Environmental A and E Pre Proposal Conference Industry Day.pptx

TEAM FAA

Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center

Environmental A&E Program

Pre-Solicitation Conference Industry Day

4 March 2021

FAA-Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center

Agenda

Opening Remarks Program Background Acquisition Strategy Milestones Source Selection Training Keys to Developing a Good Proposal Pricing (Section B)

Opening Remarks

Contracting Officer – Elizabeth Fikes

Contract Specialist – John Juarez

Program Management – Vicki Ray

“At the Center” Video - 4 minute overview of the programs at the MMAC

Google Maps Virtual Tour of the MMAC

Site History

1942-1946: Army Air Corps Base

1946-1958: Civil Aeronautics Administration

1958-1978: FAA Aeronautical Center

1978-present: FAA-MMAC

1990-1995 FTC Constructed

5 Sites Combined into Current Chlorinated Organic Plume (COP)

COP likely caused by a historical release of waste solvents from Sites 10 (Surface Storage Tanks), 11 (Sanitary Sewer), and 12 (Storm Sewer).

Line breaks/leaks from the sewer lines impacted shallow groundwater.

COP Lateral Extent 1996

COP Lateral Extent 2000

COP Lateral Extent 2010

COP Lateral Extent 2019

Exposure Pathway Diagram

Continued COP Scope

Supplemental RI Phases 1 & 2 including 3D Visualization, CSM Updates, Source Area Screening and Vapor Intrusion Evaluations – Being done under current contract.

Expected to be tasked under follow-on contract

Semi-Annual Ground Water Monitoring – compliance requirement with ODEQ.

Continue Updating the Conceptual Site Model (CSM).

Feasibility Study / Remedial Action for most expedient path to COP site closure.

Examples of Probable Task Orders

Annual Air Emissions Inventory – ODEQ General Permit for Area Source NESHAP Facilities and Small NSPS Facilities.

NEPA Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements.

Environmental Due Diligence.

PCB Release Assessments.

PFAS Release Assessments.

Other Hazardous Substance Release Assessment.

Mold Remediation Engineering “Type A” Investigations, “Type B” design and Construction Oversite.

Energy Assessments

Acquisition Strategy - Section L

Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) assessment for award IAW AMS T3.8.2-18

Offer shall be compliant with “all” requirements stated in Statement of Work.

Please note that no proposed pricing is to be provided at this time. An evaluation based on qualifications will be completed based on the submission of the offeror’s SF-330.

Non-conformance with the instructions provided in the ITO may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

Acquisition Strategy - Section M

Evaluation Factors For Award, Section 2.1.3

Rating & Score based on (4.0 Excellent / 3.0 Good / 2.0 Satisfactory / 1.0 Marginal /

0.0 Unacceptable

Evaluation process will not take price into consideration - Section 2.6 Cost / Price

Government may award with or without discussions, Section 3.1 Discussions

Notational Milestones

Source Selection Training

SOURCE SELECTION

What Is It Determine the highest “qualified” Main Members Exchanges with Offerors

EVALUATION FACTORS AND RATINGS

Professional Qualifications of the A&E Firm Past Performance Price

AWARD DECISION

Source Selection Team Main Members

Source Selection Official (SSO) Makes the award decision Approves entering and closing discussion

Contracting Officer (CO) Directs the evaluation of proposals Source of all direct communications between the Government and offerors

Source Evaluation Team (SET) Evaluate Proposals Assign Ratings Presents evaluation results to the SSO

Request For Proposal

INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING PROPOSAL

CONTENT AND FORMAT

Describe Qualification Based Selection (QBS) Provide past performance information Provide pricing data Includes format requirements, accepted document types, page limitations, etc.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Criteria for award selection Evaluation factors and order of importance in relation to each other Factor rating definitions Proposals will be evaluated against stated criteria

Keys to Developing A Good Proposal

Demonstrate a thorough understanding of requirements and inherent risks Demonstrate sufficient resources to meet the requirements Support your statements with facts, analysis and substantiating data to illustrate that you have valid and practical solutions for all requirements

Substantiate, don’t simply make claims Tell the who, what, when, where, how, how often, etc.

Give us a reason to believe you; provide information to allow an independent assessment Don’t repeat the language in the SOW, just reference the section of the SOW to which you are referring Tell the benefit to the Government of your proposed plan

Understand the SIR requirements Understand the SOW Understanding the evaluation criteria will help you know where to place emphasis in your proposal Follow the proposal instructions – provide material where requested Keep pricing data out of the technical volume Tab the information Don’t make us have to guess or search for answers Follow the exact numerical outline in the instructions

Don’t make changes to the SOW and submit a new version Document stands as written Don’t submit a Contractor’s Statement of Work (CSOW)

Don’t make changes to the SIR and submit a new version Document stands as written and amended by CO only

Typical Proposal Shortfalls

Proposal instructions are not followed Information not provided in the way it was requested Too little or too much information Statements in the proposal are not well supported Proposals are not well organized Does not follow proposal instructions structure, makes the evaluator hunt for the information DUNS/CAGE code references do not match Deficiencies – preclude award Information provided does not support claims of compliance Proposal is non-compliant to the requirements Not signing the SIR and all amendments

Pricing (Section B)

No proposed pricing is to be provided at this time IAW AMS T3.8.2-18

Section B – Supplies or Services and Costs/Prices

- No pricing information to be included in the initial proposal of the model contract

Section L – Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Bidders

5.1 General Instructions;

The following instructions for Cost/Price information will be required for those firms contacted upon completion of the QBS evaluation and to the Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the Acquisition Management System (AMS), whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, and certifications) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors, to represent the highest qualified to the Government.

Summary

This briefing/training was designed to give you an overview of what the Government expects to see in your proposal in order to award without discussions The formal solicitation is the only document that should be relied upon in determining the Government’s requirements The Government intends to award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if necessary Submit questions to the CO; questions and answers will be posted to beta.sam.gov.

image1.gif image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png