About this file

This is a Performance Work Statement (PWS) for a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) fuel sump valve compatibility test, designated PAFI-RTP-010 Rev 0, which is part of the PAFI Fuels initiative.

The test evaluates aircraft sump valve material compatibility with unleaded aviation fuels G100UL and UL100E compared to the baseline 100LL fuel. Four valve types are tested: Curtis Superior CAA-1800, SAF-AIR 3750, Cessna S2485-1, and Parker/Shaw Aero 72-478. The test requires a minimum of one valve per fuel type, though two valves per fuel is recommended. Test hardware includes 1/3 rectangle chafing dishes as fuel tank analogs, stainless-steel covers to minimize evaporation, and fuel containment systems. All valves are installed into a single fuel tank with matching fittings welded in place, with leakage confirmation required post-installation. The test runs for 42 days at ambient temperature with daily actuation of each valve. Test personnel must record date, time, fuel flow presence, static leakage, and any actuation difficulties daily, adding fuel as necessary. Threading leaks within 24 hours may be tightened and continued; those within the first week compromise results unless attributable to operator error; those after one week disqualify data. Non-threading leaks indicate valve failure and testing for that valve ceases. The pass/fail criteria require that fuel valves experience no greater leakage or operational restriction than valves exposed to 100LL.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Fuel Sump Valve Test

PAFI-RTP-010

PAFI Rig #10 Fuel Sump Valve Test

PAFI-RTP-010 Rev 0 PAFI Fuels – Fuel Sump Valves

Rev No. Rev Date Affected Pages Description of Revision New 4/16/2025 All Initial Release 0 6/12/2025 All Review

Purpose To execute dynamic evaluation of aircraft sump valves with unleaded aviation fuels, particularly G100UL and UL100E as compared to 100LL.

Background During PAFI 1 Rig 3, Dynamic Rig Testing, one of the component types tested were a collection of aircraft sump valves. The valves were manually actuated daily while continuously exposed to the test fuels under ambient conditions. The test ran for 30 days and at the end of the testing, failures with individual test fuels as compared to 100LL were observed. This test was determined to be probative and discriminative in evaluating the material compatibility of the aircraft sump valves.

Test Parameters

Test Hardware The hardware selected as representative of the industry at the time are shown in the following table. There are four types of valves represented. This does not preclude testing additional fuel valves at this time, should they be suggested.

A minimum of one valve each per fuel is required. However, experience suggests that two each of the valves per fuel is prudent.

Supplier MFG Part number O-ring type Notes

McFarlane Curtis Superior CAA-1800 MS29513-007 1/8” NPT, Flush mounted Push operation

McFarlane SAF-AIR 3750 MS29588 3/8”-24 UNF Not flush mounted Push operation

Aircraft Spruce Cessna S2485-1 MS29513-011

Aviall Parker/Shaw Aero

72-478 N/A Aviall PN 492-361 For Piper A/C Lightening Proof Push and twist

Figure 1 - Drain Valve CAA-1800 Drain Valve 3750 Drain Valve S2485-1

Figure 2 - Drain Valve 72-487 Inside and Outside of Tank

Support Hardware

“Fuel Tank” Analog A tank into which the valve receiver can be installed is required. One means which has been successfully used is a 1/3 rectangle chafing dish. The pan is conducive to the installation, non-reactive, and has a lip which can be used for ‘hanging’ the tanks. Because of the protrusion of the drain valves and the need to access the valves to actuate them, this hanging is necessary.

The 1/3 size is large enough to accommodate the four valves, and to hold sufficient fuel for the exposure.

“Fuel Tank” Analog Lids In order to minimize the evaporation of the test fluids, some type of cover is required. If the 1/3 chafing dishes are used, the matching stainless-steel covers should provide sufficient coverage.

Given the volatile nature of G100UL, however, a more positive seal may be required.

Figure 3 - Fuel Tank Analog and Lids

Fuel Containment A means of catching and containing any fuel spills up to and including the entire “fuel tank” contents is recommended.

Rig Preparation All of the individual drain valves may be installed into a single fuel tank. To accomplish this, a hole is drilled into the fuel tank and a matching fitting as appropriate to each of the fuel drain valves is welded into place. The drain valves are then installed. Lack of leakage needs to be confirmed on each installation.

Figure 4 - Installed valves - inside the tank

Figure 5 - Installed valves - Exterior of the tank

Figure 6 - Installed valves – underside

Test Profile The test pans are filled with two to three inches of test fuel and the drain valves are actuated daily for 42 days. Test pans should be placed in accordance with local regulations. Test temperature is ambient.

Test Once per day the values are actuated. Record date and time, and observe the following:

• The presence of full typical fuel flow when actuated

• Any static leakage while the valves are closed

• Any difficulty in actuation (opening or closing)

Because of the volatile nature of the fuels, static leakage may only be visible as discoloration and staining on the valve, and/or as drip marks below the tank.

Confirm the tanks remain filled with fuel. Add fuel if necessary and record the addition.

Note:

• If a valve begins leaking from the threads within the first 24 hours, attempt to tighten and stop the leaks, note the fix, and keep going.

• If the leak is in the threads and begins within the first week, try to tighten it, note it, but consider the results compromised (unless error is attributable to operator action).

• If it happens after the first week, tighten it, let it go to completion, but do not use the data.

• If the leak is other than in the installation, this will be an indication of a fail and the testing on that valve is complete.

• If the valves are installed per figures 5 and 6 in a single tank, remove the failed valve and retain it for evaluation. Install a plug or other means as necessary to seal the tank and continue testing so the remaining valves are not impacted by a loss of fuel.

Pass/Fail Criteria The fuel valves shall not experience leakage or any restriction/inability to be operated greater than that experience by the valves exposed to 100LL.

Purpose
Background
Test Parameters
Test Hardware
Support Hardware
“Fuel Tank” Analog
“Fuel Tank” Analog Lids
Fuel Containment
Rig Preparation
Test Profile
Test

Pass/Fail Criteria

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .