6973GH-23-R-00023 A0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO.

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

Items 8 and 15, and returning is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required.)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(x) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

1 5

0001 04/19/2023

AAQ-721 LOGISTICS CENTER ACQ

FAA AERONAUTICAL CENTER

PO BOX 25082

BLDG 014-AHQ, ROOM 233A

AAQ0721-AFN

OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73125

x

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment number. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By ___________ x x

6973GH-23-R-00023

copies to the issuing office.

04/19/2023

(x)

Amendment A0001 issued to delete Provision AC0110 and correct language in Provisions L.5 and M.3.

Clause I.1 Site Visit has been updated to change the date for the site visit to April 28, 2023.

Section J, Attachment 1R, Statement of Work, Revision 1 replaces Attachment 1. Attachment

7R Past Performance Questionnaire replaces Attachment 7 and Attachment 10 CBS RFIs added.

All other terms and conditions remain the same.

Continued ...

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. CONTRACT AUTHORITY 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Connie M. Houpt

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

2 5

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

6973GH-23-R-00023/0001

Due date for receipt of proposals remains the same. Proposals are due by 2:00 p.m. CT May 16, 2023.

LIST OF CHANGES:

Section I - Contract Clauses was revised as follows.

Clause List was revised as follows.

Clause I.1 is incorporated as follows:

I.1 SITE VISIT

a. Offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost of contract performance, to the extent that the information is reasonably obtainable. In no event shall failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a dispute after contract award.b. Site visit is scheduled for April 28, 2023 at 1430 CT. Offerors should meet Connie Houpt, Contracting Officer, at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center Visitor Center, 6501 Mike Monroney Blvd, Oklahoma City, OK 73169, to be escorted on site. c. Please send notification of intent to attend the site visit to connie.m.houpt@faa.gov.

Section J - List of Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments was revised as follows.

Attachment List was revised as follows.

Table has been revised and now reads as follows:

ATTACHMENT TITLE DATE NO. OF

PAGES

1 SOW Centralized Benchstock (CBS) 03/31/2023 27 1R Attachment 1R SOW Centralized Benchstock (CBS) 04262023 04/26/2023 27 2 CDRL-A001 Contract Personnel Employee Roster 03/31/2023 2 3 CDRL-A002 Employee Changes and Vacancy Report 03/31/2023 2 4 CDRL-A003 Monthly Status and Invoice Report 03/31/2023 2 5 CDRL-A004 Training Report 03/31/2023 2 6 Organizational Experience Information Form 03/31/2023 4 7 Past Performance Questionnaire 03/30/2023 4 7R Attachment 7R Past Performance Questionnaire 04/26/2023 4 8 Client Authorization Letter 03/31/2023 1

9 WD 2015-5315 12/27/2022 11

10 Attachment 10 CBS RFIs 04/26/2023 3

Section L - Instructions,Conditions, and Notices to Bidders was revised as follows.

Clause List was revised as follows.

The following clauses are no longer incorporated.

AC0110 PRICE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS (JAN 2017)

Clause L.5 is incorporated as follows:

L.5 PREPARATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

(a) Offerors must submit technical proposals in addition to price proposals. The technical proposal must be specific and in sufficient detail to enable an evaluation team to make a thorough evaluation to determine if the proposed products meet the requirements of the Government and to determine that the offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirement.(b) Offerors are advised to submit proposals, which are clear and comprehensive without additional explanation or information. Additional information may be requested from offerors whose proposals are considered to be reasonably susceptible to being made acceptable; however, the Government reserves the right to award a contractbased on initial offers received, without discussions or negotiations.(c) The technical proposal must provide information to address the following evaluation categories, which are all equal in importance:Factor 1. Organizational ExperienceDemonstrate the experience of the Offeror and/or proposed team, including sub-contract experience for the same/similar work as described in the Statement of Work (SOW). The Offeror shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Organizational Experience Information” forms, Attachment 6, in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must have been underway or completed with the last three (3) years. If any of the information required is not included in the form, then the Offeror will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable.Factor 2. Past PerformancePast performance will be evaluated based upon information received by the FAA from individuals and/or organizations that the Offeror has identified as being familiar with the work ethic, standards, performance, and deliverables demonstrated through previous or ongoing contracts of a similar nature, including but not limited to projects submitted under Factor 1. Past performance shall demonstrate ability to deliver quality product/services, demonstrate ability to achieve program objectives; and demonstrate overall performance on same/similar work. As soon as practicable, Offerors shall complete Section 1 of the attached Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 7) and send it along with the Client Authorization Letter (Attachment

8) to all points of contact (POCs) for the contracts the Offeror identified in its submission for Factor 1, Organizational Experience. The POCs shall be familiar with the work ethic, standards, performance, and deliverables demonstrated through previous or ongoing contracts of similar nature. The POCs will complete the questionnaires and forward them by email (connie.m.houpt@faa.gov) no later than the SIR Closing date.

RESPONDENTS TO THE QUESTIONNAIRES SHALL NOT SEND THE COMPLETED INFORMATION

SHEETS BACK TO THE OFFEROR. Offerors shall provide a narrative for each Organizational Experience Form (submitted under Factor 1) explaining what aspects of the contract submitted as past performance information deemed relevant to the proposed effort and to what aspects of the proposed effort the past performance contracts relate. This narrative may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the Offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a limited or no confidence assessment, since the problems encountered may have been on more complex program, or an Offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The Offeror shall clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may allow the Offeror to be considered a higher confidence candidate. Organizational Structure Change History. Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, or otherwise merged with other companies and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant past efforts or between the conclusion of recent past efforts and this source selection. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate this relevancy determination, Offerors shall include a “roadmap” describing all such changes in the organization of the Offeror’s company. A pamphlet or other commercial document describing such reorganization may suffice. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts you identify for past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment. Since the government intends to consider past performance information provided by other sources as well as that provided by the Offeror (s). The “roadmap” should be both specifically applicable to the efforts identified, yet general enough to apply to efforts on which the government receives information from other sources.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award was revised as follows.

Clause List was revised as follows.

Clause M.3 is incorporated as follows:

M.3 EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL AND PRICE PROPOSALS

FACTOR 1: Organizational ExperienceDemonstrate the experience of the Offeror and/or proposed team, including sub-contract experience for the same/similar work as described in the Statement of Work (SOW).CRITERIA: The FAA will review the experience of the Offeror provided in response to Factor 1. Offeror must meet all the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factor:

Offeror must have at least three (3) projects of $1,000,000 in value that is the same/similar to that of the work found in this solicitation within the past three (3) years (i.e., regularly engaged in the business of providing personnel services for Centralized Benchstock support as identified in the SOW); AND At least one (1) of the projects submitted must be valued at or over $100,000 in the Material Handling Industry (e.g., inventory management, Vertical Storage Unit (VSU), pallet racking, conveyor systems, other storage media); AND Projects submitted must have been completed, or underway, within the last three (3) years. ACCEPTABLE: Offeror must demonstrate the minimally acceptable criteria under this factor. Offerors with no past experience information will receive an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating for this factor. FACTOR 2: Past PerformancePast performance will be evaluated based upon information received by the FAA from individuals and/or organizations that the Offeror has identified as being familiar with the work ethic, standards, performance, and deliverables demonstrated through previous or ongoing contracts of a similar nature, including but not limited to projects submitted under Factor 1. Past performance shall demonstrate ability to deliver quality product/services, demonstrate ability to achieve program objectives; and demonstrate overall performance on same/similar work.CRITERIA: The FAA will review all formal evaluations for projects submitted under Factor 1 and may use any/all other sources of past performance information for same/similar work, or other projects, available to the FAA. The FAA may contact points of contacts listed on forms submitted under Factor 1. Offeror must demonstrate the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factorACCEPTABLE: The standard is met when, based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. All past or current references must recommend either hiring or using the Offeror again for future work and/or reflect positive performance of the work requirements.FACTOR 3: Lowest PriceOfferors found to be eligible for award after being evaluated for Factors 1 and 2 will then be evaluated for lowest Total Estimated Potential Value (TEPV) as described in Provision M.2. TEPVs of eligible offerors will be arranged from highest to lowest in order to validate lowest TEPV among offerors otherwise eligible for award.