Amendment - 0002 - SIR No 697DCK-23-R-00069 - Q and A - ORL EXEC ATCT Consoles-Slatwall Replacement.pdf

PDF 125 KB Posted

Attached to
Orlando Executive Airport Air Traffic Control Tower Slatwall/Consoles Design, Fabrication, Delivery and Installation
Solicitation number
697DCK-25-R-00069
Issued by

About this file

This is a Questions and Answers amendment (Amendment 0002) for SIR No. 697DCK-R-00069 regarding the Orlando Executive Airport Air Traffic Control Tower Slatwall/Consoles Design, Fabrication, Delivery, and Installation project.

The amendment clarifies several technical specifications and project timelines: CAD files and renderings will be provided; the Console Manufacturer is responsible for demolition of existing consoles; seismic anchoring is not required; the supervisor station will be a 36" high free-standing workstation instead of a raised platform; existing ground plates will remain with additional plates required in the slatwall console; standard 36" counter heights are acceptable; and a drop-in stainless steel sink with laminate countertop is approved. The mock-up requirement has changed to a virtual 3D rendering prior to manufacturing. Installation is planned for 4 weeks per phase, with contractors only needed on-site during demo, electrical, and console installation. Key dates include anticipated award on March 15, 2025, 10% design drawings due March 31, 2025, and 70% design drawings due April 25, 2025, with dates subject to change based on final award timing.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 0003 - Deletion of Solicitation Clauses Not Consistent with Execuitive Orders.pdf PDF
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS2.png PNG image
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS5.png PNG image
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS4.png PNG image
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS13.png PNG image
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS1.png PNG image
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS10.png PNG image
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS8.png PNG image
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS6.png PNG image
Amendment - 0002 - SIR No 697DCK-23-R-00069 - ORL EXEC ATCT Consoles-Slatwall Replacement.pdf PDF
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS9.png PNG image
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS12 (1).png PNG image
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS7.png PNG image
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS3.png PNG image
08.04.23_ORL Cab SS11.png PNG image
Orlando Executive Airport Air Traffic Control Tower Positions Power Drawing.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - 697DCK-25-R-00069 - ORL EXEC ATCT Slatwall Consoles Replacement.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - Responses to Questions.pdf PDF
Attachment 0004 - DOL Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Solicitation No. 697DCK-25-R-00069 - ORL EXEC ATCT ConsolesSlatwall Replacement.pdf PDF
Attachment 0003 - ORL EXEC ATCT Equipment List.pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 - ORL EXEC ATCT Drawing Set.pdf PDF
Attachment 0001 - Statement of Work - ORL ATCT Slatwall-Consoles - Design - Fabrication - Delivery - Installation.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SIR No. 697DCK-R-00069

Amendment 0002 - Responses to Questions

Orlando Executive Airport Air Traffic Control Tower Slatwall/Consoles Design, Fabrication, Delivery, and Installation

As a result of the site visit held on 01/22/2025 the following questions were submitted by the vendors. Answer to these questions are incorporated as part of this amendment under SIR No.

697DCK-R-00069.

Confirm that we will be able to receive a CAD file of the cab and additional views from work with Jeff Fisher.

Answer: Yes, the CAD files and renderings files will be provided as discussed.

Confirm that Console Manufacturer will be responsible for demo and not Engineering Services.

Answer: The Console Manufacturer will be responsible for the demo of the existing consoles.

Confirm seismic anchoring does not also require stamped structural calculations. This is a very costly option.

Answer: Correct, The ORL EXEC ATCT is not in an area requiring seismic anchoring.

Confirm that the raised platform at the rear supervisors' station is no longer required and that instead the Console Manufacturer should instead propose a free-standing workstation with a tall worksurface at 36" H.

Answer: The raised floor will be removed from the statement of work and standing height console requested for the Supervisors Position.

Large multi-point ground plates were observed in the cable trays in the sub junction level.

Confirm that these large plates should remain where they are, and new Ground Bars should be provided in the new consoles.

Answer: Yes. The large ground plates in the Junction Level will remain and additional ground plates will be required within the slatwall console.

Confirm that standard kitchen countertop height of 36" is acceptable, vs 38".

Answer: 36" counter height is ok for the convenience area

Confirm that a drop-in stainless-steel sink is acceptable to be compatible with the laminate countertop specified.

Answer: A drop-in sink will be acceptable with a laminate countertop

Confirm that a 2" x 12" x 1/4" ground bar that has need specifically designed in conjunction with the FAA is acceptable. Drawing attached.

Answer: The referenced ground plate will be acceptable.

Confirm that 100% Mock-up can be accomplished with actual product after manufacturing.

Answer: Change from the original SOW - A virtual mockup at the conclusion of the design prior to start of manufacture. The mock should consist of a 3d rendering of all the consoles, slatwalls, etc.

Confirm that vacuum connection should be rerouted to toe kick area of the console in that area.

Answer: Correct. The vacuum will need to be rerouted and installed in the toe kick recess.

The Install is planned for 4 weeks per phase. Should quote include installation team being on-site for entire 4-week period, or only for the demo, electrical and installation of new consoles?

Answer: The contractor’s team will only need to be on site during demo, electrical and console installation.

Is an extended surface area desired over the current stairwell to increase storage? What is the size of this surface area to be, and should it include a backsplash, handrail? (Section 2.5 #3)

Answer: The extend surface will not be required, the wall will not need to be modified.

Are there additional architectural drawings of the tower cab? (reference the ventilation / ductwork)

Answer: Yes

Are there additional plumbing drawings for the tower cab?

Answer: Yes

Dates:

When is the FAA anticipated contract award date?

Answer: Anticipated award date is March 15, 2025

Please confirm the post award site survey date to be assumed for the project schedule. (Section

2.3 lists Feb 10th, but this is prior to the bid due date.)

Answer: Site Survey visit post award will be schedule after contract award.

Please confirm the 10% Design Drawing Submission Date.

Answer: March 31, 2025, this date is subject to change depending on award date and schedule post award site visit

Please confirm the 70% Design Drawings Submission Date.

Answer: April 25, 2025, this date is subject to change depending on award date and schedule post award site visit

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .