20180829_220-7.5_Inspection_report.pdf
PDF 6 MB Posted
- Attached to
- NM FS 220(1), Romero Creek Bridge Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6982AF25B000012
About this file
This document is a Road Bridge Inspection Report for the Romero Creek Bridge, located in the Gila National Forest, Catron County, New Mexico. The routine bridge inspection was conducted on 8/29/2018 by the USDA Forest Service, Region 3, with Tracy Weber as the inspection team leader. The bridge is situated on Route 220 at Milepost 7.3250, with a structure number of 030603000001032.
The single-span concrete bridge was built in 1954 and has an overall length of 30.4 feet, with a 16-foot out-to-out width and a 14.1-foot travel width. The deck is a 23-inch thick concrete slab with no wearing surface, and the substructure is made of reinforced concrete wall abutments. The inspection report highlights several recommended maintenance items, including deck patching, cleaning the deck and drains, installing asphalt approaches, repairing the east curb, upgrading the bridge railing to current standards, and resetting object markers. The bridge was noted to have some minor issues such as map pattern cracking, efflorescence, and a small vertical crack at the centerline of abutment #1, but was generally assessed as performing with minor issues.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BidTabulationReport NM FS 220(1) Romero Creek Bridge LK.pdf | ||
| 6982AF25B000012 Bid Opening Summary.pdf | ||
| SAM.gov Interested Vendors 09.15.25.pdf | ||
| 20110101_220-7.325_BridgeGeometry.pdf | ||
| QnA _09.08.25.pdf | ||
| A001.pdf | ||
| NM FS 220(1) Plan Update 7-3-2025.pdf | ||
| Final Hydraulics Report January 14 2021.pdf | ||
| NM FS 220 1 Borrow Pits.pdf | ||
| 11.12.4 Design Physical Data and Reports.zip | ZIP file | |
| 6982AF25B000012.pdf | ||
| Technical Memorandum Pavement Materials Recommendations - November 9 2025.pdf | ||
| FINAL Geotechnical Report March 2023.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Inspection Date: 8/29/2018
Route: 220 Milepost: 7.3250 Structure No:
OVER
County, (Signature)
BRIDGE INSPECTION AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Catron New Mexico
ROMERO CREEK ROMERO CREEK
INSPECTION TEAM LEADER: Tracy Weber
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Insert Cover photo here.
ROMERO CREEK
Gila National Forest
USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION 3
030603000001032
ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
ROUTINEINSPECTION TYPE:
Structure Name: (8)Structure No:
(5D)Route:
Forest:
30.4 14.0
(45)No. Main Spans: 1
(46)No. Appr Spans: 0
No. Substrs: 2
(in Tons) Inventory Safe Load Capacity
HL-93 (RF) -
HS-20
Type 3 Type 3S2 Yes/No Type 3-3 N Months NRL (RF) N Months Rating Date: N Months
(41) Posting Status:
(70) Posting Capacity:
(31)Design Load:
(63,65)Method of Load Rating:
Yes No
Date:
Inspection Team: Leader: Jurisdiction:
Weather: Latitude:
Township: 34 0 Meridian:
(9)Location:
Narrative Report: (Add additional sheets if necessary)
NEW MEX TRUE 0
CATRON FALSE
Tracy Weber / Rex Null / Louie Canez Longitude: -109.02387
Re-rating required based on this inspection?
Substr Type:
FS
Inspection Template Revision Date: 05/31/2017
Infra data used for this report was pulled on: 05/30/18
1/4 Sect:
(92A) Fracture Critical (92B) Underwater (92C) Special
H20-44
5 - NO RATING COMPLETED
Time Completed:
8/29/2018 Time Started:
INSPECTION INFORMATION
4/5/2011 Open, No Restriction At Or Above Legal Loads
Critical Findings:
SPECIALIZED INSPECTIONS:
(43B)Superstr Type:
Specialized Inspections Required
(23 CFR 650.303)
Based on this inspection, is additional inspection work needed in these specialized inspection areas?
If Yes How Soon Neede
Wall Abutment
(43A)Superstr Material:
(44A)Superstr Material:
Concrete, Reinforced
Concrete, ReinforcedSubstr Material:
(44B)Superstr Type:
USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION 3
ROMERO CREEK(11)Milepost: 7.3250
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION
030603000001032
Gila National Forest
(32)Approach Roadway Width:
(48)Max Span:
(52)Deck Width out-out: 16.0(51)Roadway Width (Curb to Curb):
Security ID 0306QUEMADO RANGER DI
220 (6)Feature Crosse
14.0
BRIDGE DESCRIPTION and MEASUREMENTS Gila National Forest District:
25.0 (27)Year Built:
24.9
Portland Cement Concrete (108A)We aring Surface:
Integral W/Prestress Unit
Slab
NBIS Bridge Opening:
99.99 00
BRIDGE RATING SUMMARY:
(47)Horizontal (53)Vertical (34)Skew:
(107)Deck StructureType:
ROMERO CREEK
Recommended Inspection Frequency:
Tracy Weber 33.91089053 sunny 80s
10 MILES N. LUNA, NM
Months
4S Range: 21W Section:
Operating
(49)Overall Br Length:
Description:
Posting
Special Equipment Need
8/29/2018
Milepost: 7.3250 030603000001032
CODE
* 1. F C1. - C2. P C3. - C4. P C5. F C6. P C7. No
* 1. -
* 2. -
* 3. -
* 4. -
C1. - C2. -
C3. NOB
C4. NOB
*1. G *2. G *3. G
*4. - *5. - *6. - *7. - *8. -
*9. -
*10. NOB
*11. F *12. - *13. G *14. - *15. - *16. - *17. - *18. - *19. - *20. - *21. -Bracing
CONDITION CODES and REMARKS no wearing surface; top of deck slab is wearing surface 70% delamination w/ extensive efflorescence 70% delamination w/ extensive efflorescence
Wearing Surface
Deck Slab/Panels/Joists
REMARKS(Overall Code for item, to be reported to FHWA, in bold box)
58. DECK:
Posts/Piles/Tie Backs
Extensive abrasion
None noted
Girders 0 ea.
a. Diaphragms
b. Bracing
a. Chords Trusses
Structure No:
Date:
Footings Piles
No tipping, no rotation Portions of bedrock popping out under abut #1 – not scour
Caps
Backing Planks Sills/Footings
Settlement
Dirty deck – needs cleaned integral with deck (see above)
Performing w/ minor issues simple span concrete deck
Stringers
Erosion or Scour
* Only these items are used in the determination of the overall condition rating for that category, i.e. Deck, Superstructure, Substructure. Other items should be rated and remarked on but NOT included in determining the overall category rating. Items enumerated using a C (ex. C1) should be commented on but not rated. See the FHWA Coding Guide for further information as to what is included in condition ratings.
1 Also includes wingwalls connected to the superstructure above the beam seat.
2 Includes wingwalls integral with the abutment or the portion of the wingwall below the bearing seat.
none Extensive delamination
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE:
Sidewalks Drains and Drainage Extend drip edge below deck, plugged
Expansion Joints Curbs
Rideability Cleanliness Utilities
Floor Beams
60. SUBSTRUCTURE:
Caps
Erosion or Scour Settlement
Alignment (tipping, tilting, etc.)
Crib Walls/Tie Backs
Caps Footings
Wingwalls
Below grade at abutment #2, abut 1 perched on bedrock well above strm Crack in abut #1 breast wall, minor honeycomb abut #2 breat wall minor honeycomb
AB
U
TM
EN
TS
PI
ER
S
Timber Abutments (incl. WW)
Other Abutments
Columns or Walls
Structure Name:
Route:
Walls Piles
b. Portals
c. Verticals/Diagonals
Bearing Devices Paint
d. Bracing
Deflection Under Load Vibration Under Load
Alignment (tilting, rotating, etc.)
ROMERO CREEK
Milepost: 7.3250
CODE
1. G
2. -
3. G
4. G
5. G
6. 14.63
N *1. - *2. - *3. - *4. -
5. -
G
1. G
2. F
3. G
4. G
36A 0 36B 0 36C 0 36D 0 A. G B. G C. G D. -
1. G
2. G
1. G
2. F
N
CONDITION RATING OF EACH MEMBER OR ELEMENT
-NOT APPLICABLE
-APPLICABLE, BUT NO OBSERVED. (Give reason unless obvious)
-ELEMENT IN NEW OR GOOD CONDITION WITH NO REPAIRS NECESSARY.
-ELEMENT IS STILL PERFORMING THE FUNCTION FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED BUT MAY NEED MAINTENANCE.
-ELEMENT IS PERFORMING AT REDUCED CAPACITY.
-ELEMENT IS NOT PERFORMING THE FUNCTION FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED
* Only these items are used in the determination of the overall condition rating for that category, i.e. Deck, Superstructure, Substructure. Other items should be rated and remarked on but NOT included in determining the overall category rating. Items enumerated using a C (ex. C1) should be commented on but not rated. See the FHWA Coding Guide for further information as to what is included in condition ratings.
71. WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
113. SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES:
reset to correcxt height/location minor speed reduction - take foot off gas
Object Markers
68. DECK GEOMETRY: 14' width good sight distanceHorizontal in sag curveVertical
29. ROAD ADT
Structure Name:
Route:
ROMERO CREEK
Signing nothing noted
Clear Height Height (feet) from thalwag to bottom of lowest superstructure member
62. CULVERTS
Well vegetated & stable
CONDITION CODES and REMARKS (continued) Structure No.:
Date:
030603000001032
8/29/2018
G = GOOD
C = CRITICAL
72. APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT:
67. STRUCTURAL EVALUATION
NOB
F = FAIR
P = POOR
69. UNDERCLEARANCE:
Foundations none; windrow under gard rail needs removed for proper drainage none
Shoulder Embankment Roadway Embankment
APPROACH CONDITION:
Headwall/Wingwall
61. CHANNEL and CHANNEL PROTECTION:
(Overall Code for item, to be reported to FHWA, in bold box) REMARKS
Channel Scour/Erosion
Well vegetated
Well vegetated & stable nothing noted minor potholes
Channel Protection
Observed Lateral Movement
Surfacing (Not needed for reporting to FHWA)
Vegetation Waterway Obstructions/Drift stable
Shape Seams or Joints Material Condition
Approach Rail Ends Approach Guardrails
Approach Settlement APPRAISAL CODES and REMARKS
Bridge Railing not to current standards
C O
N D
IT
IO
N of e le m en ts not to current standards not to current standards none existing none
36. TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES:
Rail Transitions
Milepost: 7.3250 Structure No.:
Work Item Category Detailed Work Item Description
Inspection Routine bridge inspection every 2 years
Deck Deck patch exhibiting map pattern cracking, moderate (60%), monitor
Deck clean deck and drains
Approach Condition install asphalt approaches
Deck repair/replace 40% of east curb
Traffic Safety Features install current standard rail system
Traffic Safety Features reset object markers to currect locations per MUTCD
Substructure monitor 0.10" vertical crack at centerline abut #1
Substructure monitor/patch abut #2 downstream wingwall - honeycomed & spalled concrete
Approach Condition remove windrows for proper drainage
8/29/2018Date:ROMERO CREEK
Route:
Structure Name:
Unit
RECOMMENDED WORK ITEMS
Work Item Quantity
030603000001032220
7004003
30060010010
Work Item Code
3002002
9001001
5003001
7002002
#N/A
8001002
8003001
5003001
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Concrete Slab - Replace/Repair xxx
Clean Deck xxx
CF
SF
LSRoutine Bridge Inspection - Simple xxx
Concrete Curb - Repair/Replace, Greater than 10 cf xxx
Bridge Railing - Upgrade Bridge Railing xxxLF
SF
CF
Surfacing - Install Asphalt xxx
- xxx xxx
Concrete Abutments/Piers - Repair/Patch xxx
Concrete Abutments/Piers - Repair/Patch xxx
EA
SF
SF
LS
#N/A
Signing - Repair/Replace Object Markers
Drainage - Restore/Improve
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
Date:
Route: Milepost: 7.3250
Insert photo here.
Approach Ahead on Station
BRIDGE PHOTOS
Approach Back on Station
Insert photo here.
8/29/2018
030603000001032Structure No:
ROMERO CREEKStructure Name:
Route: Milepost: 7.3250
BRIDGE PHOTOS - cont.
Looking Upstream from the Bridge Deck
Insert photo here.
Looking Downstream from the Bridge Deck
Structure Name: ROMERO CREEK 8/29/2018
220 Structure No: 030603000001032
Route: Milepost: 7.3250
Insert photo here.
Looking Downstream - Elevation Profile
Looking Upstream - Elevation Profile
8/29/2018
Structure No: 030603000001032
BRIDGE PHOTOS - cont.
Structure Name:
Route: Milepost: 7.3250
Abutment 2 Elevation
8/29/2018
Structure No: 030603000001032
Insert photo here.
Insert photo here.
Abutment 1 Elevation
BRIDGE PHOTOS - cont.
Structure Name:
Route: Milepost: 7.3250
Typical Joint and Transition Sections at Approaches with Deck
8/29/2018
Structure No: 030603000001032
Insert photo here.
Insert photo here.
Underside of Deck - Typical
BRIDGE PHOTOS - cont.
Structure Name:
Structure Name: Date:
Route: 220 Milepost: 7.3250
14.63
2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 0 7.88 0 0 0 0 0 0 face abut1
7.00 11.4 0 0 0 0 0 0
14.80 14.66 0 0 0 0 0 0
19.00 13.78 0 0 0 0 0 0
25.00 13.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 face abut2
Water Surface
Channel Cross Section
Horizontal Dist Measured from A-1 Distance Measured from Top of Curb U.S Side @ Each Rail Post
8/29/2018 Structure No: 030603000001032
ROMERO CREEK
Input Cross-Section Data:
Height (feet) from thalwag to bottom of lowest superstructure member
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Top of Curb
(Substructure elements can be inserted in the cross-section using Insert, Shapes )
Structure Name: Date: 8/29/2018 Route: Milepost: 7.3250 030603000001032
Vertical Wall Abutments Not on Piles or Bedrock Codings
Scour Scenarios Is Footing Exposed?
Is Channel Constriction greater than
10%?
Is Stream Laterally or Vertically Unstable?
Is Flow Attacking? Bank Erosion Other factors Scour Critical Code
Ideal field conditions. No active scour or stream stability issues no no no no none none 5
Footing Exposed Only yes no no no none none 4
Footing Undermined (evaluate severity, substrate) yes (undermined) no no no none Fill in 4 or 2
Footing Exposed Plus Constriction, Unstable or Attacking (evaluate severity, substrate) yes 4 or 2
Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% no yes no no none none 4
Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% plus Unstable or Attacking (evaluate severity, substrate) no yes 4 or 2
Bridge on Unstable Channel with riprap in good condition, size and quantity. no no yes no no none 5
Bridge on Unstable Channel with bank erosion and/or damaged riprap protection no no yes no yes Fill in 4 or 2
Designed countermeasures installed, stable and performing well. no no Fill in 7
Severe scour, abutment failing yes
(undermined) 1 or 0
None of the above, Needs further review 6
220 Structure No:
ROMERO CREEK
Fill In
Scour Critical Coding, Item 113 Field Evaluation Guide
Parameters
Fill in
Fill In
Fill in
Fill in
Milepost: 7.3250
Structure Name: ROMERO CREEK 8/29/2018 Route: 220 Structure No: 030603000001032
X
14.1 FT
16 FT
N/A
N/A
23 IN
N/A
0 inches
X
X9 inches
23 inches
12 inches
30.4 FT
24.92 FT
27.67 FT
23 in
"Pick" and move them to the appropriate material or type, then add the dimension.Text Box
| Cover |
| 1-Title |
| 2-Condition |
| 3-Condition(cont) & Appraisal |
| 4 Work Items |
| 6a-Photos |
| 6b-Photos |
| 6c-Photos |
| 6d-Photos |
| 6e-Photos |
| 8-Cross -Section |
| 9VW-Scour-Vertical Wall Abut |
| LR-Concrete Data |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .