About this file

This document provides a summary of a solicitation for the construction of a new Wind and Waves Evacuation and Survival (WiWAVES) Research Facility at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center in Oklahoma City, OK. The Federal Aviation Administration requires a firm-fixed-price construction contract for the new WiWAVES facility with an estimated price range of $30-40 million. Interested offerors must attend a pre-proposal teleconference on February 3, 2021 and site visits will be held on February 3-5, 2021. Questions regarding the project are due by February 12, 2021. Proposals must be received by February 19, 2021. The contract will be awarded using a best value determination considering technical merit and past performance. The North American Industry Classification System code for this project is 236220.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
6973GH-21-R-00001-0010.pdf PDF
6973GH-21-R-00001-0009.pdf PDF
6973GH-21-R-00001-0008.pdf PDF
6973GH-21-R-00001-0007.pdf PDF
Revised Attachment 01 - Section B - Supplies or Services-Prices-02-24-21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
6973GH-21-R-00001-0006.pdf PDF
6973GH-21-R-00001-0005.pdf PDF
6973GH-21-R-00001-0004.pdf PDF
CAMI - WiWAVES - Geotechnical Report - REV1 2020-03-18.pdf PDF
Site Visit Attendee List.pdf PDF
6973GH-21-R-00001-0002.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Teleconference Charts-Feb.3.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Teleconference Attendees.pdf PDF
6973GH-21-R-00001-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 02 - WiWAVES_IFC Specs_Vol1.pdf PDF
Attachment 03 - WiWAVES_IFC Specs_Vol2.pdf PDF
Attachment 01 - Section B - Supplies or Services-Prices.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 05 - Chapter_33-Construction Safety.pdf PDF
Attachment 07 - SF25A - Payment Bond.doc DOC document
Attachment 08 - Operational Control Document.pdf PDF
Attachment 06 - SF 25 Performance Bond.pdf PDF
Attachment 04 - WiWAVES_IFC_Drawings.pdf PDF
6973GH-21-R-00001.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Contractors Release.doc DOC document
Attachment 09 - Wage Rate Decision_General Decision No_OK 20210049.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 - Past Performance Survey.docx DOCX document
Attachment 11 - Client Authorization Letter.docx DOCX document
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO.

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

Items 8 and 15, and returning is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required.)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(x) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

1 1

0003 02/09/2021

AAQ-731 FAC. & AVIATION SAFETY ACQ

FAA AERONAUTICAL CENTER

PO BOX 25082

BLDG 014-AHQ, ROOM 233A

AAQ0731-AFN

OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73125

AAQ-731 FAC. & AVIATION SAFETY ACQ

FAA AERONAUTICAL CENTER

PO BOX 25082

BLDG 014-AHQ, ROOM 233A

AAQ731-AFN

OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73125

x

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment number. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By ___________ 1 x x

6973GH-21-R-00001

1 copies to the issuing office.

01/21/2021

(x)

WO#14-002117

CAMI WiWaves New Facility

The purpose of Amendment 0003 is to add a Questions and Answers attachment.

FIRST: Questions and Answers dated February 9, 2021 is hereby incorporated. In this document, not all questions have been answered. Answers will be forthcoming.

SECOND: The Proposal Due Date remains as Friday, February 19, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. CT.

THIRD: All other terms and conditions remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. CONTRACT AUTHORITY 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Stephanie Riddle

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

SIR/RFO 6973GH-21-R-00001 CAMI WiWAVES Facility February 9, 2021

Questions and Answers

1. QUESTION: How is the evidence email to be submitted? Is it as simple as attaching the PDF copy of the emails to the submission email? Are they to be a second attachment or a part of the section 1 submission?

Does this effectively make it so that the only submission documents from GC’s for section 2 is proof of the sent emails as the responses will come directly to you?

ANSWER: The evidence provided can be the email submitted to the reference. It can be a PDF. In accordance with L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals (f), the evidence should be provided with section 2. Please refer to L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals for what should be submitted.

2. QUESTION: As a General Contractor, are we required to submit survey’s for Mechanical, Electrical, and

Pool Subcontractors on the projects we plan to submit a survey on?

ANSWER: The intent is for the General Contractor to have the subcontractors they intend to use on this project submit surveys as described in the SIR. Amendment 0001 has revised Section L.3 (f).

3. QUESTION: The sample client authorization letter is referenced as attachment 11 in Section J, however, the sample client authorization letter has attachment 12 listed in the bottom right. Please confirm this is intended to be attachment 11. On the same note, the contractor’s release is listed as attachment 12, however, no attachment number is listed on the document.

ANSWER: The sample client authorization letter has been revised and the updated copy can be found attached to Amendment 0001. The contractor’s release does not need an attachment number listed on the document.

4. QUESTION: Reference attachment 10, page 2, #2. Please confirm verbiage referencing “HQB Building Lobby Remodel” is incorrect. Will this document be corrected and reissued?

ANSWER: Attachment 10, page 2, #2 has been revised and the updated copy can be found attached to Amendment 00001.

5. QUESTION: Refer to Section 001010.1.3.C. The specifications state bids to be held good for 210 calendar days. The solicitation form says 120 calendar days. Please clarify.

ANSWER: 120 calendar days.

6. QUESTION: Are there any federal budget allocation restrictions on how much work can be paid for in a 12 month period on this project? Must the project take 24 months to complete?

ANSWER: No restrictions on how much work can be completed in a 12 month period. It is acceptable to complete the project in less than 24 months.

7. QUESTION: Currently there is only one pay item listed on the Solicitation form. Do you expect more pay items or alternates to be added?

ANSWER: Additional bid items or options are not expected.

8. QUESTION: Refer 3.4.1-1 of attachment 6973GH-21-R-00001. Bid bond of 20% is requested. Does this request allow for the “or $3 million maximum” option clause per FAR 28.101-2?

ANSWER: The FAA is not governed by the FAR and does not follow the FAR.

9. QUESTION: Attachment 10, Past Performance Survey. The top portion of page 1, whose information goes there?

ANSWER: The top portion of page 1 should be the reference’s information.

10. QUESTION: Can you please confirm the name of the entity to which the proposal bond should be made?

ANSWER: The Bid Identification is for Construction of the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center CAMI WiWAVES Facility, Oklahoma City, OK.

11. QUESTION: Is it acceptable to provide an attachment if necessary for the response to the PPS question 2?

The amount of space provided is somewhat small.

ANSWER: An attachment page maybe provided for the response to the PPS, page 2, question 2 if necessary.

12. QUESTION: Can you send me a plan holders list for this project?

ANSWER: There is not a plan holders list.

13. QUESTION: Do you have a list of GC’s that you could provide that are interested in the above project?

ANSWER: We do not have a list of interested GC’s.

14. QUESTION: Drawing C-141 notes to Jack and Bore below Christian Avenue for the data and medium voltage. Jack and bore is usually only used for water lines to keep the road from washing out in the event of a line rupture below the street. Would a convential HDD bore for electrical conduit installation be acceptable?

ANSWER:

15. QUESTION: The specifications call for the charging motors to operate on a 24V AC system. This will be the only medium voltage switch on the campus that operates in this manner. Do you want to change the switch operation to maintain consistency within the campus?

16. QUESTION: ES101 notes to pull back the existing 15KV cables and feed the new switch. The cables will not be long enough to do this. Two options:

a. Splice the cables in the manhold

b. Repull the cables to the next termination point to the south of the project

Please advise.

17. QUESTION: If the Mechanical, Electrical and Pool subcontractors PPS is due on bid day how will the General Contractor’s know which of these will be acceptable?

ANSWER: In accordance with Section L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals (f) Section II – Past Performance Information, “The Offeror (General Contractor), as well as proposed Mechanical, Electrical, and Pool sub-contractors, are required to provide Past Performance Surveys (PPS), attached to the SIR (Section J, Attachment 10), along with Client Authorization Letters (format at Section J, Attachment 11) to past customers/clients. The Offeror, along with their Mechanical, Electrical, and pool sub-contractors, will send Past Performance Surveys (PPS) to clients who are familiar with the work demonstrated through previous contracts of a similar nature.”

18. QUESTION: Is the 1500kVA pad mount transformer (TX-1) shown on drawings ES-101 and E-601 new or existing?

19. QUESTION: Are service disconnects required at the pool fans on drawing EP102?

20. QUESTION: What is the voltage and conductor type for feeder #1 on E-601?

21. QUESTION: Is a City of Oklahoma City electrical permits required?

ANSWER: Yes

22. QUESTION: Is directional boring an acceptable means for crossing under the roadways for communication and electrical conduits?

23. QUESTION: Is there anyway you could move the bid date 2 weeks?

ANSWER: At this time, the FAA is not extending the bid date 2 weeks.

24. QUESTION: Are we allowed to submit the NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) for completed projects, instead of the PPS provided in the solicitation?

ANSWER: In accordance with Section L.3 (f), “The Offeror (General Contractor), as well as proposed Mechanical, Electrical, and Pool sub-contractors, are required to provide Past Performance Surveys (PPS), attached to the SIR (Section J, Attachment 10), along with Client Authorization Letters (format at Section J, Attachment 11) to past customers/clients”. Substitutions for the Past Performance Survey are not allowed.

25. QUESTION: Please confirm that small business participation and subcontracting plans are not required to be submitted at bid time.

ANSWER: Please refer to clauses AC4559 Subcontracting Plan (SEP 2007) and 3.6.1-4 Small, Small Disadvantaged, Women-Owned and Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business Subcontracting Plan (JULY 2019) of the SIR for subcontracting plans.

26. QUESTION: Reference pages A224, A225, A226. Notes call for painting to stop at certain levels in the rooms. Please confirm that exposed roof structure in these room does not paint. Also, please confirm whether the mechanical ductwork in those rooms required to be painted. If so, does ductwork paint above the stated levels?

27. QUESTION: Refer to spec 099113 Exterior Painting and 090690 Color Schedule. No paint products are described in section 09113.3.6, only reference to 090690 Color Schedule which only lists color. Please provide paint system specifications for the exterior applications (doors & frames, bollards, concrete wall panels; CMU, gas & fire suppression pipe.)

28. QUESTION: Refer to spec 051200 thru 055213. These steel specs make reference to 099113 for matching primers with exterior paint systems but there is no information in 099113. Case in point are the rooftop stairs, ladders, rails and screen wall framing structure. Are they all unpainted galvanized or primed ferrous field painted or field paint galvanized. Please provide information and intent.

29. QUESTION: Refer Spec 051200.1.9.A. It has been requested that the structural engineer allow qualified steel fabricators who use 3rd party plant inspections in lieu of AISC Certification be allowed to bid on this project. This exception is routinely given and many past and present projects on the FAA campus have been supplied by these quality fabricators.

30. QUESTION: Refer Page A641 General Room Finish Schedule Note L. Note L states all exterior rails are galvanized or fiberglass and will not be painted. However, Elevations show exterior handrails to be painted. (refer 6/A202). Please verify if any exterior handrails are to be painted.

31. QUESTION: The Subcontractors are to submit PPS’s for the project, are we to include these with our proposal and identify who we intend to utilize?

ANSWER: The intent is for the General Contractor to have the subcontractors they intend to use on this project submit surveys as described in Section L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals

(f) Past Performance Information in the SIR and Amendment 0001.

32. QUESTION: It appears that the Subcontractor’s PPS’s will be utilized in determining award. Typically we would receive subcontract quotes from multiple subcontractors and the low bid utilized. Since we have no way of knowing how a Subcontractor will fair in your PPS’s review and what value you will assign said Subcontractor that assessment could lower the value of our bid. We suggest that we be allowed to submit the low Subcontractor as our base bid, with alternate subcontractors included as additives that you may select if you deem that sub the best value. Would this be acceptable?

ANSWER: The Government will be selecting an offeror, which provides the best value to the Government. Since this will be a firm fixed price contract, the Government will not be accepting alternates for the subcontracting team.

33. QUESTION: Is it acceptable to provide Value Engineering options in our proposal for your consideration?

ANSWER: No. This is a firm fixed price contract to be based upon the SIR, Drawings, Specifications, and Amendments.

34. QUESTION: Since this is a Best Value award, and your instructions say “Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.”

What may be included in the proposal? Is our past performance review limited to just the PPS’s? Can breakdown of pricing be provided for “Best Value” analysis?

ANSWER: Please refer to Section L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals for what is to be included in the proposal.

35. QUESTION: Can you elaborate on what you expect to see in the proposal beyond the basic documents provided?

ANSWER: Please refer to Section L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals of the SIR for what is to be provided.

36. QUESTION: Refer to Plumbing Drawings P-001. There are a few items that did not get scheduled:

- Main thermostatic mixing valve

- Wall hydrants

- Roof hydrants

- Control valves for shower The specs for each of these items only list manufacturer, but no model numbers.

37. QUESTION: As the subcontractors send out past performance surveys, I believe that they are to send them to the owners of the past projects, not the General Contractors. Is this correct?

ANSWER: Please refer to Section L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals (f) Past Performance Information of the SIR and Amendment 0001.

38. QUESTION: The Bid Bonds needs to be a hardcopy original delivered by 2-19-21, correct? Everything else can be emailed?

ANSWER: In regards to the Proposal Guarantee, please refer to Section L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals (e) (4) Proposal Guarantee of the SIR.

39. QUESTION: Is the contractors release to be submitted?

ANSWER: No. This is to be submitted after the contract is completed.

40. QUESTION: Do the PPS need to be returned to you by 3-19-21 @ 3 PM or just the receipts that they have been requested?

ANSWER: Please refer to Section L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals (f) Section II – Past Performance Information of the SIR and Amendment 0001.

41. QUESTION: Can you verify the list below is exactly what is to be turned in?

- Section 1: Contract Documentation/Price Proposal o Section A – Solicitation, Offer & Award

• 3 pages of job info o Section B – Supplies or Services/Prices

• 1 page/1 line item for pricing o Section C – just acknowledge?

o Section D – just acknowledge?

o Section E – just acknowledge?

o Section F – just acknowledge?

o Section G – just acknowledge?

o Section H – just acknowledge?

o Section I – just acknowledge?

o Section J – just acknowledge?

o Section K – fill in some information and acknowledge o Proposal Guarantee – 20% Bid Bond

- Section 2: Past Performance Information (PPS – Past Performance Survey)

ANSWER: Please refer to Section L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals of the SIR and Amendment 0001.

42. QUESTION: We are hearing a couple of subcontractors mentioning this is due tomorrow? Is anything due on 2-9-21? Or is it all due 2-19-21?

ANSWER: Please refer to Page 1 Block 13 and Section L.12 Directions for Submitting Proposal(s) of the SIR, and Amendments 0001 and 0002 for when proposals are due.

43. QUESTION: Reference Section 131500 2.3 Pool Filters, “For consideration of an alternate, Contractor must submit request with all detailed design information to Architect at least 15 days prior to bid.” With the duration and time required to submit an alternate, it will not be ready in time for bid to be approved.

Can an alternate manufacture be utilized that meet the design requirements of the specifications? If alternate filters have to be submitted in advance as the specifications indicate, can additional time be allowed or an accelerated process be put in place to review alternates now? Keeping in mind it will take 5 working days to prepare an alternate request once we have confirmation.

ANSWER: According to spec section 001250, Part 1, 1.4, the CO will only consider requests for substitutions within ten (10) days after the award of the contract.

44. QUESTION: Since subs are required to turn in the PPS 10 days before the bid date, will there be a list of accepted subs available to general contractors?

ANSWER: There is not a list of general contractors. Also, please reference Section L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals (f) Section II – Past Performance Information of the SIR and Amendment 0001 as to when PPS are to be submitted.

45. QUESTION: It is our understanding that the surveys need to be sent to our current or past clients to grade our performance so that we may be in consideration for this project. However, we are hearing some conflicting information such as we need to list current or previous General Contractors, we have done work for to grade our performance. Can you clarify?

ANSWER: Please refer to Section L.3 Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals (f) Section II – Past Performance Information of the SIR and Amendment 0001 regarding Past Performance Surveys.

46. QUESTION: Drawing FX101 Fire Suppression General Note 17. (FUTURE PHASE) - PROVIDE

ELECTRIC FIRE PUMP WITH REMOTE START/STOP CAPABILITY.

Drawing FX401 Details 2 & 4 depict (Future Phase) Fire Pump.

No specifications are provided for fire pump apparatus.

Please confirm NO fire pump is to be included with this phase of the project

47. QUESTION: Drawing FX101 Detail 3 depicts two control valves and a check valve upstream of the backflow preventer.

Please confirm these are NOT necessary with this phase of the project

48. QUESTION: Drawing FX101 Detail 3 depicts a backflow preventer with OS&Y valves.

Specification Section 211313 2.3 CONTROL VALVES A. All valves installed on the aboveground piping of the wet pipe sprinkler system which control the water supply to the sprinkler system shall be of the indicating, butterfly-type, with integral tamper switches.

2.4 BACKFLOW PREVENTION

A. A double check backflow prevention assembly shall be provided.

Please confirm the backflow prevention assembly MAY be installed with butterfly valves.

49. QUESTION: Drawing FX101 Detail 3 depicts a forward flow test riser cross connected with the fire department connection.

Please confirm these two apparatuses MAY be piped separately

50. QUESTION: On PS1.02, note #19, engineer suggests use of dry-gunite construction for the walls. Past experience suggests from a pool subcontractor that the research tank walls should be fully formed and cast-in place concrete. Please confirm this is acceptable as an alternative means of construction.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .