6-Evaluation criteria.pdf

EVALUATION CRITERIA NUMBER. 1

ABILITY OF CMAR FIRM AND ITS PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL

Maximum Point Value:

Responses limited page(s) maximum, plus resumes for key personnel

Attach resumes only for key personnel of the Project Team, detailing past experience as it relates to projects of a similar size and type.

Submit separate organizational charts delineating personnel assigned to both construction and design services, if applicable. Clearly indicate the role of each member of the proposed project team. Resumes and organizational charts do not count against the maximum page limit. Indicate that the team has a clear understanding of the County’s project and requirements. Provide a written overview of the CMAR Firm structure and composition, including all partners, subcontractors, and subconsultants.

This criterion measures similar relevant experience, expertise, credentials and benefits of the CMAR Firm’s professional staff. It assesses how well the Firm is staffed to address the pre-construction and construction aspects of the project. Staff having specific experience and expertise in construction of is preferred. Staff with previous experience in Construction Management at Risk Project delivery is preferred, although staff with previous experience in Progressive-Design Build or other collaborative delivery method with a GMP is acceptable.

Provide resumes for the following Key Staff:

In addition to resumes for these key personnel, CMAR Firms may provide up to additional resumes for Key Staff with titles and roles of their choosing. No more than total resumes shall be provided.

Resumes shall include the following information:

Describe the team members role, how they will add value to the Project.

Identify the team members employer (CMAR Firm, subcontractor, subconsultant, etc.)

Provide a description of the team members experience in the same role on similar relevant Projects and how it benefits the County

Identify the team members overall experience in number of years

Provide a list of the team members professional license, certifications and other credentials

Provide similar and relevant projects, and/or other projects using a collaborative delivery method the team member has worked on in the same role and include the start and finish dates and the Project value in construction terms.

Project team personnel do not have appropriate level of qualifications and experience. Project team does not contain all critical disciplines.

Organization of project team is inappropriate. Prime firm lacks adequate professional resources to properly provide services. Proposed project manager is not appropriate.

Some project team personnel have adequate level of qualifications and experience.

Project team lacks minor disciplines. Organization of project team is marginal. Prime firm’s professional resources to properly provide services are marginal. Proposed project manager’s qualifications are marginal.

Project team personnel have adequate level of experience. Project team contains all necessary disciplines. Organization of project team is adequate to the project. Prime firm has adequate professional resources to properly provide services. Proposed project manager’s qualifications are adequate.

Project team personnel have above average level of experience, and the project manager is uniquely qualified. Project team contains all necessary disciplines. Organization of project team is adequate to the project. Prime firm has superior professional resources to properly provide services.

EVALUATION CRITERIA NUMBER 2

CMAR FIRM’S EXPERIENCE WITH PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR SIZE AND

TYPE

Maximum Point Value:

Maximum number of projects to be included:

Responses limited to page(s) maximum per project

This criterion assesses the CMAR Firm’s experience with similar projects. CMAR Firm will be evaluated based on construction projects similar in size, length, complexity and other requested requirements. CMAR Firm may list projects completed by any subcontractor or partner identified in the Organizational Chart provided in Evaluation Criteria Number 1.

Limit responses for this section to # of page or less.

Submit up to completed projects, Preference will be given to projects that meet the requested requirements above.

Preference will be given to projects delivered using CMAR, Progressive Design Build, or other collaborative delivery method with a GMP. Provide a maximum of projects that represent the requirements above showing similar size, length and complexity. Project descriptions shall identify the similarities and discuss how their experience offers value to Hillsborough County. For each project provide the following information:

1. Project Title

2. Project Delivery Method

3. Project Location

4. Project Description

5. Projects Owners Name and Address

6. Project Owner’s Contact Person and Phone No.

7. Construction Contract Value.

8. Construction Completion Dates

9. Respondents Role (Prime, Sub-Consultant, etc.)

10. Provide Engineer of Record

11. Name & License No. of Qualifying Contractor

12. Identify members of your proposed team that worked on this representative project.

Prime firm has marginal experience with projects of a similar size and type.

Prime firm has minor successful experience with projects of a similar size and type.

Scope of services provided for representative projects vary from the Scope.

Prime firm has adequate successful, recent (within past ten (10) years) experience with projects of a similar size and type. Some of the scope of services provided for representative projects are similar to scope.

P r i m e firm has more than adequate successful, recent (within past ten (10) years) experience with projects of a similar size and type. Most of the scope of services provided for representative projects are similar to scope.

Prime firm has superior past and recent successful experience with projects of a similar size and type. All of the scope of services provided for representative projects are similar to scope.

EVALUATION CRITERIA NUMBER 3

FIRM’S WILLINGNESS AND ABILITY TO MEET SCHEDULE AND BUDGET

REQUIREMENTS

Maximum Point Value:

This criterion evaluates the CMAR Firm’s overall approach to delivering the County’s Project under the Construction Management at Risk method. The CMAR Firm is encouraged to provide a description of their unique approach to Preconstruction and Construction services.

CMAR Firms shall provide a written overview of their approach to delivery of Construction Management at Risk services that includes the following information:

A proposal-level schedule based on the preliminary Schedule and the plans included in the Design Package. (The proposal-level schedule may be provided on 11 x 17 paper and will not count towards the maximum page requirement.)

Describe the approach to Preconstruction services, including collaboration with the Architect/Engineer of Record and County for workshops, constructability reviews, value engineering and cost estimating. Firms shall describe how their approach to preconstruction services is intended to provide best value to the County.

Describe the approach to Construction services, including a general overview of their anticipated workforce structure and highlights of intended self-performance or intended subcontractor performance. Firms shall include a description of their approach to subcontractor outreach and procurement, including SBE/MBE outreach, and shall describe how their approach to subcontractor management will provide best value to the County.

Describe the approach to cost estimating and the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) development process. Firms may include examples of GMP open-book pricing structures used on previous projects.

Describe tools and procedures they will use to identify and track risks, manage change, ensure quality, and maintain the project schedule throughout the life of the project.

Describe how to manage safety of staff and residents and maintain a clean and environmentally compliant construction sites during field activities.

Limit responses for this section is/are pages or less. The preliminary schedule does not count towards this page limit.

Submittal does not address either the schedule or budget.

Submittal shows inadequate understanding of scope, schedule and budget requirements.

Submittal shows adequate schedule approach, understanding of budget control, and understanding of scope. Project budget and schedule can be met or modified to meet project intent.

Submittal shows good understanding of and approach to scope, schedule and budget.

Project budget and schedule can be met.

Submittal shows superior understanding of and approach to scope, schedule and budget with potential improvements for project delivery and cost savings.

EVALUATION CRITERIA NUMBER 4

CMAR FIRM’S RECENT, CURRENT AND PROJECTED WORKLOAD

Maximum Point Value:

This criterion measures the CMAR Firm’s resources for the project and their availability to complete all elements of this project, including pre-construction, construction, testing, start-up and commissioning. It evaluates the CMAR Firm’s current workload and backlog.

Provide a written overview describing the CMAR Firm’s current workload and the ability to deliver the scope of services. Provide the CMAR Firm’s current projects and projected project workload for the next 24 months in Florida.

Describe the CMAR Firm’s plan to deliver the project and indicate availability and proposed involvement of all subcontractors and subconsultants throughout the progression of the project.

Limit response to page(s).

Submittal shows that consultant does not have sufficient available personnel to complete services on schedule.

Submittal shows that consultant’s workload commitments will impact its ability to complete services on schedule.

Submittal shows that while consultant has adequate time and available personnel, prior workload commitments may impact its ability to complete services on schedule.

Submittal shows that consultant’s project team has adequate time and available personnel to complete services on schedule.

Submittal shows that consultant’s project team has adequate staffing available to complete services on schedule. Submittal indicates backup staffing capability in the event of unforeseen circumstances.