15 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Instructional Services supporting FAA Academy Technical Operations Training Division (AMA-400) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-18-R-00122
About this file
15 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (docx)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 34
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation: 6973GH-18-R-00094
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):
CONTRACTOR NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
ORDER NUMBER (if applicable):
PROJECT TITLE:
TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS : MM/YYYY – MM/YYYY OR Present
TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE:
CONTRACTOR ROLE (PRIME/SUBCONTRACTOR)
CONTRACT TYPE:
DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED:
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):
NAME:
TITLE:
AGENCY OR CUSTOMER:
MAILING ADDRESS
PHONE:
E-MAIL:
SIGNATURE OF RATER: (Rater must be provided by a Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer Representative or Corporate Officer with cognizance over the project for the ordering activity.
For each of the six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose one (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked as equivalent to unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. For any rating that would be Not Applicable, please explain why it does not apply.
1. Quality/Timeliness of Service.
a. How would you rate the contractor's general overall compliance with contract requirements?
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Exceeded minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Met minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Less than minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
b. How would you rate the timeliness of the Contractor's service - delivered reports on time and adhering to the required schedule?
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Exceeded minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Met minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Less than minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
c. Did the contractor commit adequate resources in a timely fashion to meet contract requirements?
| Provided abundant resources | ( ) | |
| Provided sufficient resources | ( ) | |
| Provided minimal resources | ( ) | |
| Provided insufficient resources | ( ) | |
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
d. Did the contractor commit adequate resources in a timely fashion to solve problems?
| Provided abundant resources | ( ) | |
| Provided sufficient resources | ( ) | |
| Provided minimal resources | ( ) | |
| Provided insufficient resources | ( ) | |
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
e. How would you rate the contractor on the timeliness of its responses to inquiries or other administrative matters?
| Extremely timely | ( ) | |
| Generally timely | ( ) | |
| Generally not timely | ( ) | |
| Seldom timely | ( ) | |
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
2. Cost Control.
a. If applicable, to what extent did the contractor meet the proposed cost estimates?
| Less than estimated cost | ( ) | |||
| Comparatively equal to estimate | ( ) | |||
| Exceeded the costs | ( ) | |||
| Considerably surpassed estimate | ( ) | |||
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
b. How would you rate the contractor's initiative, if any, in reducing overall costs to the Government?
| Extremely efficient | ( ) | |
| Generally efficient | ( ) | |
| Generally inefficient | ( ) | |
| Extremely inefficient | ( ) | |
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
3. Business Relations - Effective Management.
a. To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from government (or entity with requirement) counterparts?
| Considerably successful | ( ) | |
| Generally successful | ( ) | |
| Little Success | ( ) | |
| No success | ( ) | |
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
b. To what extent did the contractor display initiative in meeting contract requirements?
| Displayed considerable initiative | ( ) | ||
| Displayed some initiative | ( ) | ||
| Displayed little initiative | ( ) | ||
| Displayed no initiative | ( ) | ||
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
c. Was the contractor's selection and use of personnel appropriate for the performance of this contract?
| Provided highly qualified personnel | ( ) | ||
| Provided qualified personnel | ( ) | ||
| Provided minimal personnel | ( ) | ||
| Provided insufficient personnel | ( ) | ||
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
d. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with the Government's (or other) staff?
| Extremely effective | ( ) | |
| Generally effective | ( ) | |
| Generally ineffective | ( ) | |
| Extremely ineffective | ( ) | |
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
e. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default, or is a termination pending?
( ) Yes ( ) No
f. Has it ever been necessary to send this Contractor a Notice to Cure letter?
( ) Yes ( ) No
g. How would you rate the performance of the contractor's key personnel?
| Extremely effective | ( ) | |
| Generally effective | ( ) | |
| Generally ineffective | ( ) | |
| Extremely ineffective | ( ) | |
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
4. Customer Satisfaction.
a. To what extent did the contractor provide timely assistance, when responding to problems?
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Exceeded minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Met minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Less than minimum requirements | ( ) | |||
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
b. How would you rate the contractor's response to inquiries related to administrative issues?
| Displayed considerable initiative | ( ) | ||
| Displayed some initiative | ( ) | ||
| Displayed little initiative | ( ) | ||
| Displayed no initiative | ( ) | ||
| Not Applicable | ( ) |
c. Would you select this contractor again?
( ) Yes ( ) No
5. Integrity.
a. Did you experience any integrity problems with this Contractor?
( ) Yes ( ) No
b. Did the contractor maintain integrity during contract performance?
( ) Yes ( ) No
6. Please provide any other comments you may have.
[OFFEROR INSERT NAME] 5
File details come from the government source that posted it.