QandA_07-16-2026.pdf
PDF 274 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 69056726B000003
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) document for the Milwaukee Bridge Resurfacing and Replacement project (MT PRAIRIE 2016(3)), issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
The document addresses 11 technical inquiries from prospective bidders regarding the project scope, schedule, and design specifications. Key schedule information includes an anticipated advertisement date of May/June 2026 with a Notice-to-Proceed (NTP) of 10/08/26 and an extended Fixed Completion Date of 9/30/2027 per Amendment A001. The project involves construction activities subject to Army Corps of Engineers permitting, with the Government authorized to proceed with dewatering and temporary construction access according to the original permit submittal. The Government calculated quantities to capture impacts of the temporary access road, work platform, and cofferdam, with contractors responsible for submitting revised permit applications if their construction plans exceed permitted quantities. The government does not have available geotechnical information or typical water depth data at Pier 4; however, a surfacing memorandum for road approaches is included in the Physical Data. Amendment A002 addresses design discrepancies, including corrected floor beam quantities of 268 units totaling 98,892 pounds (versus the originally specified 124) and corrected bridge rail quantity of 2,152 lineal feet (versus 2,170), with the rail terminating at delineators with no approach rail required. The project allows for full road closure during construction without requiring an improved detour for emergency vehicles, and no public traffic is anticipated on temporary works per Section 156 traffic restrictions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BidTab_MT PRAIRIE 2016(3).pdf | ||
| BidSum_MT PRAIRIE 2016(3).pdf | ||
| QandA_08-04-2026.pdf | ||
| Amendment A004.pdf | ||
| QandA_07-30-2026.pdf | ||
| Amendment A003.pdf | ||
| QandA_07-29-2026.pdf | ||
| QandA_07-28-2026_updated.pdf | ||
| QandA_07-28-2026.pdf | ||
| QandA_07-22-2026.pdf | ||
| QandA_07-21-2026.pdf | ||
| QandA_07-20-2026.pdf | ||
| Amendment A002.pdf | ||
| QandA_07-17-2026.pdf | ||
| QandA_07-13-2026.pdf | ||
| Amendment A001.pdf | ||
| QandA_07-07-2026.pdf | ||
| QandA_07-02-2026.pdf | ||
| Physical Data_mta-prairie2016-3.zip | ZIP file | |
| mta-prairie2016-3_plans_IFB.pdf | ||
| IFB_69056726B000003.pdf |
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project No. MT PRAIRIE 2016(3)
Project: Milwaukee Bridge Resurfacing and Replacement
# General Technical Question Answer Date
1 x
Does the FHWA have an anticipated advertisement date along with an anticipated bid date for this project?
Anticipated advertisement date of
May/June 2026.
3/2/26
2 X
In regards to the above referenced project is there any Geotechnical information for this project? If so can you please publish it with the advertisement.
No geotechnical information is available for this project. A surfacing memorandum for the road approaches to the new bridge deck is included in the Physical Data.
7/1/26
3 X
In Section H of the SCR’s the letter from Army
Corps of Engineers states that the permit obtained by FHWA “ Does not authorized dewatering or temporary construction access”
This authorization can typically take up to 90 days. With the NTP shown in the contract of
10/08/26 if the authorization does take the full
90 days that would not leave us enough time to complete the project by the fixed completion date of 04/13/27. In the time of year we could expect to get this permit will be close to high water and we will likely not have time to complete the work until high water passes.
Would FHWA extend the contract to 09/30/27?
The Government has the authorization as long as the dewatering and access is completed according to the plans and impact footprint in the original permit submittal. If the dewatering or access deviates from what was in the permit, then there will need to be additional time for coordination with the USACE. The
Government will extend the Fixed
Completion Date to 9/30/2027 in
Amendment A001.
7/2/26
Check General or Technical
4 X
Is there any geotechnical data available? If so would FHWA please provide that data so we can properly plan for the temporary work access?
No geotechnical information is available for this project. A surfacing memorandum for the road approaches to the new bridge deck is included in the Physical Data.
7/2/26
5 X
On page E-10 of the SCR’s “e) Temporary works supporting public traffic.” Replaces
“(d)Temporary bridge structures for public use” from FP-14. On page E-46 of the SCR’s it states
“close road for the length of project during construction. What is meant by temporary works supporting public traffic?
Public traffic is not anticipated on any temporary work, see Section 156 for traffic restrictions. The Section 104 SCR is a standard edit/change included on all bridge projects.
7/2/26
6 X
On page E-46 of the SCR’s it states “Procedures for facilitating passage of emergency vehicles through the project limits.” If we are allowed to close the road for the during of the project does this mean we are required to provide a proper detour around the project for emergency vehicles?
An improved detour around the project is not required.
7/2/26
7 X
I think the language from page H-3 of solicitation contradicts the answer to question
#3. Are temporary works/access currently permitted?
The Government is calculating quantities to capture the impacts of the temporary access road, work platform and cofferdam.
We anticipate receiving the amended permit prior to issuing the Notice-to-
Proceed (NTP).
If the contractor develops a plan in which the permitted quantities will be exceeded, contractor is responsible for submitting a revised permit application.
7/7/26
8 X Is there any data available on typical water depth at Pier 4?
The Government does not have data regarding the typical water depth at Pier 4.
7/13/26
9 X
Plan sheet S.7 – Deck Framing Layout references a total of 124 floorbeams. If you apply the spacings noted across all 4 truss spans, I am coming up with a total of 268 ea. The only way you would get to 124 is if you are only installing floorbeams across the two end chords in each span (L0-L1, L1-L2, L7-L8, L8-L9). Plans indicate floorbeams across all chords, which is necessary for the designed grid deck plan. Please review and clarify.
This will be addressed in Amendment A002.
The corrected quantity is 268 floor beams, totaling 98,892 pounds.
7/13/26
10 X
Ref. Sheet 7 0f 13 Deck Framing Layout; The
Floor Beam Estimated Weights table states there are 124 floor beams. We find there to be
268 floor beams calculated as follows:
See the answer for question 9. 7/13/26
11 X
Plan sheet S.12 shows details for bridge rail.
Inside Elevation of Rail view shows tube rail ending 4” past the last post at the bridge end with rail extending beyond that to some un-detailed post off the end of the bridge. Appears to show like we are tying into bridge approach guardrail, but there is none. If rail ends at end of tube rail, I only come up with 2,152’ of rail
(plan qty is 2,170). Please provide additional details for rail at bridge ends, including any post details off the bridge end and required terminal or end shoe as there is no bridge approach guardrail or bid item shown in the plans or bid schedule to tie into.
This will be addressed in Amendment A002.
The corrected quantity is 2,152 lineal feet.
There is no approach rail; the rail will end at the delineators.
7/16/26
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .