20180829_220-7.5_Inspection_report.pdf

PDF 6 MB Posted

Attached to
NM FS 220(1), Romero Creek Bridge Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
6982AF25B000012
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

This document is a Road Bridge Inspection Report for the Romero Creek Bridge, located in the Gila National Forest, Catron County, New Mexico. The routine bridge inspection was conducted on 8/29/2018 by the USDA Forest Service, Region 3, with Tracy Weber as the inspection team leader. The bridge is situated on Route 220 at Milepost 7.3250, with a structure number of 030603000001032.

The single-span concrete bridge was built in 1954 and has an overall length of 30.4 feet, with a 16-foot out-to-out width and a 14.1-foot travel width. The deck is a 23-inch thick concrete slab with no wearing surface, and the substructure is made of reinforced concrete wall abutments. The inspection report highlights several recommended maintenance items, including deck patching, cleaning the deck and drains, installing asphalt approaches, repairing the east curb, upgrading the bridge railing to current standards, and resetting object markers. The bridge was noted to have some minor issues such as map pattern cracking, efflorescence, and a small vertical crack at the centerline of abutment #1, but was generally assessed as performing with minor issues.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to NM FS 220(1), Romero Creek Bridge, newest first.
File Type Posted
BidTabulationReport NM FS 220(1) Romero Creek Bridge LK.pdf PDF
6982AF25B000012 Bid Opening Summary.pdf PDF
SAM.gov Interested Vendors 09.15.25.pdf PDF
20110101_220-7.325_BridgeGeometry.pdf PDF
QnA _09.08.25.pdf PDF
A001.pdf PDF
NM FS 220(1) Plan Update 7-3-2025.pdf PDF
Final Hydraulics Report January 14 2021.pdf PDF
NM FS 220 1 Borrow Pits.pdf PDF
11.12.4 Design Physical Data and Reports.zip ZIP file
6982AF25B000012.pdf PDF
Technical Memorandum Pavement Materials Recommendations - November 9 2025.pdf PDF
FINAL Geotechnical Report March 2023.pdf PDF
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Inspection Date: 8/29/2018

Route: 220 Milepost: 7.3250 Structure No:

OVER

County, (Signature)

BRIDGE INSPECTION AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Catron New Mexico

ROMERO CREEK ROMERO CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM LEADER: Tracy Weber

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Insert Cover photo here.

ROMERO CREEK

Gila National Forest

USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION 3

030603000001032

ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

ROUTINEINSPECTION TYPE:

Structure Name: (8)Structure No:

(5D)Route:

Forest:

30.4 14.0

(45)No. Main Spans: 1

(46)No. Appr Spans: 0

No. Substrs: 2

(in Tons) Inventory Safe Load Capacity

HL-93 (RF) -

HS-20

Type 3 Type 3S2 Yes/No Type 3-3 N Months NRL (RF) N Months Rating Date: N Months

(41) Posting Status:

(70) Posting Capacity:

(31)Design Load:

(63,65)Method of Load Rating:

Yes No

Date:

Inspection Team: Leader: Jurisdiction:

Weather: Latitude:

Township: 34 0 Meridian:

(9)Location:

Narrative Report: (Add additional sheets if necessary)

NEW MEX TRUE 0

CATRON FALSE

Tracy Weber / Rex Null / Louie Canez Longitude: -109.02387

Re-rating required based on this inspection?

Substr Type:

FS

Inspection Template Revision Date: 05/31/2017

Infra data used for this report was pulled on: 05/30/18

1/4 Sect:

(92A) Fracture Critical (92B) Underwater (92C) Special

H20-44

5 - NO RATING COMPLETED

Time Completed:

8/29/2018 Time Started:

INSPECTION INFORMATION

4/5/2011 Open, No Restriction At Or Above Legal Loads

Critical Findings:

SPECIALIZED INSPECTIONS:

(43B)Superstr Type:

Specialized Inspections Required

(23 CFR 650.303)

Based on this inspection, is additional inspection work needed in these specialized inspection areas?

If Yes How Soon Neede

Wall Abutment

(43A)Superstr Material:

(44A)Superstr Material:

Concrete, Reinforced

Concrete, ReinforcedSubstr Material:

(44B)Superstr Type:

USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION 3

ROMERO CREEK(11)Milepost: 7.3250

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION

030603000001032

Gila National Forest

(32)Approach Roadway Width:

(48)Max Span:

(52)Deck Width out-out: 16.0(51)Roadway Width (Curb to Curb):

Security ID 0306QUEMADO RANGER DI

220 (6)Feature Crosse

14.0

BRIDGE DESCRIPTION and MEASUREMENTS Gila National Forest District:

25.0 (27)Year Built:

24.9

Portland Cement Concrete (108A)We aring Surface:

Integral W/Prestress Unit

Slab

NBIS Bridge Opening:

99.99 00

BRIDGE RATING SUMMARY:

(47)Horizontal (53)Vertical (34)Skew:

(107)Deck StructureType:

ROMERO CREEK

Recommended Inspection Frequency:

Tracy Weber 33.91089053 sunny 80s

10 MILES N. LUNA, NM

Months

4S Range: 21W Section:

Operating

(49)Overall Br Length:

Description:

Posting

Special Equipment Need

8/29/2018

Milepost: 7.3250 030603000001032

CODE

* 1. F C1. - C2. P C3. - C4. P C5. F C6. P C7. No

* 1. -

* 2. -

* 3. -

* 4. -

C1. - C2. -

C3. NOB

C4. NOB

*1. G *2. G *3. G

*4. - *5. - *6. - *7. - *8. -

*9. -

*10. NOB

*11. F *12. - *13. G *14. - *15. - *16. - *17. - *18. - *19. - *20. - *21. -Bracing

CONDITION CODES and REMARKS no wearing surface; top of deck slab is wearing surface 70% delamination w/ extensive efflorescence 70% delamination w/ extensive efflorescence

Wearing Surface

Deck Slab/Panels/Joists

REMARKS(Overall Code for item, to be reported to FHWA, in bold box)

58. DECK:

Posts/Piles/Tie Backs

Extensive abrasion

None noted

Girders 0 ea.

a. Diaphragms

b. Bracing

a. Chords Trusses

Structure No:

Date:

Footings Piles

No tipping, no rotation Portions of bedrock popping out under abut #1 – not scour

Caps

Backing Planks Sills/Footings

Settlement

Dirty deck – needs cleaned integral with deck (see above)

Performing w/ minor issues simple span concrete deck

Stringers

Erosion or Scour

* Only these items are used in the determination of the overall condition rating for that category, i.e. Deck, Superstructure, Substructure. Other items should be rated and remarked on but NOT included in determining the overall category rating. Items enumerated using a C (ex. C1) should be commented on but not rated. See the FHWA Coding Guide for further information as to what is included in condition ratings.

1 Also includes wingwalls connected to the superstructure above the beam seat.

2 Includes wingwalls integral with the abutment or the portion of the wingwall below the bearing seat.

none Extensive delamination

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE:

Sidewalks Drains and Drainage Extend drip edge below deck, plugged

Expansion Joints Curbs

Rideability Cleanliness Utilities

Floor Beams

60. SUBSTRUCTURE:

Caps

Erosion or Scour Settlement

Alignment (tipping, tilting, etc.)

Crib Walls/Tie Backs

Caps Footings

Wingwalls

Below grade at abutment #2, abut 1 perched on bedrock well above strm Crack in abut #1 breast wall, minor honeycomb abut #2 breat wall minor honeycomb

AB

U

TM

EN

TS

PI

ER

S

Timber Abutments (incl. WW)

Other Abutments

Columns or Walls

Structure Name:

Route:

Walls Piles

b. Portals

c. Verticals/Diagonals

Bearing Devices Paint

d. Bracing

Deflection Under Load Vibration Under Load

Alignment (tilting, rotating, etc.)

ROMERO CREEK

Milepost: 7.3250

CODE

1. G

2. -

3. G

4. G

5. G

6. 14.63

N *1. - *2. - *3. - *4. -

5. -

G

1. G

2. F

3. G

4. G

36A 0 36B 0 36C 0 36D 0 A. G B. G C. G D. -

1. G

2. G

1. G

2. F

N

CONDITION RATING OF EACH MEMBER OR ELEMENT

-NOT APPLICABLE

-APPLICABLE, BUT NO OBSERVED. (Give reason unless obvious)

-ELEMENT IN NEW OR GOOD CONDITION WITH NO REPAIRS NECESSARY.

-ELEMENT IS STILL PERFORMING THE FUNCTION FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED BUT MAY NEED MAINTENANCE.

-ELEMENT IS PERFORMING AT REDUCED CAPACITY.

-ELEMENT IS NOT PERFORMING THE FUNCTION FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED

* Only these items are used in the determination of the overall condition rating for that category, i.e. Deck, Superstructure, Substructure. Other items should be rated and remarked on but NOT included in determining the overall category rating. Items enumerated using a C (ex. C1) should be commented on but not rated. See the FHWA Coding Guide for further information as to what is included in condition ratings.

71. WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

113. SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES:

reset to correcxt height/location minor speed reduction - take foot off gas

Object Markers

68. DECK GEOMETRY: 14' width good sight distanceHorizontal in sag curveVertical

29. ROAD ADT

Structure Name:

Route:

ROMERO CREEK

Signing nothing noted

Clear Height Height (feet) from thalwag to bottom of lowest superstructure member

62. CULVERTS

Well vegetated & stable

CONDITION CODES and REMARKS (continued) Structure No.:

Date:

030603000001032

8/29/2018

G = GOOD

C = CRITICAL

72. APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT:

67. STRUCTURAL EVALUATION

NOB

F = FAIR

P = POOR

69. UNDERCLEARANCE:

Foundations none; windrow under gard rail needs removed for proper drainage none

Shoulder Embankment Roadway Embankment

APPROACH CONDITION:

Headwall/Wingwall

61. CHANNEL and CHANNEL PROTECTION:

(Overall Code for item, to be reported to FHWA, in bold box) REMARKS

Channel Scour/Erosion

Well vegetated

Well vegetated & stable nothing noted minor potholes

Channel Protection

Observed Lateral Movement

Surfacing (Not needed for reporting to FHWA)

Vegetation Waterway Obstructions/Drift stable

Shape Seams or Joints Material Condition

Approach Rail Ends Approach Guardrails

Approach Settlement APPRAISAL CODES and REMARKS

Bridge Railing not to current standards

C O

N D

IT

IO

N of e le m en ts not to current standards not to current standards none existing none

36. TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES:

Rail Transitions

Milepost: 7.3250 Structure No.:

Work Item Category Detailed Work Item Description

Inspection Routine bridge inspection every 2 years

Deck Deck patch exhibiting map pattern cracking, moderate (60%), monitor

Deck clean deck and drains

Approach Condition install asphalt approaches

Deck repair/replace 40% of east curb

Traffic Safety Features install current standard rail system

Traffic Safety Features reset object markers to currect locations per MUTCD

Substructure monitor 0.10" vertical crack at centerline abut #1

Substructure monitor/patch abut #2 downstream wingwall - honeycomed & spalled concrete

Approach Condition remove windrows for proper drainage

8/29/2018Date:ROMERO CREEK

Route:

Structure Name:

Unit

RECOMMENDED WORK ITEMS

Work Item Quantity

030603000001032220

7004003

30060010010

Work Item Code

3002002

9001001

5003001

7002002

#N/A

8001002

8003001

5003001

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

Concrete Slab - Replace/Repair xxx

Clean Deck xxx

CF

SF

LSRoutine Bridge Inspection - Simple xxx

Concrete Curb - Repair/Replace, Greater than 10 cf xxx

Bridge Railing - Upgrade Bridge Railing xxxLF

SF

CF

Surfacing - Install Asphalt xxx

- xxx xxx

Concrete Abutments/Piers - Repair/Patch xxx

Concrete Abutments/Piers - Repair/Patch xxx

EA

SF

SF

LS

#N/A

Signing - Repair/Replace Object Markers

Drainage - Restore/Improve

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx

Date:

Route: Milepost: 7.3250

Insert photo here.

Approach Ahead on Station

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Approach Back on Station

Insert photo here.

8/29/2018

030603000001032Structure No:

ROMERO CREEKStructure Name:

Route: Milepost: 7.3250

BRIDGE PHOTOS - cont.

Looking Upstream from the Bridge Deck

Insert photo here.

Looking Downstream from the Bridge Deck

Structure Name: ROMERO CREEK 8/29/2018

220 Structure No: 030603000001032

Route: Milepost: 7.3250

Insert photo here.

Looking Downstream - Elevation Profile

Looking Upstream - Elevation Profile

8/29/2018

Structure No: 030603000001032

BRIDGE PHOTOS - cont.

Structure Name:

Route: Milepost: 7.3250

Abutment 2 Elevation

8/29/2018

Structure No: 030603000001032

Insert photo here.

Insert photo here.

Abutment 1 Elevation

BRIDGE PHOTOS - cont.

Structure Name:

Route: Milepost: 7.3250

Typical Joint and Transition Sections at Approaches with Deck

8/29/2018

Structure No: 030603000001032

Insert photo here.

Insert photo here.

Underside of Deck - Typical

BRIDGE PHOTOS - cont.

Structure Name:

Structure Name: Date:

Route: 220 Milepost: 7.3250

14.63

2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 0 7.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 face abut1

7.00 11.4 0 0 0 0 0 0

14.80 14.66 0 0 0 0 0 0

19.00 13.78 0 0 0 0 0 0

25.00 13.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 face abut2

Water Surface

Channel Cross Section

Horizontal Dist Measured from A-1 Distance Measured from Top of Curb U.S Side @ Each Rail Post

8/29/2018 Structure No: 030603000001032

ROMERO CREEK

Input Cross-Section Data:

Height (feet) from thalwag to bottom of lowest superstructure member

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Top of Curb

(Substructure elements can be inserted in the cross-section using Insert, Shapes )

Structure Name: Date: 8/29/2018 Route: Milepost: 7.3250 030603000001032

Vertical Wall Abutments Not on Piles or Bedrock Codings

Scour Scenarios Is Footing Exposed?

Is Channel Constriction greater than

10%?

Is Stream Laterally or Vertically Unstable?

Is Flow Attacking? Bank Erosion Other factors Scour Critical Code

Ideal field conditions. No active scour or stream stability issues no no no no none none 5

Footing Exposed Only yes no no no none none 4

Footing Undermined (evaluate severity, substrate) yes (undermined) no no no none Fill in 4 or 2

Footing Exposed Plus Constriction, Unstable or Attacking (evaluate severity, substrate) yes 4 or 2

Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% no yes no no none none 4

Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% plus Unstable or Attacking (evaluate severity, substrate) no yes 4 or 2

Bridge on Unstable Channel with riprap in good condition, size and quantity. no no yes no no none 5

Bridge on Unstable Channel with bank erosion and/or damaged riprap protection no no yes no yes Fill in 4 or 2

Designed countermeasures installed, stable and performing well. no no Fill in 7

Severe scour, abutment failing yes

(undermined) 1 or 0

None of the above, Needs further review 6

220 Structure No:

ROMERO CREEK

Fill In

Scour Critical Coding, Item 113 Field Evaluation Guide

Parameters

Fill in

Fill In

Fill in

Fill in

Milepost: 7.3250

Structure Name: ROMERO CREEK 8/29/2018 Route: 220 Structure No: 030603000001032

X

14.1 FT

16 FT

N/A

N/A

23 IN

N/A

0 inches

X

X9 inches

23 inches

12 inches

30.4 FT

24.92 FT

27.67 FT

23 in

"Pick" and move them to the appropriate material or type, then add the dimension.Text Box

Cover
1-Title
2-Condition
3-Condition(cont) & Appraisal
4 Work Items
6a-Photos
6b-Photos
6c-Photos
6d-Photos
6e-Photos
8-Cross -Section
9VW-Scour-Vertical Wall Abut
LR-Concrete Data

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .