QandA_07-20-2026.pdf

Project No. MT PRAIRIE 2016(3)

Project: Milwaukee Bridge Resurfacing and Replacement

# General Technical Question Answer Date

1 x

Does the FHWA have an anticipated advertisement date along with an anticipated bid date for this project?

Anticipated advertisement date of

May/June 2026.

3/2/26

2 X

In regards to the above referenced project is there any Geotechnical information for this project? If so can you please publish it with the advertisement.

No geotechnical information is available for this project. A surfacing memorandum for the road approaches to the new bridge deck is included in the Physical Data.

7/1/26

3 X

In Section H of the SCR’s the letter from Army

Corps of Engineers states that the permit obtained by FHWA “ Does not authorized dewatering or temporary construction access”

This authorization can typically take up to 90 days. With the NTP shown in the contract of

10/08/26 if the authorization does take the full

90 days that would not leave us enough time to complete the project by the fixed completion date of 04/13/27. In the time of year we could expect to get this permit will be close to high water and we will likely not have time to complete the work until high water passes.

Would FHWA extend the contract to 09/30/27?

The Government has the authorization as long as the dewatering and access is completed according to the plans and impact footprint in the original permit submittal. If the dewatering or access deviates from what was in the permit, then there will need to be additional time for coordination with the USACE. The

Government will extend the Fixed

Completion Date to 9/30/2027 in

Amendment A001.

7/2/26

Check General or Technical

4 X

Is there any geotechnical data available? If so would FHWA please provide that data so we can properly plan for the temporary work access?

No geotechnical information is available for this project. A surfacing memorandum for the road approaches to the new bridge deck is included in the Physical Data.

7/2/26

5 X

On page E-10 of the SCR’s “e) Temporary works supporting public traffic.” Replaces

“(d)Temporary bridge structures for public use” from FP-14. On page E-46 of the SCR’s it states

“close road for the length of project during construction. What is meant by temporary works supporting public traffic?

Public traffic is not anticipated on any temporary work, see Section 156 for traffic restrictions. The Section 104 SCR is a standard edit/change included on all bridge projects.

7/2/26

6 X

On page E-46 of the SCR’s it states “Procedures for facilitating passage of emergency vehicles through the project limits.” If we are allowed to close the road for the during of the project does this mean we are required to provide a proper detour around the project for emergency vehicles?

An improved detour around the project is not required.

7/2/26

7 X

I think the language from page H-3 of solicitation contradicts the answer to question

#3. Are temporary works/access currently permitted?

The Government is calculating quantities to capture the impacts of the temporary access road, work platform and cofferdam.

We anticipate receiving the amended permit prior to issuing the Notice-to-

Proceed (NTP).

If the contractor develops a plan in which the permitted quantities will be exceeded, contractor is responsible for submitting a revised permit application.

7/7/26

8 X Is there any data available on typical water depth at Pier 4?

The Government does not have data regarding the typical water depth at Pier 4.

7/13/26

9 X

Plan sheet S.7 – Deck Framing Layout references a total of 124 floorbeams. If you apply the spacings noted across all 4 truss spans, I am coming up with a total of 268 ea. The only way you would get to 124 is if you are only installing floorbeams across the two end chords in each span (L0-L1, L1-L2, L7-L8, L8-L9). Plans indicate floorbeams across all chords, which is necessary for the designed grid deck plan. Please review and clarify.

This will be addressed in Amendment A002.

The corrected quantity is 268 floor beams, totaling 98,892 pounds.

7/13/26

10 X

Ref. Sheet 7 0f 13 Deck Framing Layout; The

Floor Beam Estimated Weights table states there are 124 floor beams. We find there to be

268 floor beams calculated as follows:

See the answer for question 9. 7/13/26

11 X

Plan sheet S.12 shows details for bridge rail.

Inside Elevation of Rail view shows tube rail ending 4” past the last post at the bridge end with rail extending beyond that to some un-detailed post off the end of the bridge. Appears to show like we are tying into bridge approach guardrail, but there is none. If rail ends at end of tube rail, I only come up with 2,152’ of rail

(plan qty is 2,170). Please provide additional details for rail at bridge ends, including any post details off the bridge end and required terminal or end shoe as there is no bridge approach guardrail or bid item shown in the plans or bid schedule to tie into.

This will be addressed in Amendment A002.

The corrected quantity is 2,152 lineal feet.

There is no approach rail; the rail will end at the delineators.

7/16/26

12 X

Is dewatering of the cofferdam anticipated and/or required for the Pier 4 bent scour countermeasure work?

Yes, dewatering will be required. 7/17/26

13 X

If inadequate sheet pile penetration or seepage requires additional excavation and placement of a concrete seal, is that work considered incidental to the Cofferdam pay item, or will additional compensation be provided?

Work is considered incidental to the

Cofferdam pay item 7/17/26

14 X

Would FHWA consider replacing the riprap section with concrete to eliminate the need for increasing the depth of the excavation to include a concrete seal in addition to the riprap section?

No, riprap scour mitigation is required. 7/17/26

15 X

If available, please provide any geotechnical or foundation information used to establish the cofferdam requirements and anticipated sheet pile embedment depth at Pier 4.

No geotechnical or foundation information is available.

7/17/26

16 X

As a follow up to question #12 and 13: If dewatering of the cofferdam is required for riprap placement, a concrete seal will be required in order to control seepage up from underneath the cofferdam. Reference is made to the USACE Nationwide Permit Verification on sheet H-3. This project is only permitted for

1,900 CY of material to be excavated/placed within the stream bed. With an estimated

1,600 CY of excavation and riprap placement for the permanent work, the additional excavation and placement of a concrete seal to control the water in this location would push the quantity well over the 1,900 CY permitted for this project. Will WFL be obtaining a modification to the Nationwide Permit for this work?

Yes, WFL is obtaining a modification to the

Nationwide Permit for this work, which will be based on revised temporary impact quantities. If the successful contractor proposes something different or proposes additional temporary impacts over what is in WFLs amended permit, Contractor will be responsible for submitting a revised amended permit application.

7/20/26

17 X

As a follow up to question #12 and 13:

Dewatering is a subjective requirement. Is the contractor required to perform the excavation and riprap work at Pier 4 in the dry?

WFL's assumption for the permitting of this work has been that the area will be dewatered and excavation performed in the dry before placement of riprap. This was driven partly by SCR 107.10.(e).14 and the requirement to sweep for the endangered pallid sturgeon and relocate them outside the cofferdam if present. The successful contractor can propose alternate ideas to accomplish the same objective, however for the 404 permit the successful contractor will have to submit an amended permit application if a different means and method is proposed.

7/20/26