QA 19R000016 May 24.pdf
PDF 120 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 2019 Architect/Engineer Construction Management/Inspection Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 69056719R000016
About this file
This document contains a request for qualifications from the Federal Highway Administration's Western Federal Lands Division seeking architectural and engineering firms to provide construction management and inspection support services. Up to five indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts will be awarded, with three reserved for small businesses. Interested firms should submit a completed SF 330 by close of business on June 1, 2020 to be evaluated based on professional qualifications, past performance, staff capabilities, and experience on similar projects. Task orders awarded under the contracts may range from $1,000 to $3,000,000 for construction management, inspection, and other services on highway and bridge projects in Alaska, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and other states. The maximum total value of all task orders against the contracts is $80 million.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QA 19R000016 6_11.pdf | ||
| QA 19R000016 June 5.pdf | ||
| QA 19R000016 June 1.pdf | ||
| 69056719R000016 0002.pdf | ||
| QA 19R000016 May 29.pdf | ||
| 69056719R000016 Amd 0001.pdf | ||
| QA 19R000016 May 15.pdf | ||
| 2019 CI IDIQ RFQ_All states Final.pdf | ||
| Draft SOW 2019 Architect Engineer Construction Management-Inspection Support Services.DOCX | DOCX document | |
| SF330-16_Section_E4.pdf | ||
| 2019 CI IDIQ RFQ_All states Final.pdf | ||
| SF330-16_Section_G2.pdf | ||
| SF330-16_Section_C.pdf | ||
| SF330-16_Section_H2.pdf | ||
| SF330-16a_Section_F2.pdf | ||
| SF330.pdf | ||
| WFLHD Construction Manual Supplement.pdf | ||
| Draft SOW 2019 Architect Engineer Construction Management-Inspection Support Services.DOCX | DOCX document |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DATE QUESTION ANSWER
5/7/2020
In the RFQ Minimum Requirements section, please clarify subsection B. Is this asking for two projects where the consultant provided both tasks of management and inspection? Subsection A projects already require Construction Management/Inspection
Support Services projects. What would be the additional requirement in subsection B that is not already met in subsection A?
See Amendment 0001 wording changed to I will be issuing an amendment early next week but the statement will be changed to:
B. Two (2) projects from item (A) your firm must have provided Consultant Project Engineer Management
Services and Construction Inspection Services concurrently.
5/8/2020
Would it be allowable to award one of the two full and open contracts to a firm A (non‐small business) and one of the three small business contracts to B / A JV Inc., an approved All Small Mentor‐Protege Agreement Joint
Venture of firm B (a small business) and firm A?
Yes there could be two separate IDIQ awards to firm A and B.
5/8/2020
At what point in the solicitation process does a potential
Joint Venture entity need to have a JV agreement in place?
SBA must approve the mentor/protégé agreement before the offer is due
5/14/2020
Can an anticipated Joint Venture team submit and obtain a DUNS number and register in SAM after selection, or do these need to be obtained prior to submittal?
That answer is no. AN entity (no matter what type) must have an active SAM registration at the time offers are due.
5/14/2020
Can you please let me know if there is a date established for when all questions need to be received by WFL to allow time for responses?
See Amenment 0001 Submit all questions by close of business June 1, 2020 to guarantee a response.
5/18/2020
1) Under Minimum Requirements on page 2, the third sentence states “A project is considered a single awarded Contract, Task Order, Delivery Order, Blanket
Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, Purchase Order or
Subcontract. An Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity
(IDIQ) or BPA with multiple combined awards will not be considered as a single project.” Under a previous single awarded Term Contract, we were issued two separate task orders to provide CM/I personnel for the same physical project (same project name, location and federal aid number, different personnel roles).
Individually these task orders are less than $125k, but our total consulting services on the project between the two task orders was over $150k. Would this be considered an acceptable single project if listed in our
Section F?
No. As per the definition a project is a single awarded task order, not a combination of task orders for a single requirement.
Q&A 69056719R000019
Request For Qualifications 2019 Architect/Engineer Construction Management/Inspection
Support Services for the States of AK, WA, OR, ID, MT, and WY
Q&A 69056719R000019
Request For Qualifications 2019 Architect/Engineer Construction Management/Inspection
Support Services for the States of AK, WA, OR, ID, MT, and WY
5/18/2020
2) Under Minimum Requirements, Section C.ii. on page
3, we are seeking clarification on a ‘rural location.’ US
Census Bureau definitions of a rural location are murky when it comes to remote communities in Alaska, in particular Ketchikan, AK. We have a street and pedestrian improvements project we would like to list in
Section F that our firm performed CM/I services for in downtown Ketchikan, but cannot determine if downtown Ketchikan is considered a rural location.
Ketchikan has a population under 10,000 and is only accessible by plane or marine vessel, but it is one of the larger communities in Alaska. Does the Contracting
Agency believe downtown Ketchikan meets the definition of a rural location? What is the US Census
Bureau definition that will be used to evaluate minimum requirements?
The US Census Bureau defines the term “Rural” as encompasses all population, housing, and territory not included within an urban area. There are two types of
Urban areas, urbanized areas (50,000 plus) and urban clusters (2,500 to 50,000). Ketchikan would be considered an urban cluster based on its population. A project in Ketchikan would not be considered rural.
5/19/2020
What is the definition of, or requirements for, a project that is 100% completed? If the Period of Performance on the Task order has ended, no additional work is being performed and an agency acceptance letter has been submitted, does this meet the requirements of
100% complete?
Just yes your example below would be 100% complete.
100% complete means that the period of performance has ended and there is no more remaining work.
5/19/2020
Are proposing firms permitted to include additional items such as table of contents, cover letter, section cover pages/dividers, and supporting tables and/or charts?
Table of contents, cover letter, and section cover pages/dividers are permitted.
Supporting tables and/or charts would need to be included in the applicable section and count towards page counts.
5/19/2020
On Page 1 of the RFQ, we understand 3 contracts will be awarded exclusively to small businesses. Are the two full and open competed contracts required to have a small business participation goal? If there is a small business goal requirement on the two full and open contracts, can you please provide requirements?
A large business will be required to submit a subcontracting plan with goals for subcontracted work.
FHWA’s current small business goals are located here:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/cfo/small_business/
5/19/2020
Under item A, it is requested that all relevant experience identified shall have been performed between January
1, 2015 and submission of these qualifications with projects being 100% completed. Are multi‐season projects that were awarded prior to January 1, 2015 eligible as long as the majority of the work was completed in the subsequent years prior to this submission?
Response pending.
Q&A 69056719R000019
Request For Qualifications 2019 Architect/Engineer Construction Management/Inspection
Support Services for the States of AK, WA, OR, ID, MT, and WY
5/19/2020
On Page 1 of the RFQ, it states, "A/E firms meeting the requirements described in this announcement are invited to SUBMIT A COMPLETED SF 330." Can you please confirm that a completed SF 330 includes all parts of an SF 330, including Part I: Sections A through I, and Part II for all branch offices.
Yes but only complete Part II for any branch offices that will be utilized in completing performance of this requirement.
5/19/2020
In reviewing the RFQ, we did not find the requirement of a traditional Section G – Personnel Matrix. Can you please confirm a Section G is not required by this RFQ?
You should provide a completed section G. The section will be reviewed but nothing will be evaluated.
5/19/2020
On Page 6, under Evaluation Factor 5, can you please provide detail on how WFL is intending to obtain past performance and CPARS evaluations for firms having multiple office locations and multiple DUNS numbers? We will be pulling the past performance of the offeror’s
DUNS number only.
5/21/2020
In Evaluation Factor 1 – Professional Qualifications, the
RFQ says “Submit Evaluation Factor 1 information in
Section E of the SF 330. Complete one Section E for each key personnel identified. Additional supporting documentation may be included for each key personnel identified and shall not exceed two (2) pages single‐ sided, minimum acceptable text size 12‐point.
Additional pages over the two (2) page limit will not be reviewed.” Is the intent to allow the SF 330 Section E form plus two additional pages (3 pages total) or limit content to two pages total per individual? 3 pages in total per individual
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .