM scope.

Response: While BIM Guide Series 7 Chapter 5 does not require a specific template, for reference, attached is a Region 6 template that the design team may choose to utilize.

3. What is the exact Cost of Construction at award? In the SOW, Section 1.4 Project Budget give an approximate number and then states that the exact number will be shared as soon as it is available.

Response: $105,700,000 is to be considered the Estimated Cost of Construction at Award (ECCA) and the design-to budget.

4. The Any Courts program document (Attachment E in Amendment No. 5), lists 3 District Judge

Courtrooms, each 2,400 sqft, and 1 Special Proceedings Courtroom at 600 sqft. The 600 sqft under

Special Proceedings Courtroom is an additional 600 sqft added to one of the 3 District Judge

Courtrooms, correct? In the end there are two District Judge Courtrooms at 2,400 sqft and one

Special Proceedings Courtroom at 3,000 sqft.

Response: This is correct. Reference page 6 of the subject document noting 3 total District

Courtrooms. One at 3000 SF and the other two at 2400 SF.

5. One of the documents references the use of a separate tab for each consultant within the

AE_Proposal spreadsheet workbook. However, the intelligence in the tabs really seems to be set up for all consultant rates and all consultant work/fee scopes to be listed on single tabs—‘consultant rates’ and ‘consultants’ respectively. Is it correct to say that all of the consultant information should be inserted into the two existing tabs without the addition of additional tabs?

Response: Yes, it is correct to say that all of the consultant information should be inserted into the two existing tabs and no additional tabs are necessary. Any information to the contrary can be disregarded.

6. Attachment D, in Amendment 5, is missing information we would like to request. The first column entitled “Task Names” is too narrow and cuts off the majority of the draft project schedule task names. Is it possible to get a pdf version of this document that does not cut of the task names?

A landscape layout and/or 11”x17” pdf sheet may accommodate a widened column.

Response: See attached.